Aight, so this happend yesterday in english class, kinda made me mad but nobody else seemed to have a problem with it so I'm curious to see what you fella's think.
We were in english and talking about poverty and the ways to prevent it, yada yada yada. The my teacher says "Another way we could help with the starvation in the world is to not buy imported food from tropical countries south of the equator. (She mentioned mexico in the list of countrieshere, which is not south of the equator, but I didn't bring that up.) By not buying their fruit and vegtables they have more for themselves."
Not word for word, but that's the details of what she said. That didn't quite make sense to me, so I said "Well they're getting money for the food they're selling, so it's obviously working out for them some how. If they didn't want to sell their crops then they don't have to." Too which she replied "Do you really think it's that easy?"
No, I don't think it's easy either way, their poor and will remain poor. How ever not buying anything from them is not going to magicly provide them with more food. What are your thoughts on this, my good sirs and ma'ams?
Log in to comment