[QUOTE="masters89"][QUOTE="verparanoidpers"][QUOTE="masters89"][QUOTE="verparanoidpers"][QUOTE="masters89"] ...So US is threating iran for a war !! WTF with this country its like satan toke all over it and using it against other nations by opening un-finished wars . Really i dontsee a real reason for this war other than madness and hatred against the humanity ! aint they already stucked with iraq now ?When will they be even with this madness?!
Now dont say its about the nuclear program ... the Iranian nuclear program was launched in the 1950s with the help of the United States as part of the Atoms for Peace programthen later on in the late of 2006-2007 the U.S. and some other nations officials allege the program covers an attempt to acquire nuclear weapons which somehow i assume its another way to start a war .
verparanoidpers
The iranians are buildign their uranium enrichment facilities underground. now why do you suppose that they would build them UNDERGROUND?also, iran sponsors terrorists, including hezbollah, hamas, and possibly al-qaeda. an actual invasion would be wholly impractical. however, an airstrike against their nuclear facilities would be much more practical, as there is a good chance that not a single american soldier would die in an aerial campaign.
Ok , its practical for them to airstrike thier facilities and a great chance for U.S army to survive from death... imagine how bad the area around will be polluted... there will be lost's by nations not several persons (soldiers) ,innocent people will pay for this Low-risky-attack from U.S . Generally why this anger ? so they built it underground ! what then ? maybe its safer that way so then incase maybe an nuclear substance's leaks so there wont be much damages for the nature. why creating these delustions just to be an excuse for this war!
do you want that or do you want nuclear bombs exploding in america or western europe? The Iranians supply money and arms to terrorists. You reallydont think that they would give them nuclear weapons?Iran wont do anything only if U.S obliged it to ! And do you think iran have the guts to touch any U.S land ? they're nothing compared to U.S army they're making some statements about raiding with nuclear just as an psychical war against america to stop'em from the mess they'er committing in the middle-east ... i realy wouldn't blame the presedent of iran for risking his people and country just to stop this bs from bush. They're trying to takefull control over middle-east by puting down the biggest force in that area!Thatswhatsgoinon.
eh, that's not how its going to go down. they'll give it to terrorists who will blow it up somewhere in the united states or western Europe. Its not like they'll launch an ICBM our way[QUOTE="masters89"][QUOTE="verparanoidpers"][QUOTE="masters89"][QUOTE="verparanoidpers"][QUOTE="masters89"] ... So US is threating iran for a war !! WTF with this country its like satan toke all over it and using it against other nations by opening un-finished wars . Really i dontsee a real reason for this war other than madness and hatred against the humanity ! aint they already stucked with iraq now ?When will they be even with this madness?!
Now dont say its about the nuclear program ... the Iranian nuclear program was launched in the 1950s with the help of the United States as part of the Atoms for Peace programthen later on in the late of 2006-2007 the U.S. and some other nations officials allege the program covers an attempt to acquire nuclear weapons which somehow i assume its another way to start a war .
WhOOmpa260
The iranians are buildign their uranium enrichment facilities underground. now why do you suppose that they would build them UNDERGROUND?also, iran sponsors terrorists, including hezbollah, hamas, and possibly al-qaeda. an actual invasion would be wholly impractical. however, an airstrike against their nuclear facilities would be much more practical, as there is a good chance that not a single american soldier would die in an aerial campaign.
Ok , its practical for them to airstrike thier facilities and a great chance for U.S army to survive from death... imagine how bad the area around will be polluted... there will be lost's by nations not several persons (soldiers) ,innocent people will pay for this Low-risky-attack from U.S . Generally why this anger ? so they built it underground ! what then ? maybe its safer that way so then incase maybe an nuclear substance's leaks so there wont be much damages for the nature. why creating these delustions just to be an excuse for this war!
do you want that or do you want nuclear bombs exploding in america or western europe? The Iranians supply money and arms to terrorists. You reallydont think that they would give them nuclear weapons?Iran wont do anything only if U.S obliged it to ! And do you think iran have the guts to touch any U.S land ? they're nothing compared to U.S army they're making some statements about raiding with nuclear just as an psychical war against america to stop'em from the mess they'er committing in the middle-east ... i realy wouldn't blame the presedent of iran for risking his people and country just to stop this bs from bush. They're trying to takefull control over middle-east by puting down the biggest force in that area!Thatswhatsgoinon.
The Iranian army is actually very formidable. They have been building up their arms unopposed for many years now and with a million or so well trained troops, it could get very hairy. It's not like America is the only power in the world with a decent army, then again, American analysts predicted hundreds of thousands of American deaths during the first Iraq war, and that was far from the truth.
About the air strike thing - I think an army such as Iran's would rather die in a suicidal nuclear melt down, rather then lose control of their reactors to a Coalition force. So in that regard, an air strike would be more feasible and appropriate. I don't know exactly whether an air strike could send nuclear pollution into the air or not but I do know the Israelis bombed a Nuclear Facility in the 1980's without any disaster (not sure if the plant was operational yet, though). Basically I think the Iranians will resort to destroying their reactors during an invasion anyway so an air strike is a better option.
ehh, no. Its a fact that no western army in the world can stand up to the might of the United States military. but I do agree with you on the airstrike thing, an invasion is just not possible as our forces are stretched to their limitsYou shouldn't read too much into those discovery channel docs that are pro western and especially pro-America, which say "this tank is the best" ... "this rifle is the best" ... "this missile is unstoppable", you should hold it with a pinch of salt. There are actually other countries in the world with weapons and armies which can inflict massive damage on an invading force. Invading has to be mentioned because your correct with one part of your statement, no country in the world can deploy an army for an invasion as quickly as the US but in an invading scenario, such as Iran, the advantage is gone because America would be invading, not Iran. I'll leave you with with this idea...
Underestimating your enemy means underestimating yourself. Underestimating yourself means hope for your enemy.
Log in to comment