Which was better movie and why? 300- I loved 300 because it's has lots of action and i loved special effects. Spider Man 3- I still did not watch Spider Man 3 because i am not a spider man fan.
300-for one reason-" MADNESS? THIS IS SPARTAAAAAAAAA!"RoflSponge
No... it's:
"Madness? This is... CAKETOWN!"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5eMeZ55n6cE
Both were great movies, but I'm leaning more towards 300. Spider-man 3 was more of a drama than action really and I'm more of an action movie watcher. I wished they casted somebody else for Venom than that guy from "That's 70s Show". In fact, they should start a Venom movie than move into "Venom vs. Carnage" - I always wanted that.
Both were great movies, but I'm leaning more towards 300. Spider-man 3 was more of a drama than action really and I'm more of an action movie watcher. I wished they casted somebody else for Venom than that guy from "That's 70s Show". In fact, they should start a Venom movie than move into "Venom vs. Carnage" - I always wanted that.
300 was way better. 300 we were waiting for it to be in theaters but not as much as spiderman3 and when it did arrive at the theaters it was a disappointment
300 is a vastly superior movie in pretty much every respect...
 Spider man 3 was better than I expected (I expected some terribleness) but.. it sure wasent a "good" movie by any means.. (action scenes being cool were canceled out by everything else completly sucking...) .. I've seen better stories in Segal movies...
300, Imo is one of the best movies to come out in years... and the only movie I've ever sat in a line for (for... 2 ... hours... my brother had tickets), saw it on the Imax, and really, the movie was amazing.
I didn't like either. Spider-man 3 was too long, dull and failed in its attempt at emotional depth. Whereas 300 was overly stylised and there should have been more focus on the storytelling.
If i had to go with one, i would say 300. But essentially i disliked both.
Â
*Puts on flame shield from angry 300 fans and Spider-man 3 fans*Â
Log in to comment