The New World Order am' here (?!).

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown heralded the emergence of a "new world order" Thursday as the G-20 issued details of an "unprecedented" package of measures to tackle the global economic crisis. U.S. President Barack Obama called the deal "a turning point in our pursuit of global economic recovery."

French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who had voiced concerns prior to the summit about the wisdom of pumping further public money into economies already in recession, welcomed Thursday's agreement -- though hinted at unresolved disagreements behind the scenes.

Sarkozy said the agreement represented "great progress" on reform of financial institutions and said "a page had been turned." Merkel described the deal as "a very, very good, almost historic compromise."

But Brown said: "Our message is clear and certain. We believe that in this new global age our prosperity is indivisible. We believe global problems require global solutions," Brown said.

"I think a new world order is emerging and with it the foundations of a new and progressive era of international cooperation."

CNN.

Its a conspiracy!

hmmm, seems revelations in starting to unfold, maybe.....

yea the world starts working TOGETHER and people freak out. i personally think these are baby steps into the right direction for the world.

yea the world starts working TOGETHER and people freak out. i personally think these are baby steps into the right direction for the world.

RaistlinMajere8

"I agree"

Then Hulk Hogan elbow drops Joe Biden and reveals the real New World Order.supercubedude64

yea the world starts working TOGETHER and people freak out. i personally think these are baby steps into the right direction for the world.

RaistlinMajere8

So are we screwed?

its not a conspiracy. they're telling it right to our faces: we are entering a new era with increased government control. and no one seems to care...

Here is a link to his speech.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-f9jcX9ao4&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.tv%2Fhtml%2F311353.html&feature=player_embedded

its not a conspiracy. they're telling it right to our faces: we are entering a new era with increased government control. and no one seems to care...

Slaveways

[QUOTE="Slaveways"]

its not a conspiracy. they're telling it right to our faces: we are entering a new era with increased government control. and no one seems to care...

Setsa

What's to say the Gov doesn't control the media?

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="Slaveways"]

its not a conspiracy. they're telling it right to our faces: we are entering a new era with increased government control. and no one seems to care...

Dark-Sithious

What's to say the Gov doesn't control the media?

[QUOTE="Slaveways"]

its not a conspiracy. they're telling it right to our faces: we are entering a new era with increased government control. and no one seems to care...

Setsa

who said i wasn't? either way though, a free media is better than a state-run media although sometimes i wonder if they aren't already one and the same

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] Aren't you in the slightest bit concerned about the amount of control the free-media has over people? I mean, people are always saying the government is telling you how to live your life, but really, the media is jamming ideas down our throats more than the gov : /Setsa

What's to say the Gov doesn't control the media?

Just speculating.

Text book events though, a common threat draws different nations together...

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

What's to say the Gov doesn't control the media?

Dark-Sithious

Just speculating.

Text book events though, a common threat draws different nations together...

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="Slaveways"]

its not a conspiracy. they're telling it right to our faces: we are entering a new era with increased government control. and no one seems to care...

Slaveways

who said i wasn't? either way though, a free media is better than a state-run media although sometimes i wonder if they aren't already one and the same

so...when does the revolution start?

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] Why does the government deserve all the "credit"? Whenever something suspicious happens, people blame the government instead of thinking that it may very well be the act of the market instead. After all, why would the government promote violent, lustful, and anarchist ideologies as "cool"?Setsa

Just speculating.

Text book events though, a common threat draws different nations together...

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

Just speculating.

Text book events though, a common threat draws different nations together...

Dark-Sithious

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

Just speculating.

Text book events though, a common threat draws different nations together...

Dark-Sithious

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

Just speculating.

Text book events though, a common threat draws different nations together...

Dark-Sithious

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] Sorry if this sounds like a "noob" question buuuuttt just what exactly would be wrong with a "New World Order"? Most things that would be threatened (like culture) could still be retained so long as the proper pretenses are implemented.thepwninator

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] Sorry if this sounds like a "noob" question buuuuttt just what exactly would be wrong with a "New World Order"? Most things that would be threatened (like culture) could still be retained so long as the proper pretenses are implemented.Setsa

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

Democratic or not, few people would still get more power. Unless you mean that there will be no NWO leaders, but that would make NWO pretty useless.

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] Sorry if this sounds like a "noob" question buuuuttt just what exactly would be wrong with a "New World Order"? Most things that would be threatened (like culture) could still be retained so long as the proper pretenses are implemented.-Sun_Tzu-

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

How do you know? Has Gordon Brown explained to the public what the NWO is?

I sure haven't heard any of that

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

Dark-Sithious

Democratic or not, few people would still get more power. Unless you mean that there will be no NWO leaders, but that would make NWO pretty useless.

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] Sorry if this sounds like a "noob" question buuuuttt just what exactly would be wrong with a "New World Order"? Most things that would be threatened (like culture) could still be retained so long as the proper pretenses are implemented.thepwninator

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

Aha, a joke? :o

Personally I can't say I've seen any proof that Illuminati exists

[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

Setsa

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] What if it's a democratic NWO? :o It'd just have to be separated by "area" (country) and leaders would be elected akin to how they are today.Setsa

Democratic or not, few people would still get more power. Unless you mean that there will be no NWO leaders, but that would make NWO pretty useless.

Yeah sort of like UN, just way more powerfull (as I see it at least don't know for sure ofc). And this organ naturally needs some leaders.

Although it's hard to say exactly what NWO's exactposition in the world would be

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="thepwninator"] All the power is already concentrated in just a few people. The Illuminati only has about 100 members, and only about 20 of them have real power. The rest (including myself) are their underlings.thepwninator

All is going according to plan.

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="thepwninator"] All the power is already concentrated in just a few people. The Illuminati only has about 100 members, and only about 20 of them have real power. The rest (including myself) are their underlings.thepwninator

[QUOTE="Setsa"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

Democratic or not, few people would still get more power. Unless you mean that there will be no NWO leaders, but that would make NWO pretty useless.

Dark-Sithious

Yeah sort of like UN, just way more powerfull. And this organ naturally needs some leaders.

Although it's hard to say exactly what NWO's exactposition in the world would be

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

A new World Order means more power to fewer people, and that is never good, imo

Dark-Sithious

How do you know? Has Gordon Brown explained to the public what the NWO is?

I sure haven't heard any of that

[QUOTE="thepwninator"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] Isn't the Illuminati... you know, supposed to be a secret organization? :oSetsa

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Not really. It really just means a change in policy and/or attitude. -Sun_Tzu-

How do you know? Has Gordon Brown explained to the public what the NWO is?

I sure haven't heard any of that

They are already talking about a global banking system, sounds a bit more concrete than a new attitude to me

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="Setsa"] Well, idk about you, but I sort of see the NWO as a super-league of nations sort of like the UN, except more nations are involved and it's more effective at synergizing.Setsa

Yeah sort of like UN, just way more powerfull. And this organ naturally needs some leaders.

Although it's hard to say exactly what NWO's exactposition in the world would be

If the Gov plans a NWO that is an actual "force" and not just a different attitude as sun tzu put it, then I doubt it is to benefit the people.

[QUOTE="thepwninator"] You don't really need to worry about us too much, though-we're content with our current position, and we know quite well that it could potentially be dangerous if we were to upset over a century of precedent and rule overtly rather than covertly.Setsa

I heard Jackie Chan is running, but that is just a rumor

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

How do you know? Has Gordon Brown explained to the public what the NWO is?

I sure haven't heard any of that

Dark-Sithious

They are already talking about a global banking system, sounds a bit more concrete than a new attitude to me

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Ummm I don't need Gordon Brown to explain to me what "the NWO" is. The "NWO" is a conspiracy theory. You referred to a new world order, and claimed that a new world order means that power becomes more concentrated, which isn't true. Yes, it is possible for a new world order to result in more concentrated power, but all a new world order is is a change in policy and/or attitude on a global scale. -Sun_Tzu-

They are already talking about a global banking system, sounds a bit more concrete than a new attitude to me

Reform forthe global banking system then :P

If they just strive for a more competent government, why couldn't they have played out this idea when a new world order was first mentioned by Bush in 1991?

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

They are already talking about a global banking system, sounds a bit more concrete than a new attitude to me

Dark-Sithious

Reform forthe global banking system then :P

If they just strive for a more competent government, why couldn't they have played out this idea when a new world order was first mentioned by Bush in 1991?

I think that it could happen now because we are more in a crisis than we were in 1991. There is a global recession, so then a possible solution people throw out is "why not just build a whole government around the world? That would help us get out of this (somehow)":D

[QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Umm, there already is a global banking system in place, and if it were a competent system the worst of this economic turmoil could of been adverted. The purpose of any new world order is to strive towards a more competent government, not a big government for the sake of big government.daabulls23

Reform forthe global banking system then :P

If they just strive for a more competent government, why couldn't they have played out this idea when a new world order was first mentioned by Bush in 1991?

I think that it could happen now because we are more in a crisis than we were in 1991. There is a global recession, so then a possible solution people throw out is "why not just build a whole government around the world? That would help us get out of this (somehow)":D

I don't have to worry about my mortgage, Obama will save us!

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="Dark-Sithious"]

They are already talking about a global banking system, sounds a bit more concrete than a new attitude to me

Dark-Sithious

Reform forthe global banking system then :P

If they just strive for a more competent government, why couldn't they have played out this idea when a new world order was first mentioned by Bush in 1991?

ins't this like the perfect time for a terrorist attack :shock:

I am completely against this. They are bringing inthis NEW WORLD ORDER and one currency for complete control of the masses. People WAKE UP!!! Our freedoms are being taken away and we are allowing them to do so. One government means SUPREME RULE. Obama and the admin are decieving us and leading all of us to HELL!!! Watch "The Obama Deception" on youtube and inform yourself about this topic. Don't allow them to do this.

yea the world starts working TOGETHER and people freak out. i personally think these are baby steps into the right direction for the world.

RaistlinMajere8

I really don't think you understand what this all means...

Well, not "The New Wolrd Order" as conspiracy theorists like to call it, but we are entering a new world order (general definition), which is actually pretty frightening. American sovereignty is going out the window. Not good people, not good at all.