What would you rather do??? VOTE
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'd go for the nuke. I couldn't stab ten people over and over, I just couldn't. Pushing one button once would be easier.
I'd go for the nuke. I couldn't stab ten people over and over, I just couldn't. Pushing one button once would be easier.
AlmightyMax
Me too.
[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]
I pass the psychotic test by declining to vote in this poll.
dramaybaz
This is the only real answer.
Isn't the psychotic test a test to see if you're psychotic or not? Passing would mean you were. :P
Yeah, but think of it. 10 k people dead in a second. That is the point... what is more fragmenting for the mind... an act of gore, or a large amount of people dead!I'd go for the nuke. I couldn't stab ten people over and over, I just couldn't. Pushing one button once would be easier.
AlmightyMax
[QUOTE="AlmightyMax"]Yeah, but think of it. 10 k people dead in a second. That is the point... what is more fragmenting for the mind... an act of gore, or a large amount of people dead!I'd go for the nuke. I couldn't stab ten people over and over, I just couldn't. Pushing one button once would be easier.
curono
You also argued against the stabbing, bro. So which would you go for?
It depends, there should be an other option in that poll, such as "other".. I'd choose strangulation.There truly is something beautiful about watching a bald man choke to death in slow motion.
It depends, there should be an other option in that poll, such as "other".. I'd choose strangulation.There truly is something beautiful about watching a bald man choke to death in slow motion.
-Misanthropic-
You serious or did I not detect the sarcasm?
I'd push the nuking button. Less of a hassle since I'm lazy and less time consuming since I've got more, better psychotic things to do.
The ten people. Much more fun that way.
And, as an added bonus, I didn't harm the environment! ;)
joe11king
An environmental pyscho. Kewl. ;)
You know, you may say, "Hey it's 10k people vs only 10, no contest". But you aren't looking those 10,000 people in the eyes as you stab them to death and hear their screams and pleas. Soooo, I'm going to have to go with the nuke, because surely after stabbing the 10 people I would be insane.
[QUOTE="AlmightyMax"]Yeah, but think of it. 10 k people dead in a second. That is the point... what is more fragmenting for the mind... an act of gore, or a large amount of people dead! A nuke is way gorier than stabbing someone. I forget the name of it but i watched a documentary on the A bombs we dropped on Japan and the stories from the survivors were some of the goriest i've ever heard. I'd be a little harder to do but i'd go for the 10.I'd go for the nuke. I couldn't stab ten people over and over, I just couldn't. Pushing one button once would be easier.
curono
I'd choose 10 no contest, really think about it almost everyone has nukes so if you nuke a town you'll probably get nuked back too. So yea i would kill 10 people and live
I dont know how you could choose to kill 10,000 people over 10. It would be terrible to kill them yourself but it's definitely better than killing 1,000 times more people.
I'd stab 10,010 people with a nuke.
smack_masta
[QUOTE="smack_masta"]
I'd stab 10,010 people with a nuke.
FreezeBlast95
Nah it'd just be the regular , rounded, nuclear head. Let your imagination run away with how painful that'll be...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment