the structure and evolution of the universe.

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bbwwoman
bbwwoman

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 bbwwoman
Member since 2012 • 112 Posts

The structure and evolution of the universe. We have extrapolative theories of the big bang that stand up to theoretical analysis. But what about 'before' that? Again, superstring/M-brane theories MIGHT eventually shed some light there, but we don't know.

what are your thoughts?

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

Multiverses seems likely. It could also explain alot of mysteries within out universe such as dark matter

Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

This universe has a design, we Humans are a design, we are a creation, people cant seem to fvcking undestand that.....

Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts
I once read about the "Original" universe,said to be made of light,darkness and water. But then again where did THAT come from?The one who said this theory is a religious man so he said GOD.
Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts

I think you are a dick.

My thoughts.

Iszdope
made me laugh out loud for some reason haha! sorry TC D=
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

I think you are a dick.

My thoughts.

Iszdope

Is this some kind of encrypted way to say you believe we all have a visualization of ourselves in a parallel, Spore-like universe :P ?

Avatar image for WiiCubeM1
WiiCubeM1

4735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 WiiCubeM1
Member since 2009 • 4735 Posts

A Multiverse theory would explain the origin, but we have absolutely no data from the Pre-Planck era (actually, I don't think we have any data from the Planck era, either). Best we can do is make guesses until some new evidence in the case shows up.

Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

[QUOTE="Iszdope"]

I think you are a dick.

My thoughts.

FMAB_GTO

made me laugh out loud for some reason haha! sorry TC D=

Haha yeah! i think your 1 also :lol:

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

I once read about the "Original" universe,said to be made of light,darkness and water. But then again where did THAT come from?The one who said this theory is a religious man so he said GOD.FMAB_GTO
I think you need to forget what you read
The "Original" universe was pure energy, which converted into matter, which cooled to form atoms, which further cooled to form more atoms, these atoms were pulled together by gravity, which formed stars, these stars formed the heavier elements in their cores, they exploded, these giant explosion gas clouds then clumped together to form more stars/planets/solar systems/galaxies

Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"]I once read about the "Original" universe,said to be made of light,darkness and water. But then again where did THAT come from?The one who said this theory is a religious man so he said GOD.

I think you need to forget what you read The "Original" universe was pure energy, which converted into matter, which cooled to form atoms, which further cooled to form more atoms, these atoms were pulled together by gravity, which formed stars, these stars formed the heavier elements in their cores, they exploded, these giant explosion gas clouds then clumped together to form more stars/planets/solar systens/galaxies

*forgets* *saves* Well that summed up the whole thing for me thanks chaos. I'm really not into physics and chemistry,never was except for electronic stuff,so I suck at these stuff sadly.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#15 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"]I once read about the "Original" universe,said to be made of light,darkness and water. But then again where did THAT come from?The one who said this theory is a religious man so he said GOD.

I think you need to forget what you read The "Original" universe was pure energy, which converted into matter, which cooled to form atoms, which further cooled to form more atoms, these atoms were pulled together by gravity, which formed stars, these stars formed the heavier elements in their cores, they exploded, these giant explosion gas clouds then clumped together to form more stars/planets/solar systens/galaxies

*forgets* *saves* Well that summed up the whole thing for me thanks chaos. I'm really not into physics and chemistry,never was except for electronic stuff,so I suck at these stuff sadly.

No worries "The "Original" universe was pure energy, which converted into matter (sub-atomic particles), which cooled to form atoms," Just a minor addition
Avatar image for sintygypsy
sintygypsy

180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 sintygypsy
Member since 2007 • 180 Posts

The Big Bang theory is nothing more than a funny show on TV which I enjoy a lot. That Sheldon needs to win some type of award. Thats about where the end of where the validity of the Big Bangs existence is. Nothing more than a fantasy though up by an atheist who had a bad day and wanted to excuse Creation.

Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] I think you need to forget what you read The "Original" universe was pure energy, which converted into matter, which cooled to form atoms, which further cooled to form more atoms, these atoms were pulled together by gravity, which formed stars, these stars formed the heavier elements in their cores, they exploded, these giant explosion gas clouds then clumped together to form more stars/planets/solar systens/galaxies

*forgets* *saves* Well that summed up the whole thing for me thanks chaos. I'm really not into physics and chemistry,never was except for electronic stuff,so I suck at these stuff sadly.

No worries "The "Original" universe was pure energy, which converted into matter (sub-atomic particles), which cooled to form atoms," Just a minor addition

are sub-atomic thingies protons,neutrons,electrons?
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

The Big Bang theory is nothing more than a funny show on TV which I enjoy a lot. That Sheldon needs to win some type of award. Thats about where the end of where the validity of the Big Bangs existence is. Nothing more than a fantasy though up by an atheist who had a bad day and wanted to excuse Creation.

sintygypsy
>bbwwoman >GrayF0X786 >sintygypsy Guessing they are all the same person attempting to troll
Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts

This universe has a design, we Humans are a design, we are a creation, people cant seem to fvcking undestand that.....

GrayF0X786

what evidence do you have for your position?

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#20 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"] *forgets* *saves* Well that summed up the whole thing for me thanks chaos. I'm really not into physics and chemistry,never was except for electronic stuff,so I suck at these stuff sadly.

No worries "The "Original" universe was pure energy, which converted into matter (sub-atomic particles), which cooled to form atoms," Just a minor addition

are sub-atomic thingies protons,neutrons,electrons?

Yes Neutrons and protons are composite particles Electrons are elementary particles
Avatar image for Vader993
Vader993

7533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Vader993
Member since 2010 • 7533 Posts

The Big Bang theory is nothing more than a funny show on TV which I enjoy a lot. That Sheldon needs to win some type of award. Thats about where the end of where the validity of the Big Bangs existence is. Nothing more than a fantasy though up by an atheist who had a bad day and wanted to excuse Creation.

sintygypsy
What! The big bang was thought out by a catholic priest. The big bang actually in a way points away from a godless universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre
Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#22 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

The structure and evolution of the universe. We have extrapolative theories of the big bang that stand up to theoretical analysis. But what about 'before' that? Again, superstring/M-brane theories MIGHT eventually shed some light there, but we don't know.

what are your thoughts?

bbwwoman

A wizard did it.

Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] No worries "The "Original" universe was pure energy, which converted into matter (sub-atomic particles), which cooled to form atoms," Just a minor addition

are sub-atomic thingies protons,neutrons,electrons?

Yes Neutrons and protons are composite particles Electrons are elementary particles

oh i see,and then they somehow untied with each others and formed a complete atom and so after billions of years this universe is like this. the gravity that pulled these atoms together also came from the original source?aka pure energy?
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#24 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"] are sub-atomic thingies protons,neutrons,electrons?

Yes Neutrons and protons are composite particles Electrons are elementary particles

oh i see,and then they somehow untied with each others and formed a complete atom and so after billions of years this universe is like this. the gravity that pulled these atoms together also came from the original source?aka pure energy?

Everything you see around you was at a single point in spacetime E=Mc^2 (Matter = Energy) As it expanded and cooled it particles smashed into eachother and stuck together I don't think gravity had much to do with atoms forming, because 1-We don't understand how gravity works on a quantum level and 2-atoms are held together by the strong force Every atom that makes up our solar system comes from those primordial stars that created the first heavier elements (carbon, nitrogen, oxygen) We are star dust
Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] Yes Neutrons and protons are composite particles Electrons are elementary particles

oh i see,and then they somehow untied with each others and formed a complete atom and so after billions of years this universe is like this. the gravity that pulled these atoms together also came from the original source?aka pure energy?

Everything you see around you was at a single point in spacetime E=Mc^2 (Matter = Energy) As it expanded and cooled it particles smashed into eachother and stuck together I don't think gravity had much to do with atoms forming, because 1-We don't understand how gravity works on a quantum level and 2-atoms are held together by the strong force Every atom that makes up our solar system comes from those primordial stars that created the first heavier elements (carbon, nitrogen, oxygen) We are star dust

I see...well thanks for these valuable information,in my school we learned little about his thing,we only know that the universe started with the big bang which is an explosion somewhere and sometime in space. have a nice day mate ;D [spoiler] they say mate in AU right? [/spoiler]
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#26 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"] oh i see,and then they somehow untied with each others and formed a complete atom and so after billions of years this universe is like this. the gravity that pulled these atoms together also came from the original source?aka pure energy?

Everything you see around you was at a single point in spacetime E=Mc^2 (Matter = Energy) As it expanded and cooled it particles smashed into eachother and stuck together I don't think gravity had much to do with atoms forming, because 1-We don't understand how gravity works on a quantum level and 2-atoms are held together by the strong force Every atom that makes up our solar system comes from those primordial stars that created the first heavier elements (carbon, nitrogen, oxygen) We are star dust

I see...well thanks for these valuable information,in my school we learned little about his thing,we only know that the universe started with the big bang which is an explosion somewhere and sometime in space. have a nice day mate ;D [spoiler] they say mate in AU right? [/spoiler]

Because all matter and energy was at a single point, the big bang happened everywhere...if you can wrap your head around that haha About 13.7 billion years ago We do indeed =D
Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] Everything you see around you was at a single point in spacetime E=Mc^2 (Matter = Energy) As it expanded and cooled it particles smashed into eachother and stuck together I don't think gravity had much to do with atoms forming, because 1-We don't understand how gravity works on a quantum level and 2-atoms are held together by the strong force Every atom that makes up our solar system comes from those primordial stars that created the first heavier elements (carbon, nitrogen, oxygen) We are star dust

I see...well thanks for these valuable information,in my school we learned little about his thing,we only know that the universe started with the big bang which is an explosion somewhere and sometime in space. have a nice day mate ;D [spoiler] they say mate in AU right? [/spoiler]

Because all matter and energy was at a single point, the big bang happened everywhere...if you can wrap your head around that haha About 13.7 billion years ago We do indeed =D

Still does this answer the TC's question?Which is I think what was before?You know before all of this energy-atom-boom thingie. I figure you'll answer no one knows......mate!
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
Look up the Uncertainty principle.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#29 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"] I see...well thanks for these valuable information,in my school we learned little about his thing,we only know that the universe started with the big bang which is an explosion somewhere and sometime in space. have a nice day mate ;D [spoiler] they say mate in AU right? [/spoiler]

Because all matter and energy was at a single point, the big bang happened everywhere...if you can wrap your head around that haha About 13.7 billion years ago We do indeed =D

Still does this answer the TC's question?Which is I think what was before?You know before all of this energy-atom-boom thingie. I figure you'll answer no one knows......mate!

It is impossible to know what was there/happened before time and space existed One can only theorise
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"] I see...well thanks for these valuable information,in my school we learned little about his thing,we only know that the universe started with the big bang which is an explosion somewhere and sometime in space. have a nice day mate ;D [spoiler] they say mate in AU right? [/spoiler]

Because all matter and energy was at a single point, the big bang happened everywhere...if you can wrap your head around that haha About 13.7 billion years ago We do indeed =D

Still does this answer the TC's question?Which is I think what was before?You know before all of this energy-atom-boom thingie. I figure you'll answer no one knows......mate!

Well, since time is a dimension of the universe, asking what is 'before' it makes no more sense then asking what is 'left' of it; with time beginning at the big bang, there is no 'before the universe'
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
Look up the Uncertainty principle.dramaybaz
what is the relevance of this
Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] It is impossible to know what was there/happened before time and space existed One can only theorise

YUP!
Well, since time is a dimension of the universe, asking what is 'before' it makes no more sense then asking what is 'left' of it; with time beginning at the big bang, there is no 'before the universe'Funky_Llama
OK I got it,so time started with the Big bang,that's why there is no "before" it. You two know your stuff eh :P
Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#33 Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts
my theory, the big bang was an enormous eruption of a super massive black hole. Recently a black hole with at least 21 billion solar masses have been confirmed, The black hole the universe originated from could be at least 1 Decillion, thats 1 x 10^33 and if 30% of that was blown out into space, that would be enough mass to create stars, galaxies and other black holes.
Avatar image for nunovlopes
nunovlopes

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 nunovlopes
Member since 2009 • 2638 Posts

[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] Because all matter and energy was at a single point, the big bang happened everywhere...if you can wrap your head around that haha About 13.7 billion years ago We do indeed =Dchaoscougar1
Still does this answer the TC's question?Which is I think what was before?You know before all of this energy-atom-boom thingie. I figure you'll answer no one knows......mate!

It is impossible to know what was there/happened before time and space existed One can only theorise

I once read somewhere that it doesn't make sense to ask what existed before the big-bang because there was no before, time started at the big bang!

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#35 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"] Still does this answer the TC's question?Which is I think what was before?You know before all of this energy-atom-boom thingie. I figure you'll answer no one knows......mate!nunovlopes

It is impossible to know what was there/happened before time and space existed One can only theorise

I once read somewhere that it doesn't make sense to ask what existed before the big-bang because there was no before, time started at the big bang!

That's why I said "before time and space existed" :P
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="nunovlopes"]

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] It is impossible to know what was there/happened before time and space existed One can only theorisechaoscougar1

I once read somewhere that it doesn't make sense to ask what existed before the big-bang because there was no before, time started at the big bang!

That's why I said "before time and space existed" :P

sure Big Bang is a great show but were things so boring beforehand that time actually stopped?

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

The Big Bang theory is nothing more than a funny show on TV which I enjoy a lot. That Sheldon needs to win some type of award. Thats about where the end of where the validity of the Big Bangs existence is. Nothing more than a fantasy though up by an atheist who had a bad day and wanted to excuse Creation.

sintygypsy

Actually numbnuts the "Big Bang" theory was developed by a Catholic priest.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="sintygypsy"]

The Big Bang theory is nothing more than a funny show on TV which I enjoy a lot. That Sheldon needs to win some type of award. Thats about where the end of where the validity of the Big Bangs existence is. Nothing more than a fantasy though up by an atheist who had a bad day and wanted to excuse Creation.

worlock77

Actually numbnuts the "Big Bang" theory was developed by a Catholic priest.

Just because the originator was a pedaphile doesn't mean we should disregard the theory.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="sintygypsy"]

The Big Bang theory is nothing more than a funny show on TV which I enjoy a lot. That Sheldon needs to win some type of award. Thats about where the end of where the validity of the Big Bangs existence is. Nothing more than a fantasy though up by an atheist who had a bad day and wanted to excuse Creation.

tenaka2

Actually numbnuts the "Big Bang" theory was developed by a Catholic priest.

Just because the originator was a pedaphile doesn't mean we should disregard the theory.

*yawn*

Poor trolling is poor.

Avatar image for Nude_Dude
Nude_Dude

5530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Nude_Dude
Member since 2007 • 5530 Posts

I think you are a dick.

My thoughts.

Iszdope
a black dick as well. cause he faps to bbw. Geddit?
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#42 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Lee Smolin's idea about multiverses being subject to Darwinian natural selection and those that have a propensity to form black holes survive (and when a black hole becomes massive enough, it forms into a new universe through a big bang event; universal offspring) is an incredibly fascinating hypothesis for me.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#43 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
what is the relevance of thisFunky_Llama
Considering he didn't even credit Heisenberg makes me think it had no relevance at all.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#44 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] That's why I said "before time and space existed" :P

I'm almost certain that neither are necessary in quantum mechanics. :?
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] That's why I said "before time and space existed" :P

I'm almost certain that neither are necessary in quantum mechanics. :?

wait - that time and space aren't necessary in quantum mechanics?
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts
[QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="FMAB_GTO"] I see...well thanks for these valuable information,in my school we learned little about his thing,we only know that the universe started with the big bang which is an explosion somewhere and sometime in space. have a nice day mate ;D [spoiler] they say mate in AU right? [/spoiler]

Because all matter and energy was at a single point, the big bang happened everywhere...if you can wrap your head around that haha About 13.7 billion years ago We do indeed =D

Still does this answer the TC's question?Which is I think what was before?You know before all of this energy-atom-boom thingie. I figure you'll answer no one knows......mate!

Anything prior to the big bang theory is out of the realm of todays science. At the end of the day we don't know.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#47 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] That's why I said "before time and space existed" :P

I'm almost certain that neither are necessary in quantum mechanics. :?

Wut?
Avatar image for Necrifer
Necrifer

10629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Necrifer
Member since 2010 • 10629 Posts

[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

This universe has a design, we Humans are a design, we are a creation, people cant seem to fvcking undestand that.....

Guybrush_3

what evidence do you have for your position?

Myself.

I was crafted
by vampires
from heaven.

Avatar image for ShadowsDemon
ShadowsDemon

10059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#49 ShadowsDemon
Member since 2012 • 10059 Posts
[QUOTE="Iszdope"]

I think you are a dick.

My thoughts.

Nude_Dude
a black dick as well. cause he faps to bbw. Geddit?

:lol: I laughed so hard at that.
Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#50 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45452 Posts
I heard someone explain it like:
we thought our own planet was the center of the universe we discovered that our planet was one of many planets in our solar system in orbit of a star then our star was discovered to be a star among hundreds of billions of other stars in our galaxy the universe was thought to be limited to the Milky Way until we discovered our galaxy was just one among a sky of hundreds of billions of other galaxies and we came to believe everything came from a Big Bang event... well, is it any stretch to believe that our Big Bang isn't just an isolated event?