There are people this close-minded out there......

  • 151 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Cokelore
Cokelore

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Cokelore
Member since 2008 • 379 Posts

I know people that actually not only disagree with gays getting married, but also disagree with abortion and stem cell research (I know about the adult stem cells already, but people are probably going to find something morally wrong about that too......)But think about it? Who wins in that scenario? Not only disagreeing with abortion but also stem cell research as well.......I know about my sig being a little contradictory.......but idc

Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#2 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

That's not being close-minded at all...

Avatar image for AngelofDeath213
AngelofDeath213

2219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 AngelofDeath213
Member since 2009 • 2219 Posts

Your post + sig = irony. What Christian would completely support abortion?

Avatar image for MgamerBD
MgamerBD

17550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 MgamerBD
Member since 2006 • 17550 Posts

Your post + sig = irony. What Christian would completely support abortion?

AngelofDeath213
I would...I'm not supposed too?
Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

like this is new news? really?...

Avatar image for AngelofDeath213
AngelofDeath213

2219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 AngelofDeath213
Member since 2009 • 2219 Posts
[QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"]

Your post + sig = irony. What Christian would completely support abortion?

MgamerBD
I would...I'm not supposed too?

I'm sure you don't support it 100%. There must be some scenarios in which you believe it to be wrong. In the case I am incorrect, please ignore this post; I don't feel like looking like an idiot tonight.
Avatar image for Ace_WondersX
Ace_WondersX

4455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Ace_WondersX
Member since 2003 • 4455 Posts

Stem Cell and Abortion don't have to do with being close-minded in my opinion. Those are moral conflicts that prevent those things.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts

Your post + sig = irony. What Christian would completely support abortion?

AngelofDeath213
... Me?
Avatar image for MgamerBD
MgamerBD

17550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MgamerBD
Member since 2006 • 17550 Posts
[QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"][QUOTE="MgamerBD"][QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"]

Your post + sig = irony. What Christian would completely support abortion?

I would...I'm not supposed too?

I'm sure you don't support it 100%. There must be some scenarios in which you believe it to be wrong. In the case I am incorrect, please ignore this post; I don't feel like looking like an idiot tonight.

ok *shakes hand* I can respect that.
Avatar image for Cokelore
Cokelore

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Cokelore
Member since 2008 • 379 Posts

Obama is pro-choice and a Christian (I still think), but I guess he is smart enough to realize you shouldn't use the bible to try and govern a nation.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
On the contrary, I think people who DO support abortion are closed-minded. They simply accept the mainstream opinion on the matter and dismiss anyone with a different perspective as a religious nutjob. I am completely non-religious, but I am opposed to abortion and embryonic stem cell research based on the Natural Rights Theory and the idea that people are innocent until proven guilty, coupled with the fact that an embryo is alive and biologically identical to what it will be the day it dies. Now, I do support gay rights and adult stem cell. But it seems that today people are willing to jump on and ride any bandwagon they come across, and they dismiss anyone who thinks for themselves as "behind the times" or as some religious or chauvinistic psycho.
Avatar image for xxxAdvocatexxx
xxxAdvocatexxx

1797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 xxxAdvocatexxx
Member since 2008 • 1797 Posts

And the sky is blue too....

Avatar image for AngelofDeath213
AngelofDeath213

2219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 AngelofDeath213
Member since 2009 • 2219 Posts
[QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"]

Your post + sig = irony. What Christian would completely support abortion?

jaydough
... Me?

Do you believe abortion is always the best option?
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"]

Your post + sig = irony. What Christian would completely support abortion?

AngelofDeath213
... Me?

Do you believe abortion is always the best option?

Not always. It can be very traumatizing for the woman who's pregnant, and past the first trimester, the fetus is more than a clump of cells.
Avatar image for AngelofDeath213
AngelofDeath213

2219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 AngelofDeath213
Member since 2009 • 2219 Posts
[QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"][QUOTE="jaydough"] ... Me? jaydough
Do you believe abortion is always the best option?

Not always. It can be very traumatizing for the woman who's pregnant, and past the first trimester, the fetus is more than a clump of cells.

Then you don't support it completely, do you?
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
[QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"][QUOTE="jaydough"] ... Me? jaydough
Do you believe abortion is always the best option?

Not always. It can be very traumatizing for the woman who's pregnant, and past the first trimester, the fetus is more than a clump of cells.

Every living thing in the history of the world is simply a clump of cells at any stage of development.
Avatar image for binpink
binpink

9163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 binpink
Member since 2009 • 9163 Posts

On the contrary, I think people who DO support abortion are closed-minded. They simply accept the mainstream opinion on the matter and dismiss anyone with a different perspective as a religious nutjob. savebattery

I will dismiss anyone who wants their own moral beliefs lording over my body. If you don't support abortion, don't get one. You (generally) don't have to be a religious nutjob to have some kind of inflated ego and overbearing sense of moral obligation that feeds your desire to control womens' bodies for your own peace of mind.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"][QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"] Do you believe abortion is always the best option?

Not always. It can be very traumatizing for the woman who's pregnant, and past the first trimester, the fetus is more than a clump of cells.

Then you don't support it completely, do you?

Well, I thought by completely supporting it, you meant if I was pro choice, and in most situations, yes, I am.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"] Do you believe abortion is always the best option?

Not always. It can be very traumatizing for the woman who's pregnant, and past the first trimester, the fetus is more than a clump of cells.

Every living thing in the history of the world is simply a clump of cells at any stage of development.

...Connected in a way to provide the sensation of thought and/or pain. In the first trimester, a fetus has literally no brain waves.
Avatar image for xxxAdvocatexxx
xxxAdvocatexxx

1797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 xxxAdvocatexxx
Member since 2008 • 1797 Posts

[QUOTE="AngelofDeath213"][QUOTE="jaydough"] Not always. It can be very traumatizing for the woman who's pregnant, and past the first trimester, the fetus is more than a clump of cells. jaydough
Then you don't support it completely, do you?

Well, I thought by completely supporting it, you meant if I was pro choice, and in most situations, yes, I am.

That what i assumed too... but its funny how some people like to twist words around.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts

[QUOTE="savebattery"]On the contrary, I think people who DO support abortion are closed-minded. They simply accept the mainstream opinion on the matter and dismiss anyone with a different perspective as a religious nutjob. binpink

I will dismiss anyone who wants their own moral beliefs lording over my body. If you don't support abortion, don't get one. You (generally) don't have to be a religious nutjob to have some kind of inflated ego and overbearing sense of moral obligation that feeds your desire to control womens' bodies for your own peace of mind.

Excuse me, but we're not just talking about your body here. We're talking about TWO. You, and the child you're trying to murder. Whether you believe it or not, the embryo is alive and the embryo is human. You have no right to take a human life for the sense of your own convenience. All innocent humans are entitled to their Natural Rights, and you cannot void that right. Your argument is incredible shortsighted. Don't support murder? Don't kill anyone. Don't support thievery? Don't steal anything. This is not a matter of controlling women's bodies, this is a matter of women controlling childrens' bodies. An embryo is a body within a body, it is not a part of the mother. It's a living, growing entity with its own DNA. If I had a really huge mouth and put a child inside of it, that child wouldn't be a part of me.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"] Not always. It can be very traumatizing for the woman who's pregnant, and past the first trimester, the fetus is more than a clump of cells. jaydough
Every living thing in the history of the world is simply a clump of cells at any stage of development.

...Connected in a way to provide the sensation of thought and/or pain. In the first trimester, a fetus has literally no brain waves.

Who decided that individual thought or the ability to feel pain gives one his right to life? There are many people who lack the hormone that produces pain. Are they unworthy of life? And as for thought... a newborn child is not self-aware, but an adult African Elephant is. Are elephants somehow more worthy of rights than babies?
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
TC, you're close minded by rejecting others' opinions.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="savebattery"] Every living thing in the history of the world is simply a clump of cells at any stage of development.

...Connected in a way to provide the sensation of thought and/or pain. In the first trimester, a fetus has literally no brain waves.

Who decided that individual thought or the ability to feel pain gives one his right to life? There are many people who lack the hormone that produces pain. Are they unworthy of life? And as for thought... a newborn child is not self-aware, but an adult African Elephant is. Are elephants somehow more worthy of rights than babies?

Well, what you were saying was that all life is essentially a clump of cells. All I said was that there's a big difference between, say, a dog, and a random clump of cells.
Avatar image for binpink
binpink

9163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 binpink
Member since 2009 • 9163 Posts

[QUOTE="binpink"]

[QUOTE="savebattery"]On the contrary, I think people who DO support abortion are closed-minded. They simply accept the mainstream opinion on the matter and dismiss anyone with a different perspective as a religious nutjob. savebattery

I will dismiss anyone who wants their own moral beliefs lording over my body. If you don't support abortion, don't get one. You (generally) don't have to be a religious nutjob to have some kind of inflated ego and overbearing sense of moral obligation that feeds your desire to control womens' bodies for your own peace of mind.

Excuse me, but we're not just talking about your body here. We're talking about TWO. You, and the child you're trying to murder. Whether you believe it or not, the embryo is alive and the embryo is human. You have no right to take a human life for the sense of your own convenience. All innocent humans are entitled to their Natural Rights, and you cannot void that right. Your argument is incredible shortsighted. Don't support murder? Don't kill anyone. Don't support thievery? Don't steal anything. This is not a matter of controlling women's bodies, this is a matter of women controlling childrens' bodies. An embryo is a body within a body, it is not a part of the mother. It's a living, growing entity with its own DNA. If I had a really huge mouth and put a child inside of it, that child wouldn't be a part of me.

And you have a right to tell women what to do with their bodies? Seems convenient for you. If a woman is forced to have a child she's pregnant with it is indeed a matter of controlling her body. You may not want to believe it, because maybe you'd find it tough to look a raped 13 year old pregnant girl in the face and tell her that she HAS to keep the baby and then go on and on about the cells and how it's living and how it's not about her. If you had a huge mouth I suppose it'd be easy for you to do something like that and actually convince her she's not a prisoner to a fate she didn't ask for. Until then, you're excused.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"] ...Connected in a way to provide the sensation of thought and/or pain. In the first trimester, a fetus has literally no brain waves. jaydough
Who decided that individual thought or the ability to feel pain gives one his right to life? There are many people who lack the hormone that produces pain. Are they unworthy of life? And as for thought... a newborn child is not self-aware, but an adult African Elephant is. Are elephants somehow more worthy of rights than babies?

Well, what you were saying was that all life is essentially a clump of cells. All I said was that there's a big difference between, say, a dog, and a random clump of cells.

Only in terms of how developed it is. But two types of the same animal at different stages of development are still the same animal. An embryo being a "clump of cells" (read: less developed) doesn't give me the right to kill it any more than a child or mentally challenged person being less developed gives you the right to kill them.
Avatar image for Cokelore
Cokelore

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Cokelore
Member since 2008 • 379 Posts
TC, you're close minded by rejecting others' opinions.cpo335
Oh but I do, infact I am so open-minded, I literally almost contradicted myself.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts

And you have a right to tell women what to do with their bodies? Seems convenient for you. If a woman is forced to have a child she's pregnant with it is indeed a matter of controlling her body. You may not want to believe it, because maybe you'd find it tough to look a raped 13 year old pregnant girl in the face and tell her that she HAS to keep the baby and then go on and on about the cells and how it's living and how it's not about her. If you had a huge mouth I suppose it'd be easy for you to do something like that and actually convince her she's not a prisoner to a fate she didn't ask for. Until then, you're excused.

binpink

Rape is a horribly unfortunate circumstance, but you cannot punish the child for the crimes of his father. All people are innocent until proven guilty. In order for you to be able to take a life, you have to prove without a doubt that it has done something to void its own right to life. What obligation do parents have to their children, legally and morally? In this country, it is the responsibility of a parent to assure that a child is safe and well taken care of until it is legally an adult. Not killing it would be part of that. Being born is not a question of personhood, but rather of location.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="savebattery"] Who decided that individual thought or the ability to feel pain gives one his right to life? There are many people who lack the hormone that produces pain. Are they unworthy of life? And as for thought... a newborn child is not self-aware, but an adult African Elephant is. Are elephants somehow more worthy of rights than babies?

Well, what you were saying was that all life is essentially a clump of cells. All I said was that there's a big difference between, say, a dog, and a random clump of cells.

Only in terms of how developed it is. But two types of the same animal at different stages of development are still the same animal. An embryo being a "clump of cells" (read: less developed) doesn't give me the right to kill it any more than a child or mentally challenged person being less developed gives you the right to kill them.

Yes, but despite it being in the same species, doesn't mean it deserves the exact same treatment. There are many different factors you need to take into consideration. Would you rather have a person born without the bulk of its brain killed, or a person with a fully functioning brain killed, if you had no choice?
Avatar image for Cokelore
Cokelore

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Cokelore
Member since 2008 • 379 Posts

[QUOTE="binpink"]And you have a right to tell women what to do with their bodies? Seems convenient for you. If a woman is forced to have a child she's pregnant with it is indeed a matter of controlling her body. You may not want to believe it, because maybe you'd find it tough to look a raped 13 year old pregnant girl in the face and tell her that she HAS to keep the baby and then go on and on about the cells and how it's living and how it's not about her. If you had a huge mouth I suppose it'd be easy for you to do something like that and actually convince her she's not a prisoner to a fate she didn't ask for. Until then, you're excused.

savebattery

Rape is a horribly unfortunate circumstance, but you cannot punish the child for the crimes of his father. All people are innocent until proven guilty. In order for you to be able to take a life, you have to prove without a doubt that it has done something to void its own right to life. What obligation do parents have to their children, legally and morally? In this country, it is the responsibility of a parent to assure that a child is safe and well taken care of until it is legally an adult. Not killing it would be part of that. Being born is not a question of personhood, but rather of location.

That usually almost never applies in this situation......why? Women know when they getting raped and usually a dna test is enough evidence to sentence the rapist. The women has no obligation to take care of the rapist child.....why? Because she got raped......

Avatar image for binpink
binpink

9163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 binpink
Member since 2009 • 9163 Posts

[QUOTE="binpink"]And you have a right to tell women what to do with their bodies? Seems convenient for you. If a woman is forced to have a child she's pregnant with it is indeed a matter of controlling her body. You may not want to believe it, because maybe you'd find it tough to look a raped 13 year old pregnant girl in the face and tell her that she HAS to keep the baby and then go on and on about the cells and how it's living and how it's not about her. If you had a huge mouth I suppose it'd be easy for you to do something like that and actually convince her she's not a prisoner to a fate she didn't ask for. Until then, you're excused.

savebattery

Rape is a horribly unfortunate circumstance, but you cannot punish the child for the crimes of his father.

You'd really make a raped young girl have her rapist's baby? That's a disturbing mentality and goes the show how extreme you are on the issue. I'll go to bed happy you have no control over my uterus. I wouldn't feel terribly bad, though, if you stayed up all night fretting about all the abortions that'll happen tomorrow. Particularly for the abortions performed for rape victims.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"] Well, what you were saying was that all life is essentially a clump of cells. All I said was that there's a big difference between, say, a dog, and a random clump of cells. jaydough
Only in terms of how developed it is. But two types of the same animal at different stages of development are still the same animal. An embryo being a "clump of cells" (read: less developed) doesn't give me the right to kill it any more than a child or mentally challenged person being less developed gives you the right to kill them.

Yes, but despite it being in the same species, doesn't mean it deserves the exact same treatment. There are many different factors you need to take into consideration. Would you rather have a person born without the bulk of its brain killed, or a person with a fully functioning brain killed, if you had no choice?

That's not a decision I have the right to make. One type of person deciding another type of person is less worthy of life than any other is exactly how we ended up with slavery and the Holocaust. Different people value different things about human life, and there can be NO room for subjectivity when people's lives are at stake. Furthermore, giving birth by C-section is less dangerous than an abortion to the health of the mother nearly 100% of the time. So "abortion to save the life of the mother" is a very weak argument; nevermind the fact that less than 1% of abortions are for health reasons in the first place.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts

[QUOTE="savebattery"]

[QUOTE="binpink"]And you have a right to tell women what to do with their bodies? Seems convenient for you. If a woman is forced to have a child she's pregnant with it is indeed a matter of controlling her body. You may not want to believe it, because maybe you'd find it tough to look a raped 13 year old pregnant girl in the face and tell her that she HAS to keep the baby and then go on and on about the cells and how it's living and how it's not about her. If you had a huge mouth I suppose it'd be easy for you to do something like that and actually convince her she's not a prisoner to a fate she didn't ask for. Until then, you're excused.

binpink

Rape is a horribly unfortunate circumstance, but you cannot punish the child for the crimes of his father.

You'd really make a raped young girl have her rapist's baby? That's a disturbing mentality and goes the show how extreme you are on the issue. I'll go to bed happy you have no control over my uterus. I wouldn't feel terribly bad, though, if you stayed up all night fretting about all the abortions that'll happen tomorrow. Particularly for the abortions performed for rape victims.

So, what you're saying is that being victim of a horrible crime gives you license to commit an even worse one. Being raped is awful, but murdering someone is worse. So, because you were raped, you get to murder someone who did nothing wrong?
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts

[QUOTE="savebattery"]

[QUOTE="binpink"]And you have a right to tell women what to do with their bodies? Seems convenient for you. If a woman is forced to have a child she's pregnant with it is indeed a matter of controlling her body. You may not want to believe it, because maybe you'd find it tough to look a raped 13 year old pregnant girl in the face and tell her that she HAS to keep the baby and then go on and on about the cells and how it's living and how it's not about her. If you had a huge mouth I suppose it'd be easy for you to do something like that and actually convince her she's not a prisoner to a fate she didn't ask for. Until then, you're excused.

Cokelore

Rape is a horribly unfortunate circumstance, but you cannot punish the child for the crimes of his father. All people are innocent until proven guilty. In order for you to be able to take a life, you have to prove without a doubt that it has done something to void its own right to life. What obligation do parents have to their children, legally and morally? In this country, it is the responsibility of a parent to assure that a child is safe and well taken care of until it is legally an adult. Not killing it would be part of that. Being born is not a question of personhood, but rather of location.

That usually almost never applies in this situation......why? Women know when they getting raped and usually a dna test is enough evidence to sentence the rapist. The women has no obligation to take care of the rapist child.....why? Because she got raped......

But you're still punishing an innocent child. You're not comprehending the argument.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="savebattery"] Only in terms of how developed it is. But two types of the same animal at different stages of development are still the same animal. An embryo being a "clump of cells" (read: less developed) doesn't give me the right to kill it any more than a child or mentally challenged person being less developed gives you the right to kill them.

Yes, but despite it being in the same species, doesn't mean it deserves the exact same treatment. There are many different factors you need to take into consideration. Would you rather have a person born without the bulk of its brain killed, or a person with a fully functioning brain killed, if you had no choice?

That's not a decision I have the right to make. One type of person deciding another type of person is less worthy of life than any other is exactly how we ended up with slavery and the Holocaust. Different people value different things about human life, and there can be NO room for subjectivity when people's lives are at stake. Furthermore, giving birth by C-section is less dangerous than an abortion to the health of the mother nearly 100% of the time. So "abortion to save the life of the mother" is a very weak argument; nevermind the fact that less than 1% of abortions are for health reasons in the first place.

Fine. In this scenario, a serial killer is forcing you to choose, or both die. And slavery and the holocaust were brought upon by the notion of other races being inferior, without any evidence. Now we have a large amount of evidence pointing towards a fetus not technically being completely human. Give a fetus an IQ test. See if he/she scores 100. If it does, I'll eat my hat.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"] Yes, but despite it being in the same species, doesn't mean it deserves the exact same treatment. There are many different factors you need to take into consideration. Would you rather have a person born without the bulk of its brain killed, or a person with a fully functioning brain killed, if you had no choice? jaydough
That's not a decision I have the right to make. One type of person deciding another type of person is less worthy of life than any other is exactly how we ended up with slavery and the Holocaust. Different people value different things about human life, and there can be NO room for subjectivity when people's lives are at stake. Furthermore, giving birth by C-section is less dangerous than an abortion to the health of the mother nearly 100% of the time. So "abortion to save the life of the mother" is a very weak argument; nevermind the fact that less than 1% of abortions are for health reasons in the first place.

Fine. In this scenario, a serial killer is forcing you to choose, or both die. And slavery and the holocaust were brought upon by the notion of other races being inferior, without any evidence. Now we have a large amount of evidence pointing towards a fetus not technically being completely human. Give a fetus an IQ test. See if he/she scores 100. If it does, I'll eat my hat.

Define human. A newborn child is not completely human by your definition, because it couldn't score anything on an IQ test. So, I'll turn this around on you. This same serial killer asks you to choose. Either the 25 year old dies or the newborn dies. Which is less worthy of life?
Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
so im close minded because i think all humans deserve life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. kool!
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="savebattery"] That's not a decision I have the right to make. One type of person deciding another type of person is less worthy of life than any other is exactly how we ended up with slavery and the Holocaust. Different people value different things about human life, and there can be NO room for subjectivity when people's lives are at stake. Furthermore, giving birth by C-section is less dangerous than an abortion to the health of the mother nearly 100% of the time. So "abortion to save the life of the mother" is a very weak argument; nevermind the fact that less than 1% of abortions are for health reasons in the first place.

Fine. In this scenario, a serial killer is forcing you to choose, or both die. And slavery and the holocaust were brought upon by the notion of other races being inferior, without any evidence. Now we have a large amount of evidence pointing towards a fetus not technically being completely human. Give a fetus an IQ test. See if he/she scores 100. If it does, I'll eat my hat.

Define human. A newborn child is not completely human by your definition, because it couldn't score anything on an IQ test. So, I'll turn this around on you. This same serial killer asks you to choose. Either the 25 year old dies or the newborn dies. Which is less worthy of life?

The newborn, technically speaking.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"] Fine. In this scenario, a serial killer is forcing you to choose, or both die. And slavery and the holocaust were brought upon by the notion of other races being inferior, without any evidence. Now we have a large amount of evidence pointing towards a fetus not technically being completely human. Give a fetus an IQ test. See if he/she scores 100. If it does, I'll eat my hat. jaydough
Define human. A newborn child is not completely human by your definition, because it couldn't score anything on an IQ test. So, I'll turn this around on you. This same serial killer asks you to choose. Either the 25 year old dies or the newborn dies. Which is less worthy of life?

The newborn, technically speaking.

How is that "technically speaking"? What's technical about it?
Avatar image for binpink
binpink

9163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 binpink
Member since 2009 • 9163 Posts

[QUOTE="binpink"]

[QUOTE="savebattery"] Rape is a horribly unfortunate circumstance, but you cannot punish the child for the crimes of his father.

savebattery

You'd really make a raped young girl have her rapist's baby? That's a disturbing mentality and goes the show how extreme you are on the issue. I'll go to bed happy you have no control over my uterus. I wouldn't feel terribly bad, though, if you stayed up all night fretting about all the abortions that'll happen tomorrow. Particularly for the abortions performed for rape victims.

So, what you're saying is that being victim of a horrible crime gives you license to commit an even worse one. Being raped is awful, but murdering someone is worse. So, because you were raped, you get to murder someone who did nothing wrong?

We differ on what a "person" is. Hopefully now that you know that you'll refrain from putting words in my mouth, so to speak. Although since you disagree with me on all of this, you likely will anyway. Ah well. I will do whatever I want with my own body knowing that nothing I do can come close to the gross unfairnesses that you support. Feel free to go on about how I'm an unfair murderer and yadda yadda, but I stopped taking you totally seriously when you made it clear you'd like a raped young girl to give birth to her rapist's baby. That's a whole other level of sick and cruel that I don't want to continue going back and forth with.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
deactivated-5e7f221e304c9

14645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-5e7f221e304c9
Member since 2004 • 14645 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="savebattery"] Define human. A newborn child is not completely human by your definition, because it couldn't score anything on an IQ test. So, I'll turn this around on you. This same serial killer asks you to choose. Either the 25 year old dies or the newborn dies. Which is less worthy of life?

The newborn, technically speaking.

How is that "technically speaking"? What's technical about it?

Well, you've got an animal who can't think and can't remember anything, against an animal who can think and remember. I added the "technically speaking" part to make it seem like I know what I'm talking about.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
>

We differ on what a "person" is. Hopefully now that you know that you'll refrain from putting words in my mouth, so to speak. Although since you disagree with me on all of this, you likely will anyway. Ah well. I will do whatever I want with my own body knowing that nothing I do can come close to the gross unfairnesses that you support. Feel free to go on about how I'm an unfair murderer and yadda yadda, but I stopped taking you totally seriously when you made it clear you'd like a raped young girl to give birth to her rapist's baby. That's a whole other level of sick and cruel that I don't want to continue going back and forth with.

binpink
The definition of a person is not subjective, and people thinking that it is explains why we had slavery and the Holocaust. A fetus is alive, and that's a scientific fact. And a fetus is a human, another biological fact.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="jaydough"] The newborn, technically speaking. jaydough
How is that "technically speaking"? What's technical about it?

Well, you've got an animal who can't think and can't remember anything, against an animal who can think and remember. I added the "technically speaking" part to make it seem like I know what I'm talking about.

So then you're talking from a subjective standpoint.
Avatar image for Cokelore
Cokelore

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Cokelore
Member since 2008 • 379 Posts

so im close minded because i think all humans deserve life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. kool!Silenthps

So basically all of you are saying to the rapist girl "Get over it"? Even though getting raped was completely out of her own free will?? LOLS Oh and that the rapist should be supported by the court justice system? Why, because the raped life-long traumatized women was lying and could be plotting something to get someone's money?? If you can think that deeply into other people's morals then think this......what happens if the raped women commits suicide?? What happens if the not only had rapped mom commit sucide but now also had baby left without parents barely struggles in today's society....Oh no all the variables!!

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]so im close minded because i think all humans deserve life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. kool!Cokelore

So basically all of you are saying to the rapist girl "Get over it"? Even though getting raped was completely out of her own free will?? LOLS

Think of the innocent child being murdered.
Avatar image for its_me_
its_me_

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 its_me_
Member since 2008 • 947 Posts

Abortion is a blatant human rights violation, pure and simple. We discriminated against blacks until the 70's, women until the 30's (many would say we still discriminate against both of these groups), the Japanese in the 40's, and now we are discriminating against are own children. We are destroying endless amounts of human potential, endless amounts of human minds that could make countless contributions to our world...all in order to protect a so-called "right to privacy" that an activist judge fabricated because he didn't agree with the text of our nation's constitution. It has given one group in America the power to choose who lives and who dies based on their personal feelings. It draws a wonderful parallel to the Third Reich in Nazi Germany where Hitler and his fascist friends decided, arbitrarily, that Aryans should reproduce but Jews, gays, blacks, and Asians should all be murdered. Abortion is genocide in it's most fundamental form, and it's sickening.

Avatar image for binpink
binpink

9163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 binpink
Member since 2009 • 9163 Posts

[QUOTE="binpink"]>

We differ on what a "person" is. Hopefully now that you know that you'll refrain from putting words in my mouth, so to speak. Although since you disagree with me on all of this, you likely will anyway. Ah well. I will do whatever I want with my own body knowing that nothing I do can come close to the gross unfairnesses that you support. Feel free to go on about how I'm an unfair murderer and yadda yadda, but I stopped taking you totally seriously when you made it clear you'd like a raped young girl to give birth to her rapist's baby. That's a whole other level of sick and cruel that I don't want to continue going back and forth with.

savebattery

The definition of a person is not subjective, and people thinking that it is explains why we had slavery and the Holocaust. A fetus is alive, and that's a scientific fact. And a fetus is a human, another biological fact.

Thank you for the combined biology/history lesson.

You still can't stop me from having an abortion. Perhaps that's what bothers you the most.

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
wow so you're saying killing a potential human being is more crazy then legal gay marriage. I'm an atheist but it's obvious that abortion is wrong and gay marriage is right... to me atleast.
Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

You kinda shot yourself in the foot with that signature, bud.