Thoughts on torture?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Just curious on what you guys think of torture? Recently had a debate about this in my poltiical science course, it seemed like the main voice was saying its ok.. And the main reason is the "fire with fire" idea...

Do people really think this is correct or not. I my self was absolutely appalled.. The United States government has made this a grey area in the past couple years which has disturbed me.. Just like having camera's in all of our homes (hypothetically of course) it could save our lives.. But the fact of the matter is can we really trust people with this huge responsibility? I say absolutely no.. torture is the exact same case, how can we trust the government with such a power that can be immensely abused.. Where when incarcerated a plea to guilty can be beaten out of you even if your innocent.. This has happened through out history.. Even recent times in Abu Gharib where the majority of people who were tortured were infact innocent..

Of course the majority of torturers do not believe this which will only result in increased abuse intill the person does give a statement that matchs with their idea.. Some of the people who don't confess (falsely or truthful) are merely beaten to death.. This has happened a few times in Iraq.. How can this be productive when it can only enflame the entire population giving more support to the extremist groups>? Do people realize that every study on torture that has ever been released has shown it to be a highly inaccurate piece of evidence.. Thoughts?

Avatar image for LouieV13
LouieV13

7604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#2 LouieV13
Member since 2005 • 7604 Posts
I think torture is humane. Why the hell not?
Avatar image for g-unit248
g-unit248

7197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 g-unit248
Member since 2005 • 7197 Posts
As long as states let the ICRC in i dont have any issues
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts
On one hand, you fight fire with water. On the other, the people the U.S. interrogates will never give important answers without it. So, I do not know.
Avatar image for shaza91
shaza91

3696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 shaza91
Member since 2005 • 3696 Posts
If it saves lives then I don't have a problem with it, but if it is used for someone's personal gain, that person should get life in jail.
Avatar image for da619freak
da619freak

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 da619freak
Member since 2005 • 317 Posts
i've seen enough 24 to believe that torture is not only ok its neccesarry
Avatar image for RichterBelmont7
RichterBelmont7

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 RichterBelmont7
Member since 2007 • 335 Posts

People will talk, but they're just as likely to be lying as to be telling the truth. Of course theres also the matter of it being illegal under national, military, and international, and inhumane to an extreme degree. Thats not even bringing up the fact that it does more harm than good by serving as a recruiting tool for the really bad extremists out there..not the taxi drivers who are what much of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraid consist of.

Nope, no torture for me thanks.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

On one hand, you fight fire with water. On the other, the people the U.S. interrogates will never give important answers without it. So, I do not know. organic_machine

The point though is the fact that can we honestly entrust them with the immense power that they have the RIGHT people to begin with? This has happened through out history where a force picks a innocent person and pertty much beats a confession out of them.. Alot of times the people who refuse to confess to a crime or information they do not have they have ended up dead..

about a year back they killed a man in Iraq by putting a bag over his head.. He was found to be innocent afterwards from evdience found to not have any ties to enemy forces.. How can any one think this is ok? Yeah torture in a PERFECT world with a PERFECT system of government could work, but we are in a niether perfect world or perfect government..

Avatar image for Hey_Jay
Hey_Jay

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Hey_Jay
Member since 2004 • 7221 Posts
You know, I could say it's wrong and inhumane, but I'm sure if I were given the incentive I would have no problem with it.
Avatar image for blooddemon666
blooddemon666

22587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 blooddemon666
Member since 2003 • 22587 Posts

you know who else used torture? the inquisitors, and they got the answers they wanted... not the truth.

Torture in interrogation is wrong

some whips and ball gags during teh sexay tiem is a-ok ;)

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Its like freedom of speech in my eyes.. On one hand burning the flag can be seen as distasteful (protest wise).. But Freedom of Speech is absolute, once we start banning certian things we are opening the pandoras box... We have shown recent and older stories that the government is far from efficent.. Where the patriot act hurt alot of innocent people.. Hell they just recently had a story where a g uy was deported to Syria (where he was then tortured after the US promised they would not), this was all on the belief that he had terrorist ties.. Where none such evidence has shown.. In the end in my eyes these values and ideas can not be bent and there will always be a price to pay for them..

It was once said that any one who sacrifices liberty for security deserve niether... I tend to agree with this point..

Avatar image for RichterBelmont7
RichterBelmont7

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 RichterBelmont7
Member since 2007 • 335 Posts

You know, I could say it's wrong and inhumane, but I'm sure if I were given the incentive I would have no problem with it.SaugaGames

Thats true of basically any act..the government conducted experiments on exactly such a thing (Google "The Manipulation of Human Behavior" to see).

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="SaugaGames"]You know, I could say it's wrong and inhumane, but I'm sure if I were given the incentive I would have no problem with it.RichterBelmont7

Thats true of basically any act..the government conducted experiments on exactly such a thing (Google "The Manipulation of Human Behavior" to see).

The point of the matter is we would do anything in distress for example when there is a gun at a loved ones head.. This doesn't make you crediable or your actions as justified.. Or take for instance you meet the person who murdered yoru entire family.. From a society perspective you are not justified to murder that person.. Now of course the majority of the people out there would want to kill him, but thats driven all by emotion.. Not logic or mindfulness of the laws in society... Just my 2 cents.

Avatar image for aaaaarrrrggggg
aaaaarrrrggggg

13979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 aaaaarrrrggggg
Member since 2005 • 13979 Posts
Whether it's right or wrong for information purposes, my morals would always be against it. I can't answer beyond that.