TNA vs WWE

I like TNA more. Its a throwback to the good ol Monday Night Wars days while WWE has just become a PBS kids show.

Bump Any wrestling fans here?Y2Jfan23

I like TNA more. Its a throwback to the good ol Monday Night Wars days while WWE has just become a PBS kids show.

Y2Jfan23

Oh, TNA is a throwback alright as in throw it back because it SUCKS.

I gotta go with WWE

while i'd like to have people like Angle, Joey St(yles) in WWE i just dislike how disorganized the stories are, and how many old wrestlers are there (and thus they have younger guys carry them)

You see a match between HBK and Undertaker or CM Punk and HHH and its almost like art how well they perform.

And i think the top performers in WWWE, Jericho, Edge, HBK, HHH, Taker, make the ones who aren't so good look much better (Kane, Cena)

the thing WCW got right in the monday nite wars is something TNA can't do in their present model

WCW/WWF had relatively the same ratings every week, and you knew who was bad/good. but WCW then pulled a huge game changer in hogan joining the NwO and made an epic two year battle between the good guys and the bad guys.

After 1998 though it got too convuluted (spell) and confusing and the old guys wouldn't lose to the young ones

TNA's stories and characters are too new and confusing to fans who don't know them. They must spend years, maybe a decade trying to get a bigger audience before they try to pull any of these crazy plots out

That said, does anyone here think HBK will not retire at WM26?

[QUOTE="Y2Jfan23"]Bump Any wrestling fans here?MoonMarvel

to be honest TNA needs to work harded on its booking. I remember when RVD made his debut and was just beat down like a jobber. made no sense to me.

to be honest TNA needs to work harded on its booking. I remember when RVD made his debut and was just beat down like a jobber. made no sense to me.

pete_merlin

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="Y2Jfan23"]Bump Any wrestling fans here?Y2Jfan23

[QUOTE="Y2Jfan23"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]Not many, most just laugh at it for stupid reasons. There are a few wrestling unions, try those. Also WWE > TNA to me. Too much Hogan and that Abyss thing is dumb.MoonMarvel

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="Y2Jfan23"] Yeah I can't stand Abyss either. But its still no worse than Hornswoggle.Y2Jfan23

been a fan of wwe for almost 10 years
while tna reminds me of the attitude era that's all it has going for it
while anyone can raise a stink that wwe is for kids and tna is for adults it's all about quality
and wwe has it

WWE, but I fully support TNA's popularity increase. This market desperately needs competition.

Neither, it is WAY to much like a soap opera now. Plus I prefer real fighting.

I like TNA more. Its a throwback to the good ol Monday Night Wars days while WWE has just become a PBS kids show.

Y2Jfan23

Y2Jfan23 doesn't your name have to do with Chris Jericho..? he's from the WWE. honestly, your answer is kind of stupid. both are basically the same thing. strong actors that do real moves but make sure the moves don't hurt as much as they look. I mean come on, some of the TNA wrestlers used to be part of the WWE. the winners of matches are planned out and everything. so how can you say it's a PBS show..? WWE has always be the same, pure entertainment. it's made to entertain people. it just kind of pisses me off when people say "oh WWE is fake" well my answer to that is, you can watch movies which are fake but you can't watch WWE? anyone, or at least somewhat smart people, know that WWE is mostly acting. it's made to entertain us. I'm not saying anyone here did this but people need to actually start thinking about what WWE is about instead of going along with the crowds that are against it. but back to the main question, WWE is way better. the wrestlers are better (in terms of acting and the moves), the arena looks much bigger, and it's much funnier. plus the guest hosts make it better. this is just my opinion :P