[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]I still think that this is a bad argument (even though I disagree that the swearing in District 9 hurt the movie).
EVERYTHING that anyone ever says in a movie is just words. If "they're just words" is a valid excuse, then how can we ever criticize ANY movie for having a stupid and porrly written script? After all, it's all just words, right?
And if this was the case, then every novelist would be as good as any other. All they're doing is writing words, right?
That's like excusing a bad painting because "it's all just paint", or excusing a bad photograph because "it's all just photons striking a light-sensitive emulsion".
zakkro
I thought you'd comment on this. :P Eh, I agree with what you're saying, but what I really meant is that in the context that they were used, they weren't done to make people uncomfortable. Someone was either pissed off or amazed at something, and some people just use these words.In that case, I agree. That IS a valid argument.
Just be sure to say so next time.
Again, I actually DISAGREE that District 9 had too much swearing. But the (admittedly indisputable) fact that swear words are just words really doesn't mean anything. Words are just the means by which certain information and ewmotions are communicated to the audience. This is common to EVERY artistic or journalistic work that ever uses words, but it doesn't mean that all those works are equal.
The clarification definitely helps, and I now agree with what you're saying. I thought that the swearing was fine in the given context. Others obviously disagree, and we can discuss that. But let's just make sure that when we DO criticize, that we are making valid criticisms.
Log in to comment