Top 1% of Americans reaped 67% of income gains.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Hot-Tamale
Hot-Tamale

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 Hot-Tamale
Member since 2009 • 2052 Posts

Look at this (it's a relatively unbiased source, btw): http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2908

Are we still debating the estate tax? We need to tax the hell out of these people. Think of the new revenue streams!

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

I've no problem with estate taxes and so forth. Heck set the tax rates on the wealthiest back to the Regan era while we're at it.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

sure, this data's been out there for years now. rich get richer isn't just a catch phrase. we used to be a country where things where the average Joe would reap the benefits of increased GDP but now that's mostly going to the top 1% while we peasants fight among ourselves for their crumbs. many economists will also tell you that this type of huge disparity in wealth and income leads to economic crisis as well.

Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

I support the so-called "death tax". I don't like any sort of tax system that punishes the successful, but I do like the idea of telling the successful's children to pull their own weight.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
Old news...very old It has been that way for a loooong time. Open for debate: are the super rich blessed with great luck or do they make their own luck Not open for debate: the rich are getting richer and the middle class is shrinking...been that way for a while now.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

I support the so-called "death tax". I don't like any sort of tax system that punishes the successful, but I do like the idea of telling the successful's children to pull their own weight.

Oleg_Huzwog
I agree that the kids should make their own way But I do not agree that it is ok to tax the same income twice (taxed when you earned it and when you give it away)
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

I support the so-called "death tax". I don't like any sort of tax system that punishes the successful, but I do like the idea of telling the successful's children to pull their own weight.

Oleg_Huzwog
I don't think that today's 1% is working any harder than the top 1% in the 60's or 70's. it's not like that 1% lived a bad life. I don't think today's 1% should be getting as much as they are. they wouldn't be punished since they would still be the top 1%. they just wouldn't be rewarded so obscenely much.
Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

I support the so-called "death tax". I don't like any sort of tax system that punishes the successful, but I do like the idea of telling the successful's children to pull their own weight.

rawsavon

I agree that the kids should make their own way
But I do not agree that it is ok to tax the same income twice (taxed when you earned it and when you give it away)

Could we rephrase that last part to: taxed when parent earns it and taxed when child earns it via inheritance? If an inheritance can be categorized as a separate transaction, can we still say the same income is taxed twice?

Or at least, that's how I rationalize it.

Avatar image for Meejoe27
Meejoe27

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 Meejoe27
Member since 2009 • 786 Posts

But what is the incentive to be rich?

Those 1% also have to pay taxes! LOTS of taxes!

Taxes make being rich not even worth it. I mean poor people get to keep 100% of their income, so really poor people are more rich than rich people.

What fun is a 400 foot sail boat when you have to pay 51% of your income to the governement? Why even buy a 50,000 sq foot home for your 19 year old super model girlfriend, the government is just going to take some "Luxury tax" whatever that means. Since when is owning a home a luxury? last i heard shelter was needed to survive. checkmate Govt.

Want to buy an island? hold on there buddy the Government wants to charge you taxes to pay for "Public schools" and "Nation Defense" WTF, my kids don't go to public schools, and i can just buy an army to defend myself, so why should i pay taxes? Poor people need healthcare? Well I don't need healthcare, my live in family doctor does all that. Poor people should just get live in family doctors. problem solved, omg i'm a genius, No poor people are just too dumb to think of theses things.

If i wanted to drive i would just have a road paved and then torn up after i'm done. Poor people should just do the same.

Poor people use money as an excuse for everything. get a job that pays 30 million a year and quit complaining.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

I support the so-called "death tax". I don't like any sort of tax system that punishes the successful, but I do like the idea of telling the successful's children to pull their own weight.

Oleg_Huzwog

I agree that the kids should make their own way
But I do not agree that it is ok to tax the same income twice (taxed when you earned it and when you give it away)

Could we rephrase that last part to: taxed when parent earns it and taxed when child earns it via inheritance? If an inheritance can be categorized as a separate transaction, can we still say the same income is taxed twice?

Or at least, that's how I rationalize it.

They already do tax the same money twice.
The GIVER of money pays the taxes not the receiver.

So if I earn billion dollars and give away 500 million to my kids...I pay the taxes (no matter if I am alive or dead).
This is part of our tax law (there are limits...i forget what they are...but you can give under a certain amount to people per year (yearly and lifetime limits) with no tax).

I just don't think the gov. should be able to tax my money twice.
-I have no problem with the first tax...I like roads, education, defense, etc.
-but I hate the fact that if I just keep it = no tax, but if I give it away = taxed again (except for charities)

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts
This is part of our tax law (there are limits...i forget what they are...but you can give under a certain amount to people per year (yearly and lifetime limits) with no tax).rawsavon
In general 13k per year per person.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180134 Posts

But what is the incentive to be rich?

Those 1% also have to pay taxes! LOTS of taxes!

Taxes make being rich not even worth it. I mean poor people get to keep 100% of their income, so really poor people are more rich than rich people.

W

Meejoe27

100% of barely nothing is not going to lead to a comfortable existence.:|

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

But what is the incentive to be rich?

Those 1% also have to pay taxes! LOTS of taxes!

Taxes make being rich not even worth it. I mean poor people get to keep 100% of their income, so really poor people are more rich than rich people.

Meejoe27

i hope you're kidding. I know i'd rather have 70% of 20 million than 100% of 20 thousand. also lets not forget that the rich hide income in tax shelters and off shore accounts. and that the top 1% will have a lot in investments which will either not get taxed (shelters) or at the capital gains rate which is around 18%. much less than the 30% ish that a middle class person would pay.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

[QUOTE="Meejoe27"]

But what is the incentive to be rich?

Those 1% also have to pay taxes! LOTS of taxes!

Taxes make being rich not even worth it. I mean poor people get to keep 100% of their income, so really poor people are more rich than rich people.

W

LJS9502_basic

100% of barely nothing is not going to lead to a comfortable existence.:|

As I read his post I figured he was being sarcastic. If not well then Poe's Law.
Avatar image for deactivated-5985f1128b98f
deactivated-5985f1128b98f

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-5985f1128b98f
Member since 2007 • 1914 Posts

The purpose of taxes is supposed to be to fund the legitimate functions of government. Its not supposed to be a way to "punish the nasty rich". The fact is that we have reached a point in this country where the federal tax code is a social engineering tool. We give tax breaks for mortgage interest, but not for rent paid because the govt has decided that home ownership is a desirable social goal. Eventually they will get around to taxing some activity that you enjoy because its deemed bad for society. I don't figure it will be long before we see an excise tax on soda pop / sugary drinks. If you like drinking pepsi,coke,mt dew, whatever, are you going to be happy paying an excise tax just because the govt has decided your indulgence is hurting society?

How about we start taxing WEALTH instead of income. You know guys like Ted Kennedy (may he rest in peace) paid very little in taxes because he had very high wealth but not a great deal of income. Most of his income came from tax sheltered investments. How about we pass a law to just confiscate everyones wealth above $10 million. I mean, hell, who needs more than that? So, if Steven Spielberg has a net worth of $200 million, lets just take $190 million of it. Surely he can live on the $10 million we let him keep.

Reagan cut the top marginal income tax rate from 70% to 28%. He cut all the other tax brackets as well. When Reagan took office the annual fed govt revenue was approx $500 billion. When he left office the annual fed govt revenue was approx $950 billion. Cut tax rates and tax revenues increase. It worked when JFK did it. It worked when Reagan did it.

Last thought: I have never in my life been offered a job by a poor person

Avatar image for BenBenBen93
BenBenBen93

828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 BenBenBen93
Member since 2007 • 828 Posts

the joys of the free market. that why i like state run stuff but hate everything else Communist

Avatar image for Meejoe27
Meejoe27

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#17 Meejoe27
Member since 2009 • 786 Posts

[QUOTE="Meejoe27"]

But what is the incentive to be rich?

Those 1% also have to pay taxes! LOTS of taxes!

Taxes make being rich not even worth it. I mean poor people get to keep 100% of their income, so really poor people are more rich than rich people.

Ontain

i hope you're kidding. I know i'd rather have 70% of 20 million than 100% of 20 thousand. also lets not forget that the rich hide income in tax shelters and off shore accounts. and that the top 1% will have a lot in investments which will either not get taxed (shelters) or at the capital gains rate which is around 18%. much less than the 30% ish that a middle class person would pay.

I'm sorry i was just being sarcastic. I've just heard this argument so many times from rich people with no understanding of the poor.

My dad is pretty rich, he pulls in about 700K, and he pays about 350K in taxes. I've heard him complain so much about how unfair it is. I'm guessing he has 4-6 million in the bank.

I don't feel bad for him or anyone else with millions who complains about taxes.

Call me when you have to rip out your own tooth because you can't afford a dentist.

Avatar image for xionvalkyrie
xionvalkyrie

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 xionvalkyrie
Member since 2008 • 3444 Posts

But what is the incentive to be rich?

Those 1% also have to pay taxes! LOTS of taxes!

Taxes make being rich not even worth it. I mean poor people get to keep 100% of their income, so really poor people are more rich than rich people.

What fun is a 400 foot sail boat when you have to pay 51% of your income to the governement? Why even buy a 50,000 sq foot home for your 19 year old super model girlfriend, the government is just going to take some "Luxury tax" whatever that means. Since when is owning a home a luxury? last i heard shelter was needed to survive. checkmate Govt.

Want to buy an island? hold on there buddy the Government wants to charge you taxes to pay for "Public schools" and "Nation Defense" WTF, my kids don't go to public schools, and i can just buy an army to defend myself, so why should i pay taxes? Poor people need healthcare? Well I don't need healthcare, my live in family doctor does all that. Poor people should just get live in family doctors. problem solved, omg i'm a genius, No poor people are just too dumb to think of theses things.

If i wanted to drive i would just have a road paved and then torn up after i'm done. Poor people should just do the same.

Poor people use money as an excuse for everything. get a job that pays 30 million a year and quit complaining.

Meejoe27

Actually, those 1% pay less taxes ratio wise than the middle class do. They have a ton of legal loopholes they use for tax write offs, so in the end, the %of their total wealth they pay to taxes is much less than what the middle class has to pay. Most of the American taxes come from the middle class.

Avatar image for Setsa
Setsa

8431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 Setsa
Member since 2005 • 8431 Posts
Hey, that's capitalism for you. Once you get on top, it's easy to stay on top.
Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
I've heard this stuff before, still a slap in the face everytime you hear it...
Avatar image for crazygamer1
crazygamer1

845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#21 crazygamer1
Member since 2003 • 845 Posts

I support the so-called "death tax". I don't like any sort of tax system that punishes the successful, but I do like the idea of telling the successful's children to pull their own weight.

Oleg_Huzwog
It's not punishing because the rich hide so much of their money in tax-sheltered accounts or in investments that are untaxable or what-have-you...They should have to pay like everyone else does, no more loop-hole BS or exceptions because they're rich and can do so. Besides many rich people even though they have the money never have to pay for alot of what they get because they're famous or well-known enough that they get complementary swag, meals, items, clothes, whatever, so again, since they don't buy it, no taxes from them are paid. I believe that the nation should go to a flat-tax system... make it like a 10% or whatever sales-tax across the board, that way everyone, rich or poor pay the same for what they buy, no exceptions. You can regulate your taxes with a simple budget, you spend, you pay ____% of that. That way everyone who buys anything, pays taxes the same as everyone else.
Avatar image for Unassigned
Unassigned

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Unassigned
Member since 2004 • 1970 Posts
[QUOTE="Hot-Tamale"]

Look at this (it's a relatively unbiased source, btw): http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2908

Are we still debating the estate tax? We need to tax the hell out of these people. Think of the new revenue streams!

Good for them. Sure let's tax all the successful people even more than they already are just so you can sit here on these forums and complain... please...
Avatar image for cs45F
cs45F

1147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 cs45F
Member since 2008 • 1147 Posts

People say "TAX THE RICH" and all that bs but think about it most of them worked hard to get where they were and deserve there money but if you were rich and were being taxed big time because you worked hard you wouldn't like it and be crying "DON'T TAX ME PLEASE"

I think some people are jealous.

(and no i am not rich by any means)

Avatar image for Unassigned
Unassigned

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Unassigned
Member since 2004 • 1970 Posts
[QUOTE="cs45F"]

People say "TAX THE RICH" and all that bs but think about it most of them worked hard to get where they were and deserve there money but if you were rich and were being taxed big time because you worked hard you wouldn't like it and be crying "DON'T TAX ME PLEASE"

I think some people are jealous.

(and no i am not rich by any means)

BINGO!!! Give that man a cookie!
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

People say "TAX THE RICH" and all that bs but think about it most of them worked hard to get where they were and deserve there money but if you were rich and were being taxed big time because you worked hard you wouldn't like it and be crying "DON'T TAX ME PLEASE"

I think some people are jealous.

(and no i am not rich by any means)

cs45F

dude most work no harder than anyone else. that top 1% is not made of ppl that came from nothing. the rare cases of ppl doing that are just that, rare. the majority of the 1% are from old money and they get their jobs because they know ppl. anyone that works in business knows that to get to the top it's 90% who you know and 10% what you know.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="cs45F"]

People say "TAX THE RICH" and all that bs but think about it most of them worked hard to get where they were and deserve there money but if you were rich and were being taxed big time because you worked hard you wouldn't like it and be crying "DON'T TAX ME PLEASE"

I think some people are jealous.

(and no i am not rich by any means)

Unassigned

BINGO!!! Give that man a cookie!

Screw that, you're gonna need a better argument and proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar if you want my cookie. Rich people aren't rich because they work harder, they're mostly rich because they inherited wealth. People like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are the exception, people like Paris Hilton are the rule. If you want to talk about hard work spend one day following around a construction worker, or an electrician, or a mom who's working two jobs to support her family. After that, spend the next day following one of the CEO's who runs the company that employs them and tell me who works harder. Compare their salaries, their benefits, their standard of living and tell me the disparity is proportionate to the work they do.

Avatar image for Unassigned
Unassigned

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Unassigned
Member since 2004 • 1970 Posts
[QUOTE="Ontain"]

[QUOTE="cs45F"]

People say "TAX THE RICH" and all that bs but think about it most of them worked hard to get where they were and deserve there money but if you were rich and were being taxed big time because you worked hard you wouldn't like it and be crying "DON'T TAX ME PLEASE"

I think some people are jealous.

(and no i am not rich by any means)

dude most work no harder than anyone else. that top 1% is not made of ppl that came from nothing. the rare cases of ppl doing that are just that, rare. the majority of the 1% are from old money and they get their jobs because they know ppl. anyone that works in business knows that to get to the top it's 90% who you know and 10% what you know.

He didn't say they "came from nothing" , he stated "most of them worked hard". Big difference.
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#28 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

The purpose of taxes is supposed to be to fund the legitimate functions of government. Its not supposed to be a way to "punish the nasty rich". The fact is that we have reached a point in this country where the federal tax code is a social engineering tool.

collegeboy64
what are you talking about? we've been totally going the other way. giving all the benefits to the rich. why else do you think they have over 2/3rd of the reward? you think they did more actual work than the 99%? you think they actually deserve that big of a slice of the rewards? I think they are taking a bigger slice than they deserve because they can and have the power. does that make it right? of course not. also part of our economic crisis can be attributed to our crazy disparity in wealth and income distribution that hasn't been this bad since just before the great depression.
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#29 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
[QUOTE="Unassigned"][QUOTE="Ontain"]

[QUOTE="cs45F"]

People say "TAX THE RICH" and all that bs but think about it most of them worked hard to get where they were and deserve there money but if you were rich and were being taxed big time because you worked hard you wouldn't like it and be crying "DON'T TAX ME PLEASE"

I think some people are jealous.

(and no i am not rich by any means)

dude most work no harder than anyone else. that top 1% is not made of ppl that came from nothing. the rare cases of ppl doing that are just that, rare. the majority of the 1% are from old money and they get their jobs because they know ppl. anyone that works in business knows that to get to the top it's 90% who you know and 10% what you know.

He didn't say they "came from nothing" , he stated "most of them worked hard". Big difference.

so you're saying ppl who were born to wealth worked hard to get there?
Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

Look at this (it's a relatively unbiased source, btw): http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2908

Are we still debating the estate tax? We need to tax the hell out of these people. Think of the new revenue streams!

Hot-Tamale

So people turned a profit, and?

Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

Screw that, you're gonna need a better argument and proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar if you want my cookie. Rich people aren't rich because they work harder, they're mostly rich because they inherited wealth. People like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are the exception, people like Paris Hilton are the rule. If you want to talk about hard work spend one day following around a construction worker, or an electrician, or a mom who's working two jobs to support her family. After that, spend the next day following one of the CEO's who runs the company that employs them and tell me who works harder. Compare their salaries, their benefits, their standard of living and tell me the disparity is proportionate to the work they do.

theone86

So only lower class people are working people?:|

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

So only lower class people are working people?:|

MarcusAntonius

nah just anyone other than the top 1% doesn't get their fair share of the economic growth that everyone worked for. no just lower but the middle class and upper middle class as well.

Avatar image for Alter_Echo
Alter_Echo

10724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 Alter_Echo
Member since 2003 • 10724 Posts

Its not really related but the founder of the small private company i work for makes about $600k a year after paying for everything. He has told me in great detail about the loopholes he throws his money through in order to keep pretty much all of it. I have never seen someone so proud of themself for cheating the system.

He cooks the books sooooooo much. And he's been audited and nothing happened so evidently its fairly doable without getting screwed.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#34 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

Its not really related but the founder of the small private company i work for makes about $600k a year after paying for everything. He has told me in great detail about the loopholes he throws his money through in order to keep pretty much all of it. I have never seen someone so proud of themself for cheating the system.

He cooks the books sooooooo much. And he's been audited and nothing happened so evidently its fairly doable without getting screwed.

Alter_Echo
of course. there are plenty of banks like UBS who were telling the rich how they could avoid taxes illegally. and now that the US is finally doing something about the swiss ones(no idea how many they will actually catch if any) i figure the Caribbean ones will get more business.
Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

Its not really related but the founder of the small private company i work for makes about $600k a year after paying for everything. He has told me in great detail about the loopholes he throws his money through in order to keep pretty much all of it. I have never seen someone so proud of themself for cheating the system.

He cooks the books sooooooo much. And he's been audited and nothing happened so evidently its fairly doable without getting screwed.

Alter_Echo

Outrageous. I think we should bring back serfdom. After all, we all work for our fellow man. How dare people insist they keep more of what they earn. Just think of the excess he'll spend that money on, like payroll taxes, insurance, permits, licensing, investment capital, hiring more workers, just terrible.

Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts

so the top 1% of americans took 67% of income? so what. they deserve it ifthey got to where they can take it. whatsreally scary is the government took 33% of all income, and spent it on stupid crap.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#37 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

so the top 1% of americans took 67% of income? so what. they deserve it ifthey got to where they can take it. whatsreally scary is the government took 33% of all income, and spent it on stupid crap.

Trollsters
if they could take 90% of the income while you are left in servitude would they still deserve it? just because they can take it doesn't mean they deserve it. also they don't take 33% of the incomes of the top 1%. thats' because they have pros that can hide the wealth. heck Warren Buffet says he only pays about 18% while his secretary pays 34% and he doesn't even try to hide it. they rigged to system badly through the use of their wealth on politicians and lobbyists. Buffet also has a great quote "There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning."
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180134 Posts

People say "TAX THE RICH" and all that bs but think about it most of them worked hard to get where they were and deserve there money but if you were rich and were being taxed big time because you worked hard you wouldn't like it and be crying "DON'T TAX ME PLEASE"

I think some people are jealous.

(and no i am not rich by any means)

cs45F
You don't get rich by working hard....;)
Avatar image for Alter_Echo
Alter_Echo

10724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 Alter_Echo
Member since 2003 • 10724 Posts

[QUOTE="Alter_Echo"]

Its not really related but the founder of the small private company i work for makes about $600k a year after paying for everything. He has told me in great detail about the loopholes he throws his money through in order to keep pretty much all of it. I have never seen someone so proud of themself for cheating the system.

He cooks the books sooooooo much. And he's been audited and nothing happened so evidently its fairly doable without getting screwed.

MarcusAntonius

Outrageous. I think we should bring back serfdom. After all, we all work for our fellow man. How dare people insist they keep more of what they earn. Just think of the excess he'll spend that money on, like payroll taxes, insurance, permits, licensing, investment capital, hiring more workers, just terrible.

I never said i agreed with taxing prosperity to make up for people who didnt strive for financial security in their own life. Just throwing out an example. Im sure its a fairly common practice and is mostly widespread considering how easy it is to do and get away with.
Avatar image for deactivated-5985f1128b98f
deactivated-5985f1128b98f

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-5985f1128b98f
Member since 2007 • 1914 Posts

[QUOTE="collegeboy64"]

The purpose of taxes is supposed to be to fund the legitimate functions of government. Its not supposed to be a way to "punish the nasty rich". The fact is that we have reached a point in this country where the federal tax code is a social engineering tool.

Ontain

what are you talking about? we've been totally going the other way. giving all the benefits to the rich. why else do you think they have over 2/3rd of the reward? you think they did more actual work than the 99%? you think they actually deserve that big of a slice of the rewards? I think they are taking a bigger slice than they deserve because they can and have the power. does that make it right? of course not. also part of our economic crisis can be attributed to our crazy disparity in wealth and income distribution that hasn't been this bad since just before the great depression.

So not taking a person's money, that they earned legally, is "giving" them something?

You know, one of the great things about a capitalist system is that the market determine who "actually deserve"s what rewards. I know I would rather work in a system where I am free to negotiate my pay (reward) for my work, than work in one where some elected politician, or a government bureaucrat gets to decide.

And I really don't understand the hostility to the rich. The rich create jobs and economic activity that benefits many people. Take Bill Gates for example. How many people has that man made rich? All the people who started Microsoft with him. All the people that make computers, software, peripherals, etc etc. Not to mention the increased productivity and subsequently generated wealth that has come from the PC. Did Bill Gates, on his own, make all this happen. No. But by pursuing his own self interest, taking an idea and turning it in to reality, he has increased the weath of millions of people.

Last of all: Several of you make statements about how most of the rich in this country just inherited it. Wrong. Approx 80% of all American millionaires are first generation millionaires. Besides, if you want to tax those nasty richers that inherited their wealth, you need to start taxing wealth instead of (or maybe in your mind, in addition to) income.

Avatar image for Hot-Tamale
Hot-Tamale

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 Hot-Tamale
Member since 2009 • 2052 Posts

[QUOTE="Meejoe27"]

But what is the incentive to be rich?

Those 1% also have to pay taxes! LOTS of taxes!

Taxes make being rich not even worth it. I mean poor people get to keep 100% of their income, so really poor people are more rich than rich people.

What fun is a 400 foot sail boat when you have to pay 51% of your income to the governement? Why even buy a 50,000 sq foot home for your 19 year old super model girlfriend, the government is just going to take some "Luxury tax" whatever that means. Since when is owning a home a luxury? last i heard shelter was needed to survive. checkmate Govt.

Want to buy an island? hold on there buddy the Government wants to charge you taxes to pay for "Public schools" and "Nation Defense" WTF, my kids don't go to public schools, and i can just buy an army to defend myself, so why should i pay taxes? Poor people need healthcare? Well I don't need healthcare, my live in family doctor does all that. Poor people should just get live in family doctors. problem solved, omg i'm a genius, No poor people are just too dumb to think of theses things.

If i wanted to drive i would just have a road paved and then torn up after i'm done. Poor people should just do the same.

Poor people use money as an excuse for everything. get a job that pays 30 million a year and quit complaining.

xionvalkyrie

Actually, those 1% pay less taxes ratio wise than the middle class do. They have a ton of legal loopholes they use for tax write offs, so in the end, the %of their total wealth they pay to taxes is much less than what the middle class has to pay. Most of the American taxes come from the middle class.

not to mention all those secret bank accounts in Swiss and Luxembourg banks...

the rich still make tens of millions, despite paying much of it off in the form of taxes. We could get insanely high revenue if we made it illegal to hide your money in offshore accounts.

Avatar image for Unassigned
Unassigned

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Unassigned
Member since 2004 • 1970 Posts
The American way: Encourage people to study hard, get good jobs then take their money because they're "too wealthy". How lame.
Avatar image for LanceA63
LanceA63

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 LanceA63
Member since 2003 • 417 Posts

Look at this (it's a relatively unbiased source, btw): http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2908

Are we still debating the estate tax? We need to tax the hell out of these people. Think of the new revenue streams!

Hot-Tamale
totally agree