Transformers: Dark of the Moon- 36% on Rotten Tomatoes

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for AvatarMan96
AvatarMan96

7324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

#1 AvatarMan96
Member since 2010 • 7324 Posts

Transformers 3 has a 36% on Rotten Tomatoes :o However, 90% of the audience liked it :P

What do you think of this?

Avatar image for squitsquat
squitsquat

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 squitsquat
Member since 2005 • 1990 Posts

its a crappy movie that will make money, who knew

Avatar image for Aspen706
Aspen706

4560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Aspen706
Member since 2010 • 4560 Posts

The population obviously doesn't know what a good movie is:P

Avatar image for PeelMyBanana
PeelMyBanana

255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 PeelMyBanana
Member since 2011 • 255 Posts
I think Transformers 3 has a 36% on Rotten Tomatoes. However, 90% of the audience liked it.
Avatar image for AvatarMan96
AvatarMan96

7324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

#5 AvatarMan96
Member since 2010 • 7324 Posts

Honestly, I think it looks like a good movie; I liked the other live-action Transformer movies *hides behind flame shield*

Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts

I'm probably going to go enjoy this with some friends as a social outing. People going to see this who want another Citizen Kane just don't know how to enjoy themselves imo.

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#7 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

The public likes a good gladiator fight. while the elite like their plays and poetry.

who'd of thunk it?

a good thing for me though is that i enjoy both.

:)

Avatar image for Blazerdt47
Blazerdt47

5671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Blazerdt47
Member since 2004 • 5671 Posts

I saw both the special pre-screening and midnight premiere both in IMAX 3D. I thought it was a great movie. Best one in the series so far and soooo much better than ROTF.

I have a review of it in another topic in the first couple pages, with spoilers. Those saying they won't see it because it's crap don't know anything. Don't believe them. See it for yourself and be the judge.

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

Too many "Splosions" not enought plot.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I thought it was a great movie. Critics were overly hard on it.

Avatar image for MetallicaKings
MetallicaKings

4781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 MetallicaKings
Member since 2004 • 4781 Posts
I don't get off with special effects anymore, at all. Everything had been done. Avatar bored me to tears, all the transformers were monotonous.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

its a crappy movie that will make money, who knew

squitsquat

90% of people disagree with you.

Avatar image for AvatarMan96
AvatarMan96

7324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

#14 AvatarMan96
Member since 2010 • 7324 Posts

its a crappy movie that will make money, who knew

squitsquat
Have you actually seen the movie?
Avatar image for super_mario_128
super_mario_128

23884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 super_mario_128
Member since 2006 • 23884 Posts

[QUOTE="squitsquat"]

its a crappy movie that will make money, who knew

airshocker

90% of people disagree with you.

90% of people couldn't tell a decent movie from a carcinogen
Avatar image for bobdood99
bobdood99

1862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 bobdood99
Member since 2007 • 1862 Posts
The previous two movies were horrible. Didn't expect this to be any better.
Avatar image for AvatarMan96
AvatarMan96

7324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

#17 AvatarMan96
Member since 2010 • 7324 Posts
The previous two movies were horrible. Didn't expect this to be any better.bobdood99
I actually thought the first was good, but I'll admit, the second one was pretty bad
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

90% of people couldn't tell a decent movie from a carcinogensuper_mario_128

That's your opinion.

Avatar image for arad96
arad96

7783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 arad96
Member since 2009 • 7783 Posts

I'll probably go see it in a few days. If it plot sucks, then it sucks. But at least I can expect a good time watching the violence scenes.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

[QUOTE="super_mario_128"]90% of people couldn't tell a decent movie from a carcinogenairshocker

That's your opinion.

I don't get it, so did critics also have their own opinions or were they overly hard on the film?
Avatar image for Lord_Daemon
Lord_Daemon

24535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#21 Lord_Daemon
Member since 2005 • 24535 Posts

Ratings on Transformers movies don't really mean anything as it already has such a large built in audience that as long as they deliver enough of what people liked from the first two highly successful film they will remain impervious to any naysaying -- even moreso in this case considering the hammering the first two took people are fairly numb to it.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I don't get it, so did critics also have their own opinions or were they overly hard on the film?SaintLeonidas

I also don't get it. I thought everyone was capable of having their own opinions.

Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#23 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts

[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]I don't get it, so did critics also have their own opinions or were they overly hard on the film?airshocker

I also don't get it. I thought everyone was capable of having their own opinions.

common misconception.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

common misconception.Allicrombie

My world = just turned upside down.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]I don't get it, so did critics also have their own opinions or were they overly hard on the film?airshocker

I also don't get it. I thought everyone was capable of having their own opinions.

This from the person who just said 'critics were overly hard' on the film. So what was it? Did they just have their own opinions, or were they wrong and too hard on it?
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

This from the person who just said 'critics were overly hard' on the film. So what was it? Did they just have their own opinions, or were they wrong and too hard on it?SaintLeonidas

Oh, you wanted to have a serious discussion? The simple answer to your question: Both. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]This from the person who just said 'critics were overly hard' on the film. So what was it? Did they just have their own opinions, or were they wrong and too hard on it?airshocker

Oh, you wanted to have a serious discussion? The simple answer to your question: Both. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

Oh, so you think their opinions were wrong? Didn't know you held yourself so highly.
Avatar image for monkeytoes61
monkeytoes61

8399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#28 monkeytoes61
Member since 2005 • 8399 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeSUuj98Rx0

Enough said.

Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts

It has a 7.3 on IMDb right now, I stopped caring about RT and Metacritc (for movies only, I still use MC often for games) long ago.

Avatar image for hockeyjunkie28
hockeyjunkie28

4715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 hockeyjunkie28
Member since 2004 • 4715 Posts

[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]This from the person who just said 'critics were overly hard' on the film. So what was it? Did they just have their own opinions, or were they wrong and too hard on it?airshocker

Oh, you wanted to have a serious discussion? The simple answer to your question: Both. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

And 7 page debate on opinions starts in 5...4...3...2...1...
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Oh, so you think their opinions were wrong? Didn't know you held yourself so highly.SaintLeonidas

Pot calling the kettle black, FTW.

Avatar image for drinkerofjuice
drinkerofjuice

4567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#32 drinkerofjuice
Member since 2007 • 4567 Posts

It has a 7.3 on IMDb right now, I stopped caring about RT and Metacritc (for movies only, I still use MC often for games) long ago.

StealthMonkey4
IMDB :lol:

I'm probably going to go enjoy this with some friends as a social outing. People going to see this who want another Citizen Kane just don't know how to enjoy themselves imo.

JPOBS
Or you know...maybe they just want an action movie with a bit of substance?
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]Oh, so you think their opinions were wrong? Didn't know you held yourself so highly.airshocker

Pot calling the kettle black, FTW.

At least you didn't deny claiming someones personal opinion on something is wrong, I admire your honesty in admitting your arrogance.
Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts

[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]

It has a 7.3 on IMDb right now, I stopped caring about RT and Metacritc (for movies only, I still use MC often for games) long ago.

drinkerofjuice

IMDB :lol:

I'm probably going to go enjoy this with some friends as a social outing. People going to see this who want another Citizen Kane just don't know how to enjoy themselves imo.

JPOBS

Or you know...maybe they just want an action movie with a bit of substance?

I don't see what's funny about IMDb...

Avatar image for JuarN18
JuarN18

4981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 JuarN18
Member since 2007 • 4981 Posts
Or you know...maybe they just want an action movie with a bit of substance?drinkerofjuice
"substance" is a very subjective word, some people can find substance in that movie
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

At least you didn't deny claiming someones personal opinion on something is wrong, I admire your honesty in admitting your arrogance.SaintLeonidas

If the audience didn't like it, it would be a different story.

I just think things become popular to hate on, and that drowns out the people who legitimately didn't like the movie.

So I take everything critics say with a grain of salt and pay more attention to the people who went solely to have a good time.

Avatar image for drinkerofjuice
drinkerofjuice

4567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#37 drinkerofjuice
Member since 2007 • 4567 Posts

I don't see what's funny about IMDb...

StealthMonkey4

It's a worse place than Rotten Tomatoes. At least with RT, you're getting reception from people who seem to know what they're talking about.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]At least you didn't deny claiming someones personal opinion on something is wrong, I admire your honesty in admitting your arrogance.airshocker

If the audience didn't like it, it would be a different story.

I just think things become popular to hate on, and that drowns out the people who legitimately didn't like the movie.

So I take everything critics say with a grain of salt and pay more attention to the people who went solely to have a good time.

So you tend to listen to/depend on the general audience's opinion about a films quality more so than critics...I still don't think that should make the critics 'wrong'. They weren't overly hard on the film, they just based it on their own standards of what makes a film 'good', they just criticized it more than you. This seems to be something that people forget, I say this since there have been so many threads about critics recently. They just formulate their own opinions, that is all, they aren't wrong in liking/hating it, just like the general audience isn't wrong for liking/hating it, they just both judge films completely differently, which makes sense because it is mostly all subjective outside of the objective aspects that we can all agree on, like someone's performance, but some can just over look these things while others can't.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

So you tend to listen to/depend on the general audience's opinion about a films quality more so than critics...I still don't think that should make the critics 'wrong'. They weren't overly hard on the film, they just based it on their own standards of what makes a film 'good', they just criticized it more than you. This seems to be something that people forget, I say this since there have been so many threads about critics recently. They just formulate their own opinions, that is all, they aren't wrong in liking/hating it, just like the general audience isn't wrong for liking/hating it, they just both judge films completely differently, which makes sense because it is mostly all subjective outside of the objective aspects that we can all agree on, like someone's performance, but some can just over look these things while others can't.

SaintLeonidas

What makes the critics wrong, for me, is whether I enjoyed the movie or not. To me they were all wrong.

You may not think so, but that's entirely your opinion.

Avatar image for RobbieH1234
RobbieH1234

7464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 RobbieH1234
Member since 2005 • 7464 Posts

Transformers - 144 minutes
Transformers: RofL - 150 minutes
Transformers: DotM - 155 minutes
2001: A Space Odyssey - 142 minutes

Why?

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]

So you tend to listen to/depend on the general audience's opinion about a films quality more so than critics...I still don't think that should make the critics 'wrong'. They weren't overly hard on the film, they just based it on their own standards of what makes a film 'good', they just criticized it more than you. This seems to be something that people forget, I say this since there have been so many threads about critics recently. They just formulate their own opinions, that is all, they aren't wrong in liking/hating it, just like the general audience isn't wrong for liking/hating it, they just both judge films completely differently, which makes sense because it is mostly all subjective outside of the objective aspects that we can all agree on, like someone's performance, but some can just over look these things while others can't.

airshocker

What makes the critics wrong, for me, is whether I enjoyed the movie or not. To me they were all wrong.

You may not think so, but that's entirely your opinion.

...okay then.

Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts

[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]

I don't see what's funny about IMDb...

drinkerofjuice

It's a worse place than Rotten Tomatoes. At least with RT, you're getting reception from people who seem to know what they're talking about.

The people at IMDb mostly seem to know what they're talking about, they're not critics, but they have better tastes than your average movie-goer. The critics are too artsy in my opinion, they can't just sit back and enjoy a movie every now and then that isn't the next Citizen Kane.

Avatar image for TreyoftheDead
TreyoftheDead

7982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 TreyoftheDead
Member since 2007 • 7982 Posts

The people at IMDb mostly seem to know what they're talking about, they're not critics, but they have better tastes than your average movie-goer. The critics are too artsy in my opinion, they can't just sit back and enjoy a movie every now and then that isn't the next Citizen Kane.

StealthMonkey4

Fast Five: 78% Positive, Certified Fresh

Piranha 3D: 74% Positive, Certified Fresh

Hobo With a Shotgun: 72% Postitive, Certified Fresh

Critics are very capable of just having a good time at the movies. Just because they don't like the latest Bay schlock doesn't mean they don't enjoy the occasional stupid action/horror movie. This notion that they go around expecting every film to be high art is ridiculous.

Avatar image for F1ame_Shie1d
F1ame_Shie1d

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 F1ame_Shie1d
Member since 2010 • 1389 Posts

[QUOTE="drinkerofjuice"]

[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]

I don't see what's funny about IMDb...

StealthMonkey4

It's a worse place than Rotten Tomatoes. At least with RT, you're getting reception from people who seem to know what they're talking about.

The people at IMDb mostly seem to know what they're talking about, they're not critics, but they have better tastes than your average movie-goer. The critics are too artsy in my opinion, they can't just sit back and enjoy a movie every now and then that isn't the next Citizen Kane.

My general rule. The lower the "professional" critics rate an action movie the more I'll like it. The higher they rate one of those pretentious stuck up movies the more I'll hate it.

FOr the most part I don't even pay attention to the critics. If I see a trailer for a movie and I want to see I go see it.

Avatar image for Apocalypse33
Apocalypse33

19413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Apocalypse33
Member since 2006 • 19413 Posts
It was awesome.
Avatar image for YoshiYogurt
YoshiYogurt

6008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 YoshiYogurt
Member since 2010 • 6008 Posts
I was hoping for better
Avatar image for iloverikku11
iloverikku11

11039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 iloverikku11
Member since 2005 • 11039 Posts

Going to the movies and not thinking is fine, but some movies assume you can't think

Avatar image for dissonantblack
dissonantblack

34009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 dissonantblack
Member since 2005 • 34009 Posts

unless it's made by Quenton Tarantino, everything gets bad scores from them. they have heavily criticized movies that i love. so i don't listen to them.

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

It has a higher rating than Cars 2. :|

Avatar image for Hailfire704
Hailfire704

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 Hailfire704
Member since 2009 • 729 Posts

People going to see this who want another Citizen Kane just don't know how to enjoy themselves imo.

JPOBS

People, like myself, who don't like Michael Bay don't expect another Citizen Kane, we only want him to make a movie with a coherent plot and actual character development.