...but apparently also rejects measure to cut funding for it.
Pretty interesting conundrum. It can't be authorized, but it also can't necessarily be stopped or phased out either.
Any idea what happens now?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Vote to continue U.S. role = "OMG! Congressman Joe Schmoe wants another Iraq!" = political suicide
Vote to cut funding = "OMG! Congressman Joe Schmoe doesn't support our troops!" = political suicide
[QUOTE="jetpower3"]
Palantas
I meant that I don't think anything will change in combat operations.
I don't either, but I mean in terms of long-haul consequences. It seems like this intervention is quickly losing political structure and turning into yet another open-ended committment. And maybe fears of that happening will make some think twice about not killing or actively targeting Gaddafi himself.
What happens now? Well the president said he was going to withdraw troops from afghanistan.. guess we know where they will be going now....but apparently also rejects measure to cut funding for it.
Pretty interesting conundrum. It can't be authorized, but it also can't necessarily be stopped or phased out either.
Any idea what happens now?
jetpower3
I bet if Bush was the one doing this, the House GOP would applaud him. But then again the House Dems would do what the current House GOP is doing.
I bet if Bush was the one doing this, the House GOP would applaud him. But then again the House Dems would do what the current House GOP is doing.
DroidPhysX
To be perfectly honest, democrats have done little to nothing outside of a bunch words in differing from Republican foreign policy in the past few decades.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment