V vs Rorschach

Since, I see them as sorta alike, which would winin a fight to the death? I say V

I wonder how Alan Moore would answer that question...

I wonder how Alan Moore would answer that question...

yabbicoke

[QUOTE="yabbicoke"]

I wonder how Alan Moore would answer that question...

Sajedene

I wonder how Alan Moore would answer that question...

I would say Rorschach.

[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="yabbicoke"]

I wonder how Alan Moore would answer that question...

MetalGear_Ninty

I don't think he's really pretentious at all, really, he just knows what he does is brilliant and doesn't see the point in being modest about it. I mean, I've never really heard him actually brag about his work. And the stuff about him not wanting to attach his name to his novel's film adaptations, I can't really blame him for that at all, in fact I just respect him for it.

Rorschach would win, then as he walks off Dr. Manhattan would come and kill him.

[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="yabbicoke"]

I wonder how Alan Moore would answer that question...

sammyjenkis898

pretty much this, but still i say rorshcach

Rorschach probably.

V's superhuman attributes far exceed those of Rorschach.

Rorschach for sure. V is so lame.t3hrubikscube

How could you?!?!

V, because his movie didn't suck. >__>

Of course it would be V, given that you are talking about a battle and V has the best skills in that area. But I say V would win in a battle of witsas well.

[QUOTE="yabbicoke"]

I wonder how Alan Moore would answer that question...

Sajedene

V would win. He plans ahead and has almost superhuman abilites. Rorshach is sloppy. It would be a close fight though.

I like Rorschach more. But in a fight, V would win.

WeedleLad

I like V more than Rorschach, so my votes on him.

I think Rorschach is cooler, but V seems to be stronger (how many bullets did he take) and is much more intelligent in a strategic and tactical way. V basically beat a government, and Rorschach lost to one (arrested by cops). Rorschach though is the definition of bad a**.

To sum it up Rorschach is cool, but would be beat by V in a fight.

V...

Rorschach has 6 bullets in his gun. V gets shot 20+ times and then kills 10 armored soldiers, gets shot some more, and then strangles a man to death with his bare hands. He than manages to walk several probably a mile or 2 through the subway back to his bomb.

I don't care how BA Rorschach is, but he doesn't stand a chance.

They would both go Super Sayain, the Universe would explode, and Time and God became existent. :|

Of course it would be V, given that you are talking about a battle and V has the best skills in that area. But I say V would win in a battle of witsas well.

m0zart

Second. You don't post enough. Please post more. Thanks :)

V would pwn Rorschach no contest easy win

All tho I do like Rorschach more

V

Rorschach would destroy V. Why no poll?

There's only one way to settle this nerdy question...with a nerdy answer! viewtiful26

V because he is just a way better character and has a sick base and better mask

[QUOTE="t3hrubikscube"]Rorschach for sure. V is so lame.Avistann

How could you?!?!

V

I love them both, great anti-hero's. But I'd go with V. His "cause" seems greater IMO than Rorshach.

Rorschach would be dead before he could reload.