Back in the day Wikileaks and Bradley Manning were condemned for being a rogue, traitorous and dangerous news outlet and soldier. This was done mainly by the US but also by many other governments while the US and western governments congratulated chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo for being a good rogue, traitorous and dangerous person for the chinese government.
Some time later the western governments were thrillled with the "social media revolutions" going in arab countries. For them social media was giving people the chance to come together and rise against their opressive governments and take matters into their own hands. They highly condemned the blocking of the internet or social networks done by these governments. Now fastforward to England today with all those riots that undoubtely demonstrate many people are not very happy with their government and these are the measures taken by the English government:
1. Police will be given discretion to remove face masks from people on the street.
2. The government would work with the police to stop people communicating via social websites.
3. The army could be used for guarding duties.
4. Last but not least: Curfew!
So yeah of course, as always, what's good for the goose, is not good for the gander.
I still find it ridiculous that the english government is trying to make us think these people are all just thugs and thieves while ignoring the real issues underneath the discontent.
Log in to comment