Western hypocrisy exposed once again

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

Back in the day Wikileaks and Bradley Manning were condemned for being a rogue, traitorous and dangerous news outlet and soldier. This was done mainly by the US but also by many other governments while the US and western governments congratulated chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo for being a good rogue, traitorous and dangerous person for the chinese government.

Some time later the western governments were thrillled with the "social media revolutions" going in arab countries. For them social media was giving people the chance to come together and rise against their opressive governments and take matters into their own hands. They highly condemned the blocking of the internet or social networks done by these governments. Now fastforward to England today with all those riots that undoubtely demonstrate many people are not very happy with their government and these are the measures taken by the English government:

1. Police will be given discretion to remove face masks from people on the street.

2. The government would work with the police to stop people communicating via social websites.

3. The army could be used for guarding duties.

4. Last but not least: Curfew!

So yeah of course, as always, what's good for the goose, is not good for the gander.

I still find it ridiculous that the english government is trying to make us think these people are all just thugs and thieves while ignoring the real issues underneath the discontent.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51602 Posts

I think the riots have more to do with burning **** and stealing more **** .

And if they really want to show the government they are displeased, they're doing it in a very counterproductive manor.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

I think the riots have more to do with burning **** and stealing more **** .

Chutebox
I agree.
Avatar image for Blaze787
Blaze787

535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Blaze787
Member since 2007 • 535 Posts

They are a bunch of thugs and thieves, and innocent business owners are suffering for it. And whatever underlying issues there may be are their own fault. You can choose to work hard and make something of yourself, or you can choose the life of scum...antagonizing everyone else and complaining as if the rest of the world owes you a living.

I support anything the British government does to stop these guys.

Avatar image for ItalStallion777
ItalStallion777

1953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ItalStallion777
Member since 2005 • 1953 Posts

yes because protesting the end to a ruthless leader is the same as the government trying to stop violent rioters from destroying private businesses and indiscriminately stealing and looting. :roll:

if anything the british government was too easy on them.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

I think the riots have more to do with burning **** and stealing more **** .

And if they really want to show the government they are displeased, they're doing it in a very counterproductive manor.

Chutebox

No doubt there are thugs and thieves among them but so were among arab uprisers and western governments were still complimenting them!

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

They are a bunch of thugs and thieves, and innocent business owners are suffering for it. And whatever underlying issues there may be are their own fault. You can choose to work hard and make something of yourself, or you can choose the life of scum...antagonizing everyone else and complaining as if the rest of the world owes you a living.

I support anything the British government does to stop these guys.

Blaze787
How can it be their own fault only that the system can't even give them jobs? The same is happening in Spain by the way.
Avatar image for Blaze787
Blaze787

535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Blaze787
Member since 2007 • 535 Posts

[QUOTE="Blaze787"]

They are a bunch of thugs and thieves, and innocent business owners are suffering for it. And whatever underlying issues there may be are their own fault. You can choose to work hard and make something of yourself, or you can choose the life of scum...antagonizing everyone else and complaining as if the rest of the world owes you a living.

I support anything the British government does to stop these guys.

kuraimen

How can it be their own fault only that the system can't even give them jobs? The same is happening in Spain by the way.

Get educated, and go for a profession that's in demand instead of dealing crack, committing gun violence, and generally being a cancer on society.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Blaze787"]

They are a bunch of thugs and thieves, and innocent business owners are suffering for it. And whatever underlying issues there may be are their own fault. You can choose to work hard and make something of yourself, or you can choose the life of scum...antagonizing everyone else and complaining as if the rest of the world owes you a living.

I support anything the British government does to stop these guys.

Blaze787

How can it be their own fault only that the system can't even give them jobs? The same is happening in Spain by the way.

Get educated, and go for a profession that's in demand instead of dealing crack, committing gun violence, and generally being a cancer on society.

You said that as if it was that easy and as if the system gave the same opportunities and possibilities for everyone. That's really unrealistic and as long as these governments continue to ignore that their problems will only continue to increase.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

I think the riots have more to do with burning **** and stealing more **** .

And if they really want to show the government they are displeased, they're doing it in a very counterproductive manor.

kuraimen

No doubt there are thugs and thieves among them but so were among arab uprisers and western governments were still complimenting them!

I dont think the western press was complimenting the thugs and thieves amongst the arabs.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

I think the riots have more to do with burning **** and stealing more **** .

And if they really want to show the government they are displeased, they're doing it in a very counterproductive manor.

sonicare

No doubt there are thugs and thieves among them but so were among arab uprisers and western governments were still complimenting them!

I dont think the western press was complimenting the thugs and thieves amongst the arabs.

They compliment the uprisings as a whole, as a sign of democracy, even if some of them are just thugs and thieves. In the west, on the other hand, they call everyone thugs and thieves and start implementing the same measures they criticize arab countries for implementing against them.
Avatar image for Blaze787
Blaze787

535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Blaze787
Member since 2007 • 535 Posts

It's easy to blame the government for everything. A lot of people are simply the product of the choices they make. The government can't force you to sit in school and shove knowledge down your throat. If anything, parents need to be more responsible for what their children do. Unfortunately, many in those communities are not. It's quite shameful when people blame their problems on the rest of the world, and use that as an excuse for sociopathic behaviour.

Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

Did you seriously just compare the London rioters and looters to Liu Xiaobo?

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

It's easy to blame the government for everything. A lot of people are simply the product of the choices they make. The government can't force you to sit in school and shove knowledge down your throat. If anything, parents need to be more responsible for what their children do. Unfortunately, many in those communities are not. It's quite shameful when people blame their problems on the rest of the world, and use that as an excuse for sociopathic behaviour.

Blaze787
A few people yes but when the problem is so widespread and it has so many people behind it then you have to start to realize that something is not right.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="Blaze787"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] How can it be their own fault only that the system can't even give them jobs? The same is happening in Spain by the way.kuraimen

Get educated, and go for a profession that's in demand instead of dealing crack, committing gun violence, and generally being a cancer on society.

You said that as if it was that easy and as if the system gave the same opportunities and possibilities for everyone. That's really unrealistic and as long as these governments continue to ignore that their problems will only continue to increase.

You're right... the system is broken... there is too much of the system - too much government that prevents real growth from happening.

Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#16 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

[QUOTE="Blaze787"]

They are a bunch of thugs and thieves, and innocent business owners are suffering for it. And whatever underlying issues there may be are their own fault. You can choose to work hard and make something of yourself, or you can choose the life of scum...antagonizing everyone else and complaining as if the rest of the world owes you a living.

I support anything the British government does to stop these guys.

kuraimen

How can it be their own fault only that the system can't even give them jobs? The same is happening in Spain by the way.

Because it's not the systems responsibillty to employ people?

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#17 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

This just seems like a messy blob rather than an argument...

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] No doubt there are thugs and thieves among them but so were among arab uprisers and western governments were still complimenting them!

kuraimen

I dont think the western press was complimenting the thugs and thieves amongst the arabs.

They compliment the uprisings as a whole, as a sign of democracy, even if some of them are just thugs and thieves. In the west, on the other hand, they call everyone thugs and thieves and start implementing the same measures they criticize arab countries for implementing against them.

I dont think that's comparable at all. People arent protesting any political cause in London, they're just looting and burning down stores. Had they a specific cause that they pushed forth peacefully, that would be something different.

Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

So yeah of course, as always, what's good for the goose, is not good for the gander.

kuraimen

The West generally approves of Britain's government, whereas we often have ideological differences with regimes in the Arab world.

Was there anyone here who was unaware of this?

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

So yeah of course, as always, what's good for the goose, is not good for the gander.

Palantas

The West generally approves of Britain's government, whereas we often have ideological differences with regimes in the Arab world.

Was there anyone here who was unaware of this?

i also dont mind the smell of my farts but yours are disgusting.
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

i also dont mind the smell of my farts but yours are disgusting. surrealnumber5

Heh.

You look different. Did you change your picture?

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]i also dont mind the smell of my farts but yours are disgusting. Palantas

Heh.

You look different. Did you change your picture?

every now and then, stalter and waldorf have been gone for about two months now.
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

every now and then, stalter and waldorf have been gone for about two months now.surrealnumber5

So have I. It's so confusing when people change their pictures.

Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts

I think the riots have more to do with burning **** and stealing more **** .

Chutebox

Yeah, pretty much

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

-Yawn.-

They are just thugs.

Avatar image for PS2_ROCKS
PS2_ROCKS

4679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 PS2_ROCKS
Member since 2003 • 4679 Posts
You're completely off. 95% of these people are just thugs.They're using social networking to basically inform each other of where the next looting is going to take place. There is no real goal here.
Avatar image for Tokugawa77
Tokugawa77

1554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#27 Tokugawa77
Member since 2009 • 1554 Posts

It's easy to blame the government for everything. A lot of people are simply the product of the choices they make. The government can't force you to sit in school and shove knowledge down your throat. If anything, parents need to be more responsible for what their children do. Unfortunately, many in those communities are not. It's quite shameful when people blame their problems on the rest of the world, and use that as an excuse for sociopathic behaviour.

Blaze787

I pretty much agree with this. If you screw around in school and end up as a bum it's your own fault, why blame it on people who actually worked hard to earn the lives that they have?

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#28 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

What is the purpose of the English riots?

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51602 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

I think the riots have more to do with burning **** and stealing more **** .

Iantheone

Yeah, pretty much

Haha, such an awesome vid.

Avatar image for limpbizkit818
limpbizkit818

15044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 limpbizkit818
Member since 2004 • 15044 Posts
[QUOTE="Blaze787"]

They are a bunch of thugs and thieves, and innocent business owners are suffering for it. And whatever underlying issues there may be are their own fault. You can choose to work hard and make something of yourself, or you can choose the life of scum...antagonizing everyone else and complaining as if the rest of the world owes you a living.

I support anything the British government does to stop these guys.

kuraimen
How can it be their own fault only that the system can't even give them jobs? The same is happening in Spain by the way.

The system can't get them jobs, so they burn down local business and a Sony warehouse. Now even more people within their own community are unemployed. No matter what the reason, what these people did was wrong.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="sonicare"] I dont think the western press was complimenting the thugs and thieves amongst the arabs.

sonicare

They compliment the uprisings as a whole, as a sign of democracy, even if some of them are just thugs and thieves. In the west, on the other hand, they call everyone thugs and thieves and start implementing the same measures they criticize arab countries for implementing against them.

I dont think that's comparable at all. People arent protesting any political cause in London, they're just looting and burning down stores. Had they a specific cause that they pushed forth peacefully, that would be something different.

Yes there's a political cause. Many are protesting the current policies from the government that are cutting local services, specially youth services. There's is also a much bigger political issue underneath and that's social inequality. The most unequal society gets more people will become fed up. Ignoring those issues and dismissing them all as the actions of thugs and thieves is not only unrealistic but also dangerous.

Now I also think there are many thugs and thieves that just want to create havoc but that's just a violent reaction to a system that is violent for many, you won't see much rationality going on there but the political and economical sources can be understood.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

They are a bunch of thugs and thieves, and innocent business owners are suffering for it. And whatever underlying issues there may be are their own fault. You can choose to work hard and make something of yourself, or you can choose the life of scum...antagonizing everyone else and complaining as if the rest of the world owes you a living.

I support anything the British government does to stop these guys.

Blaze787

:| Well that is a load of crap if I ever saw one.. This isn't condoning or defending the riots or the actions that occured there.. But they are usuaully always caused by civil unrest.. Something that can have many causes from government, social issues, to economic problems..

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

I didn't feel like creating a new thread so just going to post this here since the first paragraph in this article pretty much sumarizes what I was talking about here.

Britain's Riots: A Grim Portent of the Consequences of Europe's Economic Crisis?

To reduce the riots that have shaken Britain this week to nothing more than criminal wickedness, as Prime Minister David Cameron and his cohort tend to do, is a dangerous exercise in denial. And it barely survives the most cursory scrutiny: Thousands of people don't suddenly take to the streets to manifest wickedness as if in response to the appearance of Lord Voldemort's Deatheater sigil on their Blackberries, without any context; criminality -- which the actions of the rioters certainly are, with no mitigating features or excuses -- on the massive scale seen in London this week is indicative of a social crisis. And to dismiss as apologists for thuggery those who seek explanations in the state of society for a mass outbreak of criminality is a self-serving, self-deluding evasion by those in power. When so many young people have been so willing to break the laws that maintain order and protect property rights, it doesn't require a Marcellus to point out that there's something rotten in the state of Britain.

Avatar image for Stesilaus
Stesilaus

4999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Stesilaus
Member since 2007 • 4999 Posts

Cameron has lost all legitimacy as a leader.

Why hasn't the international community stepped in to impose a no-fly zone to prevent the tyrant from using police helicopters to oppress his people?

Why haven't the Houses of Parliament been bombed yet?

Why hasn't Sarkozy air-dropped weapons for the rioters?

Why isn't NATO (minus Britain) providing close air support for the rioters?

Avatar image for redstorm72
redstorm72

4646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#35 redstorm72
Member since 2008 • 4646 Posts

While I don't think the riots in London and the riots/protests in arab countries are really the same, the Arab protests were for a political change while the London riots are just a bunch of angry people smashing stuff. I agree with your point about wikileaks and the Chinese guys who leaked information though. We like to claim how open and free we are here, but when ever someone exposes some "uncomfortable" truths about our nation, we call them a traitor.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts
I don't see the hypocrisy is making a country safe for citizens....:|
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

Problem with your thought. The Britain rioters are criminals using a very flimsy excuse to loot and burn.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

Problem with your thought. The Britain rioters are criminals using a very flimsy excuse to loot and burn.

789shadow
Refer to the link I posted 4 or 5 posts above. As the article says, dismissing this phenomenon as just a bunch of thugs and criminals is a dangerous exercise in denial.
Avatar image for DeX2010
DeX2010

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 DeX2010
Member since 2010 • 3989 Posts
China's government is very oppressive and so it is right for democratic nations to condemn china and support Liu Xiaobo. The Arab Spring was the result of the middle east rebelling against dictators and wanting free speech. The London Riots were just oppurtunists wanting stuff and looting. It is an insult to the rebels who fought for democracy to associate them with the London Rioters. Do you even live in London? I can assure you everyone hates the rioters and hope they get hell and more. The police will only authorize them to block social media in extreme public disorder. I.e. A riot. The people WERE ALL THUGS. They weren't rising up against an oppressive system; I think this thread has no basis whatsoever.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
China's government is very oppressive and so it is right for democratic nations to condemn china and support Liu Xiaobo. The Arab Spring was the result of the middle east rebelling against dictators and wanting free speech. The London Riots were just oppurtunists wanting stuff and looting. It is an insult to the rebels who fought for democracy to associate them with the London Rioters. Do you even live in London? I can assure you everyone hates the rioters and hope they get hell and more. The police will only authorize them to block social media in extreme public disorder. I.e. A riot. The people WERE ALL THUGS. They weren't rising up against an oppressive system; I think this thread has no basis whatsoever.DeX2010
There are more and more sources as the one I posted above that are basically agreeing with me so I think it has lots of basis. Many of them from within the UK. They basically agree that these riots are a sign of a much more deep and complex issues within a flawed political/economical system. That's why riots and demonstrations of unrest are not limited to UK but there were evident in France not to long ago, they are evident in Greece, Spain and Israel right now and to some extent even in remote countries like Chile. Basically, what these phenomenons show is that more and more people are starting to feel left out and ignored and the more politicians and the rest of the population ignores that, the worse it will become.
Avatar image for DeX2010
DeX2010

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 DeX2010
Member since 2010 • 3989 Posts
[QUOTE="DeX2010"]China's government is very oppressive and so it is right for democratic nations to condemn china and support Liu Xiaobo. The Arab Spring was the result of the middle east rebelling against dictators and wanting free speech. The London Riots were just oppurtunists wanting stuff and looting. It is an insult to the rebels who fought for democracy to associate them with the London Rioters. Do you even live in London? I can assure you everyone hates the rioters and hope they get hell and more. The police will only authorize them to block social media in extreme public disorder. I.e. A riot. The people WERE ALL THUGS. They weren't rising up against an oppressive system; I think this thread has no basis whatsoever.kuraimen
There are more and more sources as the one I posted above that are basically agreeing with me so I think it has lots of basis. Many of them from within the UK. They basically agree that these riots are a sign of a much more deep and complex issues within a flawed political/economical system. That's why riots and demonstrations of unrest are not limited to UK but there were evident in France not to long ago, they are evident in Greece, Spain and Israel right now and to some extent even in remote countries like Chile. Basically, what these phenomenons show is that more and more people are starting to feel left out and ignored and the more politicians and the rest of the population ignores that, the worse it will become.

But it wasn't. The Tottenham riot started because a man got shot by police(he was a criminal anyway). The rest of the riots were all copycats emerging throughout the country and they were just opportunistic looters looking for free stuff. As well as the oppurtists there were others doing it still for the same reasons but they justified their actions differently. I don't really feel like typing it all out; I have posted my views and explanations previously.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="DeX2010"]China's government is very oppressive and so it is right for democratic nations to condemn china and support Liu Xiaobo. The Arab Spring was the result of the middle east rebelling against dictators and wanting free speech. The London Riots were just oppurtunists wanting stuff and looting. It is an insult to the rebels who fought for democracy to associate them with the London Rioters. Do you even live in London? I can assure you everyone hates the rioters and hope they get hell and more. The police will only authorize them to block social media in extreme public disorder. I.e. A riot. The people WERE ALL THUGS. They weren't rising up against an oppressive system; I think this thread has no basis whatsoever.DeX2010
There are more and more sources as the one I posted above that are basically agreeing with me so I think it has lots of basis. Many of them from within the UK. They basically agree that these riots are a sign of a much more deep and complex issues within a flawed political/economical system. That's why riots and demonstrations of unrest are not limited to UK but there were evident in France not to long ago, they are evident in Greece, Spain and Israel right now and to some extent even in remote countries like Chile. Basically, what these phenomenons show is that more and more people are starting to feel left out and ignored and the more politicians and the rest of the population ignores that, the worse it will become.

But it wasn't. The Tottenham riot started because a man got shot by police(he was a criminal anyway). The rest of the riots were all copycats emerging throughout the country and they were just opportunistic looters looking for free stuff. As well as the oppurtists there were others doing it still for the same reasons but they justified their actions differently. I don't really feel like typing it all out; I have posted my views and explanations previously.

I'm just going to again quote the above article since it basically says it all: Thousands of people don't suddenly take to the streets to manifest wickedness as if in response to the appearance of Lord Voldemort's Deatheater sigil on their Blackberries, without any context; criminality -- which the actions of the rioters certainly are, with no mitigating features or excuses -- on the massive scale seen in London this week is indicative of a social crisis.
Avatar image for Stesilaus
Stesilaus

4999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 Stesilaus
Member since 2007 • 4999 Posts

[QUOTE="DeX2010"]China's government is very oppressive and so it is right for democratic nations to condemn china and support Liu Xiaobo. The Arab Spring was the result of the middle east rebelling against dictators and wanting free speech. The London Riots were just oppurtunists wanting stuff and looting. It is an insult to the rebels who fought for democracy to associate them with the London Rioters. Do you even live in London? I can assure you everyone hates the rioters and hope they get hell and more. The police will only authorize them to block social media in extreme public disorder. I.e. A riot. The people WERE ALL THUGS. They weren't rising up against an oppressive system; I think this thread has no basis whatsoever.kuraimen
There are more and more sources as the one I posted above that are basically agreeing with me so I think it has lots of basis. Many of them from within the UK. They basically agree that these riots are a sign of a much more deep and complex issues within a flawed political/economical system. That's why riots and demonstrations of unrest are not limited to UK but there were evident in France not to long ago, they are evident in Greece, Spain and Israel right now and to some extent even in remote countries like Chile. Basically, what these phenomenons show is that more and more people are starting to feel left out and ignored and the more politicians and the rest of the population ignores that, the worse it will become.

If you're right, then there will be more riots, and they will probably be much worse next time ...

Like America, Britain is cutting social spending (even as it bails out those rich,welfare-leeching bankers in the upper strata of the economy). Amongst the cost-cutting measures the country is implementing is reducing the size of its police force.

:|

Avatar image for DigitalExile
DigitalExile

16046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 DigitalExile
Member since 2008 • 16046 Posts

The riots weren't about great social reform. They were about a bunch of (not being racist here) black people - mostly males - acting out against police because they are criminals and the police want to put criminals in jail. They use poverty as an excuse to be criminals, then act out when the police target them. =/

As for your other issues, the western world - for most people - is a free society where we can say and do what we think and feel. Other countries do not always offer these ideals. Only people who want to act out against the western world have an issue with it i.e. people who don't really want to be a aprt of this society but live in it. For most of us - you know, the simple minded peons being led around and told what to think and feel (:roll: ) we're free people even if we don't get all the facts, or it's hidden behind 250 channels of porn and sitcoms. >.>

Not sure where my rant was taking me there.

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts

I think the riots have more to do with burning **** and stealing more **** .

And if they really want to show the government they are displeased, they're doing it in a very counterproductive manor.

Chutebox
If you want ur government to take action, you have to act disorderly. Its a sad but its true. If it werent true, every revolution would be peaceful...how many peaceful revolutions can you name? Now I'm not disagreeing with you Chute. I agree that its counter productive in the sense that you are destroying your own country and all that jazz, but as history has shown over and over again, violence is the most effective way of getting what you want.
Avatar image for EsYuGee
EsYuGee

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 EsYuGee
Member since 2007 • 466 Posts

Back in the day Wikileaks and Bradley Manning were condemned for being a rogue, traitorous and dangerous news outlet and soldier. This was done mainly by the US but also by many other governments while the US and western governments congratulated chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo for being a good rogue, traitorous and dangerous person for the chinese government.

Some time later the western governments were thrillled with the "social media revolutions" going in arab countries. For them social media was giving people the chance to come together and rise against their opressive governments and take matters into their own hands. They highly condemned the blocking of the internet or social networks done by these governments. Now fastforward to England today with all those riots that undoubtely demonstrate many people are not very happy with their government and these are the measures taken by the English government:

1. Police will be given discretion to remove face masks from people on the street.

2. The government would work with the police to stop people communicating via social websites.

3. The army could be used for guarding duties.

4. Last but not least: Curfew!

So yeah of course, as always, what's good for the goose, is not good for the gander.

I still find it ridiculous that the english government is trying to make us think these people are all just thugs and thieves while ignoring the real issues underneath the discontent.

kuraimen
Quick questions: How was Liu Xiaobo a dangerous person? Second, What were the people in the UK protesting? What was their message? I mean, beside looting.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

Back in the day Wikileaks and Bradley Manning were condemned for being a rogue, traitorous and dangerous news outlet and soldier. This was done mainly by the US but also by many other governments while the US and western governments congratulated chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo for being a good rogue, traitorous and dangerous person for the chinese government.

Some time later the western governments were thrillled with the "social media revolutions" going in arab countries. For them social media was giving people the chance to come together and rise against their opressive governments and take matters into their own hands. They highly condemned the blocking of the internet or social networks done by these governments. Now fastforward to England today with all those riots that undoubtely demonstrate many people are not very happy with their government and these are the measures taken by the English government:

1. Police will be given discretion to remove face masks from people on the street.

2. The government would work with the police to stop people communicating via social websites.

3. The army could be used for guarding duties.

4. Last but not least: Curfew!

So yeah of course, as always, what's good for the goose, is not good for the gander.

I still find it ridiculous that the english government is trying to make us think these people are all just thugs and thieves while ignoring the real issues underneath the discontent.

EsYuGee
Quick questions: How was Liu Xiaobo a dangerous person? Second, What were the people in the UK protesting? What was their message? I mean, beside looting.

It's all about perspective. To China he was deemed dangerous, hence why he is currently incarcerated. Sure he wasnt dangerous to the US, but he was dangerous to China. So unless we deem the US perspective the only valid perspective, we must conclude that Xiaobo can legitimately be considered dangerous. As for the message the UK protesters are trying to send, I cant comment on it. I have to read up more on the situation and see.
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
The 2 aren't really comparable. The Arab uprisings revolved around the inability to have an elected government with the full perks of a society that values freedom of speech. The London riots started, at a very small scale, over societal inequality, however it turned into nothing more than looters and vandals.
Avatar image for EsYuGee
EsYuGee

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 EsYuGee
Member since 2007 • 466 Posts
[QUOTE="EsYuGee"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]

Back in the day Wikileaks and Bradley Manning were condemned for being a rogue, traitorous and dangerous news outlet and soldier. This was done mainly by the US but also by many other governments while the US and western governments congratulated chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo for being a good rogue, traitorous and dangerous person for the chinese government.

Some time later the western governments were thrillled with the "social media revolutions" going in arab countries. For them social media was giving people the chance to come together and rise against their opressive governments and take matters into their own hands. They highly condemned the blocking of the internet or social networks done by these governments. Now fastforward to England today with all those riots that undoubtely demonstrate many people are not very happy with their government and these are the measures taken by the English government:

1. Police will be given discretion to remove face masks from people on the street.

2. The government would work with the police to stop people communicating via social websites.

3. The army could be used for guarding duties.

4. Last but not least: Curfew!

So yeah of course, as always, what's good for the goose, is not good for the gander.

I still find it ridiculous that the english government is trying to make us think these people are all just thugs and thieves while ignoring the real issues underneath the discontent.

II_Seraphim_II
Quick questions: How was Liu Xiaobo a dangerous person? Second, What were the people in the UK protesting? What was their message? I mean, beside looting.

It's all about perspective. To China he was deemed dangerous, hence why he is currently incarcerated. Sure he wasnt dangerous to the US, but he was dangerous to China. So unless we deem the US perspective the only valid perspective, we must conclude that Xiaobo can legitimately be considered dangerous. As for the message the UK protesters are trying to send, I cant comment on it. I have to read up more on the situation and see.

Why is he dangerous? Did he plan to bomb a city? Hurt innocent people? destroy something?
Avatar image for Bloodseeker23
Bloodseeker23

8338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 Bloodseeker23
Member since 2008 • 8338 Posts
[QUOTE="Blaze787"]

They are a bunch of thugs and thieves, and innocent business owners are suffering for it. And whatever underlying issues there may be are their own fault. You can choose to work hard and make something of yourself, or you can choose the life of scum...antagonizing everyone else and complaining as if the rest of the world owes you a living.

I support anything the British government does to stop these guys.

kuraimen
How can it be their own fault only that the system can't even give them jobs? The same is happening in Spain by the way.

US had the same problems, we can't find jobs and yet we didn't do anything like that. *And they US ignorant ones*