What did you think of wrestlemainia 27

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for glassfish8
glassfish8

347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 glassfish8
Member since 2008 • 347 Posts

i saw wrestlemainia 27 and thought it was terrible i have not seen one that bad in a long time

was it it altitude was there something in the water

the only good match was undertaker vs triple h where the wrestlers put in a good effort

tha main event was the worst main event of any mania i have ever seen thank god for the rock

the cut scenes were averige

the matches were all somewhat lacking

the 8 man tag was a joke

it was just shocking

normaly wrestlers go the extra mile come wrestlemainia but this one it just seemed lacking

what do u guys think

PS: the PG era can go to hell

Avatar image for lloveLamp
lloveLamp

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 lloveLamp
Member since 2009 • 2891 Posts
yes it was terrible. triple h vs taker was the only good match. and announcing rock vs. cena for next years mania on the monday night raw after mania is just the biggest slap in the face to the people who paid 65 dollars just to see the build up for next years mania
Avatar image for brakey101
brakey101

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 brakey101
Member since 2009 • 704 Posts

I was un able to watch it yet i wanted to see Undertaker and Triple H the last icons of their era battle it out because i knew it was gonna be epic and apparently it was. I Think i stopped watching the Full wrestlemanias at wrestlemania 22 or 23? when was HHH V Batista? And really just cut down to the Undertaker and what use to be Money in the Bank match.

And Yes...Death to PG! We wont Blood,Swearing and attitude back :( Oh and steel chairs to the skull

Avatar image for Razor-Lazor
Razor-Lazor

12763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Razor-Lazor
Member since 2009 • 12763 Posts

It was a better show than people give it credit for, but not the best ever, obviously. Just about every match was solid, and I approved of the main event, even though it was a little stupid at the end. Orton vs. Punk and HHH vs. Taker were fantastic matches, and Cena vs. Miz was, in my opinion, great.

Oh and steel chairs to the skullbrakey101
:roll: They don't not do that because it's PG. They do that out of common sense. They don't want another Benoit to be formed out of an unprotected chair shot.

Avatar image for brakey101
brakey101

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 brakey101
Member since 2009 • 704 Posts

It was a better show than people give it credit for, but not the best ever, obviously. Just about every match was solid, and I approved of the main event, even though it was a little stupid at the end. Orton vs. Punk and HHH vs. Taker were fantastic matches, and Cena vs. Miz was, in my opinion, great.

[QUOTE="brakey101"]Oh and steel chairs to the skullRazor-Lazor

:roll: They don't not do that because it's PG. They do that out of common sense. They don't want another Benoit to be formed out of an unprotected chair shot.

True True. Even thought i didnt see the Match i read that Undertaker and HHH got fined cause they did!
Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#6 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
I didn't watch it but I read up on the fights, wasn't very interesting, no real surprises.
Avatar image for the_phenom_
the_phenom_

2992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 the_phenom_
Member since 2008 • 2992 Posts
It was good for a PPV but as a Wrestlemania it was disapointting. I expected better. At least we had some great matchs such as Cody/Rey, Orton/Punk and of course the epic encounter of HHH/Undertaker. You could probably tell from my avatar what one of my biggest disapointments was for me. The other major disapointment was the main event. Cena and Miz was a mediocre match in general and The Rock literally saved it from been a total failure. Hopfully next year with Rock/Cena will be better.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
It was ok. Miss the mad old days. They have very few "characters" any more, it's all just random muscle dudes :( Where's DX, Stone Cold, Cactus Jack, Doink the Clown, Scotty Too Hotty, the Ministry, Gangrel the Vampire, Shano Mac and the Mean Street Posse, all those wonderful characters/freaks with styIe and attitude, or at least a awacky gimmick? Wrestling these days looks like a real sport, lol., just big guys brawling each other in a semi boring way. Remember the 24/7 hardcore title? Man. Good old days.
Avatar image for Sapients_Net
Sapients_Net

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Sapients_Net
Member since 2011 • 39 Posts

Disappointed by taker's match, but then again, didn't have high hopes either. I generally read things before watching due to lack of interest, and comments generally hyped it up to be an all out brawl.

The tag was short, but thank goodness for that. Probably the most uninteresting match on the car, just seemed like it was thrown together with a segment thrown here and there to keep it somewhat interesting.

The ending to the orton match was absolutely no surprise from the beginning, given that basically every match with orton nowadays ends with a "surprise hit out of nowhere where absolutely no one could predict it happening".. yeah. That type of ending is enough to not bother watching future matches. :/

Glad rhodes is changing character and sticking with it. I like the new theme, more catchy despite any generic claims made by anyone.

Del Rio match was one that definitely had mixed opinions on how it'd end. Wish they had of put Christian in there somehow, but (SPOILER OF RECENT RAW/SMACKDOWN/Whatever it was) I suppose it's only a matter of time now before those two square off.

Those are the only ones I paid attention to. Definitely glad Miz retained though, his reign has been one of the only things that have kept my interested nowadays.

Though rather than match effort, the biggest thing that disappointed me about the event was the freaking crowd. :| I swear the crowds are getting more and more uninterested as time goes on.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Large sweaty men dressed in lycra and sitting on each others faces, whats not to like?

Avatar image for glassfish8
glassfish8

347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 glassfish8
Member since 2008 • 347 Posts

besides taker v HHH the matches were low standard remember HBKvs kurt angle and taker vs HBK last year or the matches at my favourite wm22

the cena miz match was poor was cena on drugs he was so hyper then flat it was weird the matches were terrible punk vs orton was ok

i hate how they got rid of money in the bank i loved that match

i also think taker should not have won by submission

i think wwe has tonned down its product in general not only the violence but the wrestlers are not being pushed as hard as they were they are settling for medicore it's crazy

i hope the rock and cena deleiver next year

Avatar image for LordBrew
LordBrew

269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 LordBrew
Member since 2008 • 269 Posts

1hour and 45minutes of wrestling on a 4 hour PPV = a poor Wrestlemania.

Avatar image for glassfish8
glassfish8

347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 glassfish8
Member since 2008 • 347 Posts

1hour and 45minutes of wrestling on a 4 hour PPV = a poor Wrestlemania.

LordBrew

it feels like its not about the wrestling anymore but the silly cutscenes and fireworks