This topic is locked from further discussion.
Though that will probably never happen in our lifetimes, I imagine that some sort of Pan-North American trade/political alliance similar to Europe's EU would make us practically invincible.
The_Ish
Yeah they could call it the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO. Now why does that sound familiar?...
Also the USA is basically the EU taken to an extreme. Its called the "United Statesof America" for a reason.
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]Though that will probably never happen in our lifetimes, I imagine that some sort of Pan-North American trade/political alliance similar to Europe's EU would make us practically invincible.
gameguy6700
Yeah they could call it the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO. Now why does that sound familiar?...
Also the USA is basically the EU taken to an extreme. Its called the "United Statesof America" for a reason.
States =/= countries.:roll:
[QUOTE="gameguy6700"][QUOTE="The_Ish"]Though that will probably never happen in our lifetimes, I imagine that some sort of Pan-North American trade/political alliance similar to Europe's EU would make us practically invincible.
LJS9502_basic
Yeah they could call it the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO. Now why does that sound familiar?...
Also the USA is basically the EU taken to an extreme. Its called the "United Statesof America" for a reason.
States =/= countries.:roll:
gameguy6700, the USA is a sovereign state. Sure, there are many states that make up the USA, but in reality they are nothing like a united Europe. The USA is a melting pot of many different peoples, and the different states are simply differnet places to live. Sure, some are proud to be Floridian, New Yorkian, etc., but outside the country, we identify ourselfs as American.Peter1191
First of all, "state" is another word for "nation" or "country". And, yes, the states in the USA are not soverign, hence the reason I said the USA is the EU taken to an extreme. All the EU has to do to become a soverign nation is to create a federal constitution, which there has been talk of in the past but that got shot down rather quickly since most european countries aren't thrilled about the idea of giving up their soverignity. Furthermore, just remind you two about history, the states in the US (at least the original 13) were, for a very short period of time, seperate soverign entities. Georgia, New York, Maine, all those states were at one time, on paper, seperate nations. This is also why we had the Civil War. Some states felt that they had the right to withdraw themselves from the union while the federal government felt that they didn't.
First of all, "state" is another word for "nation" or "country". And, yes, the states in the USA are not soverign, hence the reason I said the USA is the EU taken to an extreme. All the EU has to do to become a soverign nation is to create a federal constitution, which there has been talk of in the past but that got shot down rather quickly since most european countries aren't thrilled about the idea of giving up their soverignity. Furthermore, just remind you two about history, the states in the US (at least the original 13) were, for a very short period of time, seperate soverign entities. Georgia, New York, Maine, all those states were at one time, on paper, seperate nations. This is also why we had the Civil War. Some states felt that they had the right to withdraw themselves from the union while the federal government felt that they didn't.
gameguy6700
In the US...states did not denote nations or countries....so that analogy fails. Ah dude...just to remind you the states were under the control of the UK until they announced independence and ratified a constitution creating states. They didn't exist as states prior.
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]Though that will probably never happen in our lifetimes, I imagine that some sort of Pan-North American trade/political alliance similar to Europe's EU would make us practically invincible.
gameguy6700
Yeah they could call it the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO. Now why does that sound familiar?...
Also the USA is basically the EU taken to an extreme. Its called the "United Statesof America" for a reason.
NATO does not have the same influence on NA as the EU does and will on Europe.
For example, we do not all have the same currency.
[QUOTE="gameguy6700"]First of all, "state" is another word for "nation" or "country". And, yes, the states in the USA are not soverign, hence the reason I said the USA is the EU taken to an extreme. All the EU has to do to become a soverign nation is to create a federal constitution, which there has been talk of in the past but that got shot down rather quickly since most european countries aren't thrilled about the idea of giving up their soverignity. Furthermore, just remind you two about history, the states in the US (at least the original 13) were, for a very short period of time, seperate soverign entities. Georgia, New York, Maine, all those states were at one time, on paper, seperate nations. This is also why we had the Civil War. Some states felt that they had the right to withdraw themselves from the union while the federal government felt that they didn't.
LJS9502_basic
In the US...states did not denote nations or countries....so that analogy fails. Ah dude...just to remind you the states were under the control of the UK until they announced independence and ratified a constitution creating states. They didn't exist as states prior.
Yes, they do. And just to remind you, the states didn't instantly ratify the federal charter the second they gained independence from the UK, hence they were on their own for a period of time. Most of them did it in a matter of months, which is why I said a very short time. On paper they were seperate states.
Anyway, the states in everyday life are treated as merely different places to live. However, they are still seperate governments, with the only thing differing them from real countries so to speak is that they're not soverign. However they still have a lot of jurisdiction, such as laws and regulations, local taxation, how to allocate funds, etc., and for awhile they even had their own currency (a task that was later, after much controversy, relegated only to the federal government). The USA is one country, however keep in mind that it is, on paper, a legal union of seperate states under a federal government. To drive this point home, let me give you the definition of "Federal":
You do realize a good portion of Canada speaks French right?
SWTTVGfreak
a united canada-states is about as likely as a united korea
[QUOTE="SWTTVGfreak"]It's the bad portion actually.You do realize a good portion of Canada speaks French right?
sca321
[QUOTE="TrailorParkBoy"][QUOTE="sca321"][QUOTE="SWTTVGfreak"]It's the bad portion actually.You do realize a good portion of Canada speaks French right?
mark4091
Double QFT
I'm not even French and I'm getting sick of this French-bashing. I've spent time out east, and not surprisingly, most people aren't any different than any other Canadians. Like always, a loud, annoying minority is used to paint an entire region's population by the ignorant.
[QUOTE="mark4091"][QUOTE="TrailorParkBoy"][QUOTE="sca321"][QUOTE="SWTTVGfreak"]It's the bad portion actually.You do realize a good portion of Canada speaks French right?
pianist
Double QFT
I'm not even French and I'm getting sick of this French-bashing. I've spent time out east, and not surprisingly, most people aren't any different than any other Canadians. Like always, a loud, annoying minority is used to paint an entire region's population by the ignorant.
I dont hate French people (well I dont like them either) but I just dont like Quebec and the people who live there.I dont hate French people (well I dont like them either) but I just dont like Quebec and the people who live there.TrailorParkBoy
Fine. Keep it to yourself, then. There's nothing to be gained by making derogatory remarks about them. Have you ever spent time in Quebec? Do you know anyone there? Do you know anything about the province, save for what you hear on the news?
[QUOTE="TrailorParkBoy"]I dont hate French people (well I dont like them either) but I just dont like Quebec and the people who live there.pianist
Fine. Keep it to yourself, then. There's nothing to be gained by making derogatory remarks about them. Have you ever spent time in Quebec? Do you know anyone there? Do you know anything about the province, save for what you hear on the news?
how about, about49 percent wants or wanted to seperate, they cost our government more money than they are worth, I have to pay for them, imo and everyone I know, if they want to seperate let them, I and any other canadian can say what they want about Quebec.
[QUOTE="TrailorParkBoy"]I dont hate French people (well I dont like them either) but I just dont like Quebec and the people who live there.pianist
Fine. Keep it to yourself, then. There's nothing to be gained by making derogatory remarks about them. Have you ever spent time in Quebec? Do you know anyone there? Do you know anything about the province, save for what you hear on the news?
Well I do know that at a time like what was it 49% wanted to separate and they almost did. So personally I think thats reason enough to dislike them and thats far from a small minority.[QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="TrailorParkBoy"]I dont hate French people (well I dont like them either) but I just dont like Quebec and the people who live there.mark4091
Fine. Keep it to yourself, then. There's nothing to be gained by making derogatory remarks about them. Have you ever spent time in Quebec? Do you know anyone there? Do you know anything about the province, save for what you hear on the news?
how about, about49 percent wants or wanted to seperate, they cost our government more money than they are worth, I have to pay for them, imo and everyone I know, if they want to seperate let them, I and any other canadian can say what they want about Quebec.
This guy knows what I am talking about. right now every one on the western side of Canada is essentially paying welfare for the Eastern side and we don't really like it.[QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="TrailorParkBoy"]I dont hate French people (well I dont like them either) but I just dont like Quebec and the people who live there.mark4091
Fine. Keep it to yourself, then. There's nothing to be gained by making derogatory remarks about them. Have you ever spent time in Quebec? Do you know anyone there? Do you know anything about the province, save for what you hear on the news?
how about, about49 percent wants or wanted to seperate, they cost our government more money than they are worth, I have to pay for them, imo and everyone I know, if they want to seperate let them, I and any other canadian can say what they want about Quebec.
:|
Everybody costs the government money, so you have to 'pay for' everybody. The amount of tax money you pay that is returned directly to you is totally negligible. The vast majority of it will go towards social services, many of which will be of no benefit to you whatsoever. But since that's the case for ALL tax payers, you have no reason to whine about it. Other people are paying for social services you use, too.
Quebec happens to receive more because (get this) they have a larger population than most of the other provinces. They also have a unique culture and have an understandable desire to preserve it. 49% of the population wanted to separate because they do not feel that the rest of Canada respects their individuality, and with this post as a shining, blunt example, can you blame them?
This guy knows what I am talking about. right now every one on the western side of Canada is essentially paying welfare for the Eastern side and we don't really like it.TrailorParkBoy
I live in Alberta, and frankly don't care if more money is devoted to the East. More people = more expensive. We work collectively as a country for the good of all our citizens, and those who make the most must pay the most, especially when the wealthiest provinces happen to be relatively sparsely populated. Deal with it. I find it remarkably entertaining when Westerners complain about Quebec being an attention whore of a province, then turn around and whine obsessively about how the East controls everything and won't pay attention to the West. People are STILL complaining about the NEP for crying out loud. And I STILL hear talk about Westerners wanting to form a separatist party to leave Canada.
[QUOTE="TrailorParkBoy"]This guy knows what I am talking about. right now every one on the western side of Canada is essentially paying welfare for the Eastern side and we don't really like it.pianist
I live in Alberta, and frankly don't care if more money is devoted to the East. More people = more expensive. We work collectively as a country for the good of all our citizens, and those who make the most must pay the most, especially when the wealthiest provinces happen to be relatively sparsely populated. Deal with it. I find it remarkably entertaining when Westerners complain about Quebec being an attention whore of a province, then turn around and whine obsessively about how the East controls everything and won't pay attention to the West. People are STILL complaining about the NEP for crying out loud. And I STILL hear talk about Westerners wanting to form a separatist party to leave Canada.
Um the west is growing ten times faster than the east, and really quebec is not that big, my point is they should suck it up and be grateful they get more payments from the government, and get this, they get more per capita then the maritime provinces, which need them more.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment