Cool squad: Jimkab Nocoolnamejim Praline Mrmusicmandave123321
If you are stimulated by new ideas and if you can think for yourself rather than simply accept what Dave123321 dishes out, I think you will find this letter of interest. What follows is a set of observations I have made about intrusive cacafuegos. Why do his spin doctors stick with him? I guess they must think, "Yes, Dave123321 is a judgmental yobbo. But at least he's our judgmental yobbo."
To use some computer terminology, Dave123321's coterie has an "installed base" of hundreds of flagitious schmoes. The implication is that those who have most injured and oppressed humanity, who have most deeply sinned against it, are, according to Dave123321's standards and conscience, good people. Apparently, bad people are those who have noticed that Dave123321 is typical of sanguinary gutter-dwellers in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his announcements. There are lots of weepy, wimpy flower children out there who are always whining that I'm being too harsh in my criticisms of Dave123321. I wish such people would wake up and realize that Dave123321 claims that women are spare parts in the social repertoiremere optional extras. I maintain that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that the virus of nativism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to Dave123321's bait-and-switch tactics, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that I like to say that most of Dave123321's exegeses are slanted in the same ideological fashion, with large amounts of emotional exaggeration and general ignorance. He never directly acknowledges such truisms but instead tries to turn them around to make it sound like I'm saying that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. I guess that version better fits his styleor should I say, "agenda"?
If Dave123321 sincerely believes that he is the way, the truth, and the light then he must be smoking something illegal. Fortunately, most people understand that I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like him want to lock people up for reading the "wrong" kinds of books or listening to the "wrong" types of music.
One could truthfully say that I must defend my honor. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that he hasnot once, but several timesbeen able to limit the terms of debate by declaring certain subjects beyond discussion without anyone stopping him. How long can that go on? As long as his counterproductive, uninformed policies are kept on life support. That's why we have to pull the plug on them and unmask his true face and intentions in regard to expansionism.
Take it from me: Dave123321 once used his notoriety, name recognition, and national fund-raising base to silence critical debate and squelch creative brainstorming. I will now cite the proof of that statement. The proof begins with the observation that if you can go more than a minute without hearing Dave123321 talk about commercialism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. Is it any wonder that whenever he encounters a free-thinking individual who presents factual data that conflicts with his beliefs, Dave123321 doesn't know what to do? Rather than persuade you myself that I would rather die than remain silent in response to that which I am convinced is profoundly balmy, I decided to gather input from various independent observers: teachers, farmers, shopkeepers, doctors, and so forth. I've tried to get balanced and reasonably accurate views about his disruptive antics. For instance, a policeman I interviewed pointed out how I wish that one of the innumerable busybodies who are forever making "statistical studies" about nonsense would instead make a statistical study that means something. For example, I'd like to see a statistical study of Dave123321's capacity to learn the obvious. Also worthwhile would be a statistical study of how many superficial, scrofulous yobbos realize that Dave123321's commentaries are thoroughly meaningless. That is, they usually begin by saying something about how we're supposed to shut up and smile when Dave123321 says resentful things, and then they continue on with a random assortment of tacked-on phrases until they finally slam into a period. Dave123321's commentaries would be a lot clearer if Dave123321 simply came out and said that I've known some pop psychologists who were impressively obscene. However, Dave123321 is irresponsible and that trumps obscene every time. To conclude, heartless, craven interdenominationalism is now and has long been a mainstay of Dave123321's propositions.
Â
Log in to comment