You know those animal lovers-mysanthropic people who say that anyone who buys dogs at pet shops is a monster for not adopting and that buying dogs should be illegal? what is the logic behind of this?
They say that street dogs are suffering a lot so they need to be adopted and since there are many street dogs then we shouldn't be buying any before giving a home to every single street dog.
this is extremely stupid, and is somehow trying to imply that pets from pet shops are living a dream, with no suffering at all.
Pets in those shops are confined to a cage that is barely twice their size, 24 hours a day, the seven days of the week, and they can remain there for literally months.
Then, in some pet shops, if a pet fails to be sold, he is sacrificed because keeping him isn't profitable anymore, ofc not every pet shop sacrifices their animals, some of them gave them away to other pet shops or shelters, in which apparently it's now cool to get them, after they already suffered months in the shop because of brainless activists who thought that buying a pet was blasphemy.
The logic behind this is that, if everybody adopts and no one buys, then stuff such as puppy mills will stop existing, which again is something extremely stupid to say, sure that's the goal, but they are not mentioning any way to achieve it, it's like saying "the solution for less traffic is...have less traffic!"
Also their "flawless plan" includes the deaths of millions of dogs in pet shops because no one would be buying them so the owners of the shop would have to get rid of them.
So, am I getting the picture right? or am I missing something?
Log in to comment