What would happen if WW3 happened today.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Jacobistheman
Jacobistheman

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Jacobistheman
Member since 2007 • 3975 Posts

I decided to make this thread after seeing the one that got locked that the Canadian that thinks thier military is great and could beat anyone.

But who do you think would win, these sides are based on the sides that I think that everyone would take. I have reasons for deciding what sides every one would take, but they are complicated and I won't explain them.

I have ellipsises so you can decide what other countries would fight on what sides, or whatever.

I think that the US and most of Europe would win because they are a group of the worlds best militarys, but countries such as Israel and North Korea would get taken over, but eventually saved.

I think that Russia, and those countries will get conqored by the US and Europe, and China, India and China will get locked in a stalemate and sign a peace treaty. The US and Europe would invade Korea, and Norther China, but China would eventually surrender kind of like germany did in WW1.

Pakastan and India will continue to fight even after russian and all of pakastans allies have been conquored and all of indias allies decide to stop fighting, so they wouldn't have lost, but they definatly wouldn't have won.

So What do you OTites (that word is so much better than any other name for people on OT) think

Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
Who would win WWIII?

No one.
Avatar image for Vilot_Hero
Vilot_Hero

4522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Vilot_Hero
Member since 2008 • 4522 Posts
This poll is not balanced enough. I vote for Canada anyways.
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#4 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
A whole lot of nothing - because war never solves anything. There are no winners.
Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#5 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21106 Posts

This poll is not balanced enough. I vote for Canada anyways.Vilot_Hero

lol :lol: that was his plan :P

Avatar image for euphzilla03
euphzilla03

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 euphzilla03
Member since 2007 • 395 Posts

I don't think anyone would win this war in the end.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#7 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21106 Posts
We would all die without any winners because people get crazy over bombs.
Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts

What would happen if WW3 happened today.

Jacobistheman

Well, I suppose that WW3 would happen...

Avatar image for trubluah
trubluah

3678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 trubluah
Member since 2002 • 3678 Posts
People will post on gamespot.... the truth, it is!
Avatar image for Jacobistheman
Jacobistheman

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Jacobistheman
Member since 2007 • 3975 Posts
This poll is not balanced enough. I vote for Canada anyways.Vilot_Hero
Well, do you think that WW3 would be balanced?
Avatar image for LochLacksLuck
LochLacksLuck

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 LochLacksLuck
Member since 2008 • 62 Posts

well it depends who drops the first nuke/Abomb.

but then again maybe world war 3 would be an excuse to take the world population down a notch

Avatar image for uchihataru
uchihataru

531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#12 uchihataru
Member since 2007 • 531 Posts
there would be no winners or losers...i believe there wouldn't even be a world war 3 to start with...
Avatar image for kaim_i
kaim_i

959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 kaim_i
Member since 2005 • 959 Posts
huh China got a few billion people, and if they go to war, no more stuff from china, and everything will go all high in price. so China will win the war in the end. did you know that china makes all the armor for the US soldier. yeah China owns!
Avatar image for kingphillip
kingphillip

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 kingphillip
Member since 2004 • 217 Posts

" War does not determine who is right, but who is left" in this case, its Canada. :D

No, I'm joking, No one ever wins.

Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts
I don't think anyone would win, because I think WW3 will be a nuclear war, so no one wins in that case:?
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#16 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
Denmark & Norway alliance. Ofcourse, youre wondering why Sweden isnt mentioned in my DK/NOR alliance. Thats because Sweden would just make out to be the awkward 3rd wheel. And they have kaviar in tubes - thus excluding them from our winning alliance. "What about finland?" you may ask? Theyre gonners, look how close they are to Russia. Thinking they would stand a chance in an all-out nuke-tossin roundabout is just silly.
Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#17 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts
I would probably go deep underground ASAP, if possible. A World War 3 today between several major powers is bound to be a giant nukefest, though I doubt Malaysia would be unlucky enough to catch one.
Avatar image for impl0sion
impl0sion

851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 impl0sion
Member since 2006 • 851 Posts
Considering the US spend more money on military than everyone else put together, anyone who is on their side would win. Unless the US shot them by accident.
Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127732 Posts
Who would win they end up using nukes?...... Yeah that's right... No one.
Avatar image for antiredcap
antiredcap

1757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 antiredcap
Member since 2007 • 1757 Posts
I very much doubt that there will ever be a world war III.
I do however believe that some idiot will eventually and LITERALLY blow up the world.
Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#21 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
We'd all lose in WW3, the end of the world makes no winners
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#22 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
We'd all lose in WW3, the end of the world makes no winnersToriko42
denmark and norway would win, the rest of the world would lose. The sooner you recognize this as the truth, the sooner we can all proceed with our daily doings.
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts
US of A would win because we have the happiest trigger fingers.
Avatar image for rrclarkcdr
rrclarkcdr

766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 rrclarkcdr
Member since 2006 • 766 Posts

Australia would pwn everyone!

Well I don't know really, the first option will probably win the poll because of the amount of people from those countries and as people have said before if it was a nuclear nobody wins and the whole world will end up in a Fallout situation (except with no underground vaults).

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127732 Posts

Australia would pwn everyone!

Well I don't know really, the first option will probably win the poll because of the amount of people from those countries and as people have said before if it was a nuclear nobody wins and the whole world will end up in a Fallout situation (except with no underground vaults).

rrclarkcdr
Only because you have kangaroos :x Damn you and your kangaroos :x
Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
Canada and co. Or maybe Mongolia, they would have the advantage of heavily fortified tents and long range bow-and-arrows.
Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts

Canada and co. Or maybe Mongolia, they would have the advantage of heavily fortified tents and long range bow-and-arrows.clembo1990

Plus, they had the Internet over a thousand years before anyone else.

Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts

[QUOTE="clembo1990"]Canada and co. Or maybe Mongolia, they would have the advantage of heavily fortified tents and long range bow-and-arrows.aliblabla2007

Plus, they had the Internet over a thousand years before anyone else.

They discovered it when they raided ancient Indian call-centres when they were part of the Persian Empire.
Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts
[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"]

[QUOTE="clembo1990"]Canada and co. Or maybe Mongolia, they would have the advantage of heavily fortified tents and long range bow-and-arrows.clembo1990

Plus, they had the Internet over a thousand years before anyone else.

They discovered it when they raided ancient Indian call-centres when they were part of the Persian Empire.

No wonder the Timurids had elephant-mounted cannon! Those were the precursors of the tank!

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
Each side would just nuke each other to death, so nobody would win.
Avatar image for redmen12
redmen12

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 redmen12
Member since 2005 • 137 Posts

I vote for Mutually Assured Destruction.

Avatar image for bethwo
bethwo

1718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 bethwo
Member since 2008 • 1718 Posts
Antarctica would realease their ancient army of Eskimo Elites who dual weild light machine guns and have jet packs, they would unleash legions of these warriors all over the world, kill the world's leaders and take over.
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts
Antarctica would realease their ancient army of Eskimo Elites who dual weild light machine guns and have jet packs, they would unleash legions of these warriors all over the world, kill the world's leaders and take over.bethwo
I changed my mind, this is the right answer.
Avatar image for rrclarkcdr
rrclarkcdr

766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 rrclarkcdr
Member since 2006 • 766 Posts
[QUOTE="rrclarkcdr"]

Australia would pwn everyone!

Well I don't know really, the first option will probably win the poll because of the amount of people from those countries and as people have said before if it was a nuclear nobody wins and the whole world will end up in a Fallout situation (except with no underground vaults).

horgen123

Only because you have kangaroos :x Damn you and your kangaroos :x

Yeah, our kangaroo calvary is pretty damn awesome. But the main reason we would win is because I have so much experience at being a commander from playing WiC on easy and I'm not afraid to drop Daisy Cutters on my own troops. So who wants to sign up for my platoon?

And to the Eskimo Elite guy. Aren't eskimos from the Arctic because I'm pretty sure Antarctica has no native people...

Avatar image for Rigged4War
Rigged4War

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#36 Rigged4War
Member since 2009 • 36 Posts

WW3 will only have 1 winner. Chuck Norris.