This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.Ilived
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayMy father would have a hard time accepting it and my mother would accept it a lot faster -- I get along with my mother more than I get along with my father because she listens to what I have to say and she's more open minded.ernie1989
lol, going by how you described your parents, mine are similar, but I get along with my dad better because we are both stubborn and closed minded.
[QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.dooly420
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayI need to see this porno.
[QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.dooly420
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.evil_dutchman90
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
\ no she's not. she's a porn star, there's a difference. porn stars get more money and they're on camera.[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.dooly420
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
\ no she's not. she's a porn star, there's a difference. porn stars get more money and they're on camera.There is a difference, but she's still a whore, she gets more money and is on camera, but she still gets boned for money.
[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.evil_dutchman90
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
\ no she's not. she's a porn star, there's a difference. porn stars get more money and they're on camera.There is a difference, but she's still a whore, she gets more money and is on camera, but she still gets boned for money.
What do you do for a living? And don't even try to say it isn't something similar to getting boned for a paycheck. The only difference between a lawyer and a porn star is the lawyer has to buy suits.
[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.evil_dutchman90
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
\ no she's not. she's a porn star, there's a difference. porn stars get more money and they're on camera.There is a difference, but she's still a whore, she gets more money and is on camera, but she still gets boned for money.
you're not being very politically correct. if there's a camera, then you're not a whore. it's just that simple. that one little device is what separates porn stars from your everyday prostitutes.[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.donny666
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
\ no she's not. she's a porn star, there's a difference. porn stars get more money and they're on camera.There is a difference, but she's still a whore, she gets more money and is on camera, but she still gets boned for money.
Everyone has to get money somehow. Maybe she loves what she does. Doesn't mean you have to insult them for it..[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.dooly420
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
\ no she's not. she's a porn star, there's a difference. porn stars get more money and they're on camera.There is a difference, but she's still a whore, she gets more money and is on camera, but she still gets boned for money.
you're not being very politically correct. if there's a camera, then you're not a whore. it's just that simple. that one little device is what separates porn stars from your everyday prostitutes.She may not be an everyday prostitute, but they are both whores.
[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.donny666
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
\ no she's not. she's a porn star, there's a difference. porn stars get more money and they're on camera.There is a difference, but she's still a whore, she gets more money and is on camera, but she still gets boned for money.
What do you do for a living? And don't even try to say it isn't something similar to getting boned for a paycheck. The only difference between a lawyer and a porn star is the lawyer has to buy suits.
What do I do for a living? nothing yet as Igraduated from High school in november, but I go to basic training for the army in 22 days.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.evil_dutchman90
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
\ no she's not. she's a porn star, there's a difference. porn stars get more money and they're on camera.There is a difference, but she's still a whore, she gets more money and is on camera, but she still gets boned for money.
you're not being very politically correct. if there's a camera, then you're not a whore. it's just that simple. that one little device is what separates porn stars from your everyday prostitutes.She may not be an everyday prostitute, but they are both whores.
even wikipedia says they're two different things. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porn_starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whore see, i was right.[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"]\. even wikipedia says they're two different things. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porn_starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whore see, i was right. did you write those articles?;) nah jk:P[QUOTE="dooly420"]dooly420
[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="dooly420"]nothing, considering my mom's been told worse, by my sister, and was fine with it.dooly420
What can be worse? Unless if she told your mom she wants to become a man.
i'm pretty sure telling your mom you're about to star in a porno is a little worse then telling her you're gayHar Har Har, your sister is a whore.
\ no she's not. she's a porn star, there's a difference. porn stars get more money and they're on camera.There is a difference, but she's still a whore, she gets more money and is on camera, but she still gets boned for money.
you're not being very politically correct. if there's a camera, then you're not a whore. it's just that simple. that one little device is what separates porn stars from your everyday prostitutes.She may not be an everyday prostitute, but they are both whores.
even wikipedia says they're two different things. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porn_starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whore see, i was right.http://www.meriam-webster.com/dictionary/whore
1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money
No, you weren't.
[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.dooly420that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.evil_dutchman90
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again. edit: this has to be one of the most pointless arguments i've ever been in.[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.dooly420
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again.Dude, you're just making excuses because you can't hack that your sister is a whore. The fact that she gets paid for sexual acts makes her a whore, albeit a better paid and more glorified whore than just some hooker, but still a whore.
The camera makes absolutely no difference to the fact that she is a whore.
[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.evil_dutchman90
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again.Dude, you're just making excuses because you can't hack that your sister is a whore. The fact that she gets paid for sexual acts makes her a whore, albeit a better paid and more glorified whore than just some hooker, but still a whore.
The camera makes absolutely no difference to the fact that she is a whore.
the camera makes all the difference. without it, every porn star would be in jail for soliciting prostitution. since they're not, they obviously aren't considered prostitutes. edit: and why are you so obsessed with my sister being a whore?[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.evil_dutchman90
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again.Dude, you're just making excuses because you can't hack that your sister is a whore. The fact that she gets paid for sexual acts makes her a whore, albeit a better paid and more glorified whore than just some hooker, but still a whore.
The camera makes absolutely no difference to the fact that she is a whore.
I can't imagine why you are attacking the dudes sister like that (which you very obviously are or this wouldn't have gotten this far). Especially considering your choice of profesion.
All of that aside though this thread has nothing to do with porn stars or your ability to be tool, but with how parents react to lifestyle choices made by their children.
[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.dooly420
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again.Dude, you're just making excuses because you can't hack that your sister is a whore. The fact that she gets paid for sexual acts makes her a whore, albeit a better paid and more glorified whore than just some hooker, but still a whore.
The camera makes absolutely no difference to the fact that she is a whore.
the camera makes all the difference. without it, every porn star would be in jail for soliciting prostitution. since they're not, they obviously aren't considered prostitutes. edit: and why are you so obsessed with my sister being a whore?The camera makes no difference, your reference to prostitution laws means nothing because whore means the same thing in pretty much all english speaking countries, yet prostitution is not illegal in all english speaking countries. Australia, England and the U.S all have legal brothels, the people who work in these brothels are whores.
And Im not obsessed, I started an argument and I'll be damned if I'm not gonna finish it.
[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.evil_dutchman90
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again.Dude, you're just making excuses because you can't hack that your sister is a whore. The fact that she gets paid for sexual acts makes her a whore, albeit a better paid and more glorified whore than just some hooker, but still a whore.
The camera makes absolutely no difference to the fact that she is a whore.
the camera makes all the difference. without it, every porn star would be in jail for soliciting prostitution. since they're not, they obviously aren't considered prostitutes. edit: and why are you so obsessed with my sister being a whore?The camera makes no difference, your reference to prostitution laws means nothing because whore means the same thing in pretty much all english speaking countries, yet prostitution is not illegal in all english speaking countries. Australia, England and the U.S all have legal brothels, the people who work in these brothels are whores.
And Im not obsessed, I started an argument and I'll be damned if I'm not gonna finish it.
but there's no camera in these brothels, so they're whores. porn stars perform on camera to be distributed to the public. people know the names of porn stars. nobody knows the name of some random whore. porn star looks a lot better on a resume then whore does, too.[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.dooly420
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again.Dude, you're just making excuses because you can't hack that your sister is a whore. The fact that she gets paid for sexual acts makes her a whore, albeit a better paid and more glorified whore than just some hooker, but still a whore.
The camera makes absolutely no difference to the fact that she is a whore.
the camera makes all the difference. without it, every porn star would be in jail for soliciting prostitution. since they're not, they obviously aren't considered prostitutes. edit: and why are you so obsessed with my sister being a whore?The camera makes no difference, your reference to prostitution laws means nothing because whore means the same thing in pretty much all english speaking countries, yet prostitution is not illegal in all english speaking countries. Australia, England and the U.S all have legal brothels, the people who work in these brothels are whores.
And Im not obsessed, I started an argument and I'll be damned if I'm not gonna finish it.
but there's no camera in these brothels, so they're whores. porn stars perform on camera to be distributed to the public. people know the names of porn stars. nobody knows the name of some random whore. porn star looks a lot better on a resume then whore does, too.You're still trying to make technicalities where there are none. There doesn't need to be a camera, prostitutes get paid for sexual acts, porn stars get paid for sexual acts. The dictionary definition of a whore is someone who gets paid for performing sexual acts.
What happens after these sexual acts have been performed and paid for, in the way of distribution of filmed media matters not to whether the person can be called a whore or not.
[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.evil_dutchman90
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again.Dude, you're just making excuses because you can't hack that your sister is a whore. The fact that she gets paid for sexual acts makes her a whore, albeit a better paid and more glorified whore than just some hooker, but still a whore.
The camera makes absolutely no difference to the fact that she is a whore.
the camera makes all the difference. without it, every porn star would be in jail for soliciting prostitution. since they're not, they obviously aren't considered prostitutes. edit: and why are you so obsessed with my sister being a whore?The camera makes no difference, your reference to prostitution laws means nothing because whore means the same thing in pretty much all english speaking countries, yet prostitution is not illegal in all english speaking countries. Australia, England and the U.S all have legal brothels, the people who work in these brothels are whores.
And Im not obsessed, I started an argument and I'll be damned if I'm not gonna finish it.
but there's no camera in these brothels, so they're whores. porn stars perform on camera to be distributed to the public. people know the names of porn stars. nobody knows the name of some random whore. porn star looks a lot better on a resume then whore does, too.You're still trying to make technicalities where there are none. There doesn't need to be a camera, prostitutes get paid for sexual acts, porn stars get paid for sexual acts. The dictionary definition of a whore is someone who gets paid for performing sexual acts.
What happens after these sexual acts have been performed and paid for, in the way of distribution of filmed media matters not to whether the person can be called a whore or not.
i'm getting bored arguing about whores. so let's just say that i'm right and end it at that.[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.dooly420
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again.Dude, you're just making excuses because you can't hack that your sister is a whore. The fact that she gets paid for sexual acts makes her a whore, albeit a better paid and more glorified whore than just some hooker, but still a whore.
The camera makes absolutely no difference to the fact that she is a whore.
the camera makes all the difference. without it, every porn star would be in jail for soliciting prostitution. since they're not, they obviously aren't considered prostitutes. edit: and why are you so obsessed with my sister being a whore?The camera makes no difference, your reference to prostitution laws means nothing because whore means the same thing in pretty much all english speaking countries, yet prostitution is not illegal in all english speaking countries. Australia, England and the U.S all have legal brothels, the people who work in these brothels are whores.
And Im not obsessed, I started an argument and I'll be damned if I'm not gonna finish it.
but there's no camera in these brothels, so they're whores. porn stars perform on camera to be distributed to the public. people know the names of porn stars. nobody knows the name of some random whore. porn star looks a lot better on a resume then whore does, too.You're still trying to make technicalities where there are none. There doesn't need to be a camera, prostitutes get paid for sexual acts, porn stars get paid for sexual acts. The dictionary definition of a whore is someone who gets paid for performing sexual acts.
What happens after these sexual acts have been performed and paid for, in the way of distribution of filmed media matters not to whether the person can be called a whore or not.
i'm getting bored arguing about whores. so let's just say that i'm right and end it at that.No, because you are wrong. You are just trying to make yourself feel better about your sister being a whore.
[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]that says nothing about a camera being invovled. so by your definition, she's not a whore. i rest my case.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"][1:a woman who engages in sexual acts for money No, you weren't.dooly420
She still engages in sexual acts for money, the camera is just an extra part that makes no difference. your case is flawed.
the camera makes a big difference. without it, then it would be illegal. sex+money+camera=porn star which is totally legal. sex+money=prostitute which is illegal. i rest my case. again.Dude, you're just making excuses because you can't hack that your sister is a whore. The fact that she gets paid for sexual acts makes her a whore, albeit a better paid and more glorified whore than just some hooker, but still a whore.
The camera makes absolutely no difference to the fact that she is a whore.
the camera makes all the difference. without it, every porn star would be in jail for soliciting prostitution. since they're not, they obviously aren't considered prostitutes. edit: and why are you so obsessed with my sister being a whore?The camera makes no difference, your reference to prostitution laws means nothing because whore means the same thing in pretty much all english speaking countries, yet prostitution is not illegal in all english speaking countries. Australia, England and the U.S all have legal brothels, the people who work in these brothels are whores.
And Im not obsessed, I started an argument and I'll be damned if I'm not gonna finish it.
but there's no camera in these brothels, so they're whores. porn stars perform on camera to be distributed to the public. people know the names of porn stars. nobody knows the name of some random whore. porn star looks a lot better on a resume then whore does, too.sigged...[QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]No, because you are wrong. You are just trying to make yourself feel better about your sister being a whore.dooly420ok, so it's agreed. i'm right.
Har Har Har, like I said, you can't hack it.
ok, so it's agreed. i'm right.[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="evil_dutchman90"]No, because you are wrong. You are just trying to make yourself feel better about your sister being a whore.evil_dutchman90
Har Har Har, like I said, you can't hack it.
it's not my sister i'm defending, i could care less about her, it's the porn stars everywhere. they perform a service for the public. so if a woman and a man and another woman and a midget and a donkey want to mess around on camera for money, then who are you to call them whores? that camera is like a life line that separates the whores from the porn stars.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment