Whats a good reliable martial art to defend or fight with? I wanna learn one...
Suggestions?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Whats a good reliable martial art to defend or fight with? I wanna learn one...
Suggestions?
Gammet25
The art of the .45, its is very quick and easy to learn, and most people will see your knowledge of it and flee without a fight
I dont think there are all that many places that teach almost any of the martial arts you guys have suggested other than tae kwon do. They might be overall better and cooler but good luck finding someone who can teach it close.Sambo is great for one on one. Krav Magra (spelling?) is good for multiple attackers.
michael176585
Ground fighting is best since something like 80% of fights end up on the ground.Brazilian jiu jitsu. It has really gotten popular due to the popularity increase of MMA, so there are a lot of places that do it.
But you should definitely find one that suits your interest (ground fighting, traditional, weapons, etc).
IrishPunk
[QUOTE="IrishPunk"]Ground fighting is best since something like 80% of fights end up on the ground.Brazilian jiu jitsu. It has really gotten popular due to the popularity increase of MMA, so there are a lot of places that do it.
But you should definitely find one that suits your interest (ground fighting, traditional, weapons, etc).
DEVILinIRON
Difficult to apply in a real fight at times though. Sort of hard to armbar one dude while his two buddies are trying to kick your head off.
BJJ is probably one of the, if not the best art for one on one fighting. Unfortunately, real fights often aren't one on one.
That said, guillotine chokes a really, really good in most any situation.
You have a better chance of defending yourself properly if you learn Mixed Martial Arts. I say go with a mixture of
Karate, Wrestling, and Brazilian Jujitsu. You'd be a bad mother****** if you're able to master all of those and put
them into practice when needed.
Ground fighting is best since something like 80% of fights end up on the ground.[QUOTE="DEVILinIRON"][QUOTE="IrishPunk"]
Brazilian jiu jitsu. It has really gotten popular due to the popularity increase of MMA, so there are a lot of places that do it.
But you should definitely find one that suits your interest (ground fighting, traditional, weapons, etc).
Paladin_King
Difficult to apply in a real fight at times though. Sort of hard to armbar one dude while his two buddies are trying to kick your head off.
BJJ is probably one of the, if not the best art for one on one fighting. Unfortunately, real fights often aren't one on one.
That said, guillotine chokes a really, really good in most any situation.
No kidding. I can't even imagine. Not not to sure of any martial arts that teach you to handle more than one person at a time. Suppose in instances like the one you mentioned, it's easier to either have a weapon or run.Any martial art that focuses on cutting or stabbing the **** out of people. Or any martial art that utilizes shooting people with guns.
Because realistically speaking, as far as self-defense goes, the most that one usually has to do is to simply pull out a knife or a gun. You don't even have to know how to use it, simply showing it is enough to get most people to back off.
Second to that is simple diplomacy. I guarantee that talking your way out of **** is usually a far better alternative than trying to fight your way out of ****. And on those rare occasions when you DO have to fight your way out of a situation, then you're probably better off just pulling out a gun and shooting the dude who's trying to **** you up.
Now, if it's just for hobby or health or that kind of thing, I'm not talking about that. Martial arts teach discipline, focus, and practice. Things which can be applied to anything.
But when we're talking about self-defense, conventional martial arts are worthless. A gun beats any black belt, and the diplomat is smart enough to usually talk his way out of fighting in the first place.
And for the majority of people, they don't even need guns or Kung-Fu. Diplomacy is ALL they need.
Here hear!Any martial art that focuses on cutting or stabbing the **** out of people. Or any martial art that utilizes shooting people with guns.
Because realistically speaking, as far as self-defense goes, the most that one usually has to do is to simply pull out a knife or a gun. You don't even have to know how to use it, simply showing it is enough to get most people to back off.
Second to that is simple diplomacy. I guarantee that talking your way out of **** is usually a far better alternative than trying to fight your way out of ****. And on those rare occasions when you DO have to fight your way out of a situation, then you're probably better off just pulling out a gun and shooting the dude who's trying to **** you up.
Now, if it's just for hobby or health or that kind of thing, I'm not talking about that. Martial arts teach discipline, focus, and practice. Things which can be applied to anything.
But when we're talking about self-defense, conventional martial arts are worthless. A gun beats any black belt, and the diplomat is smart enough to usually talk his way out of fighting in the first place.
And for the majority of people, they don't even need guns or Kung-Fu. Diplomacy is ALL they need.
MrGeezer
[QUOTE="Gammet25"]
Whats a good reliable martial art to defend or fight with? I wanna learn one...
Suggestions?
SamusFreak
The art of the .45, its is very quick and easy to learn, and most people will see your knowledge of it and flee without a fight
I see your .45 and raise you the martial art of ka chuck, 12Gauge variant.8)
But when we're talking about self-defense, conventional martial arts are worthless. A gun beats any black belt, and the diplomat is smart enough to usually talk his way out of fighting in the first place.MrGeezerWorthless? That's quite the overstatement. Some people cannot be reasoned with, and not everyone walks around with a cannon 24/7, let alone is willing to use one. Martial arts do have a place of use in regards to self defense, so it is far from worthless.
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]But when we're talking about self-defense, conventional martial arts are worthless. A gun beats any black belt, and the diplomat is smart enough to usually talk his way out of fighting in the first place.BiancaDKWorthless? That's quite the overstatement. Some people cannot be reasoned with, and not everyone walks around with a cannon 24/7, let alone is willing to use one. Martial arts do have a place of use in regards to self defense, so it is far from worthless.
Yep. When you're at the bar and someone starts a fight with you, pulling out a gun or a knife is not the way to go.
Worthless? That's quite the overstatement. Some people cannot be reasoned with, and not everyone walks around with a cannon 24/7, let alone is willing to use one. Martial arts do have a place of use in regards to self defense, so it is far from worthless.[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"]But when we're talking about self-defense, conventional martial arts are worthless. A gun beats any black belt, and the diplomat is smart enough to usually talk his way out of fighting in the first place.IrishPunk
Yep. When you're at the bar and someone starts a fight with you, pulling out a gun or a knife is not the way to go.
It will hopefully sit his punk ass down though.
Worthless? That's quite the overstatement. Some people cannot be reasoned with, and not everyone walks around with a cannon 24/7, let alone is willing to use one. Martial arts do have a place of use in regards to self defense, so it is far from worthless.[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"]But when we're talking about self-defense, conventional martial arts are worthless. A gun beats any black belt, and the diplomat is smart enough to usually talk his way out of fighting in the first place.IrishPunk
Yep. When you're at the bar and someone starts a fight with you, pulling out a gun or a knife is not the way to go.
Depends on what the circumstances are. This holds true for any fight that isn't regulated...It will hopefully sit his punk ass down though.StripTheSoulTwo things; 1: Pulling a knife or a gun on another person is not legal. 2: What if it doesen't sit his punk ass down? Gonna' stab him? Shoot him? Or quell the situation with a quick armlock, handing him over to the bouncers.
[QUOTE="StripTheSoul"]It will hopefully sit his punk ass down though.BiancaDKTwo things; 1: Pulling a knife or a gun on another person is not legal. 2: What if it doesen't sit his punk ass down? Gonna' stab him? Shoot him? Or quell the situation with a quick armlock, handing him over to the bouncers. Actually, depending on the circumstances, even using a martial art isn't legal.
Depends on what the circumstances are. This holds true for any fight that isn't regulated...DEVILinIRONOfcourse it depends on what the circumstances are. If he has a carbine assault rifle pointed at you, i would prefer having a gun as well, but as a rule of thumb; pulling weapons can escalate the conflict into a place where you don't want to find yourself being at.
[QUOTE="DEVILinIRON"]Depends on what the circumstances are. This holds true for any fight that isn't regulated...BiancaDKOfcourse it depends on what the circumstances are. If he has a carbine assault rifle pointed at you, i would prefer having a gun as well, but as a rule of thumb; pulling weapons can escalate the conflict into a place where you don't want to find yourself being at. Right. Totally agree.
[QUOTE="StripTheSoul"]It will hopefully sit his punk ass down though.BiancaDKTwo things; 1: Pulling a knife or a gun on another person is not legal. 2: What if it doesen't sit his punk ass down? Gonna' stab him? Shoot him? Or quell the situation with a quick armlock, handing him over to the bouncers.
***** will be stepping off when I'm throwing mah piece around like a mad ******.
Straight ballin' yo.
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="StripTheSoul"]It will hopefully sit his punk ass down though.DEVILinIRONTwo things; 1: Pulling a knife or a gun on another person is not legal. 2: What if it doesen't sit his punk ass down? Gonna' stab him? Shoot him? Or quell the situation with a quick armlock, handing him over to the bouncers. Actually, depending on the circumstances, even using a martial art isn't legal.
If someone meets you with force, you must only use just enough force to protect yourself. If you pull our a gun or a knife in a bar fight, and it ends up getting used, the judge you meet in court is not going to show much compassion.
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]But when we're talking about self-defense, conventional martial arts are worthless. A gun beats any black belt, and the diplomat is smart enough to usually talk his way out of fighting in the first place.BiancaDKWorthless? That's quite the overstatement. Some people cannot be reasoned with, and not everyone walks around with a cannon 24/7, let alone is willing to use one. Martial arts do have a place of use in regards to self defense, so it is far from worthless.
*Shrugs*
I've never been in a fight yet, because **** that ****.
I've been in many situations in which people tried to start fights with me, and I've never been in a fight. And I've hung out with some pretty nasty people.
Of course I'm not saying that martial arts is NEVER of value. It's just that...most people simply use it to win fights that they could have otherwise completely avoided. I haven't gone 30 years without ever being in a fight because I cant kick peoples' asses in a fight. I've gone 30 years without ever being in a fight solely because most people usually CAN talk their way out of this ****.
Two things; 1: Pulling a knife or a gun on another person is not legal. 2: What if it doesen't sit his punk ass down? Gonna' stab him? Shoot him? Or quell the situation with a quick armlock, handing him over to the bouncers.[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="StripTheSoul"]It will hopefully sit his punk ass down though.StripTheSoul
***** will be stepping off when I'm throwing mah piece around like a mad ******.
Straight ballin' yo.
Easy now, big buy. =][QUOTE="StripTheSoul"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] Two things; 1: Pulling a knife or a gun on another person is not legal. 2: What if it doesen't sit his punk ass down? Gonna' stab him? Shoot him? Or quell the situation with a quick armlock, handing him over to the bouncers.BiancaDK
***** will be stepping off when I'm throwing mah piece around like a mad ******.
Straight ballin' yo.
Easy now, big buy. =]It was a cheap buy actually, think it was used in an unsolved murder case :/
[QUOTE="DEVILinIRON"]Actually, depending on the circumstances, even using a martial art isn't legal. BiancaDKI realize that, but chances are, it wont escalate the conflict into a place where you are bound to find yourself doing something even more illegal. It really depends... I suppose I should leave it at that. As long as you are using the martial art to merely defend yourself and not cause any more damage than necessary, I agree. It's hard to consider chances at the spur of the moment... I've been in fights before, and believe me, self-control is definitely an issue to consider. So much so, that it's best avoiding such situations at all costs...
Worthless? That's quite the overstatement. Some people cannot be reasoned with, and not everyone walks around with a cannon 24/7, let alone is willing to use one. Martial arts do have a place of use in regards to self defense, so it is far from worthless.[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"]But when we're talking about self-defense, conventional martial arts are worthless. A gun beats any black belt, and the diplomat is smart enough to usually talk his way out of fighting in the first place.MrGeezer
*Shrugs*
I've never been in a fight yet, because **** that ****.
I've been in many situations in which people tried to start fights with me, and I've never been in a fight. And I've hung out with some pretty nasty people.
Of course I'm not saying that martial arts is NEVER of value. It's just that...most people simply use it to win fights that they could have otherwise completely avoided. I haven't gone 30 years without ever being in a fight because I cant kick peoples' asses in a fight. I've gone 30 years without ever being in a fight solely because most people usually CAN talk their way out of this ****.
I overall agree with you, fighting is the least favourable solution to a problem. =]the only martial art that can beat a knife, gun, or 2-3 people at the same time is krav maga. jason bourne uses it, and on youtube theres good videos on it, the instructor teaches you how to grab a gun pointed at your face, redirect it, punch the guy in the face, break his finger in the trigger, pull the gun away, and use the nike defense (run away). search "expert village krav maga" they posted like 10 of those videos and theyre actually goodserver
Which shouldn't even be possible, if the person with the gun has any ****ing idea how to use a gun. It's a gun because it's for medium-long range combat. Yoiu're not SUPPOSED to be using a gun against opponents who are close enough to you to grab your gun. For someone to ever even be in that situation implies that they have a gun while completely failing to understand the basic concept of guns.
And in most cases when someone DOES pull a gun on you at such close range, it's often because they really ARE ignorant and untrained idiots who only want your wallet. In which case, it's usually better to just give them your ****ing wallet. I don't care how well-trained you are, fighting is more likely to get you shot. And that's stupid, when you can just call you credit card companies and report your **** stolen.
I'm not saying that such skills are NEVER useful, but it has to be so ****ing rare that it's not even worth thinking about.
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="DEVILinIRON"]Actually, depending on the circumstances, even using a martial art isn't legal. DEVILinIRONI realize that, but chances are, it wont escalate the conflict into a place where you are bound to find yourself doing something even more illegal. It really depends... I suppose I should leave it at that. As long as you are using the martial art to merely defend yourself and not cause any more damage than necessary, I agree. It's hard to consider chances at the spur of the moment... I've been in fights before, and believe me, self-control is definitely an issue to consider. So much so, that it's best avoiding such situations at all costs... Yes, it really depends. *nods*
[QUOTE="StripTheSoul"]It will hopefully sit his punk ass down though.BiancaDKTwo things; 1: Pulling a knife or a gun on another person is not legal. 2: What if it doesen't sit his punk ass down? Gonna' stab him? Shoot him? Or quell the situation with a quick armlock, handing him over to the bouncers.
Fistfights and chokeholds and kicks are also not legal.
And if you punch a person and he/she dies as a result (which DOES happen), it's still potentially murder. Just as if you'd stabbed them or shot them.
That's one of the reasons why you AVOID fights. You only fight when you NEED to. If you DON'T need to, then fighting with your hands can land you in prison for murder just as if you'd fought with a gun.
Even highly trained martial artists are better off avoiding fights, because they don't know what weapons the opponent is carrying. Even the legendary and unbeatable Japanese Warrior Musashi turned down fights. Because...**** that.
Two things; 1: Pulling a knife or a gun on another person is not legal. 2: What if it doesen't sit his punk ass down? Gonna' stab him? Shoot him? Or quell the situation with a quick armlock, handing him over to the bouncers.[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="StripTheSoul"]It will hopefully sit his punk ass down though.MrGeezer
Fistfights and chokeholds and kicks are also not legal.
And if you punch a person and he/she dies as a result (which DOES happen), it's still potentially murder. Just as if you'd stabbed them or shot them.
That's one of the reasons why you AVOID fights. You only fight when you NEED to. If you DON'T need to, then fighting with your hands can land you in prison for murder just as if you'd fought with a gun.
Even highly trained martial artists are better off avoiding fights, because they don't know what weapons the opponent is carrying. Even the legendary and unbeatable Japanese Warrior Musashi turned down fights. Because...**** that.
I know these things. Thats entirely besides my point, though. I'm not sure if you're trying to counterargue my point or just adding information to it. But yeah, i agree with you. Again. =][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] Two things; 1: Pulling a knife or a gun on another person is not legal. 2: What if it doesen't sit his punk ass down? Gonna' stab him? Shoot him? Or quell the situation with a quick armlock, handing him over to the bouncers.BiancaDK
Fistfights and chokeholds and kicks are also not legal.
And if you punch a person and he/she dies as a result (which DOES happen), it's still potentially murder. Just as if you'd stabbed them or shot them.
That's one of the reasons why you AVOID fights. You only fight when you NEED to. If you DON'T need to, then fighting with your hands can land you in prison for murder just as if you'd fought with a gun.
Even highly trained martial artists are better off avoiding fights, because they don't know what weapons the opponent is carrying. Even the legendary and unbeatable Japanese Warrior Musashi turned down fights. Because...**** that.
I know these things. Thats entirely besides my point, though. I'm not sure if you're trying to counterargue my point or just adding information to it. But yeah, i agree with you. Again. =]Nah.
I see your objection to my initial statement that "martial arts are pointless". I didn't mean to state that hand-to-hand combat NEVER has a place.
I only meant to say that using martial arts to kick peoples' asses is just as illegal as using knives or guns to kick peoples' asses. So everything else aside, LEGALITY says that one should not resort to ANY violence unless it's absolutely necessary.
And yes, you do what you have to do. If you're in a situation that requires the use of fists/knives/guns, then law be damned. You do what you must. But you're doing something ILLEGAL which could potentially get you a significant amount of time in prison. In the VAST majority of cases, diplomacy is preferrable. Because in most cases, most people can talk their way out of these situations without violence occurring. And in the minority of situations in which illegal and deadly martial arts ARE required, guns and knives are often and effective substitute. This doesn't apply with EVERY situation, sure. But in MOST situations, simply pulling out a knife or a gun is more effective than displaying your fighting stance. Most people with weapons don't want to get into a fight with someone who already has a knife/gun drawn. Even if they're martial arts experts, most people back away from that ****. Whereas, displaying your fighting stance is far less likely to get anyone to back down.
But yeah, I guess we agree. I'll admit that it was unfair for me to make the initial statement that martial arts are useless. That was wrong, ad I'll admit it. Far more accurate would have been for me to say that martial arts are useless in most situations, and specifically when we're talking about martial arts as self-defense.
But I certainly have a lot of respect for martial arts. It helps people to build character, balls, and discipline. And that's useful, even if you never get into a fight. Because you can apply those sorts of lessons to almost ANYTHING.
I think the best thing to learn is a Jeremiah Johnson-style kick to the chest. Seriously, you don't want to **** with someone who just kicked you in the chest.
Sho Shu. I took it for about a year when I was younger. It is a truly savage martial art that is not taught to widespread and is prohibited in all competitive fighting leagues. Most every move they teach you in it is fatal for your opponent.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment