[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="mindstorm"] [QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]If one is to understand the Bible as it was originally meant then one cannot come to believe that the Bible and Evolution can coexist. To believe in Evolution would contradict many aspects of the creation mentioned in the Bible. Only recently is Genesis pre-flood taken allegorically in the way that it is. If one is to be a Bible believing Christian then one cannot compromise what the book says.mindstorm
the scientific community abandoned the Global flood story 200 years ago what with James Hutton and all. Why is it that when one person who either is a Christian or claim to be a Christian says or does something somehow people take it to mean all people believe that? An example is the Pope, he has officially endorced Evolution. Because he says something doesn't mean I am to believe it. According to him I'm not even a Christian...
ooookay. so, other than it being in the book of Genesis, why do you believe the story about Noah's ark? do you endorse a global flood theory?
Yes, I do indeed endorse the global flood theory. As in two of every kind (not species) of animal got on the ark and 7 of some. As in every animal and person outside the ark was distroyed.
==Oh, you're going to hate me by the end of this.
So basically there are billions and billions of species of animals. There are several thousand species of, say, beetle. If this flood occured, say, four to five thousand years ago, then what you're telling me is that the four hundred thousand species of beetle, then, evolved over this time period? That would mean that there are one hundred species of beetle formed every year, which is approximately one species every half month.
This is an absurd evaluation, because if this were true when a woman had a child it would be an entirely new organism. But this is indeed not so.
Log in to comment