well besides the reasons already stated, it's not all that an intelligent of a choice to name your child specifically after somebody who murdered millions.
well besides the reasons already stated, it's not all that an intelligent of a choice to name your child specifically after somebody who murdered millions.XilePrincess
Roosevelt signet the paper for the two nukes just like hitler did with the holocaust
[QUOTE="XilePrincess"]well besides the reasons already stated, it's not all that an intelligent of a choice to name your child specifically after somebody who murdered millions.HFkami
Roosevelt signet the paper for the two nukes just like hitler did with the holocaust
Roosevelt didnt sign those papers it was president truman, Roosevelt was dead :roll:
And the Holocaust and the Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima aren't comparable in ANY WAY.
[QUOTE="XilePrincess"]well besides the reasons already stated, it's not all that an intelligent of a choice to name your child specifically after somebody who murdered millions.HFkami
Roosevelt signet the paper for the two nukes just like hitler did with the holocaust
good point and TC, name your kid that and let us know
[QUOTE="XilePrincess"]well besides the reasons already stated, it's not all that an intelligent of a choice to name your child specifically after somebody who murdered millions.HFkami
Roosevelt signet the paper for the two nukes just like hitler did with the holocaust
President Truman
In any case, that doesn't make it a good idea to name your child after the man responsible for the attempted systematic extermination of the Jewish race.
Unless you want to change your family name, you can't give a kid that kind of name without making it sound funny - two surnames and no first name is rather odd.
Although, you really shouldn't do either if you intend your kid not to be miserable for his whole life.
[QUOTE="XilePrincess"]well besides the reasons already stated, it's not all that an intelligent of a choice to name your child specifically after somebody who murdered millions.Sp4rtan_3
Roosevelt signet the paper for the two nukes just like hitler did with the holocaust
Roosevelt didnt sign those papers it was president truman, Roosevelt was dead :roll:
And the Holocaust and the Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima aren't comparable in ANY WAY.
Roosevelt signet the paper for the two nukes just like hitler did with the holocaust
Roosevelt didnt sign those papers it was president truman, Roosevelt was dead :roll:
And the Holocaust and the Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima aren't comparable in ANY WAY.
i still have a point there
No, hitler did it for the hell of doing it, we did it becasue japan would not end the war because of their beliefs. We wanted to end the war. We only bombed one city at first and japan still didnt give up. People dont know that, they also refused our peace treaty. We gave them plenty of chaces.
I'm naming my kid Stalin M. Hitler (M is for Mussolini). I'm going to send him to some expensive liberal private school in Manhattan. He'll be the coolest kid in school.
I'm naming my kid Stalin M. Hitler (M is for Mussolini). I'm going to send him to some expensive liberal private school in Manhattan. He'll be the coolest kid in school. wstfld
Well at least he won't get bullied. He'll do the bullying if he goes to a liberal school. :P
Such a bad name. You're setting your kid up for a lifetime of inevitable harrassment with a name like that. Theoretically, "it's just a name," but get real. Name him Bob or Joe, not Hitler
[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"] Roosevelt didnt sign those papers it was president truman, Roosevelt was dead :roll:
And the Holocaust and the Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima aren't comparable in ANY WAY.
kipohippo021
i still have a point there
No, hitler did it for the hell of doing it, we did it becasue japan would not end the war because of their beliefs. We wanted to end the war. We only bombed one city at first and japan still didnt give up. People dont know that, they also refused our peace treaty. We gave them plenty of chaces.
[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"] Roosevelt didnt sign those papers it was president truman, Roosevelt was dead :roll:
And the Holocaust and the Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima aren't comparable in ANY WAY.
i still have a point there
No, hitler did it for the hell of doing it, we did it becasue japan would not end the war because of their beliefs. We wanted to end the war. We only bombed one city at first and japan still didnt give up. People dont know that, they also refused our peace treaty. We gave them plenty of chaces. Hitler didn't do it for the hell of it he did it because he believed it was the right think to do. I read like a week ago that apperently Japan wanted the war ended and were ready to surrender. For sure if you are american there is no doubt you would have been taught that it was because you guys came into the war that it was that sole reason alone the nazis were defeated. I would like to know how you think that blowing up cities with civilians in it with a weapon that was not tested and was dropped soley with the intent of basic human extinction. You can argue that Roosevelt was a better person over all but you can not argue that he signed papers knowing full well it was planned to wipe out as many people as possible without reguards of hurting innocent civilian life.
Log in to comment