This topic is locked from further discussion.
I think he's an idiot. Along with men like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who are only trying to incite people to violence.
It's pathetic that they're politicizing the death of this young man in face of evidence showing he may very well have been in the wrong.
"Idiot like Al sharpton" Well, Al hasn't been relevant for quite some time.dr-professional
Could have fooled me, the way he's been stirring things up.
"Posting videos from yesterday" You're not very smart aren't you. Usually if one sees one video, and he likes it, he looks at the person (Or in this case from what I see Person(S))) he see's the rest of the channel and looks at the rest of the videos. But that's way too hard for you to comprehend so may I suggest going to SW or something where people have your IQ?dr-professional
Someone is rather defensive...
so you stumbled upon a terrible channel made 2 days ago? with likely no views... on accident? and use them as your source of news? and make topics on each video?
I don't have a problem with that specifically, but Bobby Rush is a blithering f*cking moron. I mean really, the guy sounds mentally challenged most of the time.RhazaknaWell the public disagreed who voted for him. I am not saying you are wrong but clearly he is not a moron and has social intelligence if he has become a congressman. Its kind of like how some entertainers drop out of highschool (they are not dumb just have a different set of intelligence).
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]I don't have a problem with that specifically, but Bobby Rush is a blithering f*cking moron. I mean really, the guy sounds mentally challenged most of the time.FlippyMittensWell the public disagreed who voted for him. I am not saying you are wrong but clearly he is not a moron and has social intelligence if he has become a congressman. Its kind of like how some entertainers drop out of highschool (they are not dumb just have a different set of intelligence). It takes certain skills to be elected to office, but intellect is not required, and can be a detriment in some cases. I agree that elected politicians have a kind of intelligence, but it has to do with knowing how to manipulate the people around you. Not something that society should value, I think.
How are they calling people to commit violence?I think he's an idiot. Along with men like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who are only trying to incite people to violence.
It's pathetic that they're politicizing the death of this young man in face of evidence showing he may very well have been in the wrong.
airshocker
[QUOTE="airshocker"]How are they calling people to commit violence? they're not. I don't like either of them, but to say they are trying to incite violence is wrong.I think he's an idiot. Along with men like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who are only trying to incite people to violence.
It's pathetic that they're politicizing the death of this young man in face of evidence showing he may very well have been in the wrong.
BossPerson
[QUOTE="FlippyMittens"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"]I don't have a problem with that specifically, but Bobby Rush is a blithering f*cking moron. I mean really, the guy sounds mentally challenged most of the time.RhazaknaWell the public disagreed who voted for him. I am not saying you are wrong but clearly he is not a moron and has social intelligence if he has become a congressman. Its kind of like how some entertainers drop out of highschool (they are not dumb just have a different set of intelligence). It takes certain skills to be elected to office, but intellect is not required, and can be a detriment in some cases. I agree that elected politicians have a kind of intelligence, but it has to do with knowing how to manipulate the people around you. Not something that society should value, I think. Politicians get college degrees and that requires some degree of intelligence. I would agree that the way are political system is can be a detriment to society but so can the way pay is distributed and the growing degree of income inequality. Haven't quite a few countries passed the US in terms of average person's living standards?
Unnecessary and inappropriate.
lo_Pine
And what do you think would be an appropriate way to protest against the system protecting the murderer of a teenage boy?
[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]
Unnecessary and inappropriate.
PfizersaurusRex
And what do you think would be an appropriate way to protest against the system protecting the murderer of a teenage boy?
Convicting someone on the House floor without all of the evidence is irresponsible and stupid for a Congressman.They aren't any worse than Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'ReillyI think he's an idiot. Along with men like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who are only trying to incite people to violence.
It's pathetic that they're politicizing the death of this young man in face of evidence showing he may very well have been in the wrong.
airshocker
He's an idiot. It's irresponsible for Congressmen to comment on cases that are under investigation by the police. KC_HokieThis. It has not yet been proven that the "victim" was wrongfully killed. People blindly follow the news without knowing all the facts. It may very well look like he was murdered for no reason, but that may not be the case since it's under investigation. For a congressman to join in that irrational thought process is disturbing, to say the least.
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]He's an idiot. It's irresponsible for Congressmen to comment on cases that are under investigation by the police. Ghost_702This. It has not yet been proven that the "victim" was wrongfully killed. People blindly follow the news without knowing all the facts. It may very well look like he was murdered for no reason, but that may not be the case since it's under investigation. For a congressman to join in that irrational thought process is disturbing, to say the least.
He didn't mention the "suspect" at all. He was protesting against such murders being legal, or at least that's how I see it.
How are they calling people to commit violence?BossPerson
He said something within the last couple weeks, I can't find the video but I was watching it on TV at the time. Or at least it sounded very much like trying to provocate an issue where one doesn't even exist.
Here's an examiner article about it. And while I'm loathe to use O'Reilly as a source, he puts it pretty well.
Every liberal in this damn country is trying to make this a race issue when it isn't, and I simply believe Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are disgusting human beings for it.
They aren't any worse than Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly Bucked20
They're much worse. O'Reilly and Limbaugh aren't calling for a ridiculous "escalation in civil disobedience".
You all think this was a race issue when it really wasn't.
He didn't mention the "suspect" at all. He was protesting against such murders being legal, or at least that's how I see it.
PfizersaurusRex
It's not murder. Stop throwing the word around so lightly. He has to be convicted for it to be murder.
[QUOTE="PfizersaurusRex"][QUOTE="lo_Pine"]
Unnecessary and inappropriate.
KC_Hokie
And what do you think would be an appropriate way to protest against the system protecting the murderer of a teenage boy?
Convicting someone on the House floor without all of the evidence is irresponsible and stupid for a Congressman. Exactly ;)[QUOTE="Bucked20"]They aren't any worse than Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly airshocker
They're much worse. O'Reilly and Limbaugh aren't calling for a ridiculous "escalation in civil disobedience".
You all think this was a race issue when it really wasn't.
If its not about race why did he call the police on so many black people ?If its not about race why did he call the police on so many black people ?Bucked20
Two questions, what are you talking about and what does it have to do with Trayvon Martin?
IIRC, a witness is backing up what Zimmerman did. It doesn't get much cut and dry as that.
[QUOTE="airshocker"][QUOTE="Bucked20"]They aren't any worse than Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly Bucked20
They're much worse. O'Reilly and Limbaugh aren't calling for a ridiculous "escalation in civil disobedience".
You all think this was a race issue when it really wasn't.
If its not about race why did he call the police on so many black people ?He has black neighbors defending him and one of his closest, most outspoken defenders is a black guy. On top that Zimmerman was known to mentor black kids.[QUOTE="Bucked20"][QUOTE="airshocker"]If its not about race why did he call the police on so many black people ?He has black neighbors defending him and one of his closest, most outspoken defenders is a black guy. On top that Zimmerman was known to mentor black kids. and about the c**n thing, people all say bad things in the heat of the moment. I've said alot of things that i want to regret, we all make these mistakes when we're angryThey're much worse. O'Reilly and Limbaugh aren't calling for a ridiculous "escalation in civil disobedience".
You all think this was a race issue when it really wasn't.
KC_Hokie
[QUOTE="Bucked20"]If its not about race why did he call the police on so many black people ?airshocker
Two questions, what are you talking about and what does it have to do with Trayvon Martin?
IIRC, a witness is backing up what Zimmerman did. It doesn't get much cut and dry as that.
He stalked him,tried to test him and ended up getting beat,he could of easily stayed in his car instead of being a paranoid b*tch.He stalked him,tried to test him and ended up getting beat,he could of easily stayed in his car instead of being a paranoid b*tch.Bucked20
You didn't answer my question and instead went off on something completely different. Bravo.
[QUOTE="airshocker"][QUOTE="Bucked20"]If its not about race why did he call the police on so many black people ?Bucked20
Two questions, what are you talking about and what does it have to do with Trayvon Martin?
IIRC, a witness is backing up what Zimmerman did. It doesn't get much cut and dry as that.
He stalked him,tried to test him and ended up getting beat,he could of easily stayed in his car instead of being a paranoid b*tch.Easy to say in hindsight. That neighborhood had a huge crime problem and the vast majority of those crimes were due to young black men. They had eight break ins over the course of 14 months...all confirmed to be young black men.This TM case has Draged on W-A-Y,W-A-Y....to long. TM needs to rest in Peace. If this was a Black-on Black killing we would NOT be where we are now.:twisted:
[QUOTE="Bucked20"]He stalked him,tried to test him and ended up getting beat,he could of easily stayed in his car instead of being a paranoid b*tch.airshocker
You didn't answer my question and instead went off on something completely different. Bravo.
He called the police 50 times on black people stop acting like you don't know that part of the storyExactly. If one black guy killed 20 other black guys would Al Sharpton or the media care?This TM case has Draged on W-A-Y,W-A-Y....to long. TM needs to rest in Peace. If this was a Black-on Black killing we would NOT be where we are now.:twisted:
Easports48
Absolutely not.
[QUOTE="Bucked20"][QUOTE="airshocker"]He stalked him,tried to test him and ended up getting beat,he could of easily stayed in his car instead of being a paranoid b*tch.Easy to say in hindsight. That neighborhood had a huge crime problem and the vast majority of those crimes were due to young black men. They had eight break ins over the course of 14 months...all confirmed to be young black men.Two questions, what are you talking about and what does it have to do with Trayvon Martin?
IIRC, a witness is backing up what Zimmerman did. It doesn't get much cut and dry as that.
KC_Hokie
Sooo that gives him the right to stalk and call the police on every black man that he see's ?
[QUOTE="airshocker"][QUOTE="Bucked20"]He stalked him,tried to test him and ended up getting beat,he could of easily stayed in his car instead of being a paranoid b*tch.Bucked20
You didn't answer my question and instead went off on something completely different. Bravo.
He called the police 50 times on black people stop acting like you don't know that part of the story He called them 41 times since 2004. Sometimes reporting pot holes. He certainly did not call the police 'on black people' in every single call.He called the police 50 times on black people stop acting like you don't know that part of the story Bucked20
I don't know that part of the story, you fvckwit. Unlike you I'm not giving this story a great deal of attention. I'm positive the justice system will do it's job.
That doesn't change the fact that all of the evidence is showing this wasn't a race issue.
Easy to say in hindsight. That neighborhood had a huge crime problem and the vast majority of those crimes were due to young black men. They had eight break ins over the course of 14 months...all confirmed to be young black men.[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Bucked20"]He stalked him,tried to test him and ended up getting beat,he could of easily stayed in his car instead of being a paranoid b*tch.Bucked20
Sooo that gives him the right to stalk and call the police on every black man that he see's ?
Following someone suspicious in your neighborhood is 'stalking'? Especially when you are the community watch leader?[QUOTE="Bucked20"][QUOTE="airshocker"]He called the police 50 times on black people stop acting like you don't know that part of the story He called them 41 times since 2004. Sometimes reporting pot holes. He certainly did not call the police 'on black people' in every single call.You didn't answer my question and instead went off on something completely different. Bravo.
KC_Hokie
Anyone who calls the police that much is a certified b*tch and what kind of fool calls the police to report potholes
He called them 41 times since 2004. Sometimes reporting pot holes. He certainly did not call the police 'on black people' in every single call.[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Bucked20"] He called the police 50 times on black people stop acting like you don't know that part of the story Bucked20
Anyone who calls the police that much is a certified b*tch and what kind of fool calls the police to report potholes
That's five times per year. The police said that's not much and even encourage residents to call them.By law a policeman can't just stop random people on the streets. That's unconstitutional. However, a citizen can confront someone and if they call the police the police can then confront those people. That's why the police actually encourage being called.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment