Which one of the 3 SAW movies is better?
Are they chonologic? do I miss out on anything if I just go ahead and see the last one?
or should I just get Hostel I first?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
i like the first one best. i think the series progressively gets more gore and less plot. dissonantblack
The 2nd one had a great plot line and wasn't as confusing as the first one.
The first one, the one that tried to be a horror movie instead of a useless gore flick, like the other 2.
I don't know, haven't SAWN any of them.
*cackle cackle cackle*
CrimzonTide
Did you just use a pun? :lol:
[QUOTE="XenoNinja"]I liked the forth Saw movie, it was pretty gory.playstation2004
Theres a fourth?
Stop trying to run up your post count!
The first one is the best, probably followed by 3.
Definitely see the first movie at least. It is one of the most genius plots ever made!
BTW random question to everyone, is the Hostel 2 ending really as "amazing" as I keep hearing on tv? If it truly is a great ending, I might check out the series just to see this ending...
I only saw the first two. The first one was pretty good, and the second one made me not really want to see the third one.
The first one had an interesting, if a bit over-the-top, plot, and really wasn't all that gory for the most part.
Saw>Saw III>Saw II
I had such a hard time deciding whether Saw III was better than the first, but I decidedI liked the first better since it seemed a more well made movie.
I've only seen Saw 2 and I thought it was a disgustingly sadistic gorefest. I'm not against gore and violence in movies, but some movies go too far. Heathcliff
:|It wasn't that gory.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment