Which type of post-apocalyptic life is the "best" (poll)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for EsYuGee
EsYuGee

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 EsYuGee
Member since 2007 • 466 Posts

I've been watching The Walking Dead recently and it got me thinking about the end of the world as we know it. We all know about the zombie apocalypse, but what about the others?

Mad Max: Nuclear apocalypse ends most life and people live in a mostly lawless land

Waterworld: The ocean level rises and everyone has to live on boats, small islands, etc.

Alien: Something like Battlefield Earth maybe. Aliens kill most people and enslave most of the remainders.

Environmental: Think of the movie 2012.

BTW, it didn't mention a Fallout-style one with mutants, etc. because that would by far be the worst, and we're trying to think about the most liveable situation.

Avatar image for deactivated-598fc45371265
deactivated-598fc45371265

13247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-598fc45371265
Member since 2008 • 13247 Posts

Waterworld sounds fun..... and not as depressing as some of the other stuff....

Avatar image for TheWZRD
TheWZRD

605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TheWZRD
Member since 2012 • 605 Posts

Environmental

Avatar image for IcyToasters
IcyToasters

12476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 IcyToasters
Member since 2007 • 12476 Posts

I voted zombies before I read about water world. That might be pretty okay.

I'm already used to the humidity ruining my hair!

Avatar image for ColdExistence
ColdExistence

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ColdExistence
Member since 2011 • 974 Posts

Containing a zombie threat would be pretty easy. The only reason it's hard in movies and what not is because the characters are stupid and suck at fighting them. Why not use tanks? Zombies can't do ****.

Avatar image for Austindro
Austindro

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Austindro
Member since 2011 • 856 Posts

Containing a zombie threat would be pretty easy. The only reason it's hard in movies and what not is because the characters are stupid and suck at fighting them. Why not use tanks? Zombies can't do ****.

ColdExistence

This

Based on the intelligence of the zombies depicted in most movies though.

Edit: I dont' want to face an Einstein zombie.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
water world would be like the wind waker so I'm down with that
Avatar image for ColdExistence
ColdExistence

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ColdExistence
Member since 2011 • 974 Posts

[QUOTE="ColdExistence"]

Containing a zombie threat would be pretty easy. The only reason it's hard in movies and what not is because the characters are stupid and suck at fighting them. Why not use tanks? Zombies can't do ****.

Austindro

This

Based on the intelligence of the zombies depicted in most movies though.

Yeah, it depends. If this was an extremely powerful airborne virus, we'd likely be ****ed. It doesn't matter if we can kill all the zombies.

Avatar image for EsYuGee
EsYuGee

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 EsYuGee
Member since 2007 • 466 Posts

Containing a zombie threat would be pretty easy. The only reason it's hard in movies and what not is because the characters are stupid and suck at fighting them. Why not use tanks? Zombies can't do ****.

ColdExistence
What if the virus is airborne and only a few people are resistant to it? Also, zombies might be dumb but they were pretty fast in Dawn of the Dead though.