who else is sick and tired of sexuality discrimination?

who's with me?

wait what

*inspects picture*

The man is with a female dog and the woman is with a male dog.

Um, yeah, the species thing, ah, I gotta go with the Conservatives on that one.

Since I'm a lesbian I'm all for the gender thing but the species thing?

Have you ever seen the things women and men do with dogs? The internet has introduced me to scary things...

So only DOGS can marry?

You're discriminating against other animals!

I'm sick of hearing about it.

What if I want to marry a horse?megagene

You're already allowed to in ~15 states.

What if I want to marry a horse?megagene

Since I'm a lesbian I'm all for the gender thing but the species thing?

Have you ever seen the things women and men do with dogs? The internet has introduced me to scary things...

Raikoh_

i feel weird? :?

I want to marry a robot.

I want to marry a robot.

avatar_genius

Obviously gender shouldn't matter, but species is a different issue. They can't consent to being in a relationship with a human, and since they can't communicate clearly with us and tell us exactly what they think, then it can definitely be considered animal abuse. The entire relationship would be based on coercion; the animal can't say what it wants and doesn't want, so it basically becomes the human forcing his/herself upon him/her, which, even in a human to human relationship, isn't healthy for either party.

Obviously gender shouldn't matter, but species is a different issue. They can't consent to being in a relationship with a human, and since they can't communicate clearly with us and tell us exactly what they think, then it can definitely be considered animal abuse. The entire relationship would be based on coercion; the animal can't say what it wants and doesn't want, so it basically becomes the human forcing his/herself upon him/her, which, even in a human to human relationship, isn't healthy for either party.

neondreamscape

There really should be no need to rationalise why we shouldn't have sex with animals.

[QUOTE="megagene"]What if I want to marry a horse?Theokhoth

You're already allowed to in ~15 states.

Honestly, I find that really gross.

[QUOTE="neondreamscape"]

Obviously gender shouldn't matter, but species is a different issue. They can't consent to being in a relationship with a human, and since they can't communicate clearly with us and tell us exactly what they think, then it can definitely be considered animal abuse. The entire relationship would be based on coercion; the animal can't say what it wants and doesn't want, so it basically becomes the human forcing his/herself upon him/her, which, even in a human to human relationship, isn't healthy for either party.

Theokhoth

There really should be no need to rationalise why we shouldn't have sex with animals.

[QUOTE="neondreamscape"]

Obviously gender shouldn't matter, but species is a different issue. They can't consent to being in a relationship with a human, and since they can't communicate clearly with us and tell us exactly what they think, then it can definitely be considered animal abuse. The entire relationship would be based on coercion; the animal can't say what it wants and doesn't want, so it basically becomes the human forcing his/herself upon him/her, which, even in a human to human relationship, isn't healthy for either party.

Theokhoth

There really should be no need to rationalise why we shouldn't have sex with animals.

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="megagene"]What if I want to marry a horse?avatar_genius

You're already allowed to in ~15 states.

Honestly, I find that really gross.

Most people do. The only reason why it's allowed is because nobody really thinks about making it illegal until some guy dies from a colonic rupture after doing it with his horse.

I agree. But the species thing is taking it a little too far. People make CHOICES in love. And almost always, a CONSCIOUS choice. Respect it, or GTFO.

Are you somehow related to Omni-Slash, by any chance? lulz

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="neondreamscape"]

Obviously gender shouldn't matter, but species is a different issue. They can't consent to being in a relationship with a human, and since they can't communicate clearly with us and tell us exactly what they think, then it can definitely be considered animal abuse. The entire relationship would be based on coercion; the animal can't say what it wants and doesn't want, so it basically becomes the human forcing his/herself upon him/her, which, even in a human to human relationship, isn't healthy for either party.

nintendog66

There really should be no need to rationalise why we shouldn't have sex with animals.

When you throw your own **** around, completely lose your sense of shame, prove souls do not exist and have the moral rationality of a pile of bricks, I will consider you an animal on the same plane as the ones we keep in zoos for entertainment.

Until then, the naturalistic justification of bestiality "but we are animals" is about as valid to me as justifying eugenics because it aids natural selection.

well, in a biological sense, homosexual relationships are just as wrong as inter-species relationships, as they both don't further natural selection and increase the reproductive capability of the human race. an animal's biological purpose is to reproduce and ensure survival. so i don't see how you can make the argument that one of them is "unnatural", while the other isn't. everyone deserves the same rights. plus, if the animal is the one doing the insertion, you can't make the argument that the human is "forcing" the animal into a relationship. it's clearly consensual.Slash-Omni

Obviously gender shouldn't matter, but species is a different issue. They can't consent to being in a relationship with a human, and since they can't communicate clearly with us and tell us exactly what they think, then it can definitely be considered animal abuse. The entire relationship would be based on coercion; the animal can't say what it wants and doesn't want, so it basically becomes the human forcing his/herself upon him/her, which, even in a human to human relationship, isn't healthy for either party.

neondreamscape

I'm all for a little interspecies erotica.

Joke thread is joke thread.

Leave the animals alone.

Joke thread is joke thread.

Leave the animals alone.

avatar_genius

well, in a biological sense, homosexual relationships are just as wrong as inter-species relationships, as they both don't further natural selection and increase the reproductive capability of the human race. an animal's biological purpose is to reproduce and ensure survival. so i don't see how you can make the argument that one of them is "unnatural", while the other isn't. everyone deserves the same rights. plus, if the animal is the one doing the insertion, you can't make the argument that the human is "forcing" the animal into a relationship. it's clearly consensual.Slash-Omni

[QUOTE="neondreamscape"]

Obviously gender shouldn't matter, but species is a different issue. They can't consent to being in a relationship with a human, and since they can't communicate clearly with us and tell us exactly what they think, then it can definitely be considered animal abuse. The entire relationship would be based on coercion; the animal can't say what it wants and doesn't want, so it basically becomes the human forcing his/herself upon him/her, which, even in a human to human relationship, isn't healthy for either party.

Genetic_Code

A lot different than having sex with it, don't you think?

[QUOTE="nintendog66"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

There really should be no need to rationalise why we shouldn't have sex with animals.

Theokhoth

When you throw your own **** around, completely lose your sense of shame, prove souls do not exist and have the moral rationality of a pile of bricks, I will consider you an animal on the same plane as the ones we keep in zoos for entertainment.

Until then, the naturalistic justification of bestiality "but we are animals" is about as valid to me as justifying eugenics because it aids natural selection.

[QUOTE="Slash-Omni"]well, in a biological sense, homosexual relationships are just as wrong as inter-species relationships, as they both don't further natural selection and increase the reproductive capability of the human race. an animal's biological purpose is to reproduce and ensure survival. so i don't see how you can make the argument that one of them is "unnatural", while the other isn't. everyone deserves the same rights. plus, if the animal is the one doing the insertion, you can't make the argument that the human is "forcing" the animal into a relationship. it's clearly consensual.Genetic_Code

[QUOTE="avatar_genius"]

Joke thread is joke thread.

Leave the animals alone.

Slash-Omni

OK, if you want my serious opinion on humans with animals, I think it's cruel and disgusting.

Seriously, leave the animals alone.

You've got major problems if you want to have sex with animals.
Seriously, what the foot.

Well I was going to disagree right from the start but the animal part just seals my views on this subject.PS2_ROCKS

Other animals have sex with other types of animals, so what the hell, yea bears turn me on.astiop

Gross, this topic was apparently made with you in mind.

The gender part i'm cool with. Not sure about the species thing though.fidosim

me to