@LordQuorthon: Oh crap, really? I'm allowed to not watch movies that I'm not interested in? Oh. My. God! Thanks for telling me, dude, because up until now I've been spending my time and money watching literally every movie that's ever been released, because I wasn't aware that I was allowed to NOT watch movies that I don't want to watch. You've just saved me so much time and money, someone needs to give you a medal!
@nintendoboy16 said:
Because, it's not like Han Solo, Boba Fett and Obi-Wan (though to be fair. I'm not sure where they can go with him after the prequels and Rebels) were beloved characters in the franchise or anything. And it's not like the acquisition of the Death Star plans was an important event LEADING to Episode IV or anything.
The point is that that kind of stuff doesn't ADVANCE the narrative, it's just back-story. I'm sure Jules Winfield could tell you an interesting story about his "Bad Motherf***er" wallet, but it's not necessary to Pulp Fiction any more than the acquisition of the Death Star plans is to Star Wars. And that's one of the inherent problems with prequels in general. If knowing how the Death Star plans were acquired was essential to the original Star Wars, then that plotline would have been IN the original Star Wars.
Beloved characters? That's another reason why prequels tend to be lame. Look to the prequel trilogy and see the need to constantly cram in crowd-pleasing stuff like Chewie meeting Yoda or Anakin Skywalker being best buddies with R2-D2 and C3PO. Everyone loves those bots, so we've gotta cram 'em in there somehow! That stuff almost always just comes off as fan-fiction. Like the writers are running through a checklist of things that fans want to see, and then saying, "put that stuff in there, and find a way to fit the story."
Like, has the Kessel Run EVER been important in the Star Wars movies? Nope. Hasn't mattered one bit during Episodes I-VIII. But it's a big piece of fanservice, so you freaking KNOW there's gonna be a Kessel Run bit in the Han Solo prequel movie. Stuff like that never feels natural to me, it feels like pandering. Not that this is inherently necessary to prequel movies, but it seems to be something that nearly all prequel writers inevitably resort to and I'll be surprised if the Han Solo movie is any different in this regard. Because the very CONCEPT of the prequel almost always revolves around this kind of stuff. Sequels can be conceptually based on the dangling threads left by the previous movie. And the natural progression is to show the consequences. What happens next? By contrast, with prequels you already KNOW what happened next. The only reason to rewind the clock is to make more money by taking the most popular stuff and then doing a fan-demanded checklist of things that people want to know more about it. The fact that (so far) these prequel movies (and planned prequel movies) have been hitting the biggest fan notes is evidence of this. The Death Star? Han Solo? Obi-Wan? Boba Fett? In other words, the POPULAR stuff. Star Wars is a vast rich universe, there are near-infinite entertaining prequel stories that they COULD make. But, for example, do you think we'll ever see a prequel movie about that asshole who got his arm sliced off by Obi-Wan in the first movie?
Log in to comment