Why are gunowners becoming the scapegoat for troubled people?

  • 136 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PrototypeTheKid
PrototypeTheKid

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 PrototypeTheKid
Member since 2012 • 441 Posts

In the wake of two awful incidents that have passed, and the rise of gun violence in certain areas in this country, why is it that the media just has to put the blame on the defenders of the domestic constitution? Why are we to blame when some idiot guns down 23 people with an ak-47 or some thug shoots and kills some little kid? Where has this country's sense of personal responsiblity gone? Even worse is how the youth in this country are being indoctrunated into thinking all gun-owners are bad, crazy people. It's sickening.

Anyone elses thoughts on this?

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

For the same reason video games, movies, music, etc are.

Avatar image for ScorpionTroll
ScorpionTroll

810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ScorpionTroll
Member since 2012 • 810 Posts

I was raised in a house with nine guns. I've recently started my own collection. Where I'm from gun ownership is just a normal every day thing.

Avatar image for PrototypeTheKid
PrototypeTheKid

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 PrototypeTheKid
Member since 2012 • 441 Posts

I was raised in a house with nine guns. I've recently started my own collection. Where I'm from gun ownership is just a normal every day thing.

ScorpionTroll

Agreed, my father taught me from early on, how to responsbile use and store a gun and not once did I even think of using it on anyone.

Avatar image for maheo30
maheo30

5102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 maheo30
Member since 2006 • 5102 Posts
The Sikh temple shooting graphically illustrates, once more, why we need to confiscate guns. Civilians cant be trusted with guns. Only the pros should be allowed to carry guns. Guns ownership ought to be confined to professional soldiers and law-enforcement officers. Not to untrained, trigger-happy civilians. Wait a minutewasnt the shooter an army vet? Okay, well I guess restricting gun access to the pros wont solve the problem after all. - Dr. Steve Hayes -
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="maheo30"]The Sikh temple shooting graphically illustrates, once more, why we need to confiscate guns. Civilians cant be trusted with guns. Only the pros should be allowed to carry guns. Guns ownership ought to be confined to professional soldiers and law-enforcement officers. Not to untrained, trigger-happy civilians. Wait a minutewasnt the shooter an army vet? Okay, well I guess restricting gun access to the pros wont solve the problem after all. - Dr. Steve Hayes -

That speech might work if he kept his guns from the military. (I don't think they're allowed to) Correct me if I'm wrong.
Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
Nobody is blaming gun owners. It's the fact that anyone in the US is able to aquire a gun.
Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

[QUOTE="ScorpionTroll"]

I was raised in a house with nine guns. I've recently started my own collection. Where I'm from gun ownership is just a normal every day thing.

PrototypeTheKid

Agreed, my father taught me from early on, how to responsbile use and store a gun and not once did I even think of using it on anyone.

Same with mine. I spent the last 5 years of my teenage life living with a cop my mom was dating. He carried his gun around every where we went and always had it lying on a shelf where it's easily visible.

But my dad is the one who really got me into guns. He would buy me powder-less bullets and grenades when I was 5 years old. We also shot his BB gun all the time. It wasn't untill I was 18 when I decided to take up guns for myself and actually go shooting.

Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts
No one blames gun owners, just guns in general. And for good reason. If you remove all guns you remove all gun crimes. America would become a safer place overnight if that were to ever happen. Unlikely however.
Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

Kamekazi_69
And you base that on what.....?
Avatar image for agpickle
agpickle

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 agpickle
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

Kamekazi_69

Because violent games, music and movies are engineered and designed with killing things in mind, right?

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

No one blames gun owners, just guns in general. And for good reason. If you remove all guns you remove all gun crimes. America would become a safer place overnight if that were to ever happen. Unlikely however.FPSfan1985

And if everybody had a field of manna in their backyard no one would starve.

Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts
[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

l4dak47
And you base that on what.....?

On the rise in unrest in Australia, and Great Britain after the tighter restrictions of guns. I didn't say it will, I said most likely in theory. But the statements and claims are there to show stripping guns away from the law abiding citizen doesn't have a noticeable impact on crime at all.
Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

because people are afraid to face the reality that there's something more fundamentally wrong with our society. I think it's because we are afraid of eachother.

the real answer IMO is to stop being afraid of eachother. stranger danger, being paranoid all the time, etc has got to stop.

Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

agpickle

Because violent games, music and movies are engineered and designed with killing things in mind, right?

Tell that to the advocates that claim movies, music, and video games warp the minds of kids and make them into cold blooded killers
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

Kamekazi_69
And you base that on what.....?

On the rise in unrest in Australia, and Great Britain after the tighter restrictions of guns. I didn't say it will, I said most likely in theory. But the statements and claims are there to show stripping guns away from the law abiding citizen doesn't have a noticeable impact on crime at all.

Eh...there's data that goes both ways in terms of gun control/ban. Also, can someone answer my post about the military above?
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

because people are afraid to face the reality that there's something more fundamentally wrong with our society. I think it's because we are afraid of eachother.

the real answer IMO is to stop being afraid of eachother. stranger danger, being paranoid all the time, etc has got to stop.

Phaze-Two
Yep. Unfortunately, this culture of fear has come from media like Fox news.
Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

Kamekazi_69
Yeah. Did you hear about the gamestop massacre? Guy went in there and threw handfuls of PSPs at the people inside. So many lives lost. He even had a 3DS...they didn't stand a chance.
Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

[QUOTE="Phaze-Two"]

because people are afraid to face the reality that there's something more fundamentally wrong with our society. I think it's because we are afraid of eachother.

the real answer IMO is to stop being afraid of eachother. stranger danger, being paranoid all the time, etc has got to stop.

l4dak47

Yep. Unfortunately, this culture of fear has come from media like Fox news.

that's one side of the argument. the other side is that fox news is the product of a culture of fear that we've had for hundreds of years. IDK which side Im on but it doesn't really matter. what matters is that we just start being more trusting of our neighbors. that's all. just don't immediatly think the worst about the people around you.

Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts
[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] And you base that on what.....?

On the rise in unrest in Australia, and Great Britain after the tighter restrictions of guns. I didn't say it will, I said most likely in theory. But the statements and claims are there to show stripping guns away from the law abiding citizen doesn't have a noticeable impact on crime at all.

Eh...there's data that goes both ways in terms of gun control/ban. Also, can someone answer my post about the military above?

So, we hit an equilibrium point. There is no solid evidence to say "yes or no, Gun control eliminates crime" Vice versa.
Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts
[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

Overlord93
Yeah. Did you hear about the gamestop massacre? Guy went in there and threw handfuls of PSPs at the people inside. So many lives lost. He even had a 3DS...they didn't stand a chance.

Yes I did! I also heard about kids using Doom as a "training simulator" before they shoot people. Man if it wasn't for violent videogames, they wouldn't have been desensitized enough to pick up a gun and kill. Only one solution, Ban video games from everyone because the government knows whats good for everyone! Video games cause people to pick up guns and kill! I can see it now!
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

yep take them away.

then take away all the knives.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/chinese-state-media-say-teenager-kills-8-wounds-5-in-knife-attack-in-northeast-of-the-country/2012/08/02/gJQALIrARX_story.html

then you better take those dogs away from people.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatal_dog_attacks_in_the_United_States

don't forget how deadly cars are better get rid of those too.

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/transportation/motor_vehicle_accidents_and_fatalities.html

whoops, record fatilities in slip and falls in the shower too, better outlaw showers while we are at it.

http://www.lawfirms.com/resources/personal-injury/slip-and-fall-accident/slip-and-fall-accidents.htm

seriously pansys, why don't you just go build an underground bunker and live in that if you are so terrified of the risks you face everyday.

Avatar image for LordRork
LordRork

2692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#24 LordRork
Member since 2004 • 2692 Posts

The US needs to decide what it wants its gun laws to do - if it's home defence, fine...but what does a person really need to achieve that? It's not an assault weapon, but a rifle, shotgun or pistol might be reasonable (and also have a place in hunting or pest control).

Many in the US are far away from the nearest policeman, so it's not unreasonable. Gun control should ensure that the person who wants a gun is capable of using it responsibly.

The right to bear arms needs to be balanced against nearly 300 years in the advances of personal weapons, something that couldn't have been foreseen in the 18th century.

Avatar image for jesuschristmonk
jesuschristmonk

3308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 jesuschristmonk
Member since 2009 • 3308 Posts

The Sikh temple shooting graphically illustrates, once more, why we need to confiscate guns. Civilians cant be trusted with guns. Only the pros should be allowed to carry guns. Guns ownership ought to be confined to professional soldiers and law-enforcement officers. Not to untrained, trigger-happy civilians. Wait a minutewasnt the shooter an army vet? Okay, well I guess restricting gun access to the pros wont solve the problem after all. - Dr. Steve Hayes - maheo30
[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

l4dak47

And you base that on what.....?

Look at drugs. Make anything illegal, and more dangerous was of getting them around will arise. People will always find ways of getting what they want.

Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

because people are afraid to face the reality that there's something more fundamentally wrong with our society. I think it's because we are afraid of eachother.

the real answer IMO is to stop being afraid of eachother. stranger danger, being paranoid all the time, etc has got to stop.

Phaze-Two

So true, People wish to blame the availability of the tools (guns) rather than think about the reasons why people are using these tools like they are.

There is just a problem with our society here, If it isn't people being driven to lifes of crime for various reasons, it is psychotically paranoid people or people who are just psychotic causing problems with guns.

I mean look at that incident where that guy got shot by police who had gone to the wrong door. He got killed BECAUSE he felt some weird need to open a door waving a gun around...

Making guns illegal does not solve anything and people need to get over that. I love the British people who come one here acting like they are superior because they banned guns when in fact their gun crime has been RISING in Britain while at least for a long time crime was actually declining here in the States.

There obviously needs to be SOME restrictions on gun posession, and we have those, Unfortunately we just aren't capable of always picking out the psychos when they buy guns and honestly, any criminal is going to try and get an illegal gun as then it will be hard to trace their crimes back to them.

We really need alot of work as a culture here in the States. Somewhere down the line we lost things like a sense of honor, a sense of togetherness, and instead we fell into a sort of me vs. them attitude and I think that is a huge part of the problem. Hell, the crazy ones who go on killing people likely could have been helped had people been there for them. Look at Columbine. Those kids became volatile when left to their own devices. For all we know they could have turned out ok had SOMEONE been there to help welcome them into a normal group of people.

That being said, there has been and always will be crazy people who go around killing people and causing problems. Tis an unfortunate fact of life and nothing we can do will ever completely get rid of that.

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

[QUOTE="Overlord93"][QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

Kamekazi_69

Yeah. Did you hear about the gamestop massacre? Guy went in there and threw handfuls of PSPs at the people inside. So many lives lost. He even had a 3DS...they didn't stand a chance.

Yes I did! I also heard about kids using Doom as a "training simulator" before they shoot people. Man if it wasn't for violent videogames, they wouldn't have been desensitized enough to pick up a gun and kill. Only one solution, Ban video games from everyone because the government knows whats good for everyone! Video games cause people to pick up guns and kill! I can see it now!

I think you're missing the point here. Video games, music, and entertainment are all indirect means of causing loss of life. Guns are not. Comparing the two is moronic and shows a fundamental lack of understanding of why anyone petitions for gun control.

Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts
[QUOTE="jesuschristmonk"][QUOTE="maheo30"] Look at drugs. Make anything illegal, and more dangerous was of getting them around will arise. People will always find ways of getting what they want.
[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

l4dak47
And you base that on what.....?

Drugs? Taking away the drugs didn't stop crime/use. Actually caused the opposite reaction.

Thats the issue with all law, making a law and enforcing a law are two very different things. The US does a horrible job enforcing laws. We know exactly where the majority of drugs that reach this country come from yet we do nothing to stop it.
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="maheo30"][QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

Just like Violent games, movie, Music, entertainment becomes a topic for censorship every time someone goes out and does something bad. Eliminating guns would most likely cause crime to explode.

jesuschristmonk

And you base that on what.....?

Look at drugs. Make anything illegal, and more dangerous was of getting them around will arise. People will always find ways of getting what they want.

I agree, but the case isn't that strong when it comes to gun control/ban. Some have shown that a ban does work, some have shown that it does not. I personally believe that it wouldn't work here, but I don't really have any strong conclusive evidence showing that per say
Avatar image for jesuschristmonk
jesuschristmonk

3308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 jesuschristmonk
Member since 2009 • 3308 Posts
Thats the issue with all law, making a law and enforcing a law are two very different things. The US does a horrible job enforcing laws. We know exactly where the majority of drugs that reach this country come from yet we do nothing to stop it. FPSfan1985
Probably takes more work to actually do the right thing, and our government is too lazy to put fourth that work lol.
Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

The US needs to decide what it wants its gun laws to do - if it's home defence, fine...but what does a person really need to achieve that? It's not an assault weapon, but a rifle, shotgun or pistol might be reasonable (and also have a place in hunting or pest control).

Many in the US are far away from the nearest policeman, so it's not unreasonable. Gun control should ensure that the person who wants a gun is capable of using it responsibly.

The right to bear arms needs to be balanced against nearly 300 years in the advances of personal weapons, something that couldn't have been foreseen in the 18th century.

LordRork

Yeah people also forget that tid-bit too. My GF lives in the boonies. Out there in farm country everything is so spread out that it really would take quite alot of time for help to show up, and you see these farm houses that are SO FAR away from one another that if someone was breaking in or some sort of animal came to attack (which funny thing my GF's Grandpa told me about how there was a dangerous pack of coyotes roaming by their house a while back after fires had killed their food supply and left the coyotes extremely desparate and dangerous) they literally HAVE to be able to handle themselves because that immediate help just isn't there.

And yeah, we need to always make sure gun owners are people who would be responsible with them, granted it is basically impossible to predict such a thing with 100% accuracy.

Avatar image for champion837
champion837

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 champion837
Member since 2012 • 1423 Posts

In the wake of two awful incidents that have passed, and the rise of gun violence in certain areas in this country, why is it that the media just has to put the blame on the defenders of the domestic constitution? Why are we to blame when some idiot guns down 23 people with an ak-47 or some thug shoots and kills some little kid? Where has this country's sense of personal responsiblity gone? Even worse is how the youth in this country are being indoctrunated into thinking all gun-owners are bad, crazy people. It's sickening.

Anyone elses thoughts on this?

PrototypeTheKid

What we are saying is that the gun culture is very bad in the US. That is the truth, that doesnt mean that we think that gun owners are terrible people.

Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts

[QUOTE="FPSfan1985"]Thats the issue with all law, making a law and enforcing a law are two very different things. The US does a horrible job enforcing laws. We know exactly where the majority of drugs that reach this country come from yet we do nothing to stop it. jesuschristmonk
Probably takes more work to actually do the right thing, and our government is too lazy to put fourth that work lol.

Yea, I'm not all the nice I guess. **** doing the right thing. Just go over there and wipe their asses out. 70% of the drug problem would be fixed over night.

Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"][QUOTE="Overlord93"] Yeah. Did you hear about the gamestop massacre? Guy went in there and threw handfuls of PSPs at the people inside. So many lives lost. He even had a 3DS...they didn't stand a chance.Overlord93

Yes I did! I also heard about kids using Doom as a "training simulator" before they shoot people. Man if it wasn't for violent videogames, they wouldn't have been desensitized enough to pick up a gun and kill. Only one solution, Ban video games from everyone because the government knows whats good for everyone! Video games cause people to pick up guns and kill! I can see it now!

I think you're missing the point here. Video games, music, and entertainment are all indirect means of causing loss of life. Guns are not. Comparing the two is moronic and shows a fundamental lack of understanding of why anyone petitions for gun control.

Once again. Try to make a rational statement against video game bans when the Anti-Violent game Organization claims games make kids pick up weapons and do horrible things. You might say its silly to blend a weapon with a game or a movie, but people will always find a way to associate them with killing, murder, violence etc. YES, there are people who believe violent games are the reason for crime. Its silly and dumb to you but its two sides of the debate. Penalizing the object above the crime committer is moronic to me
Avatar image for jesuschristmonk
jesuschristmonk

3308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 jesuschristmonk
Member since 2009 • 3308 Posts

I agree, but the case isn't that strong when it comes to gun control/ban. Some have shown that a ban does work, some have shown that it does not. I personally believe that it wouldn't work here, but I don't really have any strong conclusive evidence showing that per say l4dak47
Seems like giving everyone a gun worked out for that one state (can't remember which) that someone made a topic about a month or so ago. I guess the thought of anyone having a gun scares most people lol.

Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] I agree, but the case isn't that strong when it comes to gun control/ban. Some have shown that a ban does work, some have shown that it does not. I personally believe that it wouldn't work here, but I don't really have any strong conclusive evidence showing that per say jesuschristmonk

Seems like giving everyone a gun worked out for that one state (can't remember which) that someone made a topic about a month or so ago. I guess the thought of anyone having a gun scares most people lol.

I believe its Switzerland.
Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts
[QUOTE="Overlord93"]

[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"] Yes I did! I also heard about kids using Doom as a "training simulator" before they shoot people. Man if it wasn't for violent videogames, they wouldn't have been desensitized enough to pick up a gun and kill. Only one solution, Ban video games from everyone because the government knows whats good for everyone! Video games cause people to pick up guns and kill! I can see it now!Kamekazi_69

I think you're missing the point here. Video games, music, and entertainment are all indirect means of causing loss of life. Guns are not. Comparing the two is moronic and shows a fundamental lack of understanding of why anyone petitions for gun control.

Once again. Try to make a rational statement against video game bans when the Anti-Violent game Organization claims games make kids pick up weapons and do horrible things. You might say its silly to blend a weapon with a game or a movie, but people will always find a way to associate them with killing, murder, violence etc. YES, there are people who believe violent games are the reason for crime. Its silly and dumb to you but its two sides of the debate. Penalizing the object above the crime committer is moronic to me

Well it's much easier to depend videogames because they are worldwide. And the violence we see in America is unlike anything else in other rich countries that also play these violent videogame. The major difference between America and these other countries is gun control. Just look at Canada. They are right next to us consuming the same media, but they have super strict gun laws and we don't. I'm not saying rigid gun laws are good or bad, but they are effective at stopping alot of violent crimes.
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] I agree, but the case isn't that strong when it comes to gun control/ban. Some have shown that a ban does work, some have shown that it does not. I personally believe that it wouldn't work here, but I don't really have any strong conclusive evidence showing that per say jesuschristmonk

Seems like giving everyone a gun worked out for that one state (can't remember which) that someone made a topic about a month or so ago. I guess the thought of anyone having a gun scares most people lol.

Mhm, yea, but that was largely based on a correlation=causation conclusion. It didn't really take into other factors which is why it wasn't really conclusive at all.
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="jesuschristmonk"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] I agree, but the case isn't that strong when it comes to gun control/ban. Some have shown that a ban does work, some have shown that it does not. I personally believe that it wouldn't work here, but I don't really have any strong conclusive evidence showing that per say Kamekazi_69

Seems like giving everyone a gun worked out for that one state (can't remember which) that someone made a topic about a month or so ago. I guess the thought of anyone having a gun scares most people lol.

I believe its Switzerland.

No, it happened here in the U.S., it just wasn't a state that did that, it was a county.
Avatar image for champion837
champion837

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 champion837
Member since 2012 • 1423 Posts
[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"][QUOTE="jesuschristmonk"] Seems like giving everyone a gun worked out for that one state (can't remember which) that someone made a topic about a month or so ago. I guess the thought of anyone having a gun scares most people lol.l4dak47
I believe its Switzerland.

No, it happened here in the U.S., it just wasn't a state that did that, it was a county.

So what happened exactly (just curious).
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="champion837"][QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"] I believe its Switzerland.

No, it happened here in the U.S., it just wasn't a state that did that, it was a county.

So what happened exactly (just curious).

Local government mandated that every person living within the county get a gun. Soon after, crime began to go down. Pro guns claimed that this was evidence that guns don't create crime(and in fact lowered it). Anti-gun and thinking peoples said that correlation does not equate to causation and showed that crime rate was going down all across the country. Soon afterwards, there was was a big circle jerk. Do you want the thread, I can probably find it for you.
Avatar image for champion837
champion837

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 champion837
Member since 2012 • 1423 Posts

[QUOTE="champion837"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] No, it happened here in the U.S., it just wasn't a state that did that, it was a county. l4dak47
So what happened exactly (just curious).

Local government mandated that every person living within the county get a gun. Soon after, crime began to go down. Pro guns claimed that this was evidence that guns don't create crime(and in fact lowered it). Anti-gun and thinking peoples said that correlation does not equate to causation and showed that crime rate was going down all across the country. Soon afterwards, there was was a big circle jerk. Do you want the thread, I can probably find it for you.

You dont have to look it up, I see what you mean. That was a lot of help, thanks.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#44 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="champion837"][QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="champion837"] So what happened exactly (just curious).

Local government mandated that every person living within the county get a gun. Soon after, crime began to go down. Pro guns claimed that this was evidence that guns don't create crime(and in fact lowered it). Anti-gun and thinking peoples said that correlation does not equate to causation and showed that crime rate was going down all across the country. Soon afterwards, there was was a big circle jerk. Do you want the thread, I can probably find it for you.

Thats fine, I see what you mean from that. Thanks for all of the help. Even if it had worked it is easier to use scare tactics for one community then for an entire country. I would assume that the psychology would be completely different.

Right, the study really didn't take into account all of the factors.
Avatar image for th3warr1or
th3warr1or

20637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#45 th3warr1or
Member since 2007 • 20637 Posts

The Sikh temple shooting graphically illustrates, once more, why we need to confiscate guns. Civilians cant be trusted with guns. Only the pros should be allowed to carry guns. Guns ownership ought to be confined to professional soldiers and law-enforcement officers. Not to untrained, trigger-happy civilians. Wait a minutewasnt the shooter an army vet? Okay, well I guess restricting gun access to the pros wont solve the problem after all. - Dr. Steve Hayes - maheo30

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father of the US.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="maheo30"]The Sikh temple shooting graphically illustrates, once more, why we need to confiscate guns. Civilians cant be trusted with guns. Only the pros should be allowed to carry guns. Guns ownership ought to be confined to professional soldiers and law-enforcement officers. Not to untrained, trigger-happy civilians. Wait a minutewasnt the shooter an army vet? Okay, well I guess restricting gun access to the pros wont solve the problem after all. - Dr. Steve Hayes - th3warr1or

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father of the US.

We're fvcked then. Patriot act and NDAA has already passed. As well as the TSA.
Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

I agree completely.

Avatar image for tumbIew33d
tumbIew33d

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 tumbIew33d
Member since 2011 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="maheo30"]The Sikh temple shooting graphically illustrates, once more, why we need to confiscate guns. Civilians cant be trusted with guns. Only the pros should be allowed to carry guns. Guns ownership ought to be confined to professional soldiers and law-enforcement officers. Not to untrained, trigger-happy civilians. Wait a minutewasnt the shooter an army vet? Okay, well I guess restricting gun access to the pros wont solve the problem after all. - Dr. Steve Hayes - th3warr1or

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father of the US.

What a judgemental bastard he sounds like.
Avatar image for StRaItJaCkEt36
StRaItJaCkEt36

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 StRaItJaCkEt36
Member since 2011 • 551 Posts
Is that so? I don't see that happening. I think some people want gun control, and others don't.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

I wonder if we could get some numbers on how much easier it is for a gun owner to kill someone than somebody who does not own guns.