why are people against the second amendment?

  • 118 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for megahaloman64
megahaloman64

2532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 megahaloman64
Member since 2006 • 2532 Posts

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

megahaloman64

I don't tink you thought that part thru.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"] Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

duxup

I don't tink you thought that part thru.

Quoted for truth...

Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

[QUOTE="duxup"]

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"] Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

chessmaster1989

I don't tink you thought that part thru.

Quoted for truth...

agreed.

Avatar image for Maqda7
Maqda7

3299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 Maqda7
Member since 2008 • 3299 Posts
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="duxup"]

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"] Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

I don't tink you thought that part thru.

Quoted for truth...

Quoted for quoting the truth.
Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#6 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

megahaloman64
If that were true, then places where guns are "illegal" (take Japan, for instance) would be chaos.
Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts
Or NY has stricter gun control laws to fight crime that was there in the first place...
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

Also there is a distinct "Why do you hate America?" straw man taste to that title. Dude :o

Avatar image for tocklestein2005
tocklestein2005

5532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 tocklestein2005
Member since 2008 • 5532 Posts

meh...I just bought a gun.

Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

megahaloman64

yeah I find this thread unconvincing. Also criminals can go to gun shows where it is not illegal to buy as many gunss you wantwithout following standard rules because they do not apply to un shows. So I feel that more strict gun control is needed. so the myth of black market guns are only where they can get them since they can get them anywhere easier then the black market and legally.

Avatar image for Maniacc1
Maniacc1

5354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 Maniacc1
Member since 2006 • 5354 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="duxup"] I don't tink you thought that part thru.

observer77

Quoted for truth...

agreed.

Double agreed.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

Because it's outdated, overrated and, in terms of how it was intended, useless in the modern day to everyone but uncivilised revolutionary college students and rednecks that think the world's problems can be easily solved by firing enough rounds at the government.

If there is more crime in a place that bans guns, that is a correlational deal and not a causal deal. Japan fully outlaws guns and yet their gun crime rate is very low.

Guns should remain in the militia where they belong.

Avatar image for megahaloman64
megahaloman64

2532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 megahaloman64
Member since 2006 • 2532 Posts

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

spazzx625

If that were true, then places where guns are "illegal" (take Japan, for instance) would be chaos.

this is about the us.

Avatar image for yabbicoke
yabbicoke

4069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 yabbicoke
Member since 2007 • 4069 Posts

I don't have anything against the second amendment. If people want to use guns in a militia to fight a threat to this country, all power to them.

Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#17 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts

[QUOTE="spazzx625"][QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

megahaloman64

If that were true, then places where guns are "illegal" (take Japan, for instance) would be chaos.

this is about the us.

Yeah, I deduced that from the topic title. That doesn't change my point at all.
Avatar image for megahaloman64
megahaloman64

2532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 megahaloman64
Member since 2006 • 2532 Posts

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

observer77

yeah I find this thread unconvincing. Also criminals can go to gun shows where it is not illegal to buy as many gunss you wantwithout following standard rules because they do not apply to un shows. So I feel that more strict gun control is needed. so the myth of black market guns are only where they can get them since they can get them anywhere easier then the black market and legally.

not many criminals are gonna buy guns legally.

Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

[QUOTE="spazzx625"][QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

megahaloman64

If that were true, then places where guns are "illegal" (take Japan, for instance) would be chaos.

this is about the us.

ignoring viable examples doesn't help you.

Avatar image for joe11king
joe11king

879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 joe11king
Member since 2005 • 879 Posts

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

spazzx625

If that were true, then places where guns are "illegal" (take Japan, for instance) would be chaos.

well actually.... have you heard what happens on subways there? :cry:

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="observer77"]

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

megahaloman64

yeah I find this thread unconvincing. Also criminals can go to gun shows where it is not illegal to buy as many gunss you wantwithout following standard rules because they do not apply to un shows. So I feel that more strict gun control is needed. so the myth of black market guns are only where they can get them since they can get them anywhere easier then the black market and legally.

not many criminals are gonna buy guns legally.

So we eliminate

1. Access to guns, and

2. Cultural obsession over guns.

Avatar image for megahaloman64
megahaloman64

2532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#22 megahaloman64
Member since 2006 • 2532 Posts

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

[QUOTE="spazzx625"] If that were true, then places where guns are "illegal" (take Japan, for instance) would be chaos.spazzx625

this is about the us.

Yeah, I deduced that from the topic title. That doesn't change my point at all.

people are different in japan which does change your point.

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
Because the amount of criminals killed through self defense because a civilian had a gun is probably much much lower than the amount murders committed where the criminal was able to acquire guns from the USA legally or otherwise (if guns were illegal, gun stores wouldn't need to exist) This "they would try to get guns in other ways anyway" argument is arcane. It's analogous to saying lets make racism and discrimination okay because some people will always be racist.
Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

[QUOTE="observer77"]

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

Stricter Gun control laws make it harder for civillians to get them, not criminals. Criminals just buy them off the black market. Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

megahaloman64

yeah I find this thread unconvincing. Also criminals can go to gun shows where it is not illegal to buy as many gunss you wantwithout following standard rules because they do not apply to un shows. So I feel that more strict gun control is needed. so the myth of black market guns are only where they can get them since they can get them anywhere easier then the black market and legally.

not many criminals are gonna buy guns legally.

any criminal that knows about guns knows where to get them and gunshows have a loop hole that is simply a legal "don't ask just sell" policies. how do you think illegal gun sellers get their guns they find that loop hole and exploit it.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
Outdated amendment.. The amendment specifically says arms.. Seeing as basically the most powerful weapon they had was cannons that seriously does not compare to day.. Where we have high yield explosives (ignoring the WMD's overcourse), high calibre machine guns that can take a house apart in seconds etc etc.. There obviously needs to be some translation by today's standards.. I think its safe to say that certain weapons like assualt rifles and automatic weapons are not needed in civilian life be that for hunting or even defense.. I am perfectly fine with pistols, hunting rifles, and shotguns.. When you get into the said weapons, its when the police themselves start becoming outgunned in hardware, inless they bring in swat.
Avatar image for joe11king
joe11king

879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 joe11king
Member since 2005 • 879 Posts

[QUOTE="spazzx625"][QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

this is about the us.

megahaloman64

Yeah, I deduced that from the topic title. That doesn't change my point at all.

people are different in japan which does change your point.

no... it doesn't. If you're going to bring 'variables' like that in, we might as well just discuss why the world is full of bad people in the first place.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

Because the amount of criminals killed through self defense because a civilian had a gun is probably much much lower than the amount murders committed where the criminal was able to acquire guns from the USA legally or otherwise (if guns were illegal, gun stores wouldn't need to exist) This "they would try to get guns in other ways anyway" argument is arcane. It's analogous to saying lets make racism and discrimination okay because some people will always be racist. munu9

The argument applies to every crime and unethical thought or action ever to exist in any culture at any period in history. We have murder as illegal, but that hasn't stopped murders from occurring, therefore murder should be legal? Only if you apply the same argument people apply to the justification for guns (and drugs, as of late).

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde

12935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 82

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
Member since 2005 • 12935 Posts
Stricter gun control laws inhibit all citizens, not just criminals from obtaining weapons. I think they need to completely ban all automatic weapons. There is absolutely no use for them except killing multiple people. Why Bush did not renew the ban. And for the TC's black market argument. If they're gonna get them, why not make it a lot harder for them to get the weapons?
Avatar image for Makemap
Makemap

3755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 Makemap
Member since 2007 • 3755 Posts

[QUOTE="duxup"]

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"] Notice where there's stricter gun control laws, theres more crime like ny. That might have a connection.

chessmaster1989

I don't tink you thought that part thru.

Quoted for truth...

But, sir I just bought that gun from walmart :D.

Avatar image for megahaloman64
megahaloman64

2532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 megahaloman64
Member since 2006 • 2532 Posts

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

[QUOTE="observer77"]

yeah I find this thread unconvincing. Also criminals can go to gun shows where it is not illegal to buy as many gunss you wantwithout following standard rules because they do not apply to un shows. So I feel that more strict gun control is needed. so the myth of black market guns are only where they can get them since they can get them anywhere easier then the black market and legally.

observer77

not many criminals are gonna buy guns legally.

any criminal that knows about guns knows where to get them and gunshows have a loop hole that is simply a legal "don't ask just sell" policies. how do you think illegal gun sellers get their guns they find that loop hole and exploit it.

smugeling from other countries

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#31 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
Outdated amendment.. The amendment specifically says arms.. Seeing as basically the most powerful weapon they had was cannons that seriously does not compare to day.. Where we have high yield explosives (ignoring the WMD's overcourse), high calibre machine guns that can take a house apart in seconds etc etc.. There obviously needs to be some translation by today's standards.. I think its safe to say that certain weapons like assualt rifles and automatic weapons are not needed in civilian life be that for hunting or even defense.. I am perfectly fine with pistols, hunting rifles, and shotguns.. When you get into the said weapons, its when the police themselves start becoming outgunned in hardware, inless they bring in swat.sSubZerOo
A lot of the amendments were in response to what the British did before the revolutionary war. One interpretation of the second amendment would that they wanted you to have the freedom to own a gun so that whenever there was a foreign invader or a time of war. You could use the gun to defend your country. Counter to popular belief, I don't think the designer of the constitution really wanted you to have a gun so that you could defend yourself from people breaking into your house or some random criminal mugging you on the street.
Avatar image for z4twenny
z4twenny

4898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 z4twenny
Member since 2006 • 4898 Posts

I don't have anything against the second amendment. If people want to use guns in a militia to fight a threat to this country, all power to them.

yabbicoke

the problem is that the threat to the country is its own gov't....

Avatar image for joe11king
joe11king

879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 joe11king
Member since 2005 • 879 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]Outdated amendment.. The amendment specifically says arms.. Seeing as basically the most powerful weapon they had was cannons that seriously does not compare to day.. Where we have high yield explosives (ignoring the WMD's overcourse), high calibre machine guns that can take a house apart in seconds etc etc.. There obviously needs to be some translation by today's standards.. I think its safe to say that certain weapons like assualt rifles and automatic weapons are not needed in civilian life be that for hunting or even defense.. I am perfectly fine with pistols, hunting rifles, and shotguns.. When you get into the said weapons, its when the police themselves start becoming outgunned in hardware, inless they bring in swat.munu9
A lot of the amendments were in response to what the British did before the revolutionary war. One interpretation of the second amendment would that they wanted you to have the freedom to own a gun so that whenever there was a foreign invader or a time of war. You could use the gun to defend your country. Counter to popular belief, I don't think the designer of the constitution really wanted you to have a gun so that you could defend yourself from people breaking into your house or some random criminal mugging you on the street.

what's the difference? An invader is an invader. Are you saying it's okay to be able to protect yourself from another nation but not from a fellow American?

Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#34 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

why are people against the second amendment?megahaloman64

Because they've been brainwashed by the Liberal Media and govt-run public school system.

Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

[QUOTE="observer77"]

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

not many criminals are gonna buy guns legally.

megahaloman64

any criminal that knows about guns knows where to get them and gunshows have a loop hole that is simply a legal "don't ask just sell" policies. how do you think illegal gun sellers get their guns they find that loop hole and exploit it.

smugeling from other countries

someone is watching to many actions movies. getting a gun in the US is to easy one doesn't need to resort to such "tactics"

Avatar image for megahaloman64
megahaloman64

2532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 megahaloman64
Member since 2006 • 2532 Posts

For those who oppose, what would you do if someone with an illegal gun broke into your house with intentions to rape your wife or steal your kids?

Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

Uhm... lets not forget that a HUGE amoung of the shootings and murders in the US is NOT gang related? (well that part is huge aswell) but the average murder is likely a fairly normal human being who has access to a gun (self defence weapon) and kills wife (and this scenario is very normal).

I Do support stricter gun laws, mostly because humans are natively irrational, anger, jealousy, alcoho, are in all people, and when you are angry you do NOT think rationally (some more then others, but still).

Also "Criminals" can not be slapped into a group like that, while some gang members may opt for Black Market guns, (the Mac-10-11s are infamus for this) The still is a whole lot of criminals who prefers to use Legal weapons, Afterall... one of the more preferred weapons of a Criminal is the Glock (yeah the kind the police uses aswell) or the 1911... Because that these two handguns are fairly small, are chambered with a very capable at killing people, it is concelable, and IF you get busted by a random raid, they have nothing on you.

Oh... statistics statictics... does this sound familier? "It is more likely thata family member accedently shootshimself/herself with your gun, then it is for you to shoot a perp?" yeah that sums it up pretty much.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#38 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

For those who oppose, what would you do if someone with an illegal gun broke into your house with intentions to rape your wife or steal your kids?

megahaloman64

I have a wife and kids? When did that happen? :o

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#39 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

For those who oppose, what would you do if someone with an illegal gun broke into your house with intentions to rape your wife or steal your kids?

megahaloman64

Is this thread you just running down the list of silly gun rhetoric?

Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

why are people against the second amendment?

A: people are not against the second amendment they are against the ease of access that it allows people.

Avatar image for megahaloman64
megahaloman64

2532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 megahaloman64
Member since 2006 • 2532 Posts

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

why are people against the second amendment?LosDaddie

Because they've been brainwashed by the Liberal Media and govt-run public school system.

I agree with you but why do you have obama biden in your xbl avatar

Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

For those who oppose, what would you do if someone with an illegal gun broke into your house with intentions to rape your wife or steal your kids?

chessmaster1989

I have a wife and kids? When did that happen? :o

lol next situation we will be old and someone will come in and try to kill us during a robbery, or your daughter is walking home and gets attacked, or your walking home and get attacked, hypotheticals are just that hypothetical.

Avatar image for ShadowTech_FTW
ShadowTech_FTW

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 ShadowTech_FTW
Member since 2008 • 195 Posts

people are against everything

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

For those who oppose, what would you do if someone with an illegal gun broke into your house with intentions to rape your wife or steal your kids?

megahaloman64
What if a man with a nuclear bomb strapped to his chest burst into your house with mention to rape your pet dog.. See I can it too.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#45 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

[QUOTE="megahaloman64"]

why are people against the second amendment?megahaloman64

Because they've been brainwashed by the Liberal Media and govt-run public school system.

I agree with you but why do you have obama biden in your xbl avatar

mega, I take it your sarcasm detector is broken?

Also, I'm hoping you don't actually agree... :?

Avatar image for zakkro
zakkro

48823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 zakkro
Member since 2004 • 48823 Posts
They just want the King of England to come prancing into their homes and push them around.
Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts

I agree with you but why do you have obama biden in your xbl avatar

megahaloman64
That's because he was being sarcastic.
Avatar image for megahaloman64
megahaloman64

2532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 megahaloman64
Member since 2006 • 2532 Posts

i see this thread didn't get the conservative crowd, well what do you expect from a gameboard. And guns don't kill people, people kill people.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

i see this thread didn't get the conservative crowd, well what do you expect from a gameboard. And guns don't kill people, people kill people.

megahaloman64

But people with guns tend to do the most killing.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#50 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

i see this thread didn't get the conservative crowd, well what do you expect from a gameboard. And guns don't kill people, people kill people.

megahaloman64

People kill people with guns...