Why is it an ejoyable experiance when people watch violent movies or kill people in video games?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Violence is a natural visceral emotional outlet. It is not tolerated in civilized society so we get our rocks off through movies and video games, or by joining the military, which is an acceptable form of societal violence. It is a primitive and undesirable form of emotional expression, hence why the Military and military history is such a popular subject of study and involvement, yet frowned upon by academic institutions.
I have a dark sense of humour. Dead rising is a perfect example of humour and gore. I have a hard time imagining how someone can rip a zombie's head off with a scythe or chop one in half with a katana and not smile.
Violence really isn't fun though. And if someone gets in a real fight. Guess what, somebody usually goes to jail. My sister got into fights. She also got expelled a few times. Nothing good came from that.
I was in a real fight too. Scary stuff. My head was bleeding down my shirt. I almost had to choke the guy who attacked me. Nothing good came from it.
Most of you have said because its funny. Please elaborate, why is it funny? l0ve
I googled your question and found this, if you are willing to trust the article there's your answer.
[QUOTE="XD4NTESINF3RNOX"]Human nature weezyfbthis. it gets our hearts pumping and appeals to our baser instincts Your are speaking about an attack, what if you were on the other end though, you would still be experiencing violence, but no enjoyment..why is this? And dont we feel sympathy for that person because it might have been us? Even for the survival of our race?
Most of you have said because its funny. Please elaborate, why is it funny? l0veAre you familiar with Tom and Jerry?
Not sure if serious.You guys try to be deep. You should condemn violence in all of it's forms or fashions. That's what I do.
narlymech
Why is it an ejoyable experiance when people watch violent movies or kill people in video games?
l0ve
I figured out a while ago that there's a reason I don't like romantic comedies: The lack of consequence. In most of the movies I like (Lord of the Rings, Gladiator, Aliens, Braveheart, Apollo 13, so on), the consequences for failure are that people die. That's a pretty big consequence. What happens if the protagonists in a romantic comedy fail? Some people don't hook up.
Lots of people, like me, enjoy high stakes in their fiction. We want heros who overcome huge obstacles where the consequences for failure are immediate (the hero dies) or overwhelming (the Dark Lord takes over the world). It's pretty rare that you can create a situation with those kind of consequences without violence. It can be done; for example, I listed Apollo 13 as one of my favorite films, which contains no violence. But for the most part, you need violent situations to create a sense of tension, at least for people like me.
I understand the idea of not condoning violence in real life, but in a fantastical form, there is nothing amoral about it. It's merely a source of entertainment, or a outlet to vent pent up rage. Question: did you ever play cowboys and indians when you were a kid? Cops and robbers? Ever shoot a water gun? Nerf Gun? Play swords with wooden sticks? Shoot spit wads? Read comics?I'm not stoning anyone. I'm suggesting that people not be so casual throwing around justifieng violence. That's when it becomes fashion. It's a bad idea in general.
narlymech
It's art, creativity and I like to see where it's intended. I can say an example but I been through these conversations before a zillion times and the other guy will then say that the message can be brought through other ways and I can't be bothered to comment back because I don't understand why some people want to cage themselves into a society with as many restrictions as possible, what are they trying to protect themselves from?
I'm not stoning anyone. I'm suggesting that people not be so casual throwing around justifieng violence. That's when it becomes fashion. It's a bad idea in general.
I understand the idea of not condoning violence in real life, but in a fantastical form, there is nothing amoral about it. It's merely a source of entertainment, or a outlet to vent pent up rage. Question: did you ever play cowboys and indians when you were a kid? Cops and robbers? Ever shoot a water gun? Nerf Gun? Play swords with wooden sticks? Shoot spit wads? Read comics? Nah, there's nothing wrong with all that at all. I'm talking more of a violence in culture. The fashion and fear of violence is AS BAD or often worse than the actual violence. Maybe I just live in a fashionably violent area. Yes, this is a video game sight though. So, maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree.[QUOTE="narlymech"] Nah, there's nothing wrong with all that at all. I'm talking more of a violence in culture. The fashion and fear of violence is AS BAD or often worse than the actual violence. Maybe I just live in a fashionably violent area. Yes, this is a video game sight though. So, maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree.JustPlainLucasThey're forms of violence, are they not? Is not pretending to shoot a criminal the same as watching a criminal being shot in a movie, or shooting one in a video game? I'm not against all violent media. But it's not smart for a bunch of folks to throw it around casually.
[QUOTE="XD4NTESINF3RNOX"]Human nature weezyfbthis. it gets our hearts pumping and appeals to our baser instincts I don't think so, our baser instincts would be to avoid violence because violence could mean injury and injury could mean death or being left behind by your tribe. The idea of bloodsport is fairly new in our timeline, probably starting when the first real civilizations formed.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment