(Please note before you read, I don't think ALL music is better live. This only applies to most good bands).
Okay, I've always wondered this but I've never actually asked this question. I know everyone has their own opinions and beliefs, but I mean seriously, if you actually love music then why on Earth wouldn't you prefer live albums? Honestly, go listen to the studio version of "Black Dog" by Led Zeppelin, then listen to the live version on How the West Was Won. How can you possibly not think the solo from the live version is better? When music is live, the band is basically chanelling their emotions through their instruments, they are playing purely from the soul.They are uninhibited and boundless, they are simply there to play music and that's exactly what they do.
So please, tell, I'm genuinely interested in what you have to say, which one of these Hendrix solos is better?
Is the studio solo from "Fire" better... (solo begins at 1:22) Listen to the entire solo!
Or is the live version from Jimi's performance at Woodstock better? (solo begins at 1:13) Listen to the entire solo!
I'm not trying to piss people off or anything, I'm honestly just interested because I simply cannot understand why someone would prefer studio music. I mean sure the sound quality is WAY better with studio music, but with live work the music itself is usually at least twice as good, which for me at least FAR outweighs superior sound quality.
Log in to comment