WAIT WAIT WAIT....She only got 18 months? Surely the judge could have given her a more stiffer sentence, if the prosecutor was smart. They should have given her maximum of everything. She basically ruined this mans life forever. Rape will always be linked to him...even though he is innocent. rappid_rabbit
 So will wrongfully accused. It's one thing to be aquited. That just means there wasn't enough or any evidence to prove him guilty. It would be hearsay, but wrongfully accused proves he didn't do it.  I agree they should put her in jail longer, but appearantly they don't have enough room to keep her there longer than her sentence. She has it worse than him. She will forever be known as the jerk that sent a crippled man to jail for raping her when in reality he never touched her. She will never live that down nor will her children.
 Didn't they want some tangible or irrefutable proof? If she never met the guy and he never physically touched her it should have been evident. The truth always defeats fantasy because the truth actually happened while lies are just made up. People forget lies, because it's just fantastic babble. So eventually her stories would no longer sync. Lies are full of mistakes and contradictions because you only recall what actually happened. A lie is just a fabrication and since it never happened you don't fully recall the details. There is nothing to recall. It's embellishment. That's the entire purpose of cross examination. Someone is lying and over time that person will not recall their own bullcrap.
 I guess they don't care for semen nor DNA samples to prove he was where she claimed he raped her. That's what DNA testing is for. Everywhere you go you leave hair and skin. So if they find your hair and skin somewhere they know you were there. If they didn't find any fresh DNA there that means he wasn't there. If they don't locate any semen in her, any of his semen at the supposed location or a condom with his semen at the location or nearby then it never happened. If the cloths she was wearing while he supposedly raped her don't have any of his hair or skin sample on them then he wasn't within her proximity.
 In the U.S if a rape isn't reported with a few days they can't really prove anything. They figure he bathed and washed his cloths by then. And the victim did as well. They still investigate, but if they don't find anything it will be one HUGE hearsay case.
Log in to comment