world without war

do you believe that there should be world peace?

But that would require people to be reasonable, i dont think i could live in a landa with reasonable politicians :P

I'd start a conflict just to prevent world peace.

I think it's more than possible, I actually think that if wars don't stop they should at least have rules, 10 vs 10 or something like that in a neutral place where no innocent can be killed, maybe even a boxing match or a football match, I'm really seroius about this idea

First we're going to need a one world government.

war keeps stuff exciting. world peace would get boringmegamadman5

first we would need a world without religion ;)

first we would need a world without religion ;)

XD4NTESINF3RNOX

Actually, you would need a world without humanity.

World peace is impossible, there will always be problems. take 9/11 for example, we had been at peace for the longest time, we let our guard down, and all that peace was gone in a matter of hours.

Their should be, but it's not going to happen

i think that world peace would result in overpopulation and a more environmentally unstable planet. so if humanity really is like a cancer that is plagueing the earth at least its one that tries to kill itself once in a while

i think that world peace would result in overpopulation and a more environmentally unstable planet. so if humanity really is like a cancer that is plagueing the earth at least its one that tries to kill itself once in a while

juicestain117

there are more human ways to stop overpopulation than wars

When humans are gone from this world, there will be world peace.

War is one of the things we humans do best. Shame to let a talent go to waste.

As long as people disagree, there will be war, it's unfortunately part of our nature. Not to mention the entire economic opportunities it offers, as sick as that is. Most reasons wars happen today is in large part motivated by money.

[QUOTE="juicestain117"]

i think that world peace would result in overpopulation and a more environmentally unstable planet. so if humanity really is like a cancer that is plagueing the earth at least its one that tries to kill itself once in a while

there are more human ways to stop overpopulation than wars

World peace is impossible, there will always be problems. take 9/11 for example, we had been at peace for the longest time, we let our guard down, and all that peace was gone in a matter of hours.

Love_my_PS360

I think it's more than possible, I actually think that if wars don't stop they should at least have rules, 10 vs 10 or something like that in a neutral place where no innocent can be killed, maybe even a boxing match or a football match, I'm really seroius about this idea

hyrueprince11

LOL They should have StarCraft matches....actually....Korea would win every single war if that were the case :|.

As long as people disagree, there will be war, it's unfortunately part of our nature. Not to mention the entire economic opportunities it offers, as sick as that is. Most reasons wars happen today is in large part motivated by money.

Rekunta

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

[QUOTE="juicestain117"]

i think that world peace would result in overpopulation and a more environmentally unstable planet. so if humanity really is like a cancer that is plagueing the earth at least its one that tries to kill itself once in a while

juicestain117

there are more human ways to stop overpopulation than wars

there are a lot of countries that haven't participated in wars in a long time and don't have overpoplation problems (or at least not many)+ not every country loses a lot of people at wars, like the US, they might have lost a few but for a war that has lasted so long they haven't lost many

[QUOTE="juicestain117"][QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

there are more human ways to stop overpopulation than wars

hyrueprince11

there are a lot of countries that haven't participated in wars in a long time and don't have overpoplation problems (or at least not many)

do you believe that there should be world peace?

juicestain117

[QUOTE="juicestain117"][QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

there are more human ways to stop overpopulation than wars

there are a lot of countries that haven't participated in wars in a long time and don't have overpoplation problems (or at least not many)

impossible. someone will eventually disagree with another sideturbotoby95

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

[QUOTE="juicestain117"] this is true but i dont think they are as effective as war, specially in the short term. and i think war is natural... to humans at leastmlisen

there are a lot of countries that haven't participated in wars in a long time and don't have overpoplation problems (or at least not many)

well if we have aids, do we still need wars? we should fight against things like aids first, myabe after that we could fight against each other

I undesrtand why there were wars a long time ago, translators didn't exist and people couldn't hear each other, can't beleive that now even with trannslators wars still exist, if there were some rules in wars or they would be changed for a boxing match, a fight between presidents, football match it would be much better because I kind of understand that sometimes people just can't agree but I think that people haven't tried has ghard as they should

Yes. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem plausible, but there's no reason not to desire it, especially if we can drastically reduce the number of wars on this planet.

I think it's more than possible, I actually think that if wars don't stop they should at least have rules, 10 vs 10 or something like that in a neutral place where no innocent can be killed, maybe even a boxing match or a football match, I'm really seroius about this idea

hyrueprince11

I think it's more than possible, I actually think that if wars don't stop they should at least have rules, 10 vs 10 or something like that in a neutral place where no innocent can be killed, maybe even a boxing match or a football match, I'm really seroius about this idea

hyrueprince11

I think it's more than possible, I actually think that if wars don't stop they should at least have rules, 10 vs 10 or something like that in a neutral place where no innocent can be killed, maybe even a boxing match or a football match, I'm really seroius about this idea

hyrueprince11

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

I think it's more than possible, I actually think that if wars don't stop they should at least have rules, 10 vs 10 or something like that in a neutral place where no innocent can be killed, maybe even a boxing match or a football match, I'm really seroius about this idea

import_fighter1

sounds stupid, I know but it would be much more human than what wars are now, I understad that maybe a few could have to die but innocent opeople shouldn't die because some guy wants oil from another country+ if something like this isn't made soon we won't be fighting with little guns and tanks, the first guy who sends a nuclear weapon would win

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

I think it's more than possible, I actually think that if wars don't stop they should at least have rules, 10 vs 10 or something like that in a neutral place where no innocent can be killed, maybe even a boxing match or a football match, I'm really seroius about this idea

12345678ew

true but still, when a guy fights against another guy there are some kind of rules and they do have a conflict, in wars there aren't any rules, think that what they should actually do is fight 10 vs 10 or 100 vs 100 in a place where innocents can't be killed, well unless they wanted to

actually the best would be if wars could be stopped by talking but I know that sometimes that might be impossible

[QUOTE="XD4NTESINF3RNOX"]

first we would need a world without religion ;)

Actually, you would need a world without humanity.

[QUOTE="import_fighter1"][QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

I think it's more than possible, I actually think that if wars don't stop they should at least have rules, 10 vs 10 or something like that in a neutral place where no innocent can be killed, maybe even a boxing match or a football match, I'm really seroius about this idea

hyrueprince11

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

sounds stupid, I know but it would be much more human than what wars are now, I understad that maybe a few could have to die but innocent opeople shouldn't die because some guy wants oil from another country+ if something like this isn't made soon we won't be fighting with little guns and tanks, the first guy who sends a nuclear weapon would win

12345678ew

You're missing the whole point of what war is really about and why they happen. It's not something that leaders will play Twister and then be all happy.

[QUOTE="12345678ew"][QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

I think it's more than possible, I actually think that if wars don't stop they should at least have rules, 10 vs 10 or something like that in a neutral place where no innocent can be killed, maybe even a boxing match or a football match, I'm really seroius about this idea

true but still, when a guy fights against another guy there are some kind of rules and they do have a conflict, in wars there aren't any rules, think that what they should actually do is fight 10 vs 10 or 100 vs 100 in a place where innocents can't be killed, well unless they wanted to

actually the best would be if wars could be stopped by talking but I know that sometimes that might be impossible

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

[QUOTE="import_fighter1"]
I can see it now, the main requirements for president will be trained in the way of the ninja and maybe even a pirate.import_fighter1

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

sounds stupid, I know but it would be much more human than what wars are now, I understad that maybe a few could have to die but innocent opeople shouldn't die because some guy wants oil from another country+ if something like this isn't made soon we won't be fighting with little guns and tanks, the first guy who sends a nuclear weapon would win

12345678ew

You're missing the whole point of what war is really about and why they happen. It's not something that leaders will play Twister and then be all happy.

I'm sure that if someone thought about this before wars existed people would think that wars (as we know them now) are very very stupid

also after wars not many people end happy so it would have the same result

[QUOTE="import_fighter1"]

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]
[QUOTE="12345678ew"][QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

sounds stupid, I know but it would be much more human than what wars are now, I understad that maybe a few could have to die but innocent opeople shouldn't die because some guy wants oil from another country+ if something like this isn't made soon we won't be fighting with little guns and tanks, the first guy who sends a nuclear weapon would win

hyrueprince11

You're missing the whole point of what war is really about and why they happen. It's not something that leaders will play Twister and then be all happy.

I'm sure that if someone thought about this before wars existed people would think that wars (as we know them now) are very very stupid

also after wars not many people end happy so it would have the same result

There have been wars all throughout mankind. Even in the Stone Age. There never was "before wars existed" as long as man has been alive.

if aliens ever attack us I could almost asure that day we would have world peace, well at least humans wouldn't be fighting against humans