Ok think about it, the American system is about the illusion of freedom and a spending like economy system. Now hear me out. With communism mixed in it would centralize state and the federal gov. And leaving in checks and balances would cause even and balanced Laws in each state, having the same systems in each state would not only balance each states economics and not have to worry about hidden laws, but it would cancel out having to change ids if moving, universal security clearance, would lower insurance costs cross-state for things like cars, health etc. and would control inflation with everyone's income on average without having to adjust based on each states economy. With balance like this there would be nearly no one on gov assist and would create millions of indefinite jobs and big and small businesses alike won't have to worry about unbalanced payroll. Another big plus is unified balance states would make it possible for decent living at nearly any income, this plus the above adds spending, which would get rid of the national deficit by 2017 or so. The war on communism before caused change in the system and right now it's inevitably flawed to fail with no balance AND no spending.
People here do not seem to understand how economics and gov work. A fusion of communism would allow fed state and economics to be unified. Apart it's inevitable failure because unbalance economies in states screw with inflation and balancing making it hard for more spending.
I'm pretty sure what you acctually are thinking about is socialism. communism in it's own agenda has ideologies which would directly interfere with capitalism, one of them is having one supreme leader. Socialdemocracy works well, Scandinavia for example is very influenced by it. But is it the way for the US to go? That's not for me to judge.
I'm pretty sure what you acctually are thinking about is socialism. communism in it's own agenda has ideologies which would directly interfere with capitalism, one of them is having one supreme leader. Socialdemocracy works well, Scandinavia for example is very influenced by it. But is it the way for the US to go? That's not for me to judge.
kriggy
supreme leader with check and balances would cause unification.
People here do not seem to understand how economics and gov work. A fusion of communism would allow fed state and economics to be unified. Apart it's inevitable failure because unbalance economies in states screw with inflation and balancing making it hard for more spending.CommanderpeaceC
[QUOTE="CommanderpeaceC"]People here do not seem to understand how economics and gov work. A fusion of communism would allow fed state and economics to be unified. Apart it's inevitable failure because unbalance economies in states screw with inflation and balancing making it hard for more spending.Fightingfan
Mixed economy? Unification would not cause mixed economies wtf are u sayin?
Ok think about it, the American system is about the illusion of freedom and a spending like economy system. Now hear me out. With communism mixed in it would centralize state and the federal gov. And leaving in checks and balances would cause even and balanced Laws in each state, having the same systems in each state would not only balance each states economics and not have to worry about hidden laws, but it would cancel out having to change ids if moving, universal security clearance, would lower insurance costs cross-state for things like cars, health etc. and would control inflation with everyone's income on average without having to adjust based on each states economy. With balance like this there would be nearly no one on gov assist and would create millions of indefinite jobs and big and small businesses alike won't have to worry about unbalanced payroll. Another big plus is unified balance states would make it possible for decent living at nearly any income, this plus the above adds spending, which would get rid of the national deficit by 2017 or so. The war on communism before caused change in the system and right now it's inevitably flawed to fail with no balance AND no spending.CommanderpeaceC
I find your post to be incoherent, but I just want to say that the democrats have been experimenting with socialism for about 80 years now and it has not resulted in peace.
[QUOTE="CommanderpeaceC"]Ok think about it, the American system is about the illusion of freedom and a spending like economy system. Now hear me out. With communism mixed in it would centralize state and the federal gov. And leaving in checks and balances would cause even and balanced Laws in each state, having the same systems in each state would not only balance each states economics and not have to worry about hidden laws, but it would cancel out having to change ids if moving, universal security clearance, would lower insurance costs cross-state for things like cars, health etc. and would control inflation with everyone's income on average without having to adjust based on each states economy. With balance like this there would be nearly no one on gov assist and would create millions of indefinite jobs and big and small businesses alike won't have to worry about unbalanced payroll. Another big plus is unified balance states would make it possible for decent living at nearly any income, this plus the above adds spending, which would get rid of the national deficit by 2017 or so. The war on communism before caused change in the system and right now it's inevitably flawed to fail with no balance AND no spending.Laihendi
I find your post to be incoherent, but I just want to say that the democrats have been experimenting with socialism for about 80 years now and it has not resulted in peace. :lol:
[QUOTE="CommanderpeaceC"]Ok think about it, the American system is about the illusion of freedom and a spending like economy system. Now hear me out. With communism mixed in it would centralize state and the federal gov. And leaving in checks and balances would cause even and balanced Laws in each state, having the same systems in each state would not only balance each states economics and not have to worry about hidden laws, but it would cancel out having to change ids if moving, universal security clearance, would lower insurance costs cross-state for things like cars, health etc. and would control inflation with everyone's income on average without having to adjust based on each states economy. With balance like this there would be nearly no one on gov assist and would create millions of indefinite jobs and big and small businesses alike won't have to worry about unbalanced payroll. Another big plus is unified balance states would make it possible for decent living at nearly any income, this plus the above adds spending, which would get rid of the national deficit by 2017 or so. The war on communism before caused change in the system and right now it's inevitably flawed to fail with no balance AND no spending.Slayer_of_Bugs
I find your post to be incoherent, but I just want to say that the democrats have been experimenting with socialism for about 80 years now and it has not resulted in peace. :lol: Socialism and communism are not the same . We are talking unification and balance not bartering or sharing money.
Log in to comment