Hypothetically speaking , of course. If you could make the laws, would you try to enforce you moral standings on people living in your city or country. What laws would you make and how would you enforce them?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Current juris prudence is greatly influenced by morality. Although it isn't perfect, it does provide for norms and baselines. Would I enforce my own sense of morality? No, not entirely, but I would hope, however, that some concepts, such as murder and theft would be a shared interests across the board.
No, I could never force my own morality on others even if I think my own morality is right or better than anyone elses's.
Depending on the severity and type of thing committed, yes, but I would not do it if I were the sole arbiter.
Seeing as I'm socially libertarian, a lot more things would be legal. :Pchessmaster1989
So blackjack and hookers?
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Seeing as I'm socially libertarian, a lot more things would be legal. :Pleviathan91
So blackjack and hookers?
But no amusement parks :P[QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Seeing as I'm socially libertarian, a lot more things would be legal. :Pchessmaster1989
So blackjack and hookers?
But no amusement parks :PAnd forget the lunar landing and the blackjack. :lol:
But no amusement parks :P[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="leviathan91"]
So blackjack and hookers?
leviathan91
And forget the lunar landing and the blackjack. :lol:
Goes without saying :DHowever, I also do not swear or curse because I do not see how it could have a positive consequence. mindstorm
Cursing is great natural pain relief.
And now you know.
[QUOTE="mindstorm"] However, I also do not swear or curse because I do not see how it could have a positive consequence. br0kenrabbit
Cursing is great natural pain relief.
And now you know.
I thought that this was common knowledge.
I dont think so. I would never enforce any religous views or things like that. But then again, I dont really have those. Most of my "morality" seems to jibe with the current laws - dont kill, dont steal, etc. But if I believed in something that wast not widely held by others, I would not make it law. You shouldn't push your beliefs on others. Your beliefs are about what YOU should do, not what others should do.
[QUOTE="mindstorm"] However, I also do not swear or curse because I do not see how it could have a positive consequence. br0kenrabbit
Cursing is great natural pain relief.
And now you know.
And that is certainly a situation in which I would never hold someone accountable. However, I do like the last statement, "There is a catch, though: The more we swear, the less emotionally potent the words become, Stephens cautions. And without emotion, all that is left of a swearword is the word itself, unlikely to soothe anyone's pain."[QUOTE="XilePrincess"]Well considering one of my morals is keep your f*cking nose out of sh*t that doesn't concern you, no. Shmiity
So if you see someone in need on the street, you ignore them? I see huge flaws in this moral standing of yours.
That is the most absurd twisting of a post I've ever seen. What crevice of your ass did you pull that out of? This thread is about moral feelings becoming law. It doesn't concern me what somebody wants to do with their body. If you want another man to put his genitals in your ass and a ring on your finger, that is not my place to say yes or no. If you want to have an abortion, that's not my place to decide. If you want to drink or smoke or crisp your skin up like a burnt campfire weenie, that is not my place to say you can't. Helping somebody who is obviously bleeding out on the side of the road has nothing to do with my moral standings becoming law. If you're asking if I would make it law that you HAVE to help every person you see who may be in need, no, I'm not going to do that either. If you don't want to help somebody it's not my place to force you. I'd rather somebody do it of their own free will and caring for the situation than be legally obligated. I would help that person because I'm a good person but I would not pass a law saying everybody is being forced to be a good person and help the way I would. I am not a dictator.[QUOTE="Shmiity"][QUOTE="XilePrincess"]Well considering one of my morals is keep your f*cking nose out of sh*t that doesn't concern you, no. XilePrincess
So if you see someone in need on the street, you ignore them? I see huge flaws in this moral standing of yours.
That is the most absurd twisting of a post I've ever seen. What crevice of your ass did you pull that out of? This thread is about moral feelings becoming law. It doesn't concern me what somebody wants to do with their body. If you want another man to put his genitals in your ass and a ring on your finger, that is not my place to say yes or no. If you want to have an abortion, that's not my place to decide. If you want to drink or smoke or crisp your skin up like a burnt campfire weenie, that is not my place to say you can't. Helping somebody who is obviously bleeding out on the side of the road has nothing to do with my moral standings becoming law. If you're asking if I would make it law that you HAVE to help every person you see who may be in need, no, I'm not going to do that either. If you don't want to help somebody it's not my place to force you. I'd rather somebody do it of their own free will and caring for the situation than be legally obligated. I would help that person because I'm a good person but I would not pass a law saying everybody is being forced to be a good person and help the way I would. I am not a dictator.This is fantastic. What a genuine response
[QUOTE="Shmiity"][QUOTE="XilePrincess"]Well considering one of my morals is keep your f*cking nose out of sh*t that doesn't concern you, no. XilePrincess
So if you see someone in need on the street, you ignore them? I see huge flaws in this moral standing of yours.
That is the most absurd twisting of a post I've ever seen. What crevice of your ass did you pull that out of? This thread is about moral feelings becoming law. It doesn't concern me what somebody wants to do with their body. If you want another man to put his genitals in your ass and a ring on your finger, that is not my place to say yes or no. If you want to have an abortion, that's not my place to decide. If you want to drink or smoke or crisp your skin up like a burnt campfire weenie, that is not my place to say you can't. Helping somebody who is obviously bleeding out on the side of the road has nothing to do with my moral standings becoming law. If you're asking if I would make it law that you HAVE to help every person you see who may be in need, no, I'm not going to do that either. If you don't want to help somebody it's not my place to force you. I'd rather somebody do it of their own free will and caring for the situation than be legally obligated. I would help that person because I'm a good person but I would not pass a law saying everybody is being forced to be a good person and help the way I would. I am not a dictator. If someone running a business doesn't want to hire an employee of a certain race or gender, is that you're business?or lack there ofonly in certain cases.
In a certain way all law involves the forcing of some views on others.
whipassmt
no. if i were the law of the land it would be ultimate freedom with extremely limited government. pro choice, all drugs legal, do whatever you want as long as you dont hurt anyonemingmao3046Except it's not as simple as that. Bans on large sodas like Bloomberg has enforced in NYC contradict your limited government and 'as long as you dont hurt anyone' stance.
[QUOTE="mingmao3046"]no. if i were the law of the land it would be ultimate freedom with extremely limited government. pro choice, all drugs legal, do whatever you want as long as you dont hurt anyoneDroidPhysXExcept it's not as simple as that. Bans on large sodas like Bloomberg has enforced in NYC contradict your limited government and 'as long as you dont hurt anyone' stance. i said if i ruled the country thats what i would do. i dont agree with soda bans
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"]no. if i were the law of the land it would be ultimate freedom with extremely limited government. pro choice, all drugs legal, do whatever you want as long as you dont hurt anyonemingmao3046Except it's not as simple as that. Bans on large sodas like Bloomberg has enforced in NYC contradict your limited government and 'as long as you dont hurt anyone' stance. i said if i ruled the country thats what i would do. i dont agree with soda bans That was....err...the example of the complexity of what is limited government.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment