Topic. would you rather be 3 ft. taller or 3 ft. shorter from whatever your height is now. I'd personally be 3 feet taller.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Three feet taller. All the girls would think my junk was huge.
And I'd be the best basketball player ever.
I can't even decide! If I was 3 feet taller, I'd be too tall and if I was 3 feet shorter, I'd be too short.
Hmmm over 9 or just over 3 feet....I think I'll take shorter. They make more accomadations for shorter people than they do tall. I can barely fit into a lot of cars and tight areas as it is now
this is assuming my proportions stay the same.
I think taller = more advantages than shorter. You would still be able to make the loves to average-height women, and you'd probably get hired or promoted faster.
Sorry short people (hey I'm only 5'6" myself, it sucks).
Well I am 4'11" so going three feet shorter would make me 1'11" that would really suck. So I say three feet taller...
Wish I had a girl who looked good I would call her.I wish I was a little bit taller, I wish I was a baller.......
10thwonder
Ah, but do you wish you had a girl who looked good? and would you call her?I wish I was a little bit taller, I wish I was a baller.......
10thwonder
[QUOTE="10thwonder"]Ah, but do you wish you had a girl who looked good? and would you call her?I wish I was a little bit taller, I wish I was a baller.......
jimmyjammer69
Not as much as a rabbit in a hat :P
3 feet taller definitely. I mean, I'm already 6'0, so I wouldn't particularly want to be any taller, but I'd much rather be 9ft tall than be only 3ft.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment