Would you rather have 100% Immunity to big diseases or small illnesses?

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
Which would you rather have 100% immunity to: Small things like the common cold or a cough OR immunity bigger things like cancer, aids, etc? I'd choose to be immune to smaller illnesses because I don't see the bigger ones as a threat.
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

Big things. Small illnesses like colds are no big deal. The sniffles aren't going to harm you.

Avatar image for flordeceres
flordeceres

4662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 flordeceres
Member since 2005 • 4662 Posts

why is this even a question? it would be idiotic in the least to choose immunity to less dangerous conditions in face of life threatening ones

Avatar image for KiIIyou
KiIIyou

27204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 KiIIyou
Member since 2006 • 27204 Posts
Big ones cause it's hard to die from the small ones.
Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts

I can live with a coldso I vote Major illnesses.

Avatar image for Bane_09
Bane_09

3394

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Bane_09
Member since 2010 • 3394 Posts

Big ones, small ones are not about to kill me and are only an annoyance

Avatar image for Mega-Mustaine
Mega-Mustaine

2130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Mega-Mustaine
Member since 2010 • 2130 Posts

Major illnesses. The little things like a cold are more annoying than life threatening... :?

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

LOL:lol:

Is this serious,

Immunity to the ones that can kill and handicap me

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

why is this even a question? it would be idiotic in the least to choose immunity to less dangerous conditions in face of life threatening ones

flordeceres
But is cancer or aids something you really see yourself having to deal with later on? Given the life I live, it would be more beneficial to get rid of all the small things so that I could always be healthy.
Avatar image for noxboxlive
noxboxlive

5856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 noxboxlive
Member since 2008 • 5856 Posts

Which would you rather have 100% immunity to: Small things like the common cold or a cough OR immunity bigger things like cancer, aids, etc? I'd choose to be immune to smaller illnesses because I don't see the bigger ones as a threat.ZumaJones07

yeah i know its not like they can kill you or anythng... /sarcasm

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
big thangs
Avatar image for noxboxlive
noxboxlive

5856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 noxboxlive
Member since 2008 • 5856 Posts

[QUOTE="flordeceres"]

why is this even a question? it would be idiotic in the least to choose immunity to less dangerous conditions in face of life threatening ones

ZumaJones07

But is cancer or aids something you really see yourself having to deal with later on? Given the life I live, it would be more beneficial to get rid of all the small things so that I could always be healthy.

You do know that 1 in 3 people get cancer right?

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Which would you rather have 100% immunity to: Small things like the common cold or a cough OR immunity bigger things like cancer, aids, etc? I'd choose to be immune to smaller illnesses because I don't see the bigger ones as a threat.noxboxlive

yeah i know its not like they can kill you or anythng... /sarcasm

they can't kill me if they never get to me. I sidestep big diseases. :)
Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

You do know that 1 in 3 people get cancer right?

noxboxlive
I'm part of the 2/3 that don't?
Avatar image for noxboxlive
noxboxlive

5856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 noxboxlive
Member since 2008 • 5856 Posts

[QUOTE="noxboxlive"]

You do know that 1 in 3 people get cancer right?

ZumaJones07

I'm part of the 2/3 that don't?

well them im one fo the 1/100000000000000000000000000000000000000

that can never die...

Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts

[QUOTE="noxboxlive"]

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Which would you rather have 100% immunity to: Small things like the common cold or a cough OR immunity bigger things like cancer, aids, etc? I'd choose to be immune to smaller illnesses because I don't see the bigger ones as a threat.ZumaJones07

yeah i know its not like they can kill you or anythng... /sarcasm

they can't kill me if they never get to me. I sidestep big diseases. :)

I thought the same thing .You dont fear the cancer as much as you do catching a cold while having cancer and that cold in a day turns into nemonia (cant spell it) then you cant catch your breath or even breath and that causes your heart to stop and your dead before the cancer even had a chance.

Avatar image for megagene
megagene

23162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 megagene
Member since 2005 • 23162 Posts
[QUOTE="noxboxlive"]

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Which would you rather have 100% immunity to: Small things like the common cold or a cough OR immunity bigger things like cancer, aids, etc? I'd choose to be immune to smaller illnesses because I don't see the bigger ones as a threat.ZumaJones07

yeah i know its not like they can kill you or anythng... /sarcasm

they can't kill me if they never get to me. I sidestep big diseases. :)

As does everyone.... Until they get them.
Avatar image for flordeceres
flordeceres

4662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 flordeceres
Member since 2005 • 4662 Posts

I sidestep big diseases. :)ZumaJones07

cute, except you don't. there are tonnes of diseases in which the environment or the life you live bears little to no impact, like genetic diseases. no matter how healthy you are, there's always the chance you'll have an incurable disease that will cripple you or even kill you. not to mention the amount of people that get lung cancer, for example, that have never smoked a day in their life.

there's no logic in your reasoning

Avatar image for Tokugawa77
Tokugawa77

1554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#19 Tokugawa77
Member since 2009 • 1554 Posts

Immuneto big ones. With small colds and stuff you get an excuse to miss work/school

Avatar image for martinX3X
martinX3X

4488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 martinX3X
Member since 2009 • 4488 Posts

Definetely big diseases. Seriously, those can destroy your life.

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Small. Unless you live in a plutonium house then cancer tends to start very small and a lot of the big ones have good vaccines against them already. Also this doesn't cover injuries so it's not like the major option lowers your chances of dying young by much.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

not to mention the amount of people that get lung cancer, for example, that have never smoked a day in their life.

flordeceres

The vast majority of cancers start off as a single cell. Would you rather get rid of it at that level or wait for it to become something major and then get rid of it?

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
Small. Unless you live in a plutonium house then cancer tends to start very small and a lot of the big ones have good vaccines against them already. Also this doesn't cover injuries so it's not like the major option lowers your chances of dying young by much.markop2003
This is similar to my method of thought.

there's no logic in your reasoning

flordeceres
There is some logic, I think given my family's history and my life choices, I am less prone to getting those big diseases. I know it's naive, but I honestly don't think I'll be dealing with any of those big illnesses.
Avatar image for deactivated-5c37d3adcd094
deactivated-5c37d3adcd094

8362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-5c37d3adcd094
Member since 2006 • 8362 Posts
Big, obviously. Lifetime risk of dying from cancer alone is about 1 in 4.
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#25 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
Is this really a question? The cold will kill me one of these days. So small. :3
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

Big ones, then I would run around (maybe naked;)) in Red Forest laughing at radiation

Avatar image for shoot-first
shoot-first

9788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#27 shoot-first
Member since 2004 • 9788 Posts

Big ones cause it's hard to die from the small ones.KiIIyou

For some reason this made me lol.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Big ones, then I would run around (maybe naked;)) in Red Forest laughing at radiation

lordreaven

I think it means your also immune to most STDs too....

Just putting that out there.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#29 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Big ones of course. I don't get sick that much anyway, and small things like colds aren't bad.
Avatar image for Celldrax
Celldrax

15053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Celldrax
Member since 2005 • 15053 Posts

Immunity from life threatening diseases. A cold or a sore throat (as painful as that can be...) can be dealt with in due time.

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Big, obviously. Lifetime risk of dying from cancer alone is about 1 in 4.kamikaze_pigmy
Which may only protect you from being run over and killed by a bus the next day. This doesn't make you invulnerable.
Avatar image for -Toshy-
-Toshy-

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 -Toshy-
Member since 2008 • 1376 Posts
Small ones. When I'm old I don't want to die at the hands of the common cold or even worse live to be 150 and be too weak to eat.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

Big ones, then I would run around (maybe naked;)) in Red Forest laughing at radiation

dercoo

I think it means your also immune to most STDs too....

Just putting that out there.

It wouldn't protect you from warts, gonorrhea, scabies ect, also it wouldn't stop you from infecting other people.
Avatar image for kweeni
kweeni

11413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#34 kweeni
Member since 2007 • 11413 Posts
Big ones.
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#35 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

Voted small diseases. Chances of getting cancer? 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%

chances of getting a nasty cold? 42%

Yeah, I'll take my odds.


But then agian this poll could be a trick question. If I'm 100% immune to cancer, does that mean I can smoke 30 cigars everyday????

Avatar image for UCF_Knight
UCF_Knight

6863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 UCF_Knight
Member since 2010 • 6863 Posts
From a medical perspective, this thread makes my head hurt. I don't know whether it's the misconceptions people have about cancer, or the misconception that cancer is the only large illness that can ruin your life. And I'm hoping the whole cold = pneumonia = heart stopping thing isn't serious. For the sake of the thread, I'm definitely going with "big diseases". >.>
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
You would be derped to go with the small-disease immunity. Big diseases fo' sho'.
Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
Umm no contest lol. Anyone choosing the small things is well, idk.
Avatar image for th3warr1or
th3warr1or

20637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#39 th3warr1or
Member since 2007 • 20637 Posts
Big diseases.. I could literally do whatever the f*** I wanted since I know that this little flu I'm having isn't going to kill me.
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#40 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21694 Posts
The smaller illnesses are things you can get over at least. Big ones can be permanent and life ending. So common sense tells me to choose the big diseases....
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#41 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

Hmm let's see small curable diseases or big incurable, life threatening diseases.

Man this is tough....

Avatar image for UCF_Knight
UCF_Knight

6863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 UCF_Knight
Member since 2010 • 6863 Posts

Just because I cannot let medical ignorance go without justice, here are the chances of developing cancer.

Males 44% Females 37%

The chances of dying from cancer are of course lower, but who would rather live with cancer than the occasional bronchitis, athlete's foot, etc.

That's not even taking into account, CANCER ISN'T THE ONLY THING THAT WILL KILL YOU!

Cancer isn't even the leading cause of death worldwide, cardiovascular disease is. More people die from cardiovascular disease than cancer!

This isn't even taking into account AIDS, Diabetes, Alzheimer's, lung diseases, etc etc.

/rant

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
The smaller illnesses are things you can get over at least. Big ones can be permanent and life ending. So common sense tells me to choose the big diseases....tocool340
Indeed. In my above post, i just didn't wanna get moderated... anyone choosing the small ones must not have common sense. (hoping not to get modded)
Avatar image for ff7fan2
ff7fan2

31413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 ff7fan2
Member since 2006 • 31413 Posts
Indeed. In my above post, i just didn't wanna get moderated... anyone choosing the small ones must not have common sense. (hoping not to get modded)sethman410
Given that these "big diseases" seem to cause the most deaths, we would probably be safe in saying that without them our lives would be extended significantly. Except that doesn't stop the general aging process from occurring. Nor does it stop blood clots from forming and causing a heart attack. Nor weak joints, muscles, bones, etc. So you would be getting older and progressively weaker for who knows how long. I'm sorry if I don't want to some day become a liability for everyone else around me.
Avatar image for UCF_Knight
UCF_Knight

6863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 UCF_Knight
Member since 2010 • 6863 Posts
[QUOTE="tocool340"]The smaller illnesses are things you can get over at least. Big ones can be permanent and life ending. So common sense tells me to choose the big diseases....sethman410
Indeed. In my above post, i just didn't wanna get moderated... anyone choosing the small ones must not have common sense. (hoping not to get modded)

You shouldn't. Though perhaps it's better to say people are ignorant, rather than not having common sense. I run into a lot of people that believe cancer is the leading cause of death, so perhaps that knowledge isn't so common. The politically correct way would probably be, people have to be ignorant of the variety of life threatening illnesses and the chances of acquiring one if they would honestly take their chances and gamble their life in such a way.
Avatar image for Metaw
Metaw

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 Metaw
Member since 2010 • 387 Posts

I've had cancer and it's not so bad, I feel almost invincible now - not to say same thing can't happen to me again. It's just that I've had many colds in my life, and I'm getting really tired of it, nothing ruins my day/week more than a cold, so I would choose that.

If a big disease were to kill me then I'd have no problems with that, I'd hopefully have lived long enough and enjoyed some years coldless.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

Males 44% Females 37%

UCF_Knight
So if I'm reading this correctly, it's stating that the chance of me developing ANY type of cancer is 44% (1 in 2 for men)? And the other stuff below that is for individual cases? Those numbers don't look to bad to me lol.The worst one seems to be 1 in 6 for prostate cancer with a 2.79% chance of dying from it. I'm not worried about all that. :)
Avatar image for UCF_Knight
UCF_Knight

6863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 UCF_Knight
Member since 2010 • 6863 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"]Indeed. In my above post, i just didn't wanna get moderated... anyone choosing the small ones must not have common sense. (hoping not to get modded)ff7fan2
Given that these "big diseases" seem to cause the most deaths, we would probably be safe in saying that without them our lives would be extended significantly. Except that doesn't stop the general aging process from occurring. Nor does it stop blood clots from forming and causing a heart attack, weak joints, muscles, bones, etc. So you would be getting older and progressively weaker for who knows how long. I'm sorry if I don't want to some day become a liability for everyone else around me.

I believe osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease qualify as large illnesses.

The reason you would be a liability is because of those large illnesses. People can age just fine without these hampering illnesses and do not require assistance, especially on their entire family.

You would rather die younger, than running the chance of living in a retirement home? Even though some people are in their 90s and still living on their own..

Avatar image for Zlurodirom
Zlurodirom

1281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Zlurodirom
Member since 2006 • 1281 Posts

[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]

Males 44% Females 37%

ZumaJones07

So if I'm reading this correctly, it's stating that the chance of me developing ANY type of cancer is 44% (1 in 2 for men)? And the other stuff below that is for individual cases? Those numbers don't look to bad to me lol.The worst one seems to be 1 in 6 for prostate cancer with a 2.79% chance of dying from it. I'm not worried about all that. :)

Cant tell if you're kidding or not. But if you have a sibling, chances are one of you will develop cancer at some point in your lives. You don't think that's a significantly high rate?

P.S. A day of living in L.A. is the equivolent of smoking 14 cigarettes to the damage it does to your lungs/body, just by breathing the air, according to my professor. So living in any populated area will probably increase your risks for cancer and other diseases.

Avatar image for UCF_Knight
UCF_Knight

6863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 UCF_Knight
Member since 2010 • 6863 Posts

So if I'm reading this correctly, it's stating that the chance of me developing ANY type of cancer is 44% (1 in 2 for men)? And the other stuff below that is for individual cases? Those numbers don't look to bad to me lol.The worst one seems to be 1 in 6 for prostate cancer with a 2.79% chance of dying from it. I'm not worried about all that. :)ZumaJones07

-___-

So you have almost a 50% chance of acquiring the SECOND leading cause of death, and that's okay..

How often do you get these small illnesses? A week long cold every once in a while is really good enough reason to take a chance of ending your life several years early?