WWF. UFC isn't real lol.. Real is where one of the guy in the ring dies before the match ends. Real is when you can kick the guy's groin constantly. Real is where you can gouge eyes and don't need gloves.. Real is where you go to prison after.. Oh wait.. Well, yeah. It's not "real".
WWE 2001-2008. Those were some of the best years, when not counting the 90's of course. The whole PG image thing is entertaining at times but overall not that good. TNA-Eric B and Hulk hogan seem to love bringing back the old guys making TNA seem like like a rerun on WCW. I am sad that the woman's division is not as great as it use to be, not as bad as the WWE female division but still. UFC-Entertaining for a whole different reason. No story lines and more brutal. I enjoy all three equally.
TNA because they have the best talent and matches. That is against the WWE of course. UFC destroys them both. But WWE has sunken to a new low, hopefully they'll go back to TV14 after Linda's election business is over.
WWE 2001-2008. Those were some of the best years, when not counting the 90's of course. The whole PG image thing is entertaining at times but overall not that good. TNA-Eric B and Hulk hogan seem to love bringing back the old guys making TNA seem like like a rerun on WCW. I am sad that the woman's division is not as great as it use to be, not as bad as the WWE female division but still. UFC-Entertaining for a whole different reason. No story lines and more brutal. I enjoy all three equally.GrandJury
wrong. WWE died in 2002 when the splitted the the roster and forced to changed the name from WWF to WWE. Therefore, WWE should have its own history apart from WWF. WWE March(or April) 2002- present anyway, out of those 3 u listed i'll picked TNA. never seen alot of UFC.
[QUOTE="GrandJury"]WWE 2001-2008. Those were some of the best years, when not counting the 90's of course. The whole PG image thing is entertaining at times but overall not that good. TNA-Eric B and Hulk hogan seem to love bringing back the old guys making TNA seem like like a rerun on WCW. I am sad that the woman's division is not as great as it use to be, not as bad as the WWE female division but still. UFC-Entertaining for a whole different reason. No story lines and more brutal. I enjoy all three equally.PSP107
wrong. WWE died in 2002 when the splitted the the roster and forced to changed the name from WWF to WWE. Therefore, WWE should have its own history apart from WWF. WWE March(or April) 2002- present anyway, out of those 3 u listed i'll picked TNA. never seen alot of UFC. You seriously think there was nothing else good in the WWE after 2002?
[QUOTE="PSP107"][QUOTE="GrandJury"]WWE 2001-2008. Those were some of the best years, when not counting the 90's of course. The whole PG image thing is entertaining at times but overall not that good. TNA-Eric B and Hulk hogan seem to love bringing back the old guys making TNA seem like like a rerun on WCW. I am sad that the woman's division is not as great as it use to be, not as bad as the WWE female division but still. UFC-Entertaining for a whole different reason. No story lines and more brutal. I enjoy all three equally.GrandJury
wrong. WWE died in 2002 when the splitted the the roster and forced to changed the name from WWF to WWE. Therefore, WWE should have its own history apart from WWF. WWE March(or April) 2002- present anyway, out of those 3 u listed i'll picked TNA. never seen alot of UFC. You seriously think there was nothing else good in the WWE after 2002? you know i actually think that. When i get the chance to see WWE programming, i sit back and wonder what the hell happen.
[QUOTE="GrandJury"]WWE 2001-2008. Those were some of the best years, when not counting the 90's of course. The whole PG image thing is entertaining at times but overall not that good. TNA-Eric B and Hulk hogan seem to love bringing back the old guys making TNA seem like like a rerun on WCW. I am sad that the woman's division is not as great as it use to be, not as bad as the WWE female division but still. UFC-Entertaining for a whole different reason. No story lines and more brutal. I enjoy all three equally.PSP107
wrong. WWE died in 2002 when the splitted the the roster and forced to changed the name from WWF to WWE. Therefore, WWE should have its own history apart from WWF. WWE March(or April) 2002- present anyway, out of those 3 u listed i'll picked TNA. never seen alot of UFC. WWE died in 2004 for when the rock left... WWE from 2004-2008 wasn't bad. Currently its horrible, haven't watched in months. I don't watch TNA or UFC either though.
apples and oranges. 2 are entertainment and the other is a sport. i used to watch WWF when i was a kid. stoped after all my fav wrestlers left like the rock, stone cold. then as i grew older i got into watching MMA (ufc is just a org). kind of flipped through channels and got to a monday live raw and i was like wow...this is horrible. the acting and everything is sooo cheezy. how could i have watched this when i was little...never watched wwe ever again.
WWE, even though the current product isn't that great, and yes I know it's fake. UFC bores the hell out of me tbh, and TNA seems like it tries too hard to appear more "real" and "edgy" than the WWE, even though all they do is hire ex-WWE wrestlers Vince McMahon doesn't want anymore.
[QUOTE="GrandJury"][QUOTE="PSP107"] wrong. WWE died in 2002 when the splitted the the roster and forced to changed the name from WWF to WWE. Therefore, WWE should have its own history apart from WWF. WWE March(or April) 2002- present anyway, out of those 3 u listed i'll picked TNA. never seen alot of UFC. PSP107
You seriously think there was nothing else good in the WWE after 2002? you know i actually think that. When i get the chance to see WWE programming, i sit back and wonder what the hell happen.Back 2001-2008 it was still very much entertaining.
You can't really compare pro wrestling and MMA. They're two very different things. UFC: Second choice. I like the realness of it, but most of the times it's just boring and it feels like you're watching the same thing over & over again. The announcers sit there talking up both men and how exciting the fight is, they throw a few jabs that rarely connect, take things to the ground, and then bada boom, one of them either gets KO'd or taps. While I do appreciate the sport, and enjoy watching it from time to time, it just doesn't do much for me. TNA: Third choice. They have a lot of amazing young talent on their hands, and fantastic matches here and there, but it's so ironic how it's called Total Nonstop Action, and the majority of the show is nothing but talk. If they focus more on the matches, and stop ****ing around with the geezers (Hogan, Bischoff, Foley, Jarrett, Sting) then they could have a quality product. WWE: First choice. Absolutely wonderful entertainment that I love to watch and be a part of.
I used to love the WWE, but it's basically been unwatchable for me for a couple pf years now. The 1997-2002 attitude era was just freaking golden though. I really miss those days. :(
[QUOTE="Razor-Lazor"]You can't really compare pro wrestling and MMA. They're two very different things. UFC: Second choice. I like the realness of it, but most of the times it's just boring and it feels like you're watching the same thing over & over again. The announcers sit there talking up both men and how exciting the fight is, they throw a few jabs that rarely connect, take things to the ground, and then bada boom, one of them either gets KO'd or taps. While I do appreciate the sport, and enjoy watching it from time to time, it just doesn't do much for me. TNA: Third choice. They have a lot of amazing young talent on their hands, and fantastic matches here and there, but it's so ironic how it's called Total Nonstop Action, and the majority of the show is nothing but talk. If they focus more on the matches, and stop ****ing around with the geezers (Hogan, Bischoff, Foley, Jarrett, Sting) then they could have a quality product. WWE: First choice. Absolutely wonderful entertainment that I love to watch and be a part of.Oh your complaining about too much talking in TNA? Have you tried watching Raw lately?
Once upon a time I watched WWE, or rather, WWF. I even paid and went to a few live shows. That is until the last one I went to. I think it was Monday night Raw, and it was the main event. I don't remember the other wrestler involved, but one was Triple H. All I remember is seeing him drop a bow on his opponent, but landed about 4ft away. Complete miss, but of course they both hammed it up, and when I got home the angles of the cameras hid the mistake. Wrestling was dead to me after that.
Once upon a time I watched WWE, or rather, WWF. I even paid and went to a few live shows. That is until the last one I went to. I think it was Monday night Raw, and it was the main event. I don't remember the other wrestler involved, but one was Triple H. All I remember is seeing him drop a bow on his opponent, but landed about 4ft away. Complete miss, but of course they both hammed it up, and when I got home the angles of the cameras hid the mistake. Wrestling was dead to me after that.
WWF, I'm currently watching WWE and UFC. Why WWE? idk i'm kinda forced, but seeing how dumb the storylines are, it's quite entertaining i might add. And UFC is intense.
ufc. better stories than wwe. better personalities than wwe. better fights than wwe. dont get me wrong though wrestlemania is still a holiday for melloveLamp
The only story I ever heard in ufc is Brock Lesnar trying to act like a heel wrestler.
[QUOTE="GrandJury"]WWE 2001-2008. Those were some of the best years, when not counting the 90's of course. The whole PG image thing is entertaining at times but overall not that good. TNA-Eric B and Hulk hogan seem to love bringing back the old guys making TNA seem like like a rerun on WCW. I am sad that the woman's division is not as great as it use to be, not as bad as the WWE female division but still. UFC-Entertaining for a whole different reason. No story lines and more brutal. I enjoy all three equally. Hulk Hogan is wrestling again? For me it used to be wwe, but as said it's gone downhill.... I haven't watched it in ages, so it might have gotten better? I watched a couple of UFC matches here and there, and I think it's alright, so I pick that.
how could anyone watch WWE is beyond me, now WWF back in the days and WCW were really cool but as off now is TNA. UFC is to real which makes it BORING, so TNA for the win, and that's a ""sigh""
The comparison confuses me - the first two are considered "sports entertainment" (emphasis on the entertainment) and the third is an actual sport. The two categories have completely different target audiences and business models.
never see any of them except for a little UFC. why do i want to watch 2 muscular sweaty guys going at each other on the floor. thats not really my thing,
Log in to comment