[QUOTE="ParisHilton1Fan"][QUOTE="ChrisSpartan117"] *The entire OP* jaydoughLame. Why would you do that? :(
Look at the username, that is what made me understand it more easily.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Why would you do that? :([QUOTE="jaydough"][QUOTE="ParisHilton1Fan"]Lame.SavageM2
Look at the username, that is what made me understand it more easily.
Funnier than most of the pics here.
I'd like to thank the responses here with two videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJmDWevlt3U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Anno5f6zOtA&feature=channel
These probably won't get as many laughs as the pics, but oh well. Andyou should know that they're pretty dirty, especially the second one.
CriticsNot terribly funny. While many of these certainly have the potential to be funny, most of them are overly wordy parroting of things we've all heard before. And there's the rub: They're far too straightforward. What a picture like this needs to be laughable is spontaneity. Instead of saying "Look, here's a joke we all have been talking about for a while," it needs to show you something, make you wonder why you're seeing that, then suddenly and swiftly spring the connection of humor on you. Take that Amy Winehouse picture, for instance. That shows you something, says something that makes sense, then suddenly shifts the meaning around in an unexpected, spontaneous way that has you see the picture in another way. That's a good example of image macro humor done right. EDIT: Not trying to rain on anyone's parade, of course.mutenpika
Sometimes, they tend to nitpick. Sometimes, they are funny. Guess which one this post goes in.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment