You must prove that God exists... (year old thread please LOCK)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

It is a common misconception that atheists must be able to prove that God does not exist. Actually, the burden falls on religious persons to prove that God does exist, for the simple reason that, if you claim ANYTHING to exist, then you must be able to prove its existence.

If any religious person disagrees with this, then we establish that the burden is on people to disprove something's existence. Therefore, I claim: that there are UFOs with aliens in them; that there is a Death Star in a far-away galaxy; that Darth Vader himself came to visit me, and then left; that there is a flying spaghetti monster; that the ancient Greek gods (i.e. Zeus, Hera, etc.) exist; that the ancient Egyptian gods exist; that the Norse gods exist; that I can use 'the force' (by the way, don't say that you can just ask me to do it, and my refusal is proof--I might just not feel like it ;)); that I am a god (same logic as with 'the force'); and that I know how to build a Death Star.

Now, disprove that 8). If you can't, then it's true 8).

EDIT: This thread is over a year old and has been bumped. Moderators, please lock it.

Avatar image for Steameffekt
Steameffekt

4950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#2 Steameffekt
Member since 2008 • 4950 Posts
The bible is one proof...
Avatar image for Astaroth2k
Astaroth2k

877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Astaroth2k
Member since 2006 • 877 Posts

Impossible to prove a negative.

The bible contradcits itself hundreds of times.And it doesnt count as evidence...but if we are to beleive it is the word of God.Looks like he is incompetent and a megalomaniac that condones rape,genocide and slavery.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

The bible is one proof...Steameffekt

No, that's circular reasoning-using the so-called 'word of God' to prove God's existence. I'm sorry, but The Bible proves nothing.

Avatar image for ScreamDream
ScreamDream

3953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ScreamDream
Member since 2006 • 3953 Posts

It's impossible to prove evolution that we came from monkeys so this thread fails.

Avatar image for Astaroth2k
Astaroth2k

877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Astaroth2k
Member since 2006 • 877 Posts

It's impossible to prove evolution that we came from monkeys so this thread fails.

ScreamDream
We didnt evolve from monkeys.You fail.
Avatar image for TboneKing
TboneKing

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TboneKing
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts
The whole basis of my religion is faith. You may not have it, but I sure as hell do.
Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
Burden of proof falls on whoever makes a claim about the existence or nonexistence of God.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#9 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

It's impossible to prove evolution that we came from monkeys so this thread fails.

ScreamDream

Where in this thread to I mention evolution, and how does that tie into the existence of God? I'm sorry, but your reasoning fails.

Avatar image for Overrated_Hero
Overrated_Hero

3439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 Overrated_Hero
Member since 2008 • 3439 Posts
I don't believe that you can use the Bible as proof that God exist, also what cannot be proved cannot be disproved.
Avatar image for ScreamDream
ScreamDream

3953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ScreamDream
Member since 2006 • 3953 Posts
[QUOTE="ScreamDream"]

It's impossible to prove evolution that we came from monkeys so this thread fails.

chessmaster1989

Where in this thread to I mention evolution, and how does that tie into the existence of God? I'm sorry, but your reasoning fails.

Then what do you believe in Chessmaster?

Avatar image for DrSponge
DrSponge

12763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 DrSponge
Member since 2008 • 12763 Posts
You cannot prove or disprove God.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Burden of proof falls on whoever makes a claim about the existence or nonexistence of God.MattUD1
Correct, that's how the scientific method works, person A provides proof for something to exist then person B provides proof that it dosn't exist. I think the ball is in the thiests court though so it's thier turn to proove god exists somehow next. Relly it's all fuetile as if god is all powerful then he is powerful enough to not leave proof of his existance.
Avatar image for lucky326
lucky326

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 lucky326
Member since 2006 • 3799 Posts
You cannot prove or disprove God.DrSponge
Incorrect, to our knowledge God has never existed. Therefore it must be proven that God does exist.
Avatar image for DrSponge
DrSponge

12763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 DrSponge
Member since 2008 • 12763 Posts
[QUOTE="DrSponge"]You cannot prove or disprove God.lucky326
Incorrect, to our knowledge God has never existed. Therefore it must be proven that God does exist.

Religion is entirely faith based, so, to believe in God you need to have faith. Therefore God cannot be disproved. I'm an atheist btw.
Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
Religion is based on faith, therefore they don't have to and cannot prove the existence of God
Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#17 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

It is a common misconception that atheists must be able to prove that God does not exist. Actually, the burden falls on religious persons to prove that God does exist, for the simple reason that, if you claim ANYTHING to exist, then you must be able to prove its existence.

If any religious person disagrees with this, then we establish that the burden is on people to disprove something's existence. Therefore, I claim: that there are UFOs with aliens in them; that there is a Death Star in a far-away galaxy; that Darth Vader himself came to visit me, and then left; that there is a flying spaghetti monster; that the ancient Greek gods (i.e. Zeus, Hera, etc.) exist; that the ancient Egyptian gods exist; that the Norse gods exist; that I can use 'the force' (by the way, don't say that you can just ask me to do it, and my refusal is proof--I might just not feel like it ;)); that I am a god (same logic as with 'the force'); and that I know how to build a Death Star.

Now, disprove that 8). If you can't, then it's true 8).

st thomas aquinas, st anselm, st augustine. read their books. you fail.
Avatar image for lucky326
lucky326

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 lucky326
Member since 2006 • 3799 Posts
And as fa as I'm concerned faith is irrelevent when it comes to scientific proof, I really don't care how much of it they have.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="DrSponge"]You cannot prove or disprove God.lucky326
Incorrect, to our knowledge God has never existed. Therefore it must be proven that God does exist.

I know what you mean but due to the nature of the universe it's physically impossible to prove pretty much anything. It's impossible to prove that god does or dosn't exist just prove to within reasnoble doubt though due to the nature of the argument it's easy for the thiest side to say "God is all powerful and all knowing so it's all in his plan" and the athiests can just say "It's all a coinsiedence". So it's pretty much impossible to get to the of proof beyond resnoble doubt.
Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts

The bible is one proof...Steameffekt

Since the Bible was written by man, this logic fails.

Avatar image for lilburtonboy748
lilburtonboy748

2536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 lilburtonboy748
Member since 2007 • 2536 Posts
I don't try to prove it. It isn't possible. But logic can be used to make a case for it. You cannot prove or disprove it, faith is an important part of Christianity. But doesn't have to be blind faith like so many people think...
Avatar image for Eddie5vs1
Eddie5vs1

6085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 Eddie5vs1
Member since 2004 • 6085 Posts
How about "different strokes for different folks". You're entitled to your opinion and I'm entitled to mine. These religion topics are getting totally out of hand here on OT. I'm sorry but this is the wrong place to try to convert people. With a little searching I'm sure you can find other forums with like minded individuals. Or start a union.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

It is a common misconception that atheists must be able to prove that God does not exist. Actually, the burden falls on religious persons to prove that God does exist, for the simple reason that, if you claim ANYTHING to exist, then you must be able to prove its existence.

If any religious person disagrees with this, then we establish that the burden is on people to disprove something's existence. Therefore, I claim: that there are UFOs with aliens in them; that there is a Death Star in a far-away galaxy; that Darth Vader himself came to visit me, and then left; that there is a flying spaghetti monster; that the ancient Greek gods (i.e. Zeus, Hera, etc.) exist; that the ancient Egyptian gods exist; that the Norse gods exist; that I can use 'the force' (by the way, don't say that you can just ask me to do it, and my refusal is proof--I might just not feel like it ;)); that I am a god (same logic as with 'the force'); and that I know how to build a Death Star.

Now, disprove that 8). If you can't, then it's true 8).

supa_badman

st thomas aquinas, st anselm, st augustine. read their books. you fail.

They were written by people, so they are not proof. I'm sorry, but you are the one who fails.

Avatar image for luke1889
luke1889

14617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 luke1889
Member since 2004 • 14617 Posts
I don't believe that you can use the Bible as proof that God exist, also what cannot be proved cannot be disproved. Overrated_Hero
Precisely. No need to disprove something until it is proved. You'd only be disproving nothing effectively.
Avatar image for Eddie5vs1
Eddie5vs1

6085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 Eddie5vs1
Member since 2004 • 6085 Posts
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="supa_badman"][QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

It is a common misconception that atheists must be able to prove that God does not exist. Actually, the burden falls on religious persons to prove that God does exist, for the simple reason that, if you claim ANYTHING to exist, then you must be able to prove its existence.

If any religious person disagrees with this, then we establish that the burden is on people to disprove something's existence. Therefore, I claim: that there are UFOs with aliens in them; that there is a Death Star in a far-away galaxy; that Darth Vader himself came to visit me, and then left; that there is a flying spaghetti monster; that the ancient Greek gods (i.e. Zeus, Hera, etc.) exist; that the ancient Egyptian gods exist; that the Norse gods exist; that I can use 'the force' (by the way, don't say that you can just ask me to do it, and my refusal is proof--I might just not feel like it ;)); that I am a god (same logic as with 'the force'); and that I know how to build a Death Star.

Now, disprove that 8). If you can't, then it's true 8).

st thomas aquinas, st anselm, st augustine. read their books. you fail.

They were written by people, so they are not proof. I'm sorry, but you are the one who fails.

Oh the irony. Seriously, again, why the need to change and/or challenge other's beliefs? Especially on a gaming site?
Avatar image for luke1889
luke1889

14617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 luke1889
Member since 2004 • 14617 Posts
Oh the irony. Seriously, again, why the need to change and/or challenge other's beliefs? Especially on a gaming site?Eddie5vs1

OT discussion is devoid of all things gaming related. Thus, religion is perfectly viable. We could be on a pron forum, but still discuss religion.

Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#27 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="supa_badman"][QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

It is a common misconception that atheists must be able to prove that God does not exist. Actually, the burden falls on religious persons to prove that God does exist, for the simple reason that, if you claim ANYTHING to exist, then you must be able to prove its existence.

If any religious person disagrees with this, then we establish that the burden is on people to disprove something's existence. Therefore, I claim: that there are UFOs with aliens in them; that there is a Death Star in a far-away galaxy; that Darth Vader himself came to visit me, and then left; that there is a flying spaghetti monster; that the ancient Greek gods (i.e. Zeus, Hera, etc.) exist; that the ancient Egyptian gods exist; that the Norse gods exist; that I can use 'the force' (by the way, don't say that you can just ask me to do it, and my refusal is proof--I might just not feel like it ;)); that I am a god (same logic as with 'the force'); and that I know how to build a Death Star.

Now, disprove that 8). If you can't, then it's true 8).

st thomas aquinas, st anselm, st augustine. read their books. you fail.

They were written by people, so they are not proof. I'm sorry, but you are the one who fails.

not unless you know how to read :roll: the books are proof :? the way they explain God, shows that God does exist. to show God exists, you dont really need solid living breathing proof.
Avatar image for obsolete2k1
obsolete2k1

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 obsolete2k1
Member since 2007 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="Steameffekt"]The bible is one proof...chessmaster1989

No, that's circular reasoning-using the so-called 'word of God' to prove God's existence. I'm sorry, but The Bible proves nothing.

same goes for science. evolution (a scientific theory) is only proven by science, therefore it is a flawed method as it cannot be independently proven.
Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts

It's impossible to prove evolution that we came from monkeys so this thread fails.

ScreamDream
we didnt come from monkeys and humans have controlled evolution, see your dog as an example
Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="supa_badman"] st thomas aquinas, st anselm, st augustine. read their books. you fail.supa_badman

They were written by people, so they are not proof. I'm sorry, but you are the one who fails.

not unless you know how to read :roll: the books are proof :? the way they explain God, shows that God does exist. to show God exists, you dont really need solid living breathing proof.

Actually you do.

Fail.

Avatar image for AnObscureName
AnObscureName

2069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 AnObscureName
Member since 2008 • 2069 Posts
You say atheists do not need to disproove God yet then go onto say that if you believe anything you must proove it? Hypocrisy much? You do know that atheism is the believe that God does not and cannot exist?
Avatar image for Jacobistheman
Jacobistheman

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Jacobistheman
Member since 2007 • 3975 Posts
Well no one can prove that does or doesn't exist, that is why people have to BELIEVE that god does or doesn't exist becuase we can never really know.
Avatar image for obsolete2k1
obsolete2k1

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 obsolete2k1
Member since 2007 • 990 Posts

i don't believe that wind has been scientifically explained, nor gravity, while they have theories explaining them they are not in fact, facts, therefore are they anyless real when the wind blows or i jump off a building?

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="ScreamDream"]

It's impossible to prove evolution that we came from monkeys so this thread fails.

UNHOLY_basic
we didnt come from monkeys and humans have controlled evolution, see your dog as an example

That's not evolution as all those domestic dogs are still the same type of animal and can still breed with each other
Avatar image for Disturbed123
Disturbed123

1665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Disturbed123
Member since 2005 • 1665 Posts
particles randomly reacting to form our universe, and no scientific fact being able to prove how it happened is enough proof God actually exists cuz to me big bang and evolution is a big dud :D no offense to anyone tho, just my oppinion :)
Avatar image for gahzoo
gahzoo

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#37 gahzoo
Member since 2007 • 410 Posts
Well you can prove any idea, exist.You cannot prove God exists, nor can you prove he doesn't exist. Some people believe in him, others don't, simple. That's why it is called faith.
Avatar image for AnObscureName
AnObscureName

2069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 AnObscureName
Member since 2008 • 2069 Posts
[QUOTE="Johnny_Rock"][QUOTE="supa_badman"] not unless you know how to read :roll: the books are proof :? the way they explain God, shows that God does exist. to show God exists, you dont really need solid living breathing proof.supa_badman

Actually you do.

Fail.

the world and the universe. if you think that all of this has happened by "chance" then that is a very little mind that you have.

Why could it not have been chance?
Avatar image for gahzoo
gahzoo

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 gahzoo
Member since 2007 • 410 Posts
It could not have been chance, since matter can not be created nor destoryed, yet The Big Bang theory acknowledges that it was a dense atom tha expanded (or imploded) and that atom could not exist without soem supernatural force/energy. God.
Avatar image for Disturbed123
Disturbed123

1665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Disturbed123
Member since 2005 • 1665 Posts
[QUOTE="supa_badman"][QUOTE="Johnny_Rock"]

Actually you do.

Fail.

AnObscureName

the world and the universe. if you think that all of this has happened by "chance" then that is a very little mind that you have.

Why could it not have been chance?

because that "chance" cannot be proven even with the estatic amount of technology and information about the universe till this date.

Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts
[QUOTE="Johnny_Rock"][QUOTE="supa_badman"] not unless you know how to read :roll: the books are proof :? the way they explain God, shows that God does exist. to show God exists, you dont really need solid living breathing proof.supa_badman

Actually you do.

Fail.

the world and the universe. if you think that all of this has happened by "chance" then that is a very little mind that you have.

Little mind? Actually, honestly believing in fairytales and ghosts is far more pathetic than I ever could.

Avatar image for AnObscureName
AnObscureName

2069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 AnObscureName
Member since 2008 • 2069 Posts
[QUOTE="AnObscureName"][QUOTE="supa_badman"] the world and the universe. if you think that all of this has happened by "chance" then that is a very little mind that you have.Disturbed123
Why could it not have been chance?

because that "chance" cannot be proven even with the estatic amount of technology and information about the universe till this date.

*sigh* So because something cannot be proven then it isn't possible? Isn't that the point of this thread?
Avatar image for Crushmaster
Crushmaster

4324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Crushmaster
Member since 2008 • 4324 Posts

It is a common misconception that atheists must be able to prove that God does not exist. Actually, the burden falls on religious persons to prove that God does exist, for the simple reason that, if you claim ANYTHING to exist, then you must be able to prove its existence.

If any religious person disagrees with this, then we establish that the burden is on people to disprove something's existence. Therefore, I claim: that there are UFOs with aliens in them; that there is a Death Star in a far-away galaxy; that Darth Vader himself came to visit me, and then left; that there is a flying spaghetti monster; that the ancient Greek gods (i.e. Zeus, Hera, etc.) exist; that the ancient Egyptian gods exist; that the Norse gods exist; that I can use 'the force' (by the way, don't say that you can just ask me to do it, and my refusal is proof--I might just not feel like it ;)); that I am a god (same logic as with 'the force'); and that I know how to build a Death Star.

Now, disprove that 8). If you can't, then it's true 8).

chessmaster1989

You are committing the proof by lack of evidence fallacy.
"Claiming something is true simply because nobody has yet given any evidence to the contrary."
Example A: "There must be mountain lions living in Illinois, because I haven't seen any proof that none exist."
Example B: "No evidence has been found that life does not exist on other planets. Therefore, we are not alone in the universe."

I could say I am Elijah Wood; that I'm seven foot nine; and that I have a billion dollars invested in lunch meat. Now, I am sure you could not prove me wrong on any of these things, at least not without some in depth searching.

Lastly, we must also consider the Bible: it has never once been proven wrong. That is very good evidence for God's existence.

In fact, the odds of Christ fulfilling the Old Testament prophecies that He did are approximately one in a stastically impossible number (I believe it was in the trillions) unless He really was God.
Think of it - how can you fake that?

That is certainly good evidence for God's Word, and for God's existence. In fact, I would daresay that is excellent evidence.
In Christ,
Crushmaster.
Avatar image for Disturbed123
Disturbed123

1665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Disturbed123
Member since 2005 • 1665 Posts
[QUOTE="Disturbed123"][QUOTE="AnObscureName"] Why could it not have been chance?AnObscureName

because that "chance" cannot be proven even with the estatic amount of technology and information about the universe till this date.

*sigh* So because something cannot be proven then it isn't possible? Isn't that the point of this thread?

Nope, its entirely possible, but i personally believe that God existance is more persuasive than a bunch of particles forming the universe.

Avatar image for AnObscureName
AnObscureName

2069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 AnObscureName
Member since 2008 • 2069 Posts
[QUOTE="AnObscureName"][QUOTE="Disturbed123"]

because that "chance" cannot be proven even with the estatic amount of technology and information about the universe till this date.

Disturbed123

*sigh* So because something cannot be proven then it isn't possible? Isn't that the point of this thread?

Nope, its entirely possible, but i personally believe that God existance is more persuasive than a bunch of particles forming the universe.

If it is possible then why respond to my question "Why could it not have been chance?" with an apparent answer?
Avatar image for Astaroth2k
Astaroth2k

877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Astaroth2k
Member since 2006 • 877 Posts
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

It is a common misconception that atheists must be able to prove that God does not exist. Actually, the burden falls on religious persons to prove that God does exist, for the simple reason that, if you claim ANYTHING to exist, then you must be able to prove its existence.

If any religious person disagrees with this, then we establish that the burden is on people to disprove something's existence. Therefore, I claim: that there are UFOs with aliens in them; that there is a Death Star in a far-away galaxy; that Darth Vader himself came to visit me, and then left; that there is a flying spaghetti monster; that the ancient Greek gods (i.e. Zeus, Hera, etc.) exist; that the ancient Egyptian gods exist; that the Norse gods exist; that I can use 'the force' (by the way, don't say that you can just ask me to do it, and my refusal is proof--I might just not feel like it ;)); that I am a god (same logic as with 'the force'); and that I know how to build a Death Star.

Now, disprove that 8). If you can't, then it's true 8).

Crushmaster


You are committing the proof by lack of evidence fallacy.
"Claiming something is true simply because nobody has yet given any evidence to the contrary."
Example A: "There must be mountain lions living in Illinois, because I haven't seen any proof that none exist."
Example B: "No evidence has been found that life does not exist on other planets. Therefore, we are not alone in the universe."

I could say I am Elijah Wood; that I'm seven foot nine; and that I have a billion dollars invested in lunch meat. Now, I am sure you could not prove me wrong on any of these things, at least not without some in depth searching.

Lastly, we must also consider the Bible: it has never once been proven wrong. That is very good evidence for God's existence.

In fact, the odds of Christ fulfilling the Old Testament prophecies that He did are approximately one in a stastically impossible number (I believe it was in the trillions) unless He really was God.
Think of it - how can you fake that?

That is certainly good evidence for God's Word, and for God's existence. In fact, I would daresay that is excellent evidence.
In Christ,
Crushmaster.

Are you actually being serious? why not step out that little religious bubble for a few months and realise how absolute ridiculous you sound.Im going to play your little game though...first of all jesus did not fulfill even one third of the prophecies in the OT..b) although evolution is nothing about abiogenesis...i think we can say adam and eve did not exist.And if they they did and were the first humasn created,when caine is thrown out the garden of eden this is shown to be false...woops another contradcition.Scholars in those times couldnt keep a good story going...nevermind the blatant copy and paste job they did...

Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts
[QUOTE="Disturbed123"][QUOTE="AnObscureName"] Why could it not have been chance?AnObscureName

because that "chance" cannot be proven even with the estatic amount of technology and information about the universe till this date.

*sigh* So because something cannot be proven then it isn't possible? Isn't that the point of this thread?

You just supported the existance of God.

Avatar image for AnObscureName
AnObscureName

2069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 AnObscureName
Member since 2008 • 2069 Posts
[QUOTE="AnObscureName"][QUOTE="Disturbed123"]

because that "chance" cannot be proven even with the estatic amount of technology and information about the universe till this date.

Johnny_Rock

*sigh* So because something cannot be proven then it isn't possible? Isn't that the point of this thread?

You just supported the existance of God.

I support neither viewpoint actually... I'll have to wait until I die to find out.
Avatar image for Astaroth2k
Astaroth2k

877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Astaroth2k
Member since 2006 • 877 Posts
There was never any "chance" in the first place so this whole argument means nothing.