To me, it depends on a person's beliefs. But if one thinks that death is the true end of life, and that there is nothing after, the penalty is effective. But yet, isn't a punishment supposed to make a guilty person learn from their mistake through suffering and justice? If one dies, what has been learned? If one believes that there is no life after death, what's the point of losing life if you'll never exist afterwards to know how it feels to have no life? If one believes in life after death, the death penalty would make more sense since they will be in the hands of God's justice.
Regardless, I believe that the death penalty is wrong. A punishment is meant for someone to learn from their mistakes, and if that person can not be trusted again, they should be sentenced to jail for life. That way they can atleast reflect on their mistakes and try to improve with the life they have. What has been learned if someone kills a person that has killed? Eye for an eye doesn't seem right to me. What do you think?
Log in to comment