This topic is locked from further discussion.
I know with the old Age of Empires games you could play with like up to three or four people using the same disc. It would be nice if companies still did that. Only buy like six through eight copies of the game for like 24 people.
Now a days though it does require one copy of the game per person.
It seems to make more sense, but I've only seen the 'one player online at a time'.
My friend didn't want his copy of Battlefield 2142 anymore and lent it to me, but I can't play because it's only one CD key per account >____>
I'll probably just email EA about it sometime though.
It seems to make more sense, but I've only seen the 'one player online at a time'.
My friend didn't want his copy of Battlefield 2142 anymore and lent it to me, but I can't play because it's only one CD key per account >____>
I'll probably just email EA about it sometime though.IcyToasters
Cant he just give you his account info and you make a new character from there? Thats what I did with my brother...
There are many ways to circumvent this. Only game I've played with limited LAN is Dawn of War 2.KHAndAnime
This. The 1 cd per person is probably aimed at the general audience for the game, but if you do a bit of googling or have some previous experience, most games will work on LAN without having to purchase multiple copies.
That's how it should be anyway.DanielDust
A bit presumptuous to state that as fact.
Pretty much all PC games now have the 1 key per game. Some even have DRM which tracks how many computers you install the game on. It's sad how this is the case but pirating of PC games has made this necessary. I remember the days of playing starcraft over LAN with my buddies with one disk, that was a blast :)CrookedCrown
It never was about pirating and never will be...
Its all about money , they sell more if they make us buy 2 games to play it through LAN ... Pirating in only excuse for this nonsense.
[QUOTE="IcyToasters"]
It seems to make more sense, but I've only seen the 'one player online at a time'.
My friend didn't want his copy of Battlefield 2142 anymore and lent it to me, but I can't play because it's only one CD key per account >____>
I'll probably just email EA about it sometime though.TEH_RADIO
Cant he just give you his account info and you make a new character from there? Thats what I did with my brother...
[QUOTE="TEH_RADIO"]
[QUOTE="IcyToasters"]
It seems to make more sense, but I've only seen the 'one player online at a time'.
My friend didn't want his copy of Battlefield 2142 anymore and lent it to me, but I can't play because it's only one CD key per account >____>
I'll probably just email EA about it sometime though.IcyToasters
Cant he just give you his account info and you make a new character from there? Thats what I did with my brother...
[QUOTE="CrookedCrown"]Pretty much all PC games now have the 1 key per game. Some even have DRM which tracks how many computers you install the game on. It's sad how this is the case but pirating of PC games has made this necessary. I remember the days of playing starcraft over LAN with my buddies with one disk, that was a blast :)kazakauskas
It never was about pirating and never will be...
Its all about money , they sell more if they make us buy 2 games to play it through LAN ... Pirating in only excuse for this nonsense.
It is about money, and pirating takes money away from them. It is soooo easy to download games off the net it's a joke. Pirating is a HUGE problem.[QUOTE="kazakauskas"][QUOTE="CrookedCrown"]Pretty much all PC games now have the 1 key per game. Some even have DRM which tracks how many computers you install the game on. It's sad how this is the case but pirating of PC games has made this necessary. I remember the days of playing starcraft over LAN with my buddies with one disk, that was a blast :)CrookedCrown
It never was about pirating and never will be...
Its all about money , they sell more if they make us buy 2 games to play it through LAN ... Pirating in only excuse for this nonsense.
It is about money, and pirating takes money away from them. It is soooo easy to download games off the net it's a joke. Pirating is a HUGE problem. It's rare that someone is going to buy a game only just to play LAN with their buddies every once in awhile.It makes sense, that doesn't mean it should be that way but it does make sense. You pay for a copy for yourself not you and some friends, although DRM that only lets you install the game on a limited amount of computers is preposterous, but that is a totally different topic. It makes sense for a game to stop 2 people with the same CD Key from playing together, it proves that you are sharing the game with someone else which game companies hate. Even though I still remember epic lan parties and such, (it wasn't with 1 cd key because by now anyone that wants Starcraft has Starcraft) it was great fun. What I hate is removal of LAN in games, but I am getting much too off topic.
I am not a fan of the one CD key rule. Too many things should happen that would cause a reinstall without having a chance to uninstall the game. Not ot mention that once I pay my money I should be able to use it how I please.
I see no problem with this. You are paying these companies royalties to make use of their licensed product; in other words you are basically paying these companies to rent their product. You don't own these games. You may own a physical disk, but that doesn't mean the product on the disk is yours if you agree to use their product. It is still their product and if you don't agree with their terms, you can't use it.
If Microsoft wanted to, they could make you pay an annual fee to run Windows....or monthly fees....it is their product they're renting out. They can do what they want with it.
Pirating has nothing to do with only having one person per CD key. It's a cop out for any company to use the idea that pirating is harming them so much that they need to change their ways and use DRM or to only focus on consoles. It's all about the money. Blaming pirating; it's just an easy way out that the public will actually buy into because they don't know any better.
I don't agree with some DRM methods, but it still falls into the line that a company is just trying to protect their product. If you don't like the DRM they use, don't get the product. I personally dislike the DRM that Ubisoft has put into place on their more recently released games (like Assassin's Creed II) and because of it, I won't buy the game.
Sure, sometimes all this BS with DRM and CD keys and licensing fees (and all the rules that apply to it) sucks, but that's just how it's done. You may not like it, you might not care or you might like how this is all done....not sure what else you can do about it legally.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment