1080p LED tvs, good for gaming?

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for multiplat
multiplat

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 multiplat
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts

or no advantage over the 1080p LCDs?

Avatar image for AgentA-Mi6
AgentA-Mi6

16734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 AgentA-Mi6
Member since 2006 • 16734 Posts
For budget reasons I'd go with the regular 1080p LCD Tv
Avatar image for mike4realz
mike4realz

2577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mike4realz
Member since 2003 • 2577 Posts

or no advantage over the 1080p LCDs?

multiplat
there is...better contrast and black levels as well as slimmer but more expensive
Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
LED LCD's simply attempt to increase the native contrast on the TV. The better LED based LCD's are beginning to approach the native contrast ratios found in plasmas.
Avatar image for deathwishx2
deathwishx2

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 deathwishx2
Member since 2006 • 94 Posts

I just got a 42 inch 1080 P HD LCD Tv. You mix that with the ps3 / 360's graphics + a HD cord (Around 80 bucks) You will get the best graphics imaginable. I play Fall out 3 on this baby and I don't think I can ever go back to standard tv's. Lol

Avatar image for Videodogg
Videodogg

12611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Videodogg
Member since 2002 • 12611 Posts

I had a brief experience with the Samsung 240hz LED model. I bought one at Best Buy and owned it for 1 week before i took it back and bought a Panasonic plasma tv instead. The 240 hz mode was a joke; it made movies and tv shows look like soap operas. The picture was ultra super clear, which sounds nice, but in reality it made everything look fake or artificial. You can not play games with this mode turned on because of horrible input lag. There is a game mode which made playing games acceptable, but in the end i was paying for a feature that was usless. The colors and black levels were better than standard lcd tv's, but the picture quality was still much inferior to a good plasma tv for one third the price. I would stay away from LED backlit tv's if i were you.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

a HD cord (Around 80 bucks)

deathwishx2

HDMI cord for 80 bucks? Nonononononononononono.

Oh yeah, no.

Don't get cables anywhere else. Well except for Blue Jeans and Amazon 1 cent ones. bought 6 of them and all 3 work perfectly. And I hear Mediabridge makes pretty good cheap ones too. Don't fall for marketing BS!

LEDs are thinner and more power efficent than LCDs. Better contrast and black levels, they offer almost as good of picture as plasma with way less energy useage and weight :P If you can afford it, get one!

Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts

I had a brief experience with the Samsung 240hz LED model. I bought one at Best Buy and owned it for 1 week before i took it back and bought a Panasonic plasma tv instead. The 240 hz mode was a joke; it made movies and tv shows look like soap operas. .

Videodogg


The soap opera effect has nothing to do with the actual 240hz function. It is caused by the DNA (Digital Natural Motion) or True Motion or Motion Flow or whatever.
DNA basically takes an 24 frame signal of film and then stretches it out into a 60 frame format, adding extra frames where it sees fit. By doing this it takes away that motion blur which is natural to a 24 frame film. When you remove the motion blur by adding extra frames, the movie looks too realistic, too clean and hence looks like a soap opera. Because soap operas were all shot at 60 frames at one point in time, so are porno movies, and reality TV shows and basically everything that looks cheap and sleezy. So in the end by adding extra frames to a 24 frame film, it is actually helping in making the film look cheaper rather than better.

You did not have to return your TV, all you needed to do is turn off DNA (Digital Natural Motion) and all your movies would have gone back to it's 24p look, no more porno video effect. In fact the 240 hz actually helps make movies look more cinematic when not used in conjunction with DNA. 240hz divides into 24 by a margin of 10, so it allows for a true 24p playback without using pulldown, which actually helps enhance the 24p motion blur which we all have come to love and cherish as the real movies look.

Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
120/240 Hz processing creates artificial frames to deal with the inherent blur found in LCD's. This type of processing is not required with plasmas, DLP, or CRT's because there is no inherent motion lag in those display technologies. You are correct that some of the anti-blur/anti-judder technologies can be turned off or set to lower levels, but the 120/240Hz processing can still cause lag in video games. With his return, he upgraded to a Panasonic plasma, so basically he got no motion lag, no game lag, higher contrast, and a wider viewing angle for less money.
Avatar image for ASLplease
ASLplease

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ASLplease
Member since 2009 • 177 Posts

lol funny... I just bought the Samsung 55" 6000 series yesterday for $1999. It's shipping for free in 10 days. The dynamic contrast from LED and LCD are a huge difference. If you really want a new big TV, I highly recommend you getting the LED 55".

Avatar image for multiplat
multiplat

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 multiplat
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts

I asked around...dynamic contrast is NOT what u should look it (It's an advertising trick mostly)...."Static" or "Native" Contrast ratio is what really matters.

Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts

120/240 Hz processing creates artificial frames to deal with the inherent blur found in LCD's. This type of processing is not required with plasmas, DLP, or CRT's because there is no inherent motion lag in those display technologies. You are correct that some of the anti-blur/anti-judder technologies can be turned off or set to lower levels, but the 120/240Hz processing can still cause lag in video games. With his return, he upgraded to a Panasonic plasma, so basically he got no motion lag, no game lag, higher contrast, and a wider viewing angle for less money.rastan

Just to be completely clear 120hz/240hz does not add ANY artificial frames. All 120hz and 240hz TVs do is allow for an even division of 30hz TV output, 24hz film output, and 60hz video game output. For 30hz programming, it simply repeats 4 duplicate frames for every frame shown. For 24hz film output, it repeats 5 duplicate frames for every frame shown. And for 60hz video game output it repeats 2 duplicat frames for every frame shown. Never will 120hz TV generate any artificial frames that do not exist in the original signal, in other words it does not alter the signal in anyway.

The Motion Processing is what really creates the artificial frames in between the what would normally be filled by duplicate frames. Motion Processing or Motion Interpolation is what generates fake frames to simulate smooth 120hz motion and in turn making movies look like soap operas.

As for the Plasma, it's really a double edged blade. Yes you get, no motion lag, no game lag, higher contrast and even a wider colour gamut. But in return you lose the ability to view true white, which my opinion is more important than all the above gains. Plasma cannot show the color white at high luminance, the ABL kicks in everytime the screen is filled with a very light hue or white. This in turn makes white color scenes in games, tv and movies look gray in comparison to LED or LCD. So, yes you get some benefits but you lose the ability to see true white.

Avatar image for snowren24
snowren24

329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 snowren24
Member since 2007 • 329 Posts

I just got a 42 inch 1080 P HD LCD Tv. You mix that with the ps3 / 360's graphics + a HD cord (Around 80 bucks) You will get the best graphics imaginable. I play Fall out 3 on this baby and I don't think I can ever go back to standard tv's. Lol

deathwishx2

aw sorry man, $80, you got taken by the Best Buy sales guy. buy from blujean like the other poster said, that or monoprice or mycablemart. try to take that $80 cable back to teh store if you can. you shoudl be paying more than $5-$8 after paying for the shipping.

as for LED LCD vs LCD, if you dont mind the extra power consumption and weight, go with a plasma. better picture, better refresh rates, better price. as for teh whites issue, ive never heard that before, and i have not experienced it with my Panny plasma.

Avatar image for wowroflurah0m0
wowroflurah0m0

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 wowroflurah0m0
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="rastan"]120/240 Hz processing creates artificial frames to deal with the inherent blur found in LCD's. This type of processing is not required with plasmas, DLP, or CRT's because there is no inherent motion lag in those display technologies. You are correct that some of the anti-blur/anti-judder technologies can be turned off or set to lower levels, but the 120/240Hz processing can still cause lag in video games. With his return, he upgraded to a Panasonic plasma, so basically he got no motion lag, no game lag, higher contrast, and a wider viewing angle for less money.pimperjones


Just to be completely clear 120hz/240hz does not add ANY artificial frames. All 120hz and 240hz TVs do is allow for an even division of 30hz TV output, 24hz film output, and 60hz video game output. For 30hz programming, it simply repeats 4 duplicate frames for every frame shown. For 24hz film output, it repeats 5 duplicate frames for every frame shown. And for 60hz video game output it repeats 2 duplicat frames for every frame shown. Never will 120hz TV generate any artificial frames that do not exist in the original signal, in other words it does not alter the signal in anyway.

The Motion Processing is what really creates the artificial frames in between the what would normally be filled by duplicate frames. Motion Processing or Motion Interpolation is what generates fake frames to simulate smooth 120hz motion and in turn making movies look like soap operas.

As for the Plasma, it's really a double edged blade. Yes you get, no motion lag, no game lag, higher contrast and even a wider colour gamut. But in return you lose the ability to view true white, which my opinion is more important than all the above gains. Plasma cannot show the color white at high luminance, the ABL kicks in everytime the screen is filled with a very light hue or white. This in turn makes white color scenes in games, tv and movies look gray in comparison to LED or LCD. So, yes you get some benefits but you lose the ability to see true white.

its cool when uneducated people try and sound like they know what there talking about to make there uneducated bad purchase sound like a good one, plasmas can display true whites, sigh
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts

Yes I don't know what I'm talking about. And there is no such thing as an Automatic Brightness Limiter, because we all know that Plasma can display max luminance on all cells at all times. Why don't you do some research before coming on and whining about other people's opinions.

I noticed you got banned. How you like the ban hammerWowroflurah. Keep crying.

Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
I'll have to research this, but the colors on plasmas are normally better than LCD's and I haven't heard or read anything about plasmas not being able to produce pure white. Maybe that limiter is a setting designed to minimize screen burn-in on older plasmas or to limit maximum power consumption?
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts

Plasmas cannot run all it's cells at maximum luminance. In order for a cell to burn pure white, it needs to be at max luminance, drawing max power, but in order for all the cells to show pure white such as in an snowing scene or a white background, or a dog fight in the skies the power required far exceeds that of which is avaliable.
It's not due to burn in, it's due to power consumption. All Plasma no matter what the price range contains at built in onboard ABL ciruit which dims to TV's luminance during light colored scenes that take up the bulk of the screen. Thus it is not possible for a Plasma to display pure white in anything other than small portions, usually less than 20 percent of it's cells. You cannot turn off ABL, as it is hardwired into the circuit board.

To prevent people from finding out about this, most Plasmas are shipped and calibrated at very low brightness settings, so low that it does not require the ABL to kick in. As soon as you adjust the Plasma to a higher brightness level, the ABL kicks in and will randomly dim your set to adjust for power consumption. Imagine a power saver auto dimming feature permanently turned on all the time.

I owned a 50" top of the line Samsung 1080p Plasma before I returned it for an 120hz Sharp LCD.
Plasmas always have a bigger color gamut than LCDs, so yes the colors are better. But like I said the ABL kills light colored scenes.

To test this, all you need is an white color background and two tvs. I would use the Capcom Logo as it's almost pure white background. Have two TVs one Plasma and one LCD both running at maximum brightness. Run the Capcom Logo on both TVs, you will see that the Plasma will dim the TV, while the LCD will remain at the same luminance. In comparison the Capcom Logo on a Plasma looks light Gray when compared to the Pure White version on the LCD

Trust me, when I first found out about this I spent the better part of a my week trying to figure out how to by-pass the ABL circuit, until the guy at the store told me that this is just an inherent flaw in the Plasma technology that cannot be by-passed. I always watch my TVs at near maximum brightness, so this was a deal killer for me.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts

Plasmas cannot run all it's cells at maximum luminance. In order for a cell to burn pure white, it needs to be at max luminance, drawing max power, but in order for all the cells to show pure white such as in an snowing scene or a white background, or a dog fight in the skies the power required far exceeds that of which is avaliable.
It's not due to burn in, it's due to power consumption. All Plasma no matter what the price range contains at built in onboard ABL ciruit which dims to TV's luminance during light colored scenes that take up the bulk of the screen. Thus it is not possible for a Plasma to display pure white in anything other than small portions, usually less than 20 percent of it's cells. You cannot turn off ABL, as it is hardwired into the circuit board.

To prevent people from finding out about this, most Plasmas are shipped and calibrated at very low brightness settings, so low that it does not require the ABL to kick in. As soon as you adjust the Plasma to a higher brightness level, the ABL kicks in and will randomly dim your set to adjust for power consumption. Imagine a power saver auto dimming feature permanently turned on all the time.

I owned a 50" top of the line Samsung 1080p Plasma before I returned it for an 120hz Sharp LCD.
Plasmas always have a bigger color gamut than LCDs, so yes the colors are better. But like I said the ABL kills light colored scenes.

To test this, all you need is an white color background and two tvs. I would use the Capcom Logo as it's almost pure white background. Have two TVs one Plasma and one LCD both running at maximum brightness. Run the Capcom Logo on both TVs, you will see that the Plasma will dim the TV, while the LCD will remain at the same luminance. In comparison the Capcom Logo on a Plasma looks light Gray when compared to the Pure White version on the LCD

Trust me, when I first found out about this I spent the better part of a my week trying to figure out how to by-pass the ABL circuit, until the guy at the store told me that this is just an inherent flaw in the Plasma technology that cannot be by-passed. I always watch my TVs at near maximum brightness, so this was a deal killer for me.

pimperjones

lol.

and your (edit: pupils!) will contract on a screen of full white regardless, emulating the same thing an ABL will achieve for you. you'd also have to answer the question of why so often one of the first things done in an LCD calibration is to crank the backlight waaaay, way down. probably something about the brightness being far too high for viewing in an actual home environment for most people!

the ABL is primarily intended for power consumption, yes, but it also keeps the contrast consistent when the scene shifts from dark to light or vice versa to the point where our eyes aren't immediately seared out of our sockets on a full white scene. hihi eyestrain, i'm glad those days are done. the only *real* honest-to-god downside to an ABL is that it makes it harder to watch in direct light. you sound like you're an exception, either that your viewing environment has a hell of a lot of ambient light, or your eyes are just weird. either way, it's definitely far out of the ordinary.

Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts

Yes I don't watch my TV in an dark closet. It's in the living room, in a Condo, so there is a lot of light coming through the windows. For me the ABL bothers me because I actually notice a shift in luminance. If you're in the theatres the projector does not dim it's projection when a dark scene shifts to a daylight scene. But ABL does this and adjustments the luminance is what bothers me beyond anything. It makes the whole enjoyment of cinema a pain, because I can feel the TV making luminance changes for me without my intervention. For me, I prefer whiter whites, than pure blacks. Probably why LCD are still more popular than the Plasma.

In the end the whole argument is kinda mute since OLED will address all these problems in the long run. In the end both Plasma and LCD are flawed technologies. I really like Plasma's higher color gamut though.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts

Yes I don't watch my TV in an dark closet. It's in the living room, in a Condo, so there is a lot of light coming through the windows. For me the ABL bothers me because I actually notice a shift in luminance. If you're in the theatres the projector does not dim it's projection when a dark scene shifts to a daylight scene. But ABL does this and adjustments the luminance is what bothers me beyond anything. It makes the whole enjoyment of cinema a pain, because I can feel the TV making luminance changes for me without my intervention. For me, I prefer whiter whites, than pure blacks. Probably why LCD are still more popular than the Plasma.

In the end the whole argument is kinda mute since OLED will address all these problems in the long run. In the end both Plasma and LCD are flawed technologies. I really like Plasma's higher color gamut though.

pimperjones
ah, condo and bright window behind you. one of the cases where an LCD is generally recommended with no reservations over a plasma is if you're in an environment where you -can't- control the brightness and there's a lot of it - you definitely need an LCD in your current place. if it's a room that isn't lit up like a basketball court, then your eyes generally won't notice the difference.
Avatar image for Buttons1990
Buttons1990

3167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Buttons1990
Member since 2009 • 3167 Posts

If you don't mind sitting at a desk while you play, you could get an LED backlit 1080p Monitor to play on... A lot cheaper than big brother, but same quality as long as you are sitting close... (hence the desk reference)...

Avatar image for EDUBBooyah
EDUBBooyah

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 EDUBBooyah
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I have that problem, as soon as i got the 240hz LED i cant play COD for crap. Im dead before i can even catch my sights is that my tv. I never had a problem on my LCD.
Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
LED is LCD, just a different backlight. Your real issue is the 240 Hz processing along with other processing that goes along with it. See if you can turn all that processing off that you paid for and you may reduce your lag.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Holy f***ing s*** Batman. Thread necroing!

Avatar image for dixon7800
dixon7800

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 dixon7800
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
yeah i just bought the samsung 55inch led but 60hz tv and i cant aim if my life depended on it in call of duty black ops...i know my response time is 6ms for the tv. can someone tell me why its doing this and is there anyway to fix the problem? cuz if not im seriously thinking of going to exchange it since i spend a lot of time gaming and this is a big drag for me
Avatar image for dixon7800
dixon7800

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 dixon7800
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
oh and i tried turning game mode on and it helps just a tad but its still just brutal when im playing the game, if anyone has any solutions please do post! thanks!
Avatar image for simplyderp
simplyderp

266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 simplyderp
Member since 2009 • 266 Posts

It's called input lag. There's nothing you can do about except disable all the "image enhancement" settings on your TV. If that doesn't work, the best you can do is look online for a TV with minimal input lag. Manufacturers don't post these specs so you'll have to visit avsforum.com, for example.

Avatar image for Drakan11
Drakan11

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Drakan11
Member since 2009 • 763 Posts
oh and i tried turning game mode on and it helps just a tad but its still just brutal when im playing the game, if anyone has any solutions please do post! thanks!dixon7800
I'm no expert but I have been doing research, and apparently plasma TVs have no lag at all (they display the picture in a different way that is I guess far more efficient as it naturally has no blur or soap opera effect or lag). Try to return/sell your set and get a plasma.
Avatar image for simplyderp
simplyderp

266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 simplyderp
Member since 2009 • 266 Posts

[QUOTE="dixon7800"]oh and i tried turning game mode on and it helps just a tad but its still just brutal when im playing the game, if anyone has any solutions please do post! thanks!Drakan11
I'm no expert but I have been doing research, and apparently plasma TVs have no lag at all (they display the picture in a different way that is I guess far more efficient as it naturally has no blur or soap opera effect or lag). Try to return/sell your set and get a plasma.

Actually plasmas do have input lag. 60 Hz refresh rate + processing = lag.

Avatar image for dixon7800
dixon7800

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 dixon7800
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
does the response time on a tv matter at all? cuz i noticed my old lcd was 4ms and this led is 6ms
Avatar image for Drakan11
Drakan11

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Drakan11
Member since 2009 • 763 Posts

[QUOTE="Drakan11"][QUOTE="dixon7800"]oh and i tried turning game mode on and it helps just a tad but its still just brutal when im playing the game, if anyone has any solutions please do post! thanks!simplyderp

I'm no expert but I have been doing research, and apparently plasma TVs have no lag at all (they display the picture in a different way that is I guess far more efficient as it naturally has no blur or soap opera effect or lag). Try to return/sell your set and get a plasma.

Actually plasmas do have input lag. 60 Hz refresh rate + processing = lag.

Refresh rate has nothing to do with it. Response time is what determines input lag. Plasmas have a response time of .001ms which blows LCD/LED out of the water.
Avatar image for soulreaper-4
soulreaper-4

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 soulreaper-4
Member since 2007 • 2247 Posts
I'll have to research this, but the colors on plasmas are normally better than LCD's and I haven't heard or read anything about plasmas not being able to produce pure white. Maybe that limiter is a setting designed to minimize screen burn-in on older plasmas or to limit maximum power consumption?rastan
EH? That was a long time ago that the colors were a lot better. Today's LCDs are almost on par and in some cases on par with plasmas. One drawback of plasmas is the cheaper lifespan and lots of reflection when using it in a room with a lot of light. They need to be used on a darker room to take advantage of the image.
Avatar image for soulreaper-4
soulreaper-4

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 soulreaper-4
Member since 2007 • 2247 Posts
does the response time on a tv matter at all? cuz i noticed my old lcd was 4ms and this led is 6msdixon7800
I personally don't really know. I think the response time is overrated by people. I play on a Sony Bravia i bought years ago, it doesn't specify a response number and i haven't had any problem, everything moves normally. If this were so dramatically important today why the heck all gaming companies show demos of their latest games to the public on LCDs in conventions like E3?
Avatar image for dixon7800
dixon7800

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 dixon7800
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
its just cuz im old sharp aquos 52inch lcd had a response time of 4ms and my 55 inch samsung led both with 60hz has a response time of 6ms and the difference between playing cod is night and day when im trying to aim...so does anyone know if shorter response time means less lag?
Avatar image for simplyderp
simplyderp

266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 simplyderp
Member since 2009 • 266 Posts

Refresh rate has nothing to do with it.Drakan11

It does. Example, say you have a source that outputs a frame every 1/120 of a second. But the TV "refreshes" every 1/60 of a second. If you need to perform an action when an object appears at a certain frame, then the 60 Hz TV will have to wait another 1/120 of a second after the frame is output.

Response time is what determines input lag.Drakan11

I suggest you do more reading on this. Response time is the time it takes an LCD panel to flip a pixel to a different shade of grey. This is not input lag. Input lag is mainly caused by processing. The techniques that manufacturers use to lower response time can increase input lag, ironically.

Plasmas have a response time of .001ms which blows LCD/LED out of the water.Drakan11

Plasmas don't have "response time." This is a measurement for LCD technology. But the motion of a Plasma is much more smoother than LCD.

Avatar image for Dogswithguns
Dogswithguns

11359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#37 Dogswithguns
Member since 2007 • 11359 Posts

I have a 24" LED monitor less than a month now, it's bright and clear, thin and very light. loving it when I play game.... I would get a bigger screen LED TV for my livingroom aswell in the future if my old LCD ever die, but not gonna happen cuz the Toshiba seems gonna last for a while.

Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
[QUOTE="rastan"]I'll have to research this, but the colors on plasmas are normally better than LCD's and I haven't heard or read anything about plasmas not being able to produce pure white. Maybe that limiter is a setting designed to minimize screen burn-in on older plasmas or to limit maximum power consumption?soulreaper-4
EH? That was a long time ago that the colors were a lot better. Today's LCDs are almost on par and in some cases on par with plasmas. One drawback of plasmas is the cheaper lifespan and lots of reflection when using it in a room with a lot of light. They need to be used on a darker room to take advantage of the image.

Actually newer plasmas have a half life longer than most LCD's now. In addition, many newer LCD's have reflective plastic added above their screen now that enhances perceived native contrast ironically at the cost of reflection-doing away with one of LCD's strengths.
Avatar image for soulreaper-4
soulreaper-4

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 soulreaper-4
Member since 2007 • 2247 Posts
[QUOTE="soulreaper-4"][QUOTE="rastan"]I'll have to research this, but the colors on plasmas are normally better than LCD's and I haven't heard or read anything about plasmas not being able to produce pure white. Maybe that limiter is a setting designed to minimize screen burn-in on older plasmas or to limit maximum power consumption?rastan
EH? That was a long time ago that the colors were a lot better. Today's LCDs are almost on par and in some cases on par with plasmas. One drawback of plasmas is the cheaper lifespan and lots of reflection when using it in a room with a lot of light. They need to be used on a darker room to take advantage of the image.

Actually newer plasmas have a half life longer than most LCD's now. In addition, many newer LCD's have reflective plastic added above their screen now that enhances perceived native contrast ironically at the cost of reflection-doing away with one of LCD's strengths.

Anyway we most people, most of us fall for all these marketing thinks. Many of these so call problem are exaggerations and created just to sell more of the completions. This is like a war in which each side fight for what they want, in this case to sell more than the competition. One big problem is THE INTERNET now a days someone tells something isn't good in a forum then everyone keep repeating the same thing until almost everyone that read it end believing it. One example are the so called dynamic and contrast ratios. You get a new tv this year and the package says 60,000 then next year they say 250,00. You buy a Sony LED LCD and the package says infinite contrast and the Samsung LED LCD says they have millions of contrast ratio. DON'T TELL ME EACH SIX MONTHS or year the tv you bough is garbage. This my opinion on the subject.
Avatar image for oldskooler79
oldskooler79

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 oldskooler79
Member since 2004 • 1632 Posts

DON'T TELL ME EACH SIX MONTHS or year the tv you bough is garbage.soulreaper-4

Didn't you know that once anything (with technology) hits the shelf it becomes obsolete?

Avatar image for soulreaper-4
soulreaper-4

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 soulreaper-4
Member since 2007 • 2247 Posts

[QUOTE="soulreaper-4"]DON'T TELL ME EACH SIX MONTHS or year the tv you bough is garbage.oldskooler79

Didn't you know that once anything (with technology) hits the shelf it becomes obsolete?

Yeah but we need to use logic, these are tvs not consoles, graphic cards etc. Then for you if you bought a tv for your ps3 or 360 it is trash and you need to get a new model the next six months for $500 dollars or more?
Avatar image for soulreaper-4
soulreaper-4

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 soulreaper-4
Member since 2007 • 2247 Posts
[QUOTE="deathwishx2"]

I just got a 42 inch 1080 P HD LCD Tv. You mix that with the ps3 / 360's graphics + a HD cord (Around 80 bucks) You will get the best graphics imaginable. I play Fall out 3 on this baby and I don't think I can ever go back to standard tv's. Lol

hd5870corei7
LCD is so outdated. crap technology, is crap. Not only is your TV fail, but $80 cord? lol. You've obviously never played on a plasma.

Dude LCDs are not crap. You sound like one of those ignorants that think what they buy is the biggest and best thing in the world. Dude not everyone plays in giant living-rooms. Plasmas sizes start at 42 and over and don't tell me game developers show their games using LCDs and let people play then at conventions like E3 if they suck for gaming. YOU LIKE YOUR PLASMA THEN BE IT. Not everyone needs to like what you like and like characters the size of you and sit so close that makes them have headage and eyesores after playing. Oh and not everyone act like brats who buy giant sizes just for echo when people talk to them or visit their houses.
Avatar image for hd5870corei7
hd5870corei7

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 hd5870corei7
Member since 2010 • 1612 Posts
[QUOTE="hd5870corei7"][QUOTE="deathwishx2"]

I just got a 42 inch 1080 P HD LCD Tv. You mix that with the ps3 / 360's graphics + a HD cord (Around 80 bucks) You will get the best graphics imaginable. I play Fall out 3 on this baby and I don't think I can ever go back to standard tv's. Lol

soulreaper-4
LCD is so outdated. crap technology, is crap. Not only is your TV fail, but $80 cord? lol. You've obviously never played on a plasma.

Dude LCDs are not crap. You sound like one of those ignorants that think what they buy is the biggest and best thing in the world. Dude not everyone plays in giant living-rooms. Plasmas sizes start at 42 and over and don't tell me game developers show their games using LCDs and let people play then at conventions like E3 if they suck for gaming. YOU LIKE YOUR PLASMA THEN BE IT. Not everyone needs to like what you like and like characters the size of you and sit so close that makes them have headage and eyesores after playing. Oh and not everyone act like brats who buy giant sizes just for echo when people talk to them or visit their houses.

You are talking to me as if I have a Plasma TV. I game on a Samsung XL2370 LED monitor.
Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
...and I play on a 96" front projection LCD projector. Doesn't stop me from saying that plasma produces the best picture available today in a fixed pixel display. When I replace my 54" Sony rear projection unit in my family room (still an awesome HD picture by the way) it will be with a plasma.
Avatar image for oldskooler79
oldskooler79

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 oldskooler79
Member since 2004 • 1632 Posts

Yeah but we need to use logic, these are tvs not consoles, graphic cards etc. Then for you if you bought a tv for your ps3 or 360 it is trash and you need to get a new model the next six months for $500 dollars or more?soulreaper-4

I totally agree. I was just sayin'..

Avatar image for oldskooler79
oldskooler79

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 oldskooler79
Member since 2004 • 1632 Posts

When I replace my 54" Sony rear projection unit in my family room (still an awesome HD picture by the way) it will be with a plasma.rastan

Then please take my advise and wait for a good one. Nothing on the market today is worth a damn unless you find a Kuro. I've had both the 63C8000 and 58VT25 and they both FAIL MISERABLY next to my Pioneer 5020fd. The panasonic, which supposedly is the best you can buy atm, has floating blacks that will drive you crazy to no end. Whenever you watch dark scenes (practically every movie), the anamorphic black bars rise up to near grey. It does this all throughout the movie. The Samsung C8000 plasma is a very nice 3D plasma. In fact if you were limited to what's on the shelf now I would go for this one. The blacks are stable and deep. The main issue I have with this one is the 24hz bug. You MUST use 3:2 pulldown for all sources. If not, the blacks will rise. This is a known flaw that Sammy has dealt with for a few years now. This isn't acceptable IMO.

No other manufacturer is worth mentioning here. We're talking plasmas and we're talking the best. After owning a Kuro for a few months, you won't take any other display seriously again either.

So just wait and see if Panny gets their act together. Otherwise it would be in your best interest to seek out a Kuro now. I seriously doubt the 9G Kuro will be triumped in the next couple years. If your that desperate for a tv now you could always pick up a Sony 34XBR960 off Craigslist. At only 34" you would need to move your couch/chair closer, and probably not the ideal size for you. However, nothing beats the picture quality on this set (I have two of them). Nothing. Not even a calibrated 9G Pio Elite.

You should be able to find a 9G Kuro non-elite (5020 or 6020fd) for a reasonable price. Maybe not the 60" but the 5020 can still be found. Outside an Elite, it will be the benchmark for the coming years...

Avatar image for soulreaper-4
soulreaper-4

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 soulreaper-4
Member since 2007 • 2247 Posts
[QUOTE="hd5870corei7"][QUOTE="soulreaper-4"][QUOTE="hd5870corei7"] Dude LCDs are not crap. You sound like one of those ignorants that think what they buy is the biggest and best thing in the world. Dude not everyone plays in giant living-rooms. Plasmas sizes start at 42 and over and don't tell me game developers show their games using LCDs and let people play then at conventions like E3 if they suck for gaming. YOU LIKE YOUR PLASMA THEN BE IT. Not everyone needs to like what you like and like characters the size of you and sit so close that makes them have headage and eyesores after playing. Oh and not everyone act like brats who buy giant sizes just for echo when people talk to them or visit their houses.

You are talking to me as if I have a Plasma TV. I game on a Samsung XL2370 LED monitor.

If i sounded rude "sorry" it wasn't my intention. It's that i think that many people online think they need or the best way to play games is on 50 and 60 inches tvs.
...and I play on a 96" front projection LCD projector. Doesn't stop me from saying that plasma produces the best picture available today in a fixed pixel display. When I replace my 54" Sony rear projection unit in my family room (still an awesome HD picture by the way) it will be with a plasma.rastan
This is an example of what i was talking. I wonder is it GREED or EGO that's corrupting people minds these days. They sometime get giant screens just to say "HEY i have a giant 60 inches tvs" Oh brother.
Avatar image for oldskooler79
oldskooler79

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 oldskooler79
Member since 2004 • 1632 Posts

I wonder is it GREED or EGO that's corrupting people minds these days.soulreaper-4

No to both of these. The simple truth is that the best technology isn't available in smaller sizes. If it were, I may have considered. It has nothing to with money, even though I make alot of it. It's not my fault I took an interest in success.

EDIT --> As I noted above, I mentioned the 34" Sony as having the best picture on a consumer hdtv that can be had for a couple hundred clams on craigslist after a few weeks shopping. Proof that EGO and GREED gets thrown out the window. We simply want a solid picture for our hobby and know better, that's all.