1,5Mbps Download 768Kbps upload is good for gaming?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for berto64
berto64

12690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 berto64
Member since 2010 • 12690 Posts

Hello.

so i suscribed to another ISP and my connection is DSL will be 1.5Mbps download and 768Kbps .will it be very fast and yeah my ISP guarantees 768Kbps upload speed.

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

Thats your throughput and not any accurate measurement of speed. Your connection might still be blazing fast or incredibly slow for games.

There really no way of knowing until you actually try it out. Besides, its unlikely that you have an alternative anyways?

Having said that, those speeds should not decrease gaming performance is throughput was the concern. Which it rarely ever is since most games are typically just a few dozen Kbps of up/down.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

WHAT IS YOUR PING BRO

ALSO ONE POINT FIVE MEGABITS IS LIKE THE YEAR TWO THOUSAND SPEEDS

Avatar image for berto64
berto64

12690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 berto64
Member since 2010 • 12690 Posts

ping might be 45 or so but right now my neighbor has the same connection the ping is around 45 to 50

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

ping might be 45 or so but right now my neighbor has the same connection the ping is around 45 to 50

berto64

Ping.... to what? You ping Tibet and i can promise you its not going to be 45 ms. Even dial-up can reach near 45 ms on very close proximity servers.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="berto64"]

ping might be 45 or so but right now my neighbor has the same connection the ping is around 45 to 50

XaosII

Ping.... to what? You ping Tibet and i can promise you its not going to be 45 ms. Even dial-up can reach near 45 ms on very close proximity servers.

Yeah, but if he is getting 300ms to the next town over that is awful.

TC, go to speedtest.net and tell us your distance from the server and what your ping is.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

I used to have DSL like that, it was playable online, but not the best.

Avatar image for Silicel1
Silicel1

2342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 Silicel1
Member since 2005 • 2342 Posts

That internet just suxxx, no offense.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#9 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts
it's enough for gaming don't worry, downloading won't be fast though
Avatar image for Diwashb
Diwashb

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Diwashb
Member since 2008 • 519 Posts

Not everyone lives in the states brother. I am surviving on a 384 kbps ADS: line :-)

Avatar image for Bikouchu35
Bikouchu35

8344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Bikouchu35
Member since 2009 • 8344 Posts

My cable was that speed back in 2002. One of the fastest, but now I only get so-so speed 15-3 :\

Avatar image for scottahuch
scottahuch

1580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 scottahuch
Member since 2003 • 1580 Posts

Been gaming on 1mb/s for a long time, and I have never had trouble running an online game smoothly with it. What matters is latency, you won't really know how well it runs until you try it.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

It is enough for online gaming. It is not going to be fun for dling large files.

I game on a DSL line for qlive since comcast users have screwd up routing for that game in west coast, works great, I get 15 ping with dsl and 48 with comcast cable. A few other qlive gamers have dsl connections just because of this... although my solution is way more elegent.

Avatar image for Selkc
Selkc

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 Selkc
Member since 2011 • 203 Posts

what is the cheaper alternative? because u can do multiplayer just fine with half that...

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#16 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

[QUOTE="berto64"]

ping might be 45 or so but right now my neighbor has the same connection the ping is around 45 to 50

GummiRaccoon

Ping.... to what? You ping Tibet and i can promise you its not going to be 45 ms. Even dial-up can reach near 45 ms on very close proximity servers.

Yeah, but if he is getting 300ms to the next town over that is awful.

TC, go to speedtest.net and tell us your distance from the server and what your ping is.

Signals don't travel as the crow flies. That speed aint great but it's more than enough for gaming but like others say it's not how much data you can send or receive, it's how quick it can be sent or received. You should be fine unless you live on a farm in the middle of nowhere with massive thunder storms and power plants affecting the lines. Anything under say... 70ms of latency shold be okay, less is better though. Best to give your games a try and see how the servers treat you because even if the server is three doors away it does not mean you'll have amazing latency as connections are not direct.
Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

Ping.... to what? You ping Tibet and i can promise you its not going to be 45 ms. Even dial-up can reach near 45 ms on very close proximity servers.

JohnF111

Yeah, but if he is getting 300ms to the next town over that is awful.

TC, go to speedtest.net and tell us your distance from the server and what your ping is.

Signals don't travel as the crow flies. That speed aint great but it's more than enough for gaming but like others say it's not how much data you can send or receive, it's how quick it can be sent or received. You should be fine unless you live on a farm in the middle of nowhere with massive thunder storms and power plants affecting the lines. Anything under say... 70ms of latency shold be okay, less is better though. Best to give your games a try and see how the servers treat you because even if the server is three doors away it does not mean you'll have amazing latency as connections are not direct.

speedtest tests your latency too bro

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"][QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

Yeah, but if he is getting 300ms to the next town over that is awful.

TC, go to speedtest.net and tell us your distance from the server and what your ping is.

GummiRaccoon

Signals don't travel as the crow flies. That speed aint great but it's more than enough for gaming but like others say it's not how much data you can send or receive, it's how quick it can be sent or received. You should be fine unless you live on a farm in the middle of nowhere with massive thunder storms and power plants affecting the lines. Anything under say... 70ms of latency shold be okay, less is better though. Best to give your games a try and see how the servers treat you because even if the server is three doors away it does not mean you'll have amazing latency as connections are not direct.

speedtest tests your latency too bro

I know, i never said they didn't.
Avatar image for yachtboy
yachtboy

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 yachtboy
Member since 2003 • 1612 Posts
I had 1mbps or so back in 2000 and played with ppl from Japan to Eastern Europe without any probs..... I am sure you will be able to game just fine as long as other people aren't downloading. I only have 2 or 2.5 now, not everyone has fios....
Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

[QUOTE="JohnF111"] Signals don't travel as the crow flies. That speed aint great but it's more than enough for gaming but like others say it's not how much data you can send or receive, it's how quick it can be sent or received. You should be fine unless you live on a farm in the middle of nowhere with massive thunder storms and power plants affecting the lines. Anything under say... 70ms of latency shold be okay, less is better though. Best to give your games a try and see how the servers treat you because even if the server is three doors away it does not mean you'll have amazing latency as connections are not direct.JohnF111

speedtest tests your latency too bro

I know, i never said they didn't.

Avatar image for ShimmerMan
ShimmerMan

4634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#21 ShimmerMan
Member since 2008 • 4634 Posts

1.5 at sync is not enough through-put for gaming. Now I'm not saying you won't be able to do online gaming (you will). But I doubt you will be half as competitive as you should be vs players with less bandwidth restrictions.

Avatar image for ChocolateCake10
ChocolateCake10

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 ChocolateCake10
Member since 2008 • 759 Posts

I think a 100mb download and upload should be good, jk if you aren't doing anything else on the internet at the same time it should be okay

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

1.5 at sync is not enough through-put for gaming. Now I'm not saying you won't be able to do online gaming (you will). But I doubt you will be half as competitive as you should be vs players with less bandwidth restrictions.

ShimmerMan
Games require less bandwdith that web browsing. 1.5 mb/s is adequete.
Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#24 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

[QUOTE="ShimmerMan"]

1.5 at sync is not enough through-put for gaming. Now I'm not saying you won't be able to do online gaming (you will). But I doubt you will be half as competitive as you should be vs players with less bandwidth restrictions.

JigglyWiggly_

Games require less bandwdith that web browsing. 1.5 mb/s is adequete.

true the bottleneck with games is the upload speed from the server , not the download speed of the client. The upload speed of a game server is never as big as 1.5 mbps.

Avatar image for kaitanuvax
kaitanuvax

3814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 kaitanuvax
Member since 2007 • 3814 Posts

Noticeable lag occurs in 2005 DSL speeds of 700kb/s.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="ShimmerMan"]

1.5 at sync is not enough through-put for gaming. Now I'm not saying you won't be able to do online gaming (you will). But I doubt you will be half as competitive as you should be vs players with less bandwidth restrictions.

evildead6789

Games require less bandwdith that web browsing. 1.5 mb/s is adequete.

true the bottleneck with games is the upload speed from the server , not the download speed of the client. The upload speed of a game server is never as big as 1.5 mbps.

Mine run on 15 megabits up ;p
Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#27 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

[QUOTE="evildead6789"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] Games require less bandwdith that web browsing. 1.5 mb/s is adequete.JigglyWiggly_

true the bottleneck with games is the upload speed from the server , not the download speed of the client. The upload speed of a game server is never as big as 1.5 mbps.

Mine run on 15 megabits up ;p

Yeah , and you're a major game company?

And don't tell me you run 15 megabits up per client because this is what we're talking about here off course not the total upload speed for all clients. :p

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
What kind of game needs that much bandwidth? CSS 16 man server, 100 tick, cl_mincmdrate 80 and cl_minupdaterate 80 uses like 2 megabits... and most servers are total garbage 66 tick with 45 or 33 mincmdrate, feels like crap.
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts
What kind of game needs that much bandwidth? CSS 16 man server, 100 tick, cl_mincmdrate 80 and cl_minupdaterate 80 uses like 2 megabits... and most servers are total garbage 66 tick with 45 or 33 mincmdrate, feels like crap.JigglyWiggly_
What games does your server run?