8800 gtx or ultra, whats the FREAKIN Difference AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xipotec
xipotec

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 xipotec
Member since 2005 • 493 Posts

Help

I am losing it. Whats the real difference between these cards. Besides the 800.00 price tag for SLI. Need a pro answer.

Xipotec

Avatar image for ROCKINGFOOL
ROCKINGFOOL

1795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 ROCKINGFOOL
Member since 2005 • 1795 Posts
the 8800 ultra is actually 8800gtx but its overclocked any way why should you care go and buy the 8800gt or the ati3870 their cheap and gives incridble fram rate :)
Avatar image for blackstar
blackstar

1252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 blackstar
Member since 2004 • 1252 Posts
Yeah no need for GTX or ultra, when you have 8800 GT.
Avatar image for xipotec
xipotec

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 xipotec
Member since 2005 • 493 Posts

so duel sli gt8800 is the pretty much the same as a gtx or ultra, but you can over clock the ultra>?

Why the hell do they charge so much more for overclocking ability. Same with the core 2 duo and the C2d extreme?

Thanks. My head has stopped exploding.

Xipotec

Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

They charge so much because it is the BEST single card you can buy right now.

The Ultra is just a newer revision of the G80 core with slightly better memory modules, .8ns if I remember correctly. Basically it is the card for people with deep pockets or trying to break WRs.

Avatar image for shanelevy
shanelevy

1316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 shanelevy
Member since 2004 • 1316 Posts

so duel sli gt8800 is the pretty much the same as a gtx or ultra, but you can over clock the ultra>? NO. If you are saying that 2 8800GTs in SLI is equal to 1 8800GTX you are wrong. the 8800GTs are better. I wouldn't bother with SLI though. Both cards are overclockable.

Why the hell do they charge so much more for overclocking ability. Same with the core 2 duo and the C2d extreme? They aren't charging more for overclocking ability. The 8800GT overclocks very well, if not better than an 8800 Ultra. They are charging more because the 8800 ultra is the most powerful card around, so it has a huge premium on it.

In regards to core 2 duos and extremes you are partially correct. They are charging more for an unlocked multiplier, but don't worry about that. It has NOTHING to do with 8800GTs.

Thanks. My head has stopped exploding.

Xipotec

xipotec

Just get an 8800GT. You are obviously really confused so take my advice when I say the 8800GTX AND the 8800 Ultra ARE NOT WORTH THE MONEY.

Avatar image for xipotec
xipotec

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 xipotec
Member since 2005 • 493 Posts

What the confusion lies in is the fact that these cards have a big difference in cost and the Frame rates are not that different on 3d benchmark tests. Seems like a bamboozle to me . The GT performs about the same as the GTX and ULtra so I cannot understand the price difference. I'm a logical guy, and It seems really strange from a marketing standpoint to charge another 300.00 for a few more frames per sec and a bit larger buffer and bandwidth. Am I wrong or is this crazy?

I plan on the 8800 gt sli x2 512 AND the quad core 2.66 with 4gb ram

Avatar image for yoyo462001
yoyo462001

7535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#8 yoyo462001
Member since 2005 • 7535 Posts
i wouldnt SLI unless you were gaming at 1920x1280 + its just not worth the extra money.
Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts
What the confusion lies in is the fact that these cards have a big difference in cost and the Frame rates are not that different on 3d benchmark tests. Seems like a bamboozle to me . The GT performs about the same as the GTX and ULtra so I cannot understand the price difference. I'm a logical guy, and It seems really strange from a marketing standpoint to charge another 300.00 for a few more frames per sec and a bit larger buffer and bandwidth. Am I wrong or is this crazy?

I plan on the 8800 gt sli x2 512 AND the quad core 2.66 with 4gb ramxipotec

G92 GT and GTS cannot handle the higher resolutions as well as the 640mb GTS and GTX.
While the G92 has roughly equal shader power, it lacks 4-8 ROPs and has a lower memory bandwidth.

Avatar image for shanelevy
shanelevy

1316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 shanelevy
Member since 2004 • 1316 Posts
[QUOTE="xipotec"]What the confusion lies in is the fact that these cards have a big difference in cost and the Frame rates are not that different on 3d benchmark tests. Seems like a bamboozle to me . The GT performs about the same as the GTX and ULtra so I cannot understand the price difference. I'm a logical guy, and It seems really strange from a marketing standpoint to charge another 300.00 for a few more frames per sec and a bit larger buffer and bandwidth. Am I wrong or is this crazy?

I plan on the 8800 gt sli x2 512 AND the quad core 2.66 with 4gb ramLordEC911

G92 GT and GTS cannot handle the higher resolutions as well as the 640mb GTS and GTX.
While the G92 has roughly equal shader power, it lacks 4-8 ROPs and has a lower memory bandwidth.

Nah, even at 19x12 resolution the G92 cards are better than the 8800 GTS 640. They do fall behind the GTX noticeably though, and more so with filters.

Either way, unless you want a 24 inch monitor (those aren't cheap btw), you should just get one evga 8800 GT and step it up later. Your 3 month period will be available when the new cards come out.

Avatar image for xipotec
xipotec

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 xipotec
Member since 2005 • 493 Posts

Here's the specs I am looking at,

Dual 512MB NVIDIA® GeForceTM 8800 GT - SLI Enabled

Intel® CoreTM 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz 8MB Cache 1066MHz FSB

4GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 800MHz - 4 x 1024MB

500GB SATA 3Gb/s 7,200RPM 16MB Cache

1000 Watt Multi-GPU Approved Power Supply

Vista 64 bit.

Samsung 906BW 19-Inch Digital/Analog Widescreen LCD Monitor

An ultra-fast 2 ms (G to G) response time is perfect for motion editing. 19.0-inch Wide Viewable Size 0.285mm Pixel Pitch 300 cd/m2 Brightness (typical) 2000 - 1 DC Contrast Ratio (typical) 2 ms (G to G) Response Time (typical) 160 Degrees Horizontal and Vertical Viewing Angles 1440 x 900 Native Resolution 16 - 10 Aspect Ratio Analog & Digital Interface Analog RGB, TMDS Digital Link, DVI Input Video Signal Separate H/V, Composite H/V, SOG Sync Type 15-pin D-sub, DVI-D Input connectors 42 watts (max), Less than 1 watt (DMPS mode) Power Consumption 75 mm VESA Wall Mount DDC 2B Plug and Play MagicTune with asset management, MagicSpeed, MagicColor, MagicBright 3 Windows, Windows Vista, Mac, Sun DVI (HDCP), Swivel and tilt Dimensions - Width 17.6 x Height 14.3 x Depth 7.9 inches Weight - 9.3 pounds

Hows that sound?????

xipo

Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#12 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
The 8800 Ultra is based off the same core as the 8800GTX. What NVIDIA did differently was some modest revisions (not like the change from G80 to G92... more like a G80 rev B), and are made from cherry-picked cores that are more flexible toward overclocking beyond even rated speeds that they start at. Though at this point, it's a bit silly to buy one unless you intend on running at very high resolutions full-time (because the added memory over the GT/GTS 512 still put the GTX/Ultra at the edge), or you already have one and were intending to make an SLi.