8800GTX and bottleneck question

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deathsquad99
deathsquad99

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 deathsquad99
Member since 2006 • 153 Posts
I really want to upgrade to one of these cards but im concerned about my processor speed. I have an AMD X2 4400 dual core. how much would the card be held back, and more importantly, should I buy a new processor as well?
Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts
im not quit that sure with that processor but if there is some it won't be much
Avatar image for My_name_a_Borat
My_name_a_Borat

762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 My_name_a_Borat
Member since 2007 • 762 Posts

I really want to upgrade to one of these cards but im concerned about my processor speed. I have an AMD X2 4400 dual core. how much would the card be held back, and more importantly, should I buy a new processor as well?deathsquad99

You'll be fine with your current processor.

Avatar image for ZJI
ZJI

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ZJI
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
I really want to upgrade to one of these cards but im concerned about my processor speed. I have an AMD X2 4400 dual core. how much would the card be held back, and more importantly, should I buy a new processor as well?deathsquad99
Depends how you look at it. Even if you have the x6700 quad if you get the x6800 quad it's still going to be faster. But that processor is already very fast, on par with the E6320, so I would say no.
Avatar image for THA-TODD-BEAST
THA-TODD-BEAST

4569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 THA-TODD-BEAST
Member since 2003 • 4569 Posts
Nah, shouldn't be much of a bottleneck.. an X2 4400+ isn't a slow processor or anything and it's dual core to top it off so you'll be just fine I think.
Avatar image for deathsquad99
deathsquad99

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deathsquad99
Member since 2006 • 153 Posts
sweet....thanks for the replies guys:)
Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

Wow, I am amazed that all of you are psychic and know what resolution he runs at...
Resolution is the main factor in finding if you are bottlenecked or not.

BTW- bottlenecking isn't such a terrible thing like some people make it out to be.

Avatar image for THA-TODD-BEAST
THA-TODD-BEAST

4569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 THA-TODD-BEAST
Member since 2003 • 4569 Posts

Wow, I am amazed that all of you are psychic and know what resolution he runs at...
Resolution is the main factor in finding if you are bottlenecked or not.

BTW- bottlenecking isn't such a terrible thing like some people make it out to be.

LordEC911

Regardless of the resolution, with that processor I seriously doubt he's going to run into any significant bottlenecks.

He probably runs at 1280x1024 resolution, if I had to guess.

Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts
Regardless of the resolution, with that processor I seriously doubt he's going to run into any significant bottlenecks.

He probably runs at 1280x1024 resolution, if I had to guess.THA-TODD-BEAST

Ummm... yes it does depend on the resolution...
You might want to look up the definition of bottlenecking...

x2 4400+ ~= E6300

A GTX is going to be bottlenecked even at 1600x1200 with his processor...
http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/391/23/

I'm not saying it is a bad thing, I'm just stating that it IS bottlenecked...

Avatar image for ZBoater
ZBoater

1855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ZBoater
Member since 2003 • 1855 Posts

Wow, I am amazed that all of you are psychic and know what resolution he runs at...
Resolution is the main factor in finding if you are bottlenecked or not.

BTW- bottlenecking isn't such a terrible thing like some people make it out to be.

LordEC911

Congratulations! You win the prize for smartest answer. In a sea of guesses and misinformation, sometimes the OBVIOUS is ignored. Thanks for pointing this out. Resolution will be a key factor in determining bottlenecks of any system - I am sure that 1024x768 isn't the same as 1920x1200....

Avatar image for THA-TODD-BEAST
THA-TODD-BEAST

4569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 THA-TODD-BEAST
Member since 2003 • 4569 Posts
[QUOTE="THA-TODD-BEAST"]Regardless of the resolution, with that processor I seriously doubt he's going to run into any significant bottlenecks.

He probably runs at 1280x1024 resolution, if I had to guess.LordEC911

Ummm... yes it does depend on the resolution...
You might want to look up the definition of bottlenecking...

x2 4400+ ~= E6300

A GTX is going to be bottlenecked even at 1600x1200 with his processor...
http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/391/23/

I'm not saying it is a bad thing, I'm just stating that it IS bottlenecked...

Notice I said SIGNFICIANT bottlenecks in terms of performing much slower than anticipated .. a few FPS isn't going to hurt anyone, especially not 5-10 or so.

I also don't recall saying that resolution doesn't matter. I said regardless of his resolution, there shouldn't be any SIGNIFICANT bottlenecks and the 8800 GTX will still be a badass card. It isn't like his CPU is going to be a killer or anything.

Avatar image for ZBoater
ZBoater

1855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 ZBoater
Member since 2003 • 1855 Posts

Notice I said SIGNFICIANT bottlenecks in terms of performing much slower than anticipated .. a few FPS isn't going to hurt anyone, especially not 5-10 or so.

I also don't recall saying that resolution doesn't matter. I said regardless of his resolution, there shouldn't be any SIGNIFICANT bottlenecks and the 8800 GTX will still be a badass card. It isn't like his CPU is going to be a killer or anything.

THA-TODD-BEAST

So you think there wouldn't be "significant" bottlenecking if he ran, at say, 1920x1200 or 2560x1600? And if running at 1600x1050 or lower, wouldn't a GTS be a better buy?

Avatar image for THA-TODD-BEAST
THA-TODD-BEAST

4569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 THA-TODD-BEAST
Member since 2003 • 4569 Posts

So you think there wouldn't be "significant" bottlenecking if he ran, at say, 1920x1200 or 2560x1600? And if running at 1600x1050 or lower, wouldn't a GTS be a better buy?

ZBoater

A GTS is generally the better buy if you're gaming at lower resolutions, regardless of any type of bottleneck. The GTX, in my opinion, is the card that you get if you game at high resolutions and want to crank up the graphics and still - even after all that - get good frame rates.

But even at lower resolutions, the GTX has an advantage however the GTS still performs great or at least good enough so that a GTX isn't absolutely necessary. It's purely personal preference in terms of which card he wants, though.

Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

But even at lower resolutions, the GTX has an advantage however the GTS still performs great or at least good enough so that a GTX isn't absolutely necessary. It's purely personal preference in terms of which card he wants, though.THA-TODD-BEAST

The GTX has no advantage over the GTS if the GTS is being bottlenecked by your CPU at lower resolutions...

Avatar image for Macolele
Macolele

534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Macolele
Member since 2006 • 534 Posts
8800GTX needs fastest CPU E6700 or higher. However, when gfx card is bottlenecked, we're still able to max out of it by higher resolution. We'll get same frame rate and better graphic.