trubritar here has two killer systems, and hes put them side by side, theyre all INSANELY overclocked as ul see in the vid, who wins? watch to find out
VIDEO
This topic is locked from further discussion.
trubritar here has two killer systems, and hes put them side by side, theyre all INSANELY overclocked as ul see in the vid, who wins? watch to find out
VIDEO
I was wondering the same thing about Crytek's pc. cliffgnome
their soecs are pure workstation (dual Xeon 4 cores, 4 gigs of ram, and PNY Quadro 1.5 gb gddr3, and the game was made at 1 fps, but then optimised and sped up 4 our likings)
have a look at this vid http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=UXlR-Sjwg4wIQT786
Still not as good as the original post.
[QUOTE="IQT786"]have a look at this vid http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=UXlR-Sjwg4wLarge_Soda
Still not as good as the original post.
i only post 4 the best, though maxishinehas an awesome pc, trubritar rules youtube, hey, hes got skulltrail baby, nothin beats that
1680 x 1050, i go from 30 - 35 average.. in the 60's in the indoor environment
2 evga 9800's 780i sli , stock Q9300
That is nuts, 3 9800 GTX or 4 9800 GX2 to play crysis max.Each GPU in the 9800GX2's are clocked slower than the 9800GTX's. That, and Crysis is notoriously bad for multi-GPU scaling for either CrossFire X or SLi. You can get a nice increase with two GPU's, but after that, it tanks badly unless you were to try running the CPU overclocked under a vapochill or something.
How will the new Nvidia Cards compare to this?
EDIT: How come 4 9800 GX2 did barely better then 3 9800 GTX, isnt a GX2 supposed to better? EVOLV3
A Mac Pro with two quad-core Xeons and 32GB of vRAM. Would also go to explain why Crysis scales so poorly with multi-GPU; intel's 5000 series chipsets for their Xeon stuff has no multi-GPU support whatsoever.
I wonder what PC specs the guys over at Crytek have when they made this game.EVOLV3
[QUOTE="cliffgnome"]That is a insanely freakish godlike computer and it still has trouble playing Crysis with AA enabled.
Crytek you have outwitten us. EVOLV3
lol i wonder that too
That is nuts, 3 9800 GTX or 4 9800 GX2 to play crysis max.
How will the new Nvidia Cards compare to this?
EDIT: How come 4 9800 GX2 did barely better then 3 9800 GTX, isnt a GX2 supposed to better? EVOLV3
It's not 4 9800 gx2's. It's 2 of them. Two 9800 gx2's = quad sli.
[QUOTE="EVOLV3"]A Mac Pro with two quad-core Xeons and 32GB of vRAM. Would also go to explain why Crysis scales so poorly with multi-GPU; intel's 5000 series chipsets for their Xeon stuff has no multi-GPU support whatsoever.
I wonder what PC specs the guys over at Crytek have when they made this game.codezer0
hell, what gfx card did they use? Quadro? dual gpu (7950 GX2 at the timne?) or what?
1680 x 1050, i go from 30 - 35 average.. in the 60's in the indoor environment
2 evga 9800's 780i sli , stock Q9300
nimatoad2000
I get that (atleast) with one 9800. So yes, sounds a bit low.
Great video, I love Trubritar's videos, but how does he get his hands on these computers??Brainkiller05
no idea... maybe he works for a hardware company/retailer, or maybe hes just filthy rich
[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"]Great video, I love Trubritar's videos, but how does he get his hands on these computers??GTR2addict
no idea... maybe he works for a hardware company/retailer, or maybe hes just filthy rich
:( wish I was filthy rich stinkin 8600 :(Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment