9800GX2 < 8800GTS SLI

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

Why spend $600 on a 9800GX2 when you can get two overclocked MSI 8800GTS(G92) for $500 total ($249 a piece and $219 after rebates)? The 8800GTS cards in SLI will most certainly out perform a single 9800GX2 and they cost $100 less.

Heres the 8800GTS:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127325

Avatar image for TrooperManaic
TrooperManaic

3863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 TrooperManaic
Member since 2004 • 3863 Posts
because you cant quad sli 8800gts. Even now it isnt worth it but maybe in the future it will.
Avatar image for yoyo462001
yoyo462001

7535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#3 yoyo462001
Member since 2005 • 7535 Posts
i suppose it exploits those who do not have an nvidia board, making them pay 100 dollars extra. but im sure they will bring the price down to it can meet demand most likely to 550 dollars soon.
Avatar image for Musacircuit_2
Musacircuit_2

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Musacircuit_2
Member since 2008 • 570 Posts

Why spend $600 on a 9800GX2 when you can get two overclocked MSI 8800GTS(G92) for $500 total ($249 a piece and $219 after rebates)? The 8800GTS cards in SLI will most certainly out perform a single 9800GX2 and they cost $100 less.

Heres the 8800GTS:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127325

nVidiaGaMer
Becasue SLI motherboards cost about $150 more than normal ones.:|
Avatar image for littlehelp
littlehelp

1264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 littlehelp
Member since 2004 • 1264 Posts
If the 9800GX2 goes down in price over time, people may end up SLi 9800GX2. Which is better than 8800GTS SLi. :o
Avatar image for mikeblunt2020
mikeblunt2020

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 mikeblunt2020
Member since 2007 • 130 Posts
The answer is simple. Because I want to use an Intel chipset. The 9800 allows me to obtain the SLI experience on a much higher quality chipset than Nvidia's current offerings.
Avatar image for Musacircuit_2
Musacircuit_2

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Musacircuit_2
Member since 2008 • 570 Posts

The answer is simple. Because I want to use an Intel chipset. The 9800 allows me to obtain the SLI experience on a much higher quality chipset than Nvidia's current offerings.mikeblunt2020
Wow nice PC.

Avatar image for TheDuffman26
TheDuffman26

1346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TheDuffman26
Member since 2006 • 1346 Posts

The answer is simple. Because I want to use an Intel chipset. The 9800 allows me to obtain the SLI experience on a much higher quality chipset than Nvidia's current offerings.mikeblunt2020

790i > x38/48

Avatar image for mikeblunt2020
mikeblunt2020

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 mikeblunt2020
Member since 2007 • 130 Posts

[QUOTE="mikeblunt2020"]The answer is simple. Because I want to use an Intel chipset. The 9800 allows me to obtain the SLI experience on a much higher quality chipset than Nvidia's current offerings.TheDuffman26

790i > x38/48

While the 790i is getting good reviews, I don't see any evidence of it being 'better' than the x38/x48. I'm not saying its a bad chipset at all. What I am saying is that Nvidia has been lacking in the chipset department since Nforce 4. While Intel's 3-series chipsets have been excellent offerings.

Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts

Why spend $600 on a 9800GX2 when you can get two overclocked MSI 8800GTS(G92) for $500 total ($249 a piece and $219 after rebates)? The 8800GTS cards in SLI will most certainly out perform a single 9800GX2 and they cost $100 less.

Heres the 8800GTS:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127325

nVidiaGaMer
:lol: what a joke you have to be kidding me your the one who said 9 series=future 8 series=garabage ?? I think I found myself a new sig
Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts
[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

Why spend $600 on a 9800GX2 when you can get two overclocked MSI 8800GTS(G92) for $500 total ($249 a piece and $219 after rebates)? The 8800GTS cards in SLI will most certainly out perform a single 9800GX2 and they cost $100 less.

Heres the 8800GTS:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127325

mastershake575

:lol: what a joke you have to be kidding me your the one who said 9 series=future 8 series=garabage ?? I think I found myself a new sig

I changed my mind and it looks like it didn't double the performance of dual 8800Ultras as the rumors had suggested.

Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts
[QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

Why spend $600 on a 9800GX2 when you can get two overclocked MSI 8800GTS(G92) for $500 total ($249 a piece and $219 after rebates)? The 8800GTS cards in SLI will most certainly out perform a single 9800GX2 and they cost $100 less.

Heres the 8800GTS:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127325

nVidiaGaMer

:lol: what a joke you have to be kidding me your the one who said 9 series=future 8 series=garabage ?? I think I found myself a new sig

I changed my mind and it looks like it didn't double the performance of dual 8800Ultras as the rumors had suggested.

i don't know what website you go for news all the ones i read said it was just going to be a die shrink which won't mean that much increase in performance
Avatar image for Baselerd
Baselerd

5104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#13 Baselerd
Member since 2003 • 5104 Posts
[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

Why spend $600 on a 9800GX2 when you can get two overclocked MSI 8800GTS(G92) for $500 total ($249 a piece and $219 after rebates)? The 8800GTS cards in SLI will most certainly out perform a single 9800GX2 and they cost $100 less.

Heres the 8800GTS:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127325

Musacircuit_2

Becasue SLI motherboards cost about $150 more than normal ones.:|

Umm... No? They don't cost much more... usually in the $50 range more than their non-SLI equivalents. Of course there are those $250 enthusiast boards that have SLI, but theyre price isnt because of SLI. Stop spreading lies.

Avatar image for DarCowAlways
DarCowAlways

571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#14 DarCowAlways
Member since 2007 • 571 Posts
Like some people have said here, you can SLI the 9800GX2. Then you have to have FOUR 8800GTS' to match it, in theory. Many pople don't have said SLI board, so the GX2 is better for saving space/power and leaving room to upgrade.
Avatar image for SSJBen
SSJBen

7071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#15 SSJBen
Member since 2003 • 7071 Posts

You talk as if everyone has an Nvidia board.

650i and 680i are outdated. While you can find some cheap 680i for your SLIing needs, I don't see the point in them when they have problems supporting Yorkfield.

750i is plain subtle now, not many manufacturers supports it due to its amazingly hot NB. Finally we have 780i, which costs $200 and upwards. Worth it? No I don't think so. I'd rather spend $70 less on a P35 board and go with a 9800GX2.

I'm not going to go into talks with 790i as that will completely throw the "budget" limitation out of the flow.

Avatar image for Baselerd
Baselerd

5104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#16 Baselerd
Member since 2003 • 5104 Posts
AMD has alot cheaper SLI mobo's ($90-$100 range). However if your in the market for SLI, you can probably afford the intel platform.
Avatar image for muirplayer
muirplayer

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 muirplayer
Member since 2004 • 406 Posts
Only paying $323 USD for my 9800.
Avatar image for Baselerd
Baselerd

5104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#18 Baselerd
Member since 2003 • 5104 Posts

Only paying $323 USD for my 9800.muirplayer

?

Avatar image for muirplayer
muirplayer

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 muirplayer
Member since 2004 • 406 Posts
Trading my G80 gts with evga's step up program.
Avatar image for SearchMaster
SearchMaster

7243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 SearchMaster
Member since 2005 • 7243 Posts

[QUOTE="muirplayer"]Only paying $323 USD for my 9800.Baselerd

?

Stepping up for sure but its really good one saying hes trading his old GTS (NOT 512mb)
Avatar image for Musacircuit_2
Musacircuit_2

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Musacircuit_2
Member since 2008 • 570 Posts
[QUOTE="Baselerd"]

[QUOTE="muirplayer"]Only paying $323 USD for my 9800.SearchMaster

?

Stepping up for sure but its really good one saying hes trading his old GTS (NOT 512mb)

Hm actually the 8800GTS he has is 640MB with 112 SP's and it's better than 8800GT and is not far behind the 512MB GTS.
Avatar image for Menfear
Menfear

1068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 Menfear
Member since 2004 • 1068 Posts
Is there something wrong with the Asus P5N-D ?
Avatar image for TrooperManaic
TrooperManaic

3863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 TrooperManaic
Member since 2004 • 3863 Posts
[QUOTE="SearchMaster"][QUOTE="Baselerd"]

[QUOTE="muirplayer"]Only paying $323 USD for my 9800.Musacircuit_2

?

Stepping up for sure but its really good one saying hes trading his old GTS (NOT 512mb)

Hm actually the 8800GTS he has is 640MB with 112 SP's and it's better than 8800GT and is not far behind the 512MB GTS.

I thought the g80 8800's were slower then the g92 8800GT.
Avatar image for Musacircuit_2
Musacircuit_2

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Musacircuit_2
Member since 2008 • 570 Posts
[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="SearchMaster"][QUOTE="Baselerd"]

[QUOTE="muirplayer"]Only paying $323 USD for my 9800.TrooperManaic

?

Stepping up for sure but its really good one saying hes trading his old GTS (NOT 512mb)

Hm actually the 8800GTS he has is 640MB with 112 SP's and it's better than 8800GT and is not far behind the 512MB GTS.

I thought the g80 8800's were slower then the g92 8800GT.

Eh the G80 8800's are not slower than G92 GT it's just the G80 GTS.However that particular 640MB GTS the EVGA SSC has 112 SP's like the 8800GT and is clocked at GTX speeds.I dont know whether it's G80 or 92 but it does generaly outperform the GT.It is the 96 SP equiped GTS which is inferior to the GT.

The best 8800 card is still based on G80.

Avatar image for haols
haols

2348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 haols
Member since 2005 • 2348 Posts
[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="SearchMaster"][QUOTE="Baselerd"]

[QUOTE="muirplayer"]Only paying $323 USD for my 9800.TrooperManaic

?

Stepping up for sure but its really good one saying hes trading his old GTS (NOT 512mb)

Hm actually the 8800GTS he has is 640MB with 112 SP's and it's better than 8800GT and is not far behind the 512MB GTS.

I thought the g80 8800's were slower then the g92 8800GT.



The normal 8800GTS versions with 96 SPs are.
However Nvidia released a small batch of 640MB GTS's with 112SPs. These unusual cards soon became obsolete by the entrance of the G92 cores though.
Avatar image for muirplayer
muirplayer

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 muirplayer
Member since 2004 • 406 Posts

G80:

Avatar image for Musacircuit_2
Musacircuit_2

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Musacircuit_2
Member since 2008 • 570 Posts

G80:

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/1135/sscdg5.jpg

muirplayer

Ya that GTS beats 8800GT.

However a step up to 9800GX2 wont be bad at all.:)

Avatar image for TheDuffman26
TheDuffman26

1346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 TheDuffman26
Member since 2006 • 1346 Posts
[QUOTE="muirplayer"]

G80:

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/1135/sscdg5.jpg

Musacircuit_2

Ya that GTS beats 8800GT.

However a step up to 9800GX2 wont be bad at all.:)

It's funny how you call the Q9450 a waste, and is not necessary... yet you tell everyone to buy a $600 video card.

Avatar image for Musacircuit_2
Musacircuit_2

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Musacircuit_2
Member since 2008 • 570 Posts
[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="muirplayer"]

G80:

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/1135/sscdg5.jpg

TheDuffman26

Ya that GTS beats 8800GT.

However a step up to 9800GX2 wont be bad at all.:)

It's funny how you call the Q9450 a waste, and is not necessary... yet you tell everyone to buy a $600 video card.

A Q9450 is not a waste but is a waste for someone with an E6600.

Secondly a CPU is not as much important as a GPU.You will ALWAYS push more frames with a better GPU but that's not the case with a CPU.Current high end CPU's are overkill for most games,you can certainly not say that for high end GPU's.

Avatar image for TheDuffman26
TheDuffman26

1346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 TheDuffman26
Member since 2006 • 1346 Posts
[QUOTE="TheDuffman26"][QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="muirplayer"]

G80:

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/1135/sscdg5.jpg

Musacircuit_2

Ya that GTS beats 8800GT.

However a step up to 9800GX2 wont be bad at all.:)

It's funny how you call the Q9450 a waste, and is not necessary... yet you tell everyone to buy a $600 video card.

A Q9450 is not a waste but is a waste for someone with an E6600.

Secondly a CPU is not as much important as a GPU.You will ALWAYS push more frames with a better GPU but that's not the case with a CPU.Current high end CPU's are overkill for most games,you can certainly not say that for high end GPU's.

i guess thats true, i agree